History > 2013 > UK > Justice (I)
Ian Watkins gets 35-year sentence
for
child sex crimes
Detectives
believe there are more victims
and will continue to investigate activities
of former Lostprophets singer
Wednesday
18 December 2013
16.31 GMT
Theguardian.com
Steven Morris and agency
This article was published on the Guardian website
at 16.31 GMT on Wednesday 18 December 2013.
It was last modified at 16.50 GMT
on Wednesday 18 December 2013.
It was first published at 14.40 GMT
on Wednesday 18 December 2013.
The rock
singer Ian Watkins has received a 35-year sentence after admitting a string of
sex offences involving children including the attempted rape of a baby.
Two women, known only as Woman A and Woman B – who are the mothers of children
he abused – were sentenced to 14 and 17 years respectively.
Watkins was jailed by Mr Justice Royce for 29 years. He will serve at least two
thirds of that before the parole board can decide if he should be released. If
he is released early, he will serve the rest of the jail term on licence. But
the judge stipulated he will serve an extra six years on licence on top of that,
bringing the total sentence to 35 years.
Royce told Watkins: "Those who have appeared in these courts over many years see
a large number of horrific cases. This case, however, breaks new ground.
"You, Watkins, achieved fame and success as the lead singer of Lostprophets. You
had many fawning fans. That gave you power. You knew you could use that power to
induce young female fans to help satisfy your insatiable lust and take part in
the sexual abuse of their own children.
"Away from the highlights of your public performances lay a dark and sinister
side."
Watkins looked blank as he was led from the dock. The sentence was greeted by
shouts of "yes" from the public gallery.
During his sentencing hearing it emerged that the day after the former
Lostprophets lead singer admitted his offences he told a female fan from prison
that he was going to issue a statement saying it had been "mega lolz". He also
told her he did not know "what everybody is getting so freaked out about".
Watkins, who has been on suicide watch in prison, told the woman, only
identified as Samantha, that he had thought about telling the court: "Come on,
it was not that bad; nobody got hurt." He said another tactic could be to "win
them over with my charm" and claim: "I was off my head and do not remember
anything."
The hearing was told that in a second conversation with the same woman on the
following day he insisted that no baby was ever harmed.
Christopher Clee, prosecuting, detailed images found on Watkins's computer. Of a
total of 90 images of child abuse, 24 fell into the most serious category. He
also possessed 22 images of bestiality.
In mitigation, Watkins's barrister, Sally O'Neill, said her client's life had
unravelled because of the pressures of fame and his drug addiction.
She said: "He was the singer of an extremely successful band that sold millions
of records and the focus of considerable attention from fans. Fans who would do
anything to attract his attention and once they had it do anything to keep it.
It was 24 hours a day, seven days a week. He was bombarded with messages from
fans trying to hit on him."
She said drugs played a "considerable part" in Watkins's offending. She
explained his "mega lolz" comments as bravado, adding: "He was at a very low ebb
and under considerable stress."
She said Watkins conceded that it was "probably his arrogance" that led him to
believe he could live outside normal rules of morality. "He has perhaps,
belatedly but nonetheless now, realised the gravity of what has happened," she
said.
As Watkins begins his prison sentence, detectives said they would continue to
investigate his activities.
They said they believed there were more victims and were liaising with forces
across Britain, the international police organisation Interpol and the
department for homeland security in the US. South Wales detectives have already
travelled to the US and to Germany, where the band toured extensively, to try to
establish if Watkins committed sex offences there.
The police, organisations that work with abused children and Watkins's former
bandmates have all urged other victims to contact the authorities.
Watkins and two female fans in their 20s, who cannot be named, had been due to
stand trial last month at Cardiff crown court for a total of more than 20
offences, including allegations involving the women's children, a boy and a
girl. He had denied the accusations and loyal fans had attended court to show
their support.
But at the last moment – after jury members had been warned they would have to
examine some very disturbing images and arrangements had been made for them to
receive counselling after the trial – Watkins and the women pleaded guilty to
almost all the charges.
Watkins, whose former band has sold around 3.5m albums, admitted 13 charges over
five years including attempting to rape one of the children and conspiring to
rape the other. The court was told that the two women sexually abused their
children at his behest and were prepared to make the children available to him
for sex.
The prosecution said the attempted rape happened while Watkins was staying at a
hotel in west London shortly after appearing on BBC Radio 1.
When police investigated Watkins, who is from Pontypridd in south Wales, they
found a "secret" computer disc. GCHQ experts helped police get access to the
material on the disc, which featured videos of sexual abuse, including the
attempted rape.
Watkins, a user of crack cocaine and crystal meth, maintained he could not
remember the incident but the court was told this could have been because he was
high on drugs. It emerged he had also discussed forcing his victims to take
drugs – and one of them was found to have been "exposed" to crystal meth.
Clee, the prosecutor, branded Watkins a "determined and committed paedophile".
The court heard of one exchange in which a woman offered him a "summer of child
porn". He replied: "Hell yes, baby."
Watkins's barrister claimed that Woman A and Woman B were equally to blame for
the abuse that was carried out.
But Woman A's barrister, Jonathan Fuller QC, said his client was an
impressionable 17-year-old when she met Watkins for the first time.
"She was corrupted by him," said Fuller. "He darkened her world with drugs and
even injected her with heroin. She sacrificed her own moral compass so she could
sustain a relationship with a man she was obsessed with.
"She was a girl doing her A-levels. He was in the limelight and a rock star. She
was vulnerable and exploited."
Christine Laing QC, for Woman B, said her client was a "very immature young
woman" suffering from an undiagnosed personality disorder and postnatal
depression when she first spoke to Watkins. Laing told the court how Watkins had
told Woman B: "You and your daughter now belong to me."
South Wales police – who have codenamed their investigation Operation Globe –
said detectives had spoken to witnesses around the world. They said two young
victims were now being cared for in places of safety, but the force would
continue to question Watkins in case there were other victims.
Before the sentencing, Detective Chief Inspector Peter Doyle said he believed
there were further victims.
Co-founded by Watkins in Pontypridd in 1997, Lostprophets released five albums.
The other members of Lostprophets announced the band was splitting up last
month. They have made it clear they knew nothing of Watkins's offending.
After the singer's conviction, HMV removed the band's music from sale. Rhondda
Cynon Taf council agreed that paving stones bearing his lyrics in Pontypridd
should be removed.
Ian Watkins gets 35-year sentence for child sex crimes, G, 18.12.2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/18/
ian-watkins-jailed-child-sex-crimes
A very public murder:
the
killing of Private Lee Rigby
Savage
street attack on soldier was retaliation
for perceived western oppression of Muslims,
court hears
Friday 29
November 2013
20.59 GMT
The Guardian
Vikram Dodd, Josh Halliday
and Matthew Taylor
This article was published on the Guardian website
at 20.59 GMT on Friday 29 November 2013.
A version appeared on p1 of the Main section section of the Guardian on Saturday
30 November 2013.
It was last modified at 01.41 GMT
on Saturday 30 November 2013.
Two men who
launched a "barbarous" attack on a soldier in a London street, holding his hair
and hacking at his neck as they attempted to behead him, claimed they were
inflicting "carnage" in retaliation for western oppression of Muslims, an Old
Bailey jury heard on Friday.
Lee Rigby, 25, was killed near the Woolwich barracks in south-east London in May
in an attack carried out by Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale. They deny
murder.
The jury saw new and graphic footage of the attack and its aftermath, as it was
revealed that one of the assailants had produced a handwritten note justifying
his actions which he passed to an onlooker.
In it Adebolajo tried to justify the attack as a strike against the west for
alleged aggression against Muslims.
Prosecutors say that when paramedics arrived, Adebolajo told them: "Please let
me lay here. I don't want anyone to die, I just want soldiers out of my country
… Your government is all wrong, I did it for my God. I wish the bullets had
killed me so I can join my friends and family."
Richard Whittam QC, prosecuting, said Adebolajo, 28, and Adebowale, 22, crashed
a Vauxhall Tigra into Rigby from behind as he crossed the road, at a speed of
30-40mph. CCTV footage showed that Rigby, the father of a two-year-old son, was
lifted on to the bonnet and hit the windscreen.
He was flung to the ground as the car hit a street sign, and was not seen to
move again. Whittam said the two defendants, brandishing a cleaver and knives
bought the day before, then got out of the car and Adebolajo, in the words of
one witness, embarked on a "barbarous" attack.
"The driver was carrying a cleaver in his right hand. He knelt down by Lee Rigby
and took hold of his hair. He then repeatedly hacked at the right side of his
neck just below the jawline. He was using considerable force, bringing his hand
into the air each time before he struck."
Another witness, the crown said, also saw that Adebolajo "held his head and
deliberately sliced at the neck". The other man, Adebowale, "stabbing Lee Rigby
to the body with some force".
The jury heard that more scenes of horror unfolded, with Adebolajo striking nine
times at the soldier's neck. Onlookers screamed hysterically and shouted at the
attackers to stop.
Another witness said he saw Adebolajo "sawing at the neck of Lee Rigby with a
'machete' and the other man trying to cut bits of the body by hacking away at
it". Whittam said the witness described the attack as "being like a butcher
attacking a joint of meat". The two men are then accused of dragging the body
into the middle of the road, because "they wanted the members of the public
present to see the consequences of their barbarous acts", Whittam said.
Rigby – a drummer and machine-gunner in the 2nd Battalion, the Royal Regiment of
Fusiliers – had served in Helmand, Afghanistan. On the day he was killed he was
travelling back from the Tower of London where he was helping army recruitment.
Pictures held up in court showed he was wearing a Help for Heroes sweatshirt as
he arrived at nearby Woolwich station, shortly after 2pm.
The jury and Rigby's family and friends watched on screens around the Old Bailey
as graphic scenes were shown in court. At times it was too harrowing and some
left the court.
The two defendants sat in the dock separated by security guards, just feet away
from Rigby's family. Brown paper was taped over part of the dock where the
defendants sat, so they were shielded from the view of the victim's relatives
and friends.
Video was played of Adebolajo handing a letter to a woman after the attack. The
court heard the handwritten note said that "carnage reaching your town" was
"simply retaliation for your oppression in our towns". It continued: "Whereas
the average Joe Bloggs working-class man loses his sons when they're killed by
our brothers, when the heat of battle reaches your local street it's unlikely
that any of your so-called politicians will be at risk or caught in crossfire so
I suggest you remove them.
"Remove them and replace them with people who will secure your safety by
immediate withdrawal from the affairs of Muslims."
The court heard that in a police interview after the attack Adebolajo is alleged
to have said: "Your people have gone to Afghanistan and raped and killed our
women. I am seeking retribution. I wouldn't stoop so low as to rape and kill
women." He added: "I thank the person who shot me because it is what Allah would
have wanted."
Whittam dismissed any notion that retaliation for any perceived wrongdoing was a
defence morally or in law and pointed out that Rigby had been dressed in
civilian clothes. The prosecutor told the court: "Killing to make a political
point, or to frighten the public to put pressure on the government, or as an
expression of anger, is murder and remains murder whether the government in
question is a good one, a bad one or a dreadful one.
"Equally, there is no defence of moral justification for killing, just as there
is no defence of religious justification. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a
tooth suggests revenge or retaliation and, in the context of this case, murder."
The jury also saw footage which the crown said showed how close an armed officer
who rushed to the scene came to being injured. As police arrived, Adebolajo came
within feet of the female officer who realised too late that she could not get
her gun out of a leg holster in time as she was sitting in the front seat of a
car.
Adebolajo, the crown said while playing the video footage, raised a meat cleaver
at the officer, and was stopped only by her colleague in the back seat of the
car who opened fire, without time to aim properly. The shots propelled Adebolajo
off his feet. His alleged accomplice, Adebowale, was pointing a gun at them and
was also shot.
Both men are also charged with conspiring to murder and the attempted murder of
police officers who arrived at the scene of the attack, which they deny.
The court was told the two accused had pleaded guilty to having a firearm with
intent to cause fear of violence, and the crown allege the weapon was used to
scare off members of the public as the accused waited for the police to arrive.
The trial continues.
A very public murder: the killing of Private Lee Rigby, G, 29.11.2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/nov/29/lee-rigby-woolwich-attack-court
Carole Waugh murder:
conman Rakesh Bhayani jailed for life
Bhayani to serve minimum 27 years in prison after being convicted
of stabbing wealthy woman to death
Last modified
on Friday 20 June 2014 15.01 BST
The Guardian
Press Association
Thursday 28 November 2013 12.51 GMT
A conman has been jailed for life with a minimum term of 27 years
after stabbing to death a wealthy woman in her flat, hiding her body in the boot
of a car and spending her money.
Rakesh Bhayani, 41, was sentenced at the Old Bailey on Thursday for the murder
of Carole Waugh. A jury had convicted Bhayani of the murder on Wednesday.
Waugh, 49, died at her flat in Marylebone, central London, where she lived
alone. Her body was placed in a bag which was carried to a car. The vehicle was
initially stored in a central London car park, then left in a rented garage in
New Malden, south London.
She was said to have been a lonely woman who worked as an amateur escort and who
believed Bhayani was her friend. Police described Bhayani as "a confidence
trickster who murdered her with the sole intention of stripping her assets and
the belongings she had worked hard for".
Sentencing Bhayani, Mr Justice Wilkie said he had "ruthlessly targeted" Waugh
and "left her body to rot". He said the murder and subsequent dumping of the
body had been carried out with "greed, callousness and total lack of any regard"
for her.
The murder arose out of an argument about money, the judge said, and he
described Waugh as a risk-taker who was vulnerable to conmen.
He said: "Without a second thought, you calmly and comprehensively set about
stealing her identity. You took steps to ensure her body would not be found for
a sufficient time."
Wilkie said Bhayani embarked on the complete "asset-stripping of her persona".
Waugh's family were in court for the sentencing and heard that the murder was
not premeditated.
Wilkie sentenced Bhayani to life with a minimum of 27 years in jail. He also
sentenced him to six years for perverting the course of justice and six years
for conspiracy to defraud, both of which will run concurrently with his life
sentence.
His co-accused Nicholas Kutner, 48, was jailed for a total of 13 years – seven
for perverting the course of justice by concealing the death, and six for
conspiracy to defraud.
The two men showed no emotion as they were taken down after the sentencing.
Wilkie said Bhayani was the instigator and chief organiser of the fraud, and the
pair had spent Waugh's money on hotels, casinos and escorts. The court heard
earlier that Bhayani had a gambling addiction.
The judge said Kutner was in the flat when Bhayani murdered Waugh and was then
"on board with the actions to conceal her death and thwart the investigation"
into her murder. He said the concealment of Waugh's body was a job for two
people and they were both motivated by greed.
Referring to the pair's previous convictions, Wilkie said the men had appalling
records for offences of dishonesty.
Before the sentencing, a statement from Waugh's family was read out in which she
was described as "loving, supportive and great fun".
The statement, signed by her brother Christopher Waugh, spoke of "disbelief,
dismay, darkness" as the family had to "face our worst fears" in the wake of the
murder.
"Why did the authorities not take her disappearance seriously?" the statement
asked.
The court heard that five days after Waugh's funeral, her mother collapsed and
later died "broken-hearted", unable to understand how and why the tragic events
had unfolded.
The statement said the family, especially Waugh's mother, had always looked
forward to her visits. "She always had great stories to tell," the court heard.
Carole Waugh murder: conman Rakesh Bhayani jailed for life,
G, NOVEMBER 28, 2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/nov/28/carole-waugh-murder-rakesh-bhayani-life-prison
Woman admits murdering three men
found
stabbed to death in ditches
Monday 18
November 2013
12.46 GMT
The Guardian
Press Association
This article was published on the Guardian website
at 12.46 GMT on Monday 18
November 2013.
A version appeared on p4 of the Main section section
of the
Guardian on Tuesday 19 November 2013.
It was last modified at 00.16 GMT
on
Tuesday 19 November 2013.
It was first published at 12.07 GMT
on Monday 18
November 2013.
A
30-year-old woman unexpectedly admitted at the Old Bailey that she had stabbed
to death three men whose bodies were found in ditches in Cambridgeshire this
spring, following a dispute about rent.
Appearing in the dock in a white shirt with a star tattooed under her right eye,
Joanna Dennehy, 30, admitted killing property developer Kevin Lee, 48, Lukasz
Slaboszewski, 31, and John Chapman, 56, who were found with multiple stab wounds
over the course of four days in March and April.
Her guilty plea took her lawyers by surprise, and they applied for time to
discuss the plea with their client. But Dennahy told the judge, Mr Justice
Sweeney: "I've pleaded guilty, and that's that."
Dennehy, from Peterborough, also pleaded guilty to the attempted murders of
another two men, Robin Bereza and John Rogers, and admitted "preventing the
lawful and decent burial" of all three murder victims.
She appeared alongside her 7ft 3in tall partner Gary Richards, 47, also known as
a Gary Stretch. He denies the two attempted murders and helping Dennehy to dump
the bodies.
Dennehy's lawyer Nigel Lickley QC told the court that he would have to check
with his client that she did want to plead guilty, saying: "It is incumbent on
us to inform the court whether the pleas will be maintained or changed … if that
is possible we will inform the court on Monday."
But she interrupted the lawyer and said: "I'm not coming back down here again
just to say the same stuff. It's a long way to come to say the same thing I have
just said."
The body of Lee, described as a "wonderful father and husband", was discovered
by a dogwalker in a ditch near the A16 in Newborough, Cambridgeshire, on 30
March with stab wounds to his chest. Police began a nationwide hunt to find
Dennehy and Stretch, urging the public to look out for the striking-looking
pair.
Dennehy was first arrested on 5 April. A day later, police were called by a
farmer to say he had uncovered two more bodies on private land in Thorney Dyke,
about 10 miles from Newborough. Lukasz Slaboszewski, a builder originally from
Poland, was found with stab wounds to the heart, while John Chapman, who had
served in the navy, had been stabbed in the neck and chest. In court, Dennehy
admitted killing Lee and Chapman on 29 March and Slaboszewski between 19 and 29
March.
During the search for the pair, locals said that Kevin Lee was the owner of a
property where Stretch had been living and that there had been a dispute about
rent money owed to the landlord.
The Daily Mail reported that Julie Gibbons, Stretch's ex-partner and mother of
his teenage children Charlie and Garry, said before his arrest that he had been
sharing a four-bedroom house with strangers. Locals said he lived in a shared
house, which had been split into bedsits by Lee, with a man called John, who was
in his 50s, and a younger man.After his death, Lee's family described his death
as a "tragic loss". In a statement the family said: "We are devastated by
Kevin's death. He was a wonderful husband, father, loving brother and son."
Two other defendants appeared at the hearing by videolink. Leslie Layton, 36, of
Bifield, Orton Goldhay, pleaded not guilty to perverting the course of justice
at an earlier hearing, while Robert Moore, 55, of Belvoir Way, Peterborough,
denied assisting an offender.
Woman admits murdering three men found stabbed to death in ditches,
NYT, 18.11.2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/nov/18/
woman-admits-murdering-men-stabbed-ditches
Student pleads guilty
to
attacks on Midlands mosques
Pavlo Lapshyn killed 82-year-old Muslim and planted bombs in Wolverhampton and
Tipton to increase racial conflict
Monday 21
October 2013
15.13 BST
The Guardian
Vikram Dodd
This article was published on the Guardian website
at 15.13 BST on Monday 21 October 2013.
A version appeared on p1 of the Main section section
of the Guardian on Tuesday 22 October 2013.
It was last modified at 01.07 BST
on Tuesday 22 October 2013.
A Ukrainian
student has pleaded guilty to trying to incite a race war on Britain's streets
by launching a terrorist campaign in which he stabbed a Muslim grandfather to
death and exploded bombs near mosques in an attempt to murder and maim
worshippers.
Pavlo Lapshyn, 25, admitted to police that he hated anyone who was not white and
that he wanted to carry out a series of violent attacks to convulse community
relations.
His campaign started in April 2013, just five days after his arrival from
Ukraine, where he had won a prize to gain work experience in Britain. When the
PhD student was arrested in July, hours before it was feared he could strike
again, police found three partially assembled bombs in his Birmingham flat.
His campaign caused alarm at the top levels of the British government, with the
domestic security service MI5 joining the police-led hunt.
Lapshyn's bombing campaign started after the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby in a
London street, with his final explosive detonating weeks later on the day of
Rigby's funeral – although police believe the campaign was not motivated by the
murder of the soldier. It is believed the Ukrainian acted alone and was
unconnected to any group.
On Monday,Laphshyn yesterday pleaded guilty at the Old Bailey in London to the
murder and staging the bomb attacks, after confessing to them during police
interviews. He will be sentenced on Friday.
The student stabbed Mohammed Saleem, 82, to death in Birmingham as he walked a
few hundred yards from a mosque to his home.
Mohammed Saleem, who was stabbed to death as he walked home from the mosque in
April Mohammed Saleem, who was stabbed to death as he walked home from the
mosque in April. Photograph: PA
During police interviews Lapshyn confessed when asked about the murder: "I have
a racial hatred so I have a motivation, a racial motivation and racial hatred."
Police say he did not mention Muslims or a specific hatred of Islam.
After the guilty pleas, Shazia Khan, Saleem's daughter, said of her murdered
father: "He was targeted simply because of his faith. His beard and his clothing
represented who he was. To kill someone because of what they look like and what
they believe in is unforgivable."
After the murder Lapshyn acquired materials for bombs. By June he had started
placing homemade explosives outside mosques on Fridays, the main day when
Muslims attend places of worship.
The device he planted in July, which had 100 nails wrapped around it to maximise
the carnage, was aimed at worshippers at the Tipton mosque, where 300 were
people expected to attend prayers.
But prayers that particular Friday were held one hour later, so mass casualties
were avoided. The device was so powerful it left nails embedded in tree trunks,
police said.
The search for Lapshyn was the most intense hunt for a serial bomber on the
British mainland in years.
Assistant Chief Constable Marcus Beale, head of the West Midlands
counter-terrorism unit, said Lapshyn was "self-radicalised" and used the
internet to learn how to make bombs. After his arrest Lapshyn told police he
"would like to increase racial conflict" and felt a series of explosions would
achieve more than one big attack.
He was explicit about his motivation for the Tipton mosque attack in an
interview recorded after he was cautioned: "The purpose was to commit a
terrorist act."
Detectives who interviewed him described him as "calm and calculated". He even
told police he carried out an attack near the mosque in Wolverhampton, which
they had previously been unaware of.
After the verdict the home secretary Theresa May said: "This is a satisfying
outcome to a highly distressing case where Pavlo Lapshyn's hatred has robbed a
family of a loved one and attempted to cause fear and division within our
communities."
Some in Muslim communities felt the attacks were under-reported in the media
because Islam was the target, a view shared at one point publicly by West
Midlands deputy chief constable David Thompson. Today Beale said "both the media
and ourselves should reflect".
Lapshyn had been a gifted student who was studying for a PhD in machine
building. Social media pages belonging to him contain extremist rightwing and
Nazi material. There were images of Timothy McVeigh, whose bombing of a US
government building in Oklahoma in 1995 killed 168 people.
Ukrainian researchers say Lapshyn's social media pages also contain material
relating to Hitler, about contemporary Nazis, and rabidly antisemitic material.
A laptop seized by British police contained an extremist rightwing publication,
The Turner Diaries, also believed to have been read by McVeigh.
Further extremist material was found on Lapshyn's laptop, plus details of
planning and virtual reconnaissance for the attacks. There were bus timetables
to get him to the mosques he attacked, as well as press coverage of Mohammed
Saleem's murder.
Police say they found no material belonging to British racist groups such as the
British National party or the English Defence League. Nor was there material
suggesting his bombing campaign was incited by the terrorist murder of Lee Rigby
on 22 May, which occurred a month before Lapshyn's first bomb attack.
Lapshyn came to Britain after winning a competition to work at a software firm
in Birmingham. At a prizegiving ceremony he stood next to the British ambassador
to Ukraine.
Police say their inquiries showed no links to groups in Ukraine. But police
there had arrested and fined him after an explosion in his flat in
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, which may have provided clues for his later actions.
Student pleads guilty to attacks on Midlands mosques, NYT, 21.10.2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/21/
ukrainian-pleads-guilty-attacks-midland-mosques
Hamzah Khan's brother
tells
court of four-year-old boy's neglect
Qaiser Khan, 22, who originally refused to give evidence at mother's trial, says
child slept in buggy that stank of urine
Friday 20
September 2013
15.01 BST
The Guardian
Press Association
This article was published on the Guardian website
at 15.01 BST on Friday 20 September 2013.
A version appeared on p14 of the Main section section
of the Guardian on Saturday 21 September 2013.
It was last modified at 00.10 BST
on Saturday 21 September 2013.
The brother
of a four-year-old boy whose body was found mummified in his mother's bedroom
told a jury how he saw the boy eating the contents of his nappy and sleeping in
a buggy that stank of urine.
Qaiser Khan, 22, was giving evidence on the third day of the trial of his
mother, Amanda Hutton, 43, who denies the manslaughter of her son Hamzah Khan.
Hamzah's body was found in a travel cot in his mother's bedroom in Bradford,
West Yorkshire, in September 2011. He had died 21 months earlier in December
2009.
On Friday, Khan told Bradford crown court that Hamzah slept upright in a
urine-soaked buggy that "stank". He said his brother was left in a dirty nappy
and he saw him eating the contents. "Hamzah appeared neglected," he said.
"I was only at the house for a couple of days. The buggy smelled so bad of urine
I got disinfectant and cleaned it out."
Khan was also asked about a text message he sent to Hutton in December 2008.
Paul Greaney QC, prosecuting, said the text said: "Watch out Monday you bitch.
I'm going to go to the police station to report you for child neglect and abuse.
Look at Hamzah." Khan said he did not remember sending it.
Asked by Stephen Meadowcroft QC, defending, if he was exaggerating what was
happening at the house because he had a bad relationship with his mother, Khan
said: "I've seen this with my own eyes."
Khan told the court that when he was aged about 13, he was made to drink
"mouldy, off milk" by his mother as punishment. He said his mother would spend
her days drinking. "She would go upstairs and drink and then I wouldn't see her
for most of the day," he said.
Earlier, Khan had refused to answer any questions when he first stepped into the
witness box. But after a break he returned to court to give his evidence.
The prosecution has told the court Hutton starved her son to death. The
defendant told police her son died after he was taken ill.
Meadowcroft suggested Hutton was coping before Hamzah's death. He said: "The
child died tragically and it wasn't her fault. After that, she collapsed."
Khan replied: "Urined buggy – was that coping? That was before 2009. It was
quite clear she wasn't coping. She hadn't cleaned the house up and she didn't
clean the nappies."
Earlier, the court heard how Hamzah's father, Aftab Khan, urged police to check
on Hamzah and told officers he was going to report his wife to social services.
The jury heard that police interviewed Aftab Khan in 2008 after arresting him on
suspicion of assaulting Hutton – an offence to which he later pleaded guilty in
court.
In the interview he claimed Hamzah was undernourished and neglected. He said:
"Believe me, I'm going to get in touch with them [social services] because it's
gone so far now." Aftab Khan told the officers he wanted to take Hamzah to a
doctor but Hutton would not let him. He said: "I've told her time and time again
there's something wrong with that child – take him to the doctor." He said his
wife's problems were due to her alcohol consumption.
When DI Ian Lawrie, of West Yorkshire police, was asked if Aftab Khan did report
his concerns to social services, he replied: "There's no record I'm aware of of
any such referral."
Lawrie said police did go to the house after the interview with Aftab Khan. He
also confirmed police had been called to the house on eight separate occasions
in the two-and-a-half years up to 2008.
The case continues.
Hamzah Khan's brother tells court of four-year-old boy's neglect,
G, 20.9.2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/sep/20/
hamzah-khan-brother-court-evidence
Daniel Pelka's mother and stepfather
jailed for life
Magdelena Luczak and Mariusz Krezolek
to serve minimum of 30 years
for starving, torturing and killing four-year-old son
Friday 2 August 2013
13.03 BST
Theguardian.com
Steven Morris
This article was published on guardian.co.uk at 13.03 BST
on Friday 2 August 2013.
A version appeared on p4 of the Main section section
of theguardian.com on
Saturday 3 August 2013.
It was last modified at 00.01 BST on Saturday 3 August 2013. It was first
published at 12.42 BST on Friday 2 August 2013.
The mother and stepfather of Daniel Pelka have been jailed for
life for starving, torturing and battering the four-year-old boy to death.
Magdelena Luczak, 27, and her partner, Mariusz Krezolek, 34, were told they
would serve at least 30 years behind bars before being eligible for parole.
Sentencing the pair at Birmingham crown court, the judge, Mrs Justice Cox, said
the pair had subjected Daniel to "unimaginable acts of cruelty".
She said a "particularly grave" feature was that they had systematically starved
him. "He was literally wasting away," the judge said, noting that experts had
compared his body to that of concentration camp victims.
The judge said that the fatal attack was a "brutal assault" carried out after he
had been force-fed salt and subjected to a "cold water punishment" in which he
was held under water in the bath.
She said the couple had carefully lied to the authorities before and after
Daniel's death, "cynically" deceiving teachers and welfare and medical officers.
The pair had shown no remorse during the trial, she said, and held them jointly
culpable: "Yours was a partnership of equals."
Police images from the Daniel Pelka case A soiled mattress from the room where
Daniel Pelka was kept; the door to the room with its handle removed; a computer
image of Daniel's severely emaciated body, and Daniel himself. Photograph: West
Midlands police/EPA
In mitigation, Stephen Linehan QC, for Luczak, had asked the judge not to "snuff
out" hope for her. "This young woman came to this country hoping for a better
life and now she is facing a life in prison. She has lost everything. Her
situation is truly desperate."
Nigel Lambert QC, for Krezolek, said his client had no previous convictions for
violence. Krezolek was ashamed and shocked at his cruelty to Daniel, but still
insisted he had not intended to kill the boy, Lambert said, arguing that this
set him apart from offenders who set out to murder a child.
Eleven of the 12 jurors who convicted the pair returned to see them sentenced.
During the nine-week trial, the jurors had heard how Luczak and Krezolek
systematically denied Daniel meals and force-fed him salt to make him vomit when
he was caught sneaking extra food. He was so hungry that he stole sandwiches
from other children at school and dug through bins for discarded apple cores.
One child protection expert who examined the boy's body said she had seen such
emaciation only in pictures of concentration camp victims. A radiologist
compared Daniel's frame to that of a seriously ill cancer patient, and a police
detective said he looked like child from a famine-ridden part of Africa.
The couple kept him locked for long periods in a tiny, unheated box room, which
he had to use as a toilet, at the family home in Coventry. They ordered him to
adopt stress positions used by torturers and to go on endurance runs around the
house.
When the pair believed he had misbehaved they threw him into cold baths and his
mother once boasted that she had almost drowned him, while his sibling, who
cannot be identified, reported that they had once seen the boy's head being held
under water.
Daniel died in March last year after being hit around the head by one or both
adults. His body was laid out on a bed next to his terrified sibling and Luczak
and Krezolek waited more than 30 hours before calling 999.
During the trial it emerged that professionals – including health workers and
police – had had numerous contacts with the family. Teachers at his school,
Little Heath primary, had seen him scavenging for food and noticed injuries to
his face but no effective action was taken to protect him.
A serious case review is being carried out by the Coventry safeguarding children
board. The review has already scrutinised the actions of all the agencies
involved with Daniel and the plan is to publish the findings within six weeks
once new information that arose during the trial has been taken into account.
On Thursday the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, branded the treatment meted
out to the boy as evil and vile. Speaking during his weekly phone-in on the
London radio station LBC, Clegg said: "Clearly people must have seen something
was wrong with this boy. We all ask the same questions: how did this happen?
What happened when teachers saw this boy scavenging in bins, when they saw him
lose all that weight? They apparently did pass information on – why did no one
act on it?
"So many teachers and people in the NHS and social work that I know have only
the best interests of children at heart. It's not a lack of motive. But I think
what people worry about is that maybe one bit of the system doesn't talk to
another bit of the system."
Jurors, who had sat through a wealth of evidence charting six months of
systematic abuse of the defenceless youngster, took less than four hours to
unanimously convict Luczak and former soldier Krezolek, both Polish nationals,
on Wednesday.
Daniel Pelka's mother and stepfather jailed
for life, G, 2.8.2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/aug/02/
daniel-pelka-mother-stepfather-jailed-life
Daniel Pelka murder:
mother
and stepfather face life sentences
Magdelena Luczak and Mariusz Krezolek
found guilty of killing boy
whose body was likened to concentration camp victim
Wednesday
31 July 2013
18.59 BST
The Guardian
Steven Morris
This article was published
on guardian.co.uk at 18.59 BST
on Wednesday 31 July 2013.
A version appeared on p5
of the Main section section
of the Guardian on Thursday 1 August 2013.
It was last modified at 00.47 BST
on Thursday 1 August 2013.
The mother
and stepfather of a four-year-old boy who was battered to death after being
subjected to a six-month regime of starvation and physical torture will be
jailed for life on Friday after being found guilty of murdering the boy, whose
body was so emaciated that one experienced health worker compared it to that of
a concentration camp victim.
Jurors took under four hours to unanimously convict Daniel Pelka's mother,
Magdelena Luczak, and stepfather, Mariusz Krezolek, following a nine-week trial
at Birmingham crown court. A review has been launched to establish why chances
to save Daniel were missed before the pair starved and killed him.
Luczak and Krezolek systematically denied the boy meals and force-fed him salt
to make him vomit when he was caught sneaking extra food. He was so hungry that
he stole sandwiches from other children at school and dug through bins for
discarded apple cores.
The couple kept him locked for long periods in a tiny, unheated box room, which
he had to use as a toilet, at the family home in Coventry. They ordered him to
adopt stress positions used by torturers and to go on endurance runs around the
house.
When the pair believed he had misbehaved they threw him into cold baths. His
mother once boasted that she had almost drowned him, and his sibling – who
cannot be identified – reported once having seen Daniel's head being held under
water.
In March last year Daniel died after being hit around the head by one or both
adults. His body was laid out on a bed next to his terrified sibling. Luczak and
Krezolek waited 33 hours before calling 999.
During the trial it emerged that professionals – including teachers, health
workers and police – had a string of contacts with the family and some had
raised concerns.
A serious case review is being carried out by the Coventry safeguarding children
board. The review has already scrutinised the actions of all the agencies
involved with Daniel, and the plan is to publish the findings within six weeks
once new information that cropped up during the trial has been taken in.
The review will examine why no action was taken after staff at Daniel's school
noticed his thinness, bruising on his neck and what appeared to be two black
eyes.
It will also look into contact between doctors and Daniel, who was seen by a
community paediatrician and found to be underweight but not "wasted" three weeks
before his death.
The review will study the way police and social services approached an incident
more than a year before Daniel died when Krezolek broke the boy's arm. The
couple, who are Polish nationals, claimed he had fallen off a sofa.
Peter Wanless, chief executive of the NSPCC, said: "Crucial questions need to be
asked about how a youngster slipped through the child protection net. The
indications that Daniel was suffering for some months should have been plain to
see – he was disappearing in front of people's eyes."
Outside court the boy's natural father, Eryk Pelka, said: "It's a great tragedy
that such a little angel had to leave this world. I hope that those responsible
will be punished severely." He said he felt the authorities could have done more
to protect Daniel.
Detective Inspector Christopher Hanson said Luczak, who told teachers that
Daniel was so thin because he had an eating disorder, was a convincing liar. He
added: "Those with the ultimate duty of care turned Daniel from a beautiful and
bright-eyed little boy into a broken bag of bones."
When Daniel's body was examined, experts were shocked. Skin was hanging in folds
off his thighs and arms. His tummy was tiny, his rib cage protruding and his
spine was clearly visible all the way down his back. His hair was falling out.
He weighed one and a half stone, the sort of weight normally associated with an
18-month-old.
One child protection expert who examined the boy said she had seen such
emaciation only in pictures of concentration camp victims. A radiologist
compared Daniel's frame to that of a seriously ill cancer patient, and a police
detective said he looked like a child from a famine-ridden part of Africa.
After the final, fatal attack, a postmortem revealed he died of bleeding and
swelling in the brain.
Krezolek, 34, and Luczak, 27, who both drank heavily and took drugs, blamed each
other during the trial. Krezolek, a former soldier who worked in car factory,
denied killing the boy because he was another man's son.
Both initially claimed Daniel collapsed after suffering chest pains. But
detectives discovered texts exchanged between the defendants that hinted at the
dreadful regime. One sent by Krezolek said: "Well now he is temporarily
unconscious because I nearly drowned him."
Officers also found hand and fingerprints on the inside of the door, which had
no handle, as if the child had desperately tried to get out.
Startling testimony came from Daniel's sibling, whose name, age and gender
cannot be revealed. The child told police that Krezolek would prevent Daniel
from eating and would hit him and put him into cold baths.
Describing the night Daniel died, the sibling said: "I tried to wake him up but
I couldn't. Then I tried to listen for his heartbeat but I could not hear
anything."
Daniel Pelka murder: mother and stepfather face life sentences,
G, 31.7.2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/31/
daniel-pelka-murder-mother-stepfather-guilty
Horror film fanatic jailed for life
after 'sadistic' killing of friend
Gary George sentenced to minimum of 30 years
after Chester crown court hears of gruesome murder
Monday 25 March 2013
12.35 GMT
Last modified
on Thursday 19 June 2014 21.30 BST
The Guardian
Press Association
A horror film fanatic who killed his friend in a scene that
mirrored one of his favourite spine-chillers has been jailed for life.
Gary George, 41, will serve a minimum of 30 years after he tortured and
mutilated Andrew Nall, 53, in a "cruel and sadistic" attack.
George was obsessed with witchcraft and horror films, Chester crown court was
told.
He particularly liked to watch The Loved Ones, a 2009 Australian film in which
an attack takes place with a "chilling similarity" to the death of Nall, the
court heard.
George beat his victim and inflicted 49 separate knife wounds, including a wound
carved into his stomach that had salt poured on to it.
There was also a "creamy substance", thought to be cleaning fluid, found in
Nall's eyes, the prosecution said.
His body was discovered lying in a pool of blood in his bedroom at his flat in
Chester on 30 August last year.
After the killing George, a homeless alcoholic, went into an off-licence where
he told the shop assistant: "I've just killed my best mate."
He initially denied the murder but changed his plea to guilty last week as his
three-week trial was coming to a close.
Passing sentence, Judge Elgan Edwards said: "This was a cruel and vicious
attack. It was also a sadistic attack.
"I am satisfied that in behaving in the way you did, you were aping the conduct
in a film of which you were obsessed, namely The Loved Ones."
The judge said that he and the jury had "the misfortune" of watching the movie's
murder sequence during the trial and added: "I regret to say that, as in this
film, you committed many acts while the unfortunate Mr Nall was still alive.
"And that included the substance in his eyes, be that cleaning fluid, and the
carving of marks upon his chest."
George, wearing a navy blue jumper, stood bolt upright in the dock with his arms
behind his back and showed no emotion as his sentence was passed.
The recorder described Nall, also an alcoholic, as "vulnerable".
He added: "He was vulnerable because of the amount of drink he had taken.
"You knew he had, you took advantage of it and, putting it in a nutshell, he was
no match for you.
"You killed him in a most cruel and sadistic way and you enjoyed doing so."
Nall, a former supermarket worker, was described to the jury by Ian Unsworth QC,
prosecuting, as a "pleasant, polite and friendly man".
But the victim was also a heavy drinker who was in regular contact with the
probation and support services, Unsworth said.
He told the trial Nall was subjected to a "brutal, ruthless and sadistic attack"
in his own home.
"He was beaten, kicked and stabbed on dozens and dozens of occasions," Unsworth
said. "A strange long wound was carved into his abdomen, salt was found on his
wounded body. He was tortured."
George, the barrister told the trial, had a keen interest in witchcraft.
Unsworth added: "He watched horror films. One film in particular that he liked
to watch was called The Loved Ones, a violent horror film.
"In a chilling precursor to what befell Andrew Nall, one scene depicts a man
being stabbed on multiple occasions, his chest having a letter carved into it
before salt was thrown on to the wound."
George was caught when he was arrested for assaulting another man 10 hours after
the murder of Nall.
During his police interviews he disclosed that he had murdered someone,
levelling false accusations that his victim was a paedophile and a rapist.
George's co-defendant, Christine Holleran, 50, was cleared of murder and
manslaughter by the jury on Friday.
Holleran, who told the jury she witnessed the attack but played no part in it,
shouted "justice, justice" as their majority verdict was returned.
Giving evidence, she said George was growling as he stabbed Nall, and said: "He
was like the devil."
She said she then ran away from Mr Nall's flat "in a state of shock".
Horror film fanatic jailed for life after 'sadistic' killing of
friend,
G, 25 MARCH 2013,
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/mar/25/horror-film-fanatic-jailed-murder
Mother jailed for life
for beating son to death
for not
learning Qur'an
Sara Ege treated son Yaseen 'like a dog'
when he struggled to memorise
passages of Islamic holy book, court heard
Monday 7
January 2013
13.54 GMT
Guardian.co.uk
Steven Morris and agencies
This article was published on guardian.co.uk
at 13.54 GMT
on Monday 7 January 2013.
It was last modified at 14.24 GMT
on Monday 7 January 2013.
It was first published at 13.55 GMT
on Monday 7 January 2013.
A mother who beat her seven-year-old son to death for failing to learn the
Qur'an by heart and then burned his body in an attempt to hide her crime has
been jailed for life.
Sara Ege, 33, collapsed and had to be helped sobbing from the dock after being
told on Monday she would serve 17 years before she could be considered for
parole.
Cardiff crown court heard that Ege treated her son Yaseen "like a dog" when he
struggled to memorise passages of the holy book of Islam. She beat him on the
hands and his body until he collapsed on the floor of his bedroom and died.
Ege used barbecue lighting gel to set fire to the boy's body to try to conceal
what she had done. Initially emergency services believed he had been killed in a
fire at the family home in Pontcanna, Cardiff.
But a postmortem revealed he had died before the fire had begun and had suffered
multiple injuries to his body caused by three months of physical punishment.
The jury was told that Ege and her husband, taxi driver Yousef Ege, 38, enrolled
Yaseen in advanced classes at a local mosque because they wanted him to become
Hafiz – someone who memorises the Qur'an.
As a child, Ege had herself committed large sections of the book to memory and
entered competitions to demonstrate her ability. But she became increasingly
frustrated when her son was unable to do as well as she expected and began
beating him.
Following her arrest, Ege, a mathematics graduate, confessed to killing her son.
She told police she was "getting angry too much", adding: "I would shout at
Yaseen all the time. I was getting very wild and I hit Yaseen with a stick on
his back like a dog."
Ege said she frequently promised herself that she would stop attacking her son
but could not resist beating him. She claimed she had been urged on by the devil
and bad spirits. At one point she believed the stick she used to punish her son
was possessed by an evil spirit.
A teaching assistant at the boy's school noticed that his handwriting was
deteriorating and discovered he was using his left hand because it was too
painful for him to use his right. On another occasion Ege was called into school
because he was in too much pain to sit. She moved him to a new school.
On the day her son died she told police he collapsed on the floor of his bedroom
after she had beaten him and, half-conscious, continued to recite from the
Qur'an.
Ege said: "He was breathing as if he was asleep when I left him. He was still
murmuring the same thing over and over again. I thought that he was just tired."
She forced him to drink milk; and when she went back to him he was shaking and
shivering. She did not seek medical help and the boy died. The woman then used
barbecue lighting gel to set fire to his body.
Ege later retracted her account of what had happened and claimed her husband and
his family had forced her to make the confession. She accused her husband, who
stood trial with her, of being a violent bully and the real killer.
Yousef Ege was cleared of causing or allowing his son's death by failing to act
to prevent it. Sara Ege was found guilty of the murder, which took place in July
2010, and perverting the course of justice.
Mother jailed for life for beating son to death for not learning Qur'an,
G,
7.1.2013,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jan/07/mother-jailed-life-son-quran
|