History > 2012 > USA > Indian reservations (I)
Case Pits Adoptive Parents
Against Tribal Rights
December
24, 2012
The New York Times
By ADAM LIPTAK
WASHINGTON
— “What has been the toughest decision for you?” Charlie Rose asked Justice
Antonin Scalia in a television interview a few weeks ago. He meant the most
personally wrenching.
Justice Scalia has served on the Supreme Court for more than a quarter of a
century, and he has seen his share of difficult cases. But one stuck out.
“It was pretty early on in my time on this court,” he said. “We had a case in
which a very wealthy rancher and his wife had adopted a child of a young man and
woman on an Indian reservation who had had the child out of wedlock. And they
gave the child to the rancher to raise.”
A state court in Mississippi had approved the arrangement. But a federal law,
the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, required tribal courts rather than state
ones to decide.
“The kid was, I think, 5 years old or so” by the time the case reached the
Supreme Court, Justice Scalia recalled. “And we had to turn that child over to
the tribal council. I found that very hard. But that’s what the law said,
without a doubt.”
Justice Scalia’s recollection of the case, from 1989, was understandably a
little hazy. It involved 3-year-old twins, and their adoptive father had died by
the time the case was decided.
But he had the main point right. In various ways, the 1978 law he cited makes it
hard to remove American Indian children from their parents, their tribes and
their heritage.
The case that troubled Justice Scalia now has a sequel, and at their private
conference next week, the justices will consider whether to hear it.
The new case involves a South Carolina couple who were ordered to turn over a
27-month-old girl they had cared for since birth to her biological father, an
Indian, whom the little girl had never met.
The South Carolina Supreme Court, saying it did so “with a heavy heart,” ruled
for the father even as it acknowledged that the adoptive couple, Matt and
Melanie Capobianco, were “ideal parents who have exhibited the ability to
provide a loving family environment.” He works as a technician at Boeing; she
has a doctorate in developmental psychology.
Under South Carolina law, the child, Veronica, would have stayed with the
Capobiancos. Under the federal law, she was sent to live with her biological
father, Dusten Brown, a member of the Cherokee Nation.
The federal law was a reaction to a dark history of abusive child welfare
practices involving Indian children and was sensitive to distinctive aspects of
Native American culture. But the Capobiancos and their supporters say the law
may have gone too far, by intruding on domestic decisions traditionally governed
by state law and by putting a thumb on the legal scale based on the race of one
of the parties.
The central question for the justices, the Capobiancos say, is whether an absent
father should have the right to thwart a mother’s wishes about the fate of her
child simply because he happens to be an Indian. The vote in the State Supreme
Court was 3 to 2, and the dissenters were not impressed with Mr. Brown.
According to one dissenting judge, Mr. Brown had “turned his back on the joys
and responsibilities of fatherhood at every turn.” Another said Mr. Brown’s
“vanishing act triggered the adoption in the first instance.”
Here is a piece of evidence that may color your view of Mr. Brown: before his
daughter was born, he renounced his parental rights by text message. In
fairness, the child’s mother also used text messages to break off their
engagement and to ask for child support.
Mr. Brown changed his mind when he heard that his former fiancée, who is not an
Indian, had put their daughter up for adoption. He invoked the 1978 law, and he
has so far succeeded in blocking the adoption, despite opposition not only from
the Capobiancos but also from the girl’s biological mother and the girl’s
court-appointed guardian.
Family courts ordinarily base their decisions on the best interests of the child
before them. But the 1978 law says other factors must be considered. “The tribe
has an interest in the child which is distinct from but on a parity with the
interest of the parents,” Justice William J. Brennan Jr., writing for himself,
Justice Scalia and four other justices, explained in the 1989 decision,
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield. This was, Justice Brennan
added, “a relationship that many non-Indians find difficult to understand.”
Justice Brennan recognized that the law sometimes produced heartbreak. “Three
years’ development of family ties cannot be undone,” he wrote, “and a separation
at this point would doubtless cause considerable pain.” But the 1978 law, he
said, required that the tribal court make the decision.
The questions in the new case, Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, No. 12-399, concern
other parts of the law. But the larger issue is similar, and how it is answered
could affect thousands of adoptions every year.
In the 1989 case that Justice Scalia discussed with Mr. Rose, there was, though
the justice did not seem to know it, something of a happy ending. The tribal
court allowed the children to remain with their adoptive family, saying that “it
would have been cruel to take them from the only mother they knew.” At the same
time, the court ordered that the children stay in contact with their extended
family and tribe.
There does not seem to be such a middle ground in the new case, and it is not
clear whether the justices will want to take on the burden of a decision with
the potential to weigh on them for decades.
Case Pits Adoptive Parents Against Tribal Rights, NYT, 24.12.2012,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/us/american-indian-adoption-case-comes-to-supreme-court.html
On
Wounded Knee
October 23,
2012
The New York Times
Russell
Means, the Oglala Lakota Sioux protester, organizer and actor who led the
American Indian Movement through an era of vivid, often violent protests in the
1970s, didn’t win much in the way of fundamental political and social change.
AIM had too much chaos and infighting for that. He didn’t lead a life of
exemplary activism: too many courtroom battles and bar brawls, too many guns.
When he died on Monday, at age 72, few could look back at his turbulent living
and showmanship and setbacks and render any verdict but: Mixed.
Even those who dismiss Mr. Means as an opportunist and sellout, who demean his
authenticity and scorn his political stunts, have to acknowledge Wounded Knee.
Wounded Knee, the 1973 siege, came long after Wounded Knee, the 1890 massacre,
which ended organized American Indian resistance to white rule. Between both
battles was a long period of erasure, in which Indians came to be seen as
functionally extinct, living on celluloid and in history books, perhaps, as
place names and car models, but not in the larger public consciousness.
But the Indians never went away, as Mr. Means helped — stunningly — to prove.
The movement’s notoriety, starting with an occupation a few years earlier at
Alcatraz, exploded at Wounded Knee, where a confrontation over tribal corruption
at the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota turned into a 71-day siege.
United States marshals turned it into a war zone. It prompted a cultural
awakening, led by a young former drifter from California who had gotten to know
his Lakota roots from summer visits to relatives at Pine Ridge.
In the years since, Pine Ridge and other reservations have not escaped plagues
of poverty and alcohol. Governmental neglect remains a scandal. But there are
more Indians today than in 1890, and many tribes are richer, thanks to lucrative
ironies like gambling and tobacco. Indians have revived much traditional
knowledge and pride and are still fighting injustice. In the Black Hills, where
the government evicted the Indians and carved presidential faces on a sacred
mountainside, the Sioux and other Indians make drums and jewelry and teach
tourists: We are still here.
The country is still good at ignoring Indians, but for a time Mr. Means and the
American Indian Movement punctured that invisibility. By raising hell for 71
days in one of the most remote corners of the continent, on behalf of an abused
and forgotten people, he and his allies captured the attention of the world. “It
was pretty much all over three-and-a-half years after Alcatraz,” wrote Paul
Chaat Smith, an American Indian writer and associate curator at the National
Museum of the American Indian, “when exhausted, hungry rebels signed an
agreement that ended the Wounded Knee occupation. There were other actions and
protests, but none came close to capturing the imagination of the Indian world
or challenging American power.”
On Wounded Knee, NYT, 23.10.2012,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/24/opinion/the-siege-of-wounded-knee.html
Russell Means,
Who
Revived Warrior Image of American Indian,
Dies at
72
October 22,
2012
The New York Times
By ROBERT D. McFADDEN
Russell C.
Means, the charismatic Oglala Sioux who helped revive the warrior image of the
American Indian in the 1970s with guerrilla-tactic protests that called
attention to the nation’s history of injustices against its indigenous peoples,
died on Monday at his ranch in Porcupine, S.D., on the Pine Ridge Indian
Reservation. He was 72.
The cause was esophageal cancer that had spread recently to his tongue, lymph
nodes and lungs, said Glenn Morris, Mr. Means’s legal representative. Told in
the summer of 2011 that the cancer was inoperable, Mr. Means had already
resolved to shun mainstream medical treatments in favor of herbal and other
native remedies.
Strapping, ruggedly handsome in buckskins, with a scarred face, piercing dark
eyes and raven braids that dangled to the waist, Mr. Means was, by his own
account, a magnet for trouble — addicted to drugs and alcohol in his early
years, and later arrested repeatedly in violent clashes with rivals and the law,
once tried for abetting a murder, shot several times, stabbed once and
imprisoned for a year for rioting.
He styled himself a throwback to ancestors who resisted the westward expansion
of the American frontier and, with theatrical protests that brought national
attention to poverty and discrimination suffered by his people, became arguably
the nation’s best-known Indian since Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse.
But critics, including many Native Americans, called him a tireless
self-promoter who capitalized on his angry-rebel notoriety by running quixotic
races for the presidency and the governorship of New Mexico, by acting in dozens
of movies — notably in the title role of “The Last of the Mohicans” (1992) — and
by writing and recording music commercially with Indian warrior and heritage
themes.
He rose to national attention as a leader of the American Indian Movement in
1970 by directing a band of Indian protesters who seized the Mayflower II ship
replica at Plymouth, Mass., on Thanksgiving Day. The boisterous confrontation
between Indians and costumed “Pilgrims” attracted network television coverage
and made Mr. Means an overnight hero to dissident Indians and sympathetic
whites.
Later, he orchestrated an Indian prayer vigil atop the federal monument of
sculptured presidential heads at Mount Rushmore, S.D., to dramatize Lakota
claims to Black Hills land. In 1972, he organized cross-country caravans
converging on Washington to protest a century of broken treaties, and led an
occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. He also attacked the “Chief Wahoo”
mascot symbol of the Cleveland Indians baseball team, a toothy Indian caricature
that he called racist and demeaning. It is still used.
And in a 1973 protest covered by the national news media for months, he led
hundreds of Indians and white sympathizers in an occupation of Wounded Knee,
S.D., site of the 1890 massacre of some 350 Lakota men, women and children in
the last major conflict of the American Indian wars. The protesters demanded
strict federal adherence to old Indian treaties, and an end to what they called
corrupt tribal governments.
In the ensuing 71-day standoff with federal agents, thousands of shots were
fired, two Indians were killed and an agent was paralyzed. Mr. Means and his
fellow protest leader Dennis Banks were charged with assault, larceny and
conspiracy. But after a long federal trial in Minnesota in 1974, with the
defense raising current and historic Indian grievances, the case was dismissed
by a judge for prosecutorial misconduct.
Mr. Means later faced other legal battles. In 1976, he was acquitted in a jury
trial in Rapid City, S.D., of abetting a murder in a barroom brawl. Wanted on
six warrants in two states, he was convicted in 1976 of involvement in a 1974
riot during a clash between the police and Indian activists outside a Rapid City
courthouse. He served a year in a state prison, where he was stabbed by another
inmate.
Mr. Means also survived several gunshots — one in the abdomen fired during a
scuffle with an Indian Affairs police officer in North Dakota in 1975, a grazed
forehead in what he called a drive-by assassination attempt on the Rosebud
Indian Reservation in South Dakota in 1975, and one in the chest fired by
another would-be assassin on another South Dakota reservation in 1976.
Undeterred, he led a caravan of Sioux and Cheyenne into a gathering of 500
people commemorating the centennial of Gen. George Armstrong Custer’s last stand
at Little Big Horn in Montana in 1876, the nation’s worst defeat of the Indian
wars. To pounding drums, Mr. Means and his followers mounted a speaker’s
platform, joined hands and did a victory dance, sung in Sioux Lakota, titled
“Custer Died for Your Sins.”
Russell Charles Means was born on Nov. 10, 1939, on the Pine Ridge Indian
Reservation in South Dakota, the oldest of four sons of Harold and Theodora
Feather Means. The Anglo-Saxon surname was that of a great-grandfather. When he
was 3, the family moved to the San Francisco Bay area, where his father, a
welder and auto mechanic, worked in wartime shipyards.
Russell attended public schools in Vallejo and San Leandro High School, where he
faced racial taunts, had poor grades and barely graduated in 1958. He drifted
into delinquency, drugs, alcoholism and street fights. He also attended four
colleges, including Arizona State at Tempe, but did not earn a degree. For much
of the 1960s he rambled about the West, working as a janitor, printer, cowboy
and dance instructor.
In 1969, he took a job with the Rosebud Sioux tribal council in South Dakota.
Within months, he moved to Cleveland and became founding director of a
government-financed center helping Native Americans adapt to urban life. He also
met Mr. Banks, who had recently co-founded the American Indian Movement. In 1970
Mr. Means became the movement’s national director, and over the next decade his
actions made him a household name.
In 1985 and 1986, he went to Nicaragua to support indigenous Miskito Indians
whose autonomy was threatened by the leftist Sandinista government. He reported
Sandinista atrocities against the Indians and urged the Reagan administration to
aid the victims. Millions in aid went to right-wing contras opposing the
Sandinistas, but none to their Indian allies.
In 1987, Mr. Means ran for president. He sought the Libertarian Party nomination
but lost to Ron Paul, a former and future Congressman from Texas. In 2002, Mr.
Means campaigned independently for the New Mexico governorship, but was barred
procedurally from the ballot.
Mr. Means retired from the American Indian Movement in 1988, but leaders from
the movement with whom he had feuded for years scoffed, saying he had “retired”
six times previously. They generally disowned him and his work, calling him an
opportunist out for political and financial gain. In 1989, he told Congress
there was “rampant graft and corruption” in tribal governments and federal
programs assisting Native Americans.
Mr. Means began his acting career in 1992, and, over two decades, appeared in
more than 30 films and television productions, including “Natural Born Killers”
(1994) and “Pathfinder” (2007). He also recorded CDs, including “Electric
Warrior: The Sound of Indian America,” (1993) and wrote a memoir, “Where White
Men Fear to Tread,” (1995, with Marvin J. Wolf).
He was married and divorced four times and had nine children. He adopted many
others following Lakota tradition. His fifth marriage, to Pearl Daniels, was in
1999, and she survives him.
Mr. Means cut off his braids a few months before receiving his cancer diagnosis.
It was, he said in an interview in October 2011 , a gesture of mourning for his
people. In Lakota lore, he explained, the hair holds memories, and mourners
often cut it to release those memories, and the people in them, to the spirit
world.
Daniel E.
Slotnik contributed reporting.
Russell Means, Who Revived Warrior Image of American Indian, Dies at 72, NYT,
22.10.2012,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/23/us/russell-means-american-indian-activist-dies-at-72.html
Tribe Revives Language on Verge of Extinction
August 3,
2012
The New York Times
By KIRK JOHNSON
SILETZ,
Ore. — Local native languages teeter on the brink of oblivion all over the world
as the big linguistic sweepstakes winners like English, Spanish or Mandarin ride
a surging wave of global communications.
But the forces that are helping to flatten the landscape are also creating new
ways to save its hidden, cloistered corners, as in the unlikely survival of
Siletz Dee-ni. An American Indian language with only about five speakers left —
once dominant in this part of the West, then relegated to near extinction — has,
since earlier this year, been shouting back to the world: Hey, we’re talking.
(In Siletz that would be naa-ch’aa-ghit-’a.)
“We don’t know where it’s going to go,” said Bud Lane, a tribe member who has
been working on the online Siletz Dee-ni Talking Dictionary for nearly seven
years, and recorded almost all of its 10,000-odd audio entries himself. In its
first years the dictionary was password protected, intended for tribe members.
Since February, however, when organizers began to publicize its existence, Web
hits have spiked from places where languages related to Siletz are spoken, a
broad area of the West on through Canada and into Alaska. That is the heartland
of the Athabascan family of languages, which also includes Navajo. And there has
been a flurry of interest from Web users in Italy, Switzerland and Poland, where
the dark, rainy woods of the Pacific Northwest, at least in terms of language
connections, might as well be the moon.
“They told us our language was moribund and heading off a cliff,” said Mr. Lane,
54, sitting in a storage room full of tribal basketry and other artifacts here
on the reservation, about three hours southwest of Portland, Ore. He said he has
no fantasies that Siletz will conquer the world, or even the tribe.
Stabilization for now is the goal, he said, “creating a pool of speakers large
enough that it won’t go away.”
But in the hurly-burly of modern communications, keeping a language alive goes
far beyond a simple count of how many people can conjugate its verbs. Think Jen
Johnson’s keypad thumbs. A graduate student in linguistics at Georgetown
University, Ms. Johnson, 21, stumbled onto Siletz while studying linguistics at
Swarthmore College, which has helped the tribe build its dictionary. She fell in
love with its cadences, and now texts in Siletz, her fourth language of study,
with a tribe member in Oregon.
Language experts who helped create the dictionary say the distinctiveness of
Siletz Dee-ni (pronounced SiLETZ day-KNEE), or Coastal Athabascan as it is also
called, comes in part from the unique way the language managed to survive.
Most other language preservation projects have a base, however small, of people
who speak the language. The Ojibwe People’s Dictionary, for example, which went
online this year, focuses on one of the most widely spoken native languages in
Canada and the Upper Midwest.
The 12 other dictionaries financed in recent years by the Living Tongues
Institute, a nonprofit group, in partnership with the National Geographic
Society — which helped start the Siletz dictionary project in 2005 and now uses
it as a blueprint — are all centered on languages still in use, however small or
threatened their populations of speakers may be. Matukar Panau, for instance, an
Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea, has about 600 speakers remaining, in two
small villages.
Siletz, by contrast, had become, by the time of the dictionary, almost an
artifact — preserved in song for certain native dances, but without a single
person living who had grown up with it as a first language.
There were people who had listened to the elders, like Mr. Lane, and there were
old recordings, made by anthropologists who came through the West in the 1930s
and 1960s, but not much else. Mr. Lane wants to incorporate some of those
scratchy recordings into future versions of the dictionary.
What can also bridge an ancient language’s roots to younger tribe members, some
new Siletz learners said, is that it can sound pretty cool.
“There are a couple of sounds that are nowhere in the English language, like
you’re going to spit, almost — kids seem much more open to that,” said Sonya
Moody-Jurado, who grew up hearing a few words from her mother — like nose
(mish), and dog (lin-ch’e’) — and has been attending with a grandson Siletz
classes taught by Mr. Lane.
“They’re trailblazers, showing the way for small languages to cross the digital
divide,” said K. David Harrison, an associate professor of linguistics at
Swarthmore who worked with the Siletz tribe and the other partners to build the
dictionary. Professor Harrison said he went to Colombia recently, talking to
indigenous tribes about preserving their languages, but when the laptops opened
up, the Siletz dictionary, with its impressive size and search capabilities, was
the focus. “It’s become a model of how you do it,” he said.
When settlers were streaming west in the 1850s on the Oregon Trail and
displacing American Indians from desirable farmland, government Indian policy
created artificial conglomerates of tribes, jamming them into one place even
though the groups spoke different languages and in many instances had little in
common.
The Siletz people were among the largest bands that ended up here on this spit
of land jutting into the Pacific Ocean. By dint of their numbers, their language
prevailed over other tribes, and their dances, sung in Siletz, became adopted by
other tribes as their cultures faded.
“We’re the last standing,” Mr. Lane said.
But the threat of oblivion was constant. In the 1950s, the tiny tribe was
declared dead by the United States — a “termination” from the rolls, in the
jargon of the time. The Siletz clawed back — clinging to former reservation
lands and cultural anchors in songs and dances — and two decades later, in the
mid-1970s, became only the second tribe in the nation to go from nonexistence to
federally recognized status. The Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians now have
about 4,900 enrolled members and a profitable casino in the nearby resort town
of Lincoln City.
School was also once the enemy of tribal languages. Government boarding schools,
where generations of Indian children were sent, aimed to stamp out native ways
and tongues. Now, the language is taught through the sixth grade at the public
charter school in Siletz, and the tribe aims to have a teaching program in place
in the next few years to meet Oregon’s high school language requirements,
allowing Siletz, in a place it originated, to be taught as a foreign language.
Tribe Revives Language on Verge of Extinction, NYT, 3.8.2012,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/04/us/siletz-language-with-few-voices-finds-modern-way-to-survive.html
Poverty’s Poster Child
May 9, 2012
The New York Times
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
PINE RIDGE,
S.D.
This sprawling Pine Ridge Indian Reservation is a Connecticut-sized zone of
prairie and poverty, where the have-nots are defined less by the money they lack
than by suffocating hopelessness.
In the national number line of inequality, people here represent the “other 1
percent,” the bottom of the national heap.
Pine Ridge is a poster child of American poverty and of the failures of the
reservation system for American Indians in the West. The latest Census Bureau
data show that Shannon County here had the lowest per capita income in the
entire United States in 2010. Not far behind in that Census Bureau list of
poorest counties are several found largely inside other Sioux reservations in
South Dakota: Rosebud, Cheyenne River and Crow Creek.
Poverty in the United States, including in the reservations, is so entrenched
because it is often part of a toxic brew of alcohol or drug dependencies,
dysfunctional families and educational failures. It self-replicates generation
after generation.
“What’s a man or woman to do?” asked Ben, a young man here who said he started
drinking at age 12. “I felt helpless. I felt worthless, and I wanted a drink to
get rid of my pain. But then you get more pain.”
Ben says he financed his alcohol and drug habits by turning to crime and
violence. He’s now on probation and didn’t want his family name used for fear of
getting in more trouble.
“I did a lot of things to get money to drink,” he added regretfully. These
included beating people up as a debt collector for beer stores just outside the
reservation and driving girls to those stores where they exchanged sex for
alcohol, he said.
Ben, now in his 30s, says that he quit alcohol several years ago. But he is
overweight and in poor health, surviving on disability payments and seeing no
chance of getting a job.
Unemployment on Pine Ridge is estimated at around 70 percent, and virtually the
only jobs are those working for the government or for the Oglala Sioux tribe
itself.
There are, of course, some reservations around the country that have struck it
rich with gambling or other ventures. But here in the prairies, those riches are
only rumors.
Half the population over 40 on Pine Ridge has diabetes, and tuberculosis runs at
eight times the national rate. As many as two-thirds of adults may be
alcoholics, one-quarter of children are born with fetal alcohol spectrum
disorders, and the life expectancy is somewhere around the high 40s — shorter
than the average for sub-Saharan Africa. Less than 10 percent of children
graduate from high school.
One reason businesses don’t invest in reservations is that even though
unemployment is so high, companies find it difficult to recruit dependable
workers, according to Robert Brave Heart, who runs the Red Cloud Indian School.
“People here still have to develop good work habits, even getting to work on
time,” Brave Heart said. “And people here have constant family crises that cause
them to miss work.”
Brave Heart, the son of a medicine man, is a success story and is turning out
more of them at his school. These young people are going off to college to
acquire skills that may help them turn the reservation around in the future.
How might present and future leaders lift up Indian reservations such as Pine
Ridge out of poverty? A starting point is to understand what holds them back.
One factor is the alcohol and drug abuse and broken families. That’s why I
blasted Anheuser-Busch in my last column for helping siphon alcohol into the
reservation against tribal rules.
A second is that reservations are often structured in ways that discourage
private investment. Tribal lands often aren’t deeded to individuals but are
common property, and tribal law means that outside investors can’t rely on
uniform commercial codes and may have no reliable recourse if they are cheated.
Third, the arid lands here just can’t support many people. Rural areas
throughout the great plains states, including those with overwhelmingly white
populations, are losing inhabitants and are also among the poorest in the
country.
Even though the reservation system is largely failing in the West, there are
bright spots. One is the growing number of American Indians getting a good
education. Another is that initiatives to emphasize traditional Sioux culture
and spirituality seem to have boosted community pride and helped wean some
families from alcohol and drugs.
My hunch is that these Indian reservations will have to shed people: They can’t
generate enough jobs, and a community with perpetual joblessness will always be
stunted. But many American Indian communities throughout the United States have
already demonstrated enormous resilience over the last two centuries — and
that’s a basis for hope.
Poverty’s Poster Child, NYT, 9.5.2012,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/10/opinion/kristof-povertys-poster-child.html
A Repository for Eagles Finds Itself In Demand
May 4, 2012
The New York Times
By DAN FROSCH
Miles from
downtown Denver, in a small warehouse on the city’s edge, Bernadette Atencio
watched as two men methodically bundled piles of dead eagles into boxes, careful
to include enough frozen gel packs so the remains would not thaw.
“This one’s going to Prescott, Ariz.,” Ms. Atencio said, nodding toward one bird
tightly parceled in plastic. “That one’s going to Pendleton, Ore.”
Despite appearances, this was not some surreptitious animal-smuggling ring. It
was a typical Wednesday at the National Eagle Repository, the only place where
American Indians can legally obtain bald and golden eagles from the federal
government for traditional ceremonies.
Through a series of federal acts dating to the 1940s, bald and golden eagles
have been fiercely protected. It is illegal to hunt the birds and also to
collect feathers or eagle parts without the proper permit.
And so, for more than 30 years, this United States Fish and Wildlife Service
program has been shipping thousands of eagle carcasses and parts to American
Indians, who view the animals as sacred.
But a growing backlog of applications, and a slew of recent court battles over
when American Indians can lawfully obtain eagles on their own, has raised
questions about whether the repository is sufficient.
Currently, tribal members seeking an immature golden eagle, the most coveted
bird, must wait about four and a half years. Wait times for a bald eagle are two
years. Despite the efforts by the Wildlife Service to ship animals as swiftly as
possible, the waiting list has swelled to more than 6,000 applications.
“More and more of our young people are going back to our spiritual way of life,
and we can’t do our ceremonies without the eagles,” said Lee Plenty Wolf, a
member of the Oglala Sioux tribe who lives in Fort Collins, Colo., and received
a bald eagle on April 26 after waiting almost three years.
Federal law, however, forbids anyone without a specialized permit who finds a
dead eagle or eagle feathers from taking them. Each week on average, the
repository receives dozens of dead eagles or parts sent from across the country
by state and federal wildlife officers. Some have died naturally; others were
roadkill or electrocuted by power lines.
But with 4,500 requests coming in each year, the repository simply does not have
enough eagles, said Ms. Atencio, who supervises the warehouse, in an old Army
maintenance building.
“It’s a supply and demand issue, and we need more supply,” she said. “It’s a
double-edged sword. To fill all the requests in a timely manner means we need
more dead birds.”
Having to wait so long to use eagles in religious ceremonies has become a source
of frustration for many tribes.
“Eagles are sacred to us, so of course we are interested in eagle protection,”
said Melissa Holds the Enemy, a lawyer for the Crow tribe in Montana. “But there
is a huge disconnect that is not being addressed. Protecting eagles and
accommodating Indian religious freedoms do not need to conflict with one
another.”
Driven by the delays, the Crow have been fashioning a plan to present to Fish
and Wildlife officials that would allow tribal members with permits to keep dead
eagles found on tribal land, Ms. Holds the Enemy said.
Daniel M. Ashe, director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, said in an e-mail
that the agency was especially sensitive to American Indians’ religious needs
and recently streamlined the application process to reduce wait times.
Mr. Ashe also cited a special program that has, in recent years, allowed five
tribes to keep injured eagles that could not be released in the wild. The tribes
are permitted to distribute naturally molted feathers for ceremonial use, but
cannot kill the birds.
“We understand the importance of eagles to the religious beliefs of tribal
members, and we are committed to doing everything we can, within the boundaries
of federal law and our mandate to ensure healthy eagle populations in the wild,
to improve tribes’ access to eagles for religious purposes,” he said.
Debate over the issue has also played out in courtrooms of late. In 2005, a
Northern Arapaho man, Winslow Friday, was prosecuted for killing a bald eagle on
tribal land. Mr. Friday’s lawyer, John Carlson, argued that the repository’s
wait time was intolerably long and that when birds were sent to tribe members,
they were often too badly burned or decomposed for use.
A federal judge in Wyoming, William F. Downes, dismissed the charge against Mr.
Friday. But the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in Denver,
overturned the ruling. Mr. Friday eventually pleaded guilty in tribal court and
paid a $2,500 fine.
In March, the Fish and Wildlife Service granted the Northern Arapaho a permit to
“take,” or kill, two bald eagles for religious purposes. The tribe, which
initially applied for the permit more than two years ago, had filed a federal
lawsuit in 2011 saying the process was taking too long. Applications for such
permits are rare.
On March 30, a lawyer for the Northern Arapaho filed an amended complaint in
federal court in Cheyenne, Wyo., calling the permit “a sham” because it forced
the tribe to obtain the eagles off its reservation, which left tribal members
subject to prosecution under state law.
According to Jerome Ford, assistant director of the Wildlife Service’s migratory
bird program, a joint tribal statute between the Eastern Shoshone tribe and the
Northern Arapaho, who share the Wind River Reservation, prohibits the taking of
eagles on the actual reservation.
The permit was “the only option that did not create a conflict” between the two
tribes, he said.
As that case continues, Fish and Wildlife officials planned to meet this summer
with tribal governments to figure out ways to speed the process for receiving
eagle feathers.
“This is an issue across all tribal nations,” said Myron Pourier, who sits on
the executive board for the Oglala Sioux tribe in South Dakota, which hopes to
build its own eagle repository. “All of them are going through the same federal
red tape when they shouldn’t be. Especially when this is a part of our way of
life.”
A Repository for Eagles Finds Itself In Demand, NYT, 4.5.2012,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/05/us/a-repository-for-eagles-finds-itself-in-demand.html
At Tribe’s Door, a Hub of Beer and Heartache
March 5,
2012
The New York Times
By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
WHITECLAY,
Neb. — Four rickety metal shacks that line the main road in this town of maybe
10 people sell an average of 13,000 cans of beer and malt liquor a day. The
nearest sizable city is two hours north. But just 240 yards north — across the
state line in South Dakota — is the sprawling Pine Ridge Indian Reservation,
where alcohol has been banned since the 1970s.
Nearly all the alcohol bought in Whiteclay winds up on Pine Ridge or is consumed
by its residents, tribal officials say. Pine Ridge is home to the Oglala Sioux
Tribe and is one of the poorest places in the country, according to 2010 census
data.
In February, the Oglala Sioux filed a federal lawsuit against the stores, and
Anheuser-Busch and several other large American brewing companies, accusing them
of encouraging the illegal purchase, possession, transport and consumption of
alcohol on the reservation. Fetal alcohol syndrome, fatal drunken driving
accidents and beer-fueled murders have cast a pall over Pine Ridge for decades.
After the lawsuit was filed, Whiteclay’s two-lane road, Highway 87, bustled with
traffic driving to and from the beer stores. Dozens of people in various states
of inebriation wandered along the road. Other men and women were passed out in
front of abandoned buildings. A Hank Williams Jr. 45, “I’d Rather Be Gone,” was
among the detritus along the road, as well as empty liquor bottles, a copy of
“Tabernacle Hymns No. 3,” soiled clothing and a dead puppy.
Thomas M. White, the Omaha lawyer who filed the lawsuit on behalf of the tribe,
describes Whiteclay as “Sodom and Gomorrah.” There is a lawless feeling in the
town.
The Sheridan County sheriff’s office, responsible for patrolling Whiteclay, is
19 miles away and has only five deputies. The department says it lacks the
resources to properly patrol the town. The tribal police department, which has
38 officers — down from 101 six years ago — lacks jurisdiction.
John Yellow Bird Steele, the tribal president, said 90 percent of criminal cases
in the court system and a similar number of reservation illnesses were caused by
alcohol — the vast majority of which, he said, was brought illegally from
Whiteclay.
“We believe we can’t get ahead, or function, without Whiteclay being addressed,”
he said.
On Pine Ridge, which is roughly the size of Connecticut but has a population of
about only 45,000, the tribal police last year made 20,000 alcohol-related
arrests. As an indication of the depth of the problem, Thomas Poor Bear, a
tribal vice president who has been a leader in calling for change in Whiteclay,
was arrested and jailed last month and charged with obstructing government
function and having consumed alcohol. Mr. Poor Bear has denied the charges,
saying he had taken cold medicine. But his lawyer, Tom Clifford, said that his
client drank “a couple of beers” before his arrest.
The lawsuit seeks $500 million for costs incurred by the tribe for health care,
law enforcement and social services related to chronic drinking, and to limit
the amount of beer Whiteclay shops can sell. The legal argument is that the
brewers and the stores know that they are selling alcohol to people who have no
permissible place to consume it, and who are smuggling it onto the reservation
for illegal use and resale. Any sign of alcohol — the smell of beer, walking
funny, slurred speech — can get a person arrested in Pine Ridge.
The suit was filed in federal court because the federal authorities oversee
Indian reservations and are the ultimate arbiters on alcohol issues.
Anheuser-Busch and the other alcohol companies named in the lawsuit declined to
comment or did not return calls and e-mails seeking comment.
Excessive alcohol consumption is the leading cause of preventable death among
American Indians, and they are affected at about twice the rate of the national
average, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The lawsuit comes amid a growing debate on Pine Ridge and other reservations
about the wisdom of alcohol prohibition.
About a third of the nation’s 310 reservations ban alcohol, but Pine Ridge is
the only remaining dry reservation in South Dakota. It abuts the Rosebud Sioux
Reservation, which allows alcohol.
Proponents of repealing prohibition say legalizing alcohol would enable tribes
to enact tighter controls and to use new revenue for treatment programs.
“Not to disrespect our elders and ancestors, but we’ve gone through several
generations,” said Milton Bians, a tribal police captain, who was raised by
grandparents because his parents drank.
Though the reservation is dry, nearly every aspect of life there is affected by
alcohol. Tribal leaders say four in five families on the reservation have
someone with a drinking problem, and one in four babies are born with fetal
alcohol syndrome or fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Rates of diabetes, teenage
suicide, crime and unemployment are in some cases exponentially higher than
national averages, according to federal and tribal data and officials.
The beer store owners declined to comment, citing the lawsuit. Whiteclay’s other
businesses, which include two groceries and an auto body shop, say they feel
little responsibility.
Victor Clarke, who has lived in Whiteclay 19 years and owns Arrowhead Foods, a
grocery that does not sell alcohol, said there would be dozens of places within
an hour’s drive where alcohol could be bought if the town’s annual sale of 4.9
million cans of beer and malt liquor was halted.
He said the widespread fear that Whiteclay’s troublesome customers would then
move elsewhere virtually guarantees the town’s survival.
“People don’t want Whiteclay to go away,” he said. “The state of Nebraska
doesn’t want Whiteclay to go away because it allows problems to be isolated in
this one little place. You hear people in the towns around here, saying, ‘We
don’t want these guys in our town.’ ”
Each side blames the other for the drunken assaults, robberies and murders that
are part of Whiteclay’s ebb and flow.
“A lot of times, there’s a problem that boils up in South Dakota and ends up in
Whiteclay,” said Sheriff Terry Robbins of Sheridan County. About the prospect of
more patrols, he said, “With the economy the way it is, I don’t see us doing
anything that we’re not trying now.” Deputies patrol the town two to three times
a day.
The Arrowhead Inn, one of Whiteclay’s four beer stores, has a sign posted
saying, “Cash your income tax check here.” The store takes a 3 percent
commission. Pine Ridge has no banks, so the liquor stores serve that purpose.
The shop sells a 30-pack of Budweiser cans for $27.25 — a price higher than in
New York City, and nearly twice as high as elsewhere in the country. But the
drink of choice in Whiteclay is Hurricane High Gravity Lager, a malt liquor
brewed by Anheuser-Busch. A 16-ounce can costs $1.50 at the Arrowhead Inn. Its
alcohol content is 8.1 percent; regular beer has an alcohol content of about 5
percent.
Daryl Walking, 46, a former Marine who said he has been drinking since he was a
boy, said he spends three nights a week in jail for public intoxication and the
other four in the cold.
“I’ll curl up against the wall and I’ll wake up half frozen, but I’ll still be
O.K.,” he said.
His friend James Whiteface, 43, was recently released from the tribal jail. It
was his birthday, and he showed the date of birth on his arrest form to prove
it.
“I came here right after I got out,” he said, referring to Whiteclay. “This is
where everybody meets.” he said. Mr. Whiteface, a slight man, said he could
drink six 16-ounce cans of Hurricane in one sitting.
A Nebraska State Patrol officer drove past. Someone shouted an obscenity. The
trooper slammed on the brakes and shouted obscenities back, threatening to call
in the sheriff to “clear this town.”
An hour later, there was no sheriff, and the crowds of drinkers had grown
thicker.
At Tribe’s Door, a Hub of Beer and Heartache, NYT, 5.3.2012,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/06/us/next-to-tribe-with-alcohol-ban-a-hub-of-beer.html
|