History > 2007 > USA > Indian-Americans (I)
Indian-American
Elected Louisiana’s Governor
October 21, 2007
The New York Times
By ADAM NOSSITER
NEW ORLEANS, Oct. 20 — Bobby Jindal, a conservative Republican congressman
from the New Orleans suburbs and the son of immigrants from India, was elected
Louisiana’s governor Saturday, inheriting a state that was suffering well before
Hurricane Katrina left lingering scars two years ago.
Mr. Jindal, 36, defeated three main challengers in an open primary, becoming
this state’s first nonwhite governor since a Reconstruction-era figure briefly
held the office 130 years ago.
With more than 90 percent of the vote counted, Mr. Jindal received 53 percent,
above the 50 percent-plus-one threshold needed to avoid a runoff in November. He
will be the nation’s first Indian-American governor when he takes office in
January.
Mr. Jindal’s victory over a state Democratic party weakened by perceptions of
post-hurricane incompetence and corruption was expected, as he has had an
overwhelming lead in polls for months. The incumbent, Gov. Kathleen Babineaux
Blanco, hurt by stumbles after Hurricane Katrina, did not seek re-election.
The ascendancy of the Brown- and Oxford-educated Mr. Jindal, an unabashed policy
wonk who has produced a stream of multipoint plans, is likely to be regarded as
a racial breakthrough of sorts in this once-segregated state. Still, it is one
with qualifiers attached.
For one thing, he is by now a familiar figure in Louisiana, having made a strong
run for the governorship in 2003, though losing to Ms. Blanco. Before that he
had held a series of high-profile administrative jobs, including state health
secretary at the age of 24, when he earned a reputation for efficiency — critics
said cold-bloodedness — for slashing a bloated budget, cutting jobs and lowering
reimbursements to doctors.
For another, he did not have the support of a majority of the state’s blacks,
about a third of the population, who vote Democratic.
Yet Mr. Jindal, with his decisive victory on Saturday, appears to have overcome
a significant racial hurdle that blocked him in 2003, according to analysts:
race-based opposition in the deeply conservative northern and eastern parishes
of Louisiana that once supported the Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke.
A born-again Roman Catholic, Mr. Jindal made a particular campaign target of
these areas, visiting them frequently and bringing his brand of devout
Christianity to their rural churches. His social-conservative message — teaching
“intelligent design” as an alternative to evolution in public schools, a total
ban on abortion, repealing hate-crimes laws — would have been welcome in these
areas.
Mr. Jindal campaigned as a cautious reformer, promising a more ethical
government, for example, with greater transparency from lobbyists and
legislators. His extensive résumé helped him project an image of competence, as
did his detailed if conventional policy prescriptions — both evidently appealing
to voters here weary of missteps in government since Hurricane Katrina.
But he faces significant challenges. He takes over what is now the nation’s
poorest, most uneducated and most unhealthy state, by a number of important
measures.
Cleaning up the Capitol in Baton Rouge, which Mr. Jindal has promised to make
his first order of business, is unlikely to be regarded as a top priority, as it
hardly has been in the past, by a Legislature jealous of its perquisites.
Mr. Jindal has promised to focus resources on the state’s ports, roads and
research universities, which have received little state investment. But again,
parochial interests and factionalism in a state with strong regional and ethnic
divisions often work against these broader initiatives at the Capitol.
And Mr. Jindal, as a fiscal conservative, has had much to say about what he
terms “out-of-control spending” but little about a regressive tax structure that
relies heavily on sales taxes.
Indian-American Elected
Louisiana’s Governor, NYT, 21.10.2007,
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/21/us/nationalspecial/21louisiana.html
In Jews, Indian-Americans
See a Role Model in Activism
October 2, 2007
The New York Times
By NEELA BANERJEE
When Anil Godhwani and his brother, Gautam, looked into creating a community
center for Indian-Americans in Silicon Valley, they turned to the Jewish
Community Center of San Francisco as a model.
When the Hindu American Foundation began, it looked to groups like the
Anti-Defamation League and the Simon Wiesenthal Center for guidance with its
advocacy and lobbying efforts.
Indian-Americans, who now number 2.4 million in this country, are turning to
American Jews as role models and partners in areas like establishing community
centers, advocating on civil rights issues and lobbying Congress.
Indians often say they see a version of themselves and what they hope to be in
the experience of Jews in American politics: a small minority that has succeeded
in combating prejudice and building political clout.
Sanjay Puri, the chairman of the U.S. India Political Action Committee, said:
“What the Jewish community has achieved politically is tremendous, and members
of Congress definitely pay a lot of attention to issues that are important to
them. We will use our own model to get to where we want, but we have used them
as a benchmark.”
One instance of Indians following the example of Jews occurred last year when
Indian-American groups, including associations of doctors and hotel owners,
banded together with political activists to win passage of the United
States-India Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Act, which allows New Delhi to buy
fuel, reactors and other technology to expand its civilian nuclear program.
“Indian-Americans have taken a page out of the Jewish community’s book to
enhance relations between the homeland and the motherland,” said Nissim B.
Reuben, program officer for India-Israel-United States Relations at the American
Jewish Committee and himself an Indian Jew.
The American Jewish Committee, like some other Jewish groups, has worked with
Indians on immigration and hate crimes legislation. It has taken three groups of
Indian-Americans to Israel, where they have met Arabs and Palestinians, as well
as Jews.
Many Indian-Americans, like the Godhwanis and others with the India Community
Center in Milpitas, Calif., have taken an avowedly nonsectarian approach in
creating institutions. But among Hindus, who are a majority in India and among
Indian-Americans here, some assert that a vital bond they share with Jews is the
threat to India and Israel from Muslim terrorists.
“Some on both sides of the discussion feel that way, and take a stance that is
anti-Muslim or anti-terrorist, depending on your point of view,” said Nathan
Katz, professor of religious studies at Florida International University in
Miami.
Most Jewish groups, however, have tried to avoid a sectarian cast to their work
with Indian-Americans. Instead, Jews said they were struck by the parallels
between the issues that Jews and Indians had faced.
“It echoes 30 years ago,” said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the
Wiesenthal center. “There is the same feeling of a growing community that says,
‘We want our voices to be represented, and how do we that?’ “
For years, many Indians who immigrated to the United States in the late 1960s
and early 1970s considered India their home. Now, most are rooted in the United
States, as are their children, and they have moved with astonishing speed into
politics, said Representative Frank Pallone Jr., Democrat of New Jersey, where
there is a large Indian-American constituency. Mr. Pallone is a founder of the
Congressional Caucus on India. Representative Bobby Jindal, a Republican from
Louisiana who is Indian-American, is running for governor of his state, and
Indian-Americans hold or are vying for other local elected positions nationwide.
Indian-Americans have reached out to American Jews, in part, because of the
growing friendship between India and Israel, whose chilly cold war relations
began to thaw in the 1990s.
Indian and Israeli heads of state have recently visited each other’s countries.
The countries have strengthened trade and intelligence ties. In February, the
chief rabbi of Israel, Yona Metzger, met with Hindu leaders in India, after
which the Jewish and Hindu clerics declared common beliefs, among them that
their “respective traditions teach that there is one supreme being.” The
statement was a breakthrough because many Jews had long considered Hinduism a
form of idolatry, Professor Katz said.
Inspired by the Wiesenthal Center, which produces a CD annually that compiles
Internet hate speech, the Hindu American Foundation issued its own report this
year about “online hatred and bigotry against Hindus,” Suhag Shukla, the
foundation’s legal counsel, said. The foundation also learned from the success
of Jewish groups that it needed a full-time staff member to lobby Congress.
The Hindu American Foundation is among those who contend that Jews and Hindus
are natural allies because of the common threat Israel and India face from
Islamic terrorists. “There are the shared terrorist threats where we are the
religious minority, for example Jammu-Kashmir and Islamic terrorism there or the
situation in Israel,” Ms. Shukla said, referring to the anti-Indian insurgency
in the northern state.
Those parallels disturb some Indian-Americans, who contend they veil a deeper
anti-Muslim sentiment.
“This makes me relatively suspicious, because there is the desire to reduce the
complexity of the issues in a conflict,” said Vijay Prashad, professor of South
Asian history at Trinity College in Hartford.
The India Community Center in Milpitas, Calif., represents the nonsectarian
approach many Indian-Americans take to replicating the experience of American
Jews. When Anil Godhwani began talking to other Indians in Silicon Valley about
opening a center, “more than one person talked to us about making this a Hindu
community center — sometimes in very strong terms,” he said. That was never his
intention, though he was raised Hindu.
A Silicon Valley millionaire who sold his company to Netscape in the late 1990s,
Mr. Godhwani said he and his brother envisioned a place that promoted the
variety of Indian culture to Indian-Americans and non-Indians alike. The
Godhwanis canvassed other ethnic centers and the Y.M.C.A. But the Jewish
Community Center model resonated with them. It celebrated Jewish culture while
avoiding the divisiveness of politics and religion. And it welcomed outsiders.
The India Community Center occupies a 40,000-square-foot building that offers,
among other things, free medical care for the uninsured, Indian language classes
and Bollywood-style aerobics but keeps out religious activities.
Talat Hassan, chairwoman of the center’s board of trustees, said, “Those of us
who grew up in the ‘50s, ‘60s and ‘70s in India grew up in a truly inclusive
atmosphere, and that is the gift that India can give to rest of the world: the
ability to embrace diversity in very deep way.”
“Then we came here, and maybe India was changing in this way too,” Ms. Hassan
said, “but Indian-Americans were organized around religion, and we found that to
be very divisive. We thought there should be a place where people can come
together as Indian-Americans, period, regardless of religion.”
In Jews,
Indian-Americans See a Role Model in Activism, NYT, 2.10.2007,
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/02/us/02hindu.html
|