History > 2008 > USA > African-Americans (I)
Residents of Lima, Ohio,
posted a sign at the house where Ms.
Wilson, 26,
was killed and her 14-month-old son was injured.
Illustration:
J. D. Pooley
for The New York Times
Police Shooting of Mother and Infant
Exposes a City’s Racial
Tension
NYT
30.1.2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/30/us/30lima.html
Black Americans see Obama
rise in context of history
Thu Feb 28, 2008
9:30am EST
Reuters
By Matthew Bigg
ATLANTA (Reuters) - Barack Obama has not asked black voters to back him
solely because he could become the first black president in U.S. history, but
for many African Americans the prospect remains tantalizing.
Many see his campaign for the Democratic nomination in terms of racial progress
and in the context of a long struggle for political participation.
In interviews, people said Obama's ability to win primary and caucus races in
predominantly white states also challenged a deep pessimism about the electoral
prospects for an African American. Obama had a Kenyan father and white American
mother.
"There is a population of African Americans, specifically the masses of African
Americans ... who see Barack Obama as the culmination of the civil rights
movements and other movements against racial inequality," said Melissa
Harris-Lacewell, professor of politics at Princeton University in New Jersey.
"No one thought this would happen in our lifetime, or even in the lifetime of
our children," Harris-Lacewell said.
Blacks overwhelmingly vote for Democratic candidates and big majorities have
supported Obama over his rival Sen. Hillary Clinton who, along with her husband
former President Bill Clinton, forged close ties with black voters.
Clinton has campaigned extensively for black votes but has seen her support
erode despite the backing of influential politicians including the top tax
writer in the House of Representatives, Rep. Charles Rangel of New York.
The senior black representative in Congress, Rep. James Clyburn of South
Carolina, is staying neutral in the race but in a sign of eroding support
prominent Congressman John Lewis switched his endorsement on Wednesday from
Clinton to Obama.
"The people are pressing for a new day in American politics and I think they see
Sen. Barack Obama as a symbol of that change," Lewis said.
COMPLEXITY BEHIND SUPPORT
Black support for Obama who is running to succeed President George W. Bush in
elections in November is sometimes presented as a matter of simple racial pride.
The sentiment is expressed by the slogan seen on T-shirts: "He's black and I'm
proud", a reference to a 1968 song by soul singer James Brown "Say it Loud - I'm
Black and I'm Proud". But some argue the reasons for it are complex.
A year ago, black voters were unsure about Obama, who was relatively unknown and
had not risen through civil rights era of the 1960s that brought many blacks
into national politics.
In February 2007 he lagged behind Clinton in polls of black voters, who make up
about 10 percent of the U.S. electorate and are considered the most reliable
Democratic block.
Only after a January 3 win in Iowa, where there are few black voters, did his
popularity among South Carolina blacks soar, suggesting that Obama's appeal in
part is based upon his ability to rally a diverse constituency.
"(Black) people want their vote to count. They may have thought that he was
attractive as a candidate but they weren't going to vote for him if he had no
chance," said William Jelani Cobb, a history professor at Spelman College in
Atlanta.
"With Obama he is going for broke. That raised a higher bar for him getting
support from black folk," Cobb said.
In a debate with Clinton on Tuesday the Illinois senator repeated a message
central to his campaign, which he has used with largely black audiences: that he
can help bring unity.
"I can bring this country together I think in a unique way, across divisions of
race, religion, region. And that is what's going to be required in order for us
to actually deliver on the issues that both Senator Clinton and I care so much
about," he said.
The Democratic nominee will face the presumptive Republican nominee, Sen. John
McCain of Arizona.
FEAR OF VIOLENCE
Even as Obama takes center stage in U.S. national politics, several voters
expressed a fear they said was based upon history that suggests an African
American risks having his ambition thwarted through violence.
The memory of the assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King 40
years ago is never far from their minds.
"This man's life they are going to snuff out before they let him sit in this
seat (the White House)," said Shirley Hightower, a community activist at a
housing project in Atlanta. "I like Obama but I am scared for him," she said.
At his request, the U.S. Secret Service began protecting Obama in May, the
earliest that a presidential candidate has received protection -- 18 months
before an election.
The U.S. Secret Service routinely provides security for the nominee from each
political party, and as a former first lady, Clinton is protected.
(Editing by Jim Loney and Jackie Frank)
Black Americans see
Obama rise in context of history, R, 28.2.2008,
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1361052220080228
FACTBOX:
Significant events
in black American history
Thu Feb 28, 2008
9:30am EST
Reuters
(Reuters) - Democratic Sen. Barack Obama is in a tight race with Sen. Hillary
Clinton for the party's nomination to run against the presumptive Republican
nominee John McCain in the November presidential election. Obama would be the
first U.S. black president.
Following is a timeline of some of the significant events in black American
history.
1619 - The first African slaves arrive in Virginia.
1787 - The U.S. Constitution states that Congress may not ban the slave trade
until 1808.
1793 - The invention of the cotton gin increases demand for slave labor in the
South. Fugitive Slave Act seeks to require free states to return fugitive
slaves, but is rarely enforced in the North.
1808 - Importation of slaves banned.
1831-1861 - Around 75,000 slaves escape to the North and freedom using an
"underground railroad".
1831 - Nat Turner leads a slave rebellion in Virginia.
1850 - Fugitive Slave Act revised to require law enforcement to return runaway
slaves, forcing Northerners to choose between slavery and abolition.
1857 - U.S. Supreme Court decides the case of slave Dred Scott who sued for his
freedom. Court said slaves were private property and no slave or descendant
could be a U.S. citizen; Congress had no authority to outlaw slavery in federal
territories.
1861 - The Confederacy is founded when the South secedes. The Civil War begins.
1863 - President Lincoln issues the Emancipation Proclamation, declaring all
slaves in Confederate states free.
1865 - The civil war ends. Lincoln is assassinated. The 13th amendment to the
U.S. Constitution outlaws slavery.
1868 - The 14th amendment grants full citizenship to all African-Americans.
1870. The right to vote is given to black males.
1896 - The Supreme Court holds that racial segregation is constitutional, paving
the way for segregation in the South.
1948 - President Truman issues an executive order desegregating the U.S. armed
forces.
1954 - A Supreme Court decision declares racial segregation in schools is
unconstitutional.
1955 - Emmett Till, a black teenager, is murdered in Mississippi for allegedly
whistling at a white woman.
1955 - Rosa Parks refuses to give up her seat on a segregated bus in Montgomery,
Alabama. Her arrest sparks a successful year-long boycott led by Martin Luther
King to desegregate the city's buses.
1957 - The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, a civil rights group, is
founded.
1961 - Student and other volunteers known as "freedom riders" begin taking bus
trips through the south despite violent opposition to test new laws that
prohibit segregation.
1963 - King is jailed during civil rights protests in Birmingham, Alabama.
Delivers "I Have a Dream" speech in Washington. Four black girls killed when
bomb explodes at a Birmingham church.
1964 - President Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act. Bodies of three civil
rights workers murdered in Mississippi are found. King wins the Nobel Peace
Prize.
1965 - Civil rights leader Malcolm X is murdered. State troopers attack civil
rights marchers in Selma, Alabama. Congress passes the Voting Rights Act.
1968 - Martin Luther King is assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee.
Source:
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/bhmtimeline.html#AAH-1960
(Editing by Jim Loney and Jackie Frank)
FACTBOX: Significant events in black American
history, R, 28.2.2008,
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUKN2743706220080228
Record - High Ratio
of Americans in Prison
February
28, 2008
Filed at 11:12 a.m. ET
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The New York Times
NEW YORK
(AP) -- For the first time in history, more than one in every 100 American
adults is in jail or prison, according to a new report tracking the surge in
inmate population and urging states to rein in corrections costs with
alternative sentencing programs.
The report, released Thursday by the Pew Center on the States, said the 50
states spent more than $49 billion on corrections last year, up from less than
$11 billion 20 years earlier. The rate of increase for prison costs was six
times greater than for higher education spending, the report said.
Using updated state-by-state data, the report said 2,319,258 adults were held in
U.S. prisons or jails at the start of 2008 -- one out of every 99.1 adults, and
more than any other country in the world.
The steadily growing inmate population ''is saddling cash-strapped states with
soaring costs they can ill afford and failing to have a clear impact either on
recidivism or overall crime,'' said the report.
Susan Urahn, managing director of the Pew Center on the States, said budget woes
are prompting officials in many states to consider new, cost-saving corrections
policies that might have been shunned in the recent past for fear of appearing
soft in crime.
''We're seeing more and more states being creative because of tight budgets,''
she said in an interview. ''They want to be tough on crime, they want to be a
law-and-order state -- but they also want to save money, and they want to be
effective.''
The report cited Kansas and Texas as states which have acted decisively to slow
the growth of their inmate population. Their actions include greater use of
community supervision for low-risk offenders and employing sanctions other than
reimprisonment for ex-offenders who commit technical violations of parole and
probation rules.
''The new approach, born of bipartisan leadership, is allowing the two states to
ensure they have enough prison beds for violent offenders while helping less
dangerous lawbreakers become productive, taxpaying citizens,'' the report said.
According to the report, the inmate population increased last year in 36 states
and the federal prison system.
The largest percentage increase -- 12 percent -- was in Kentucky, where Gov.
Steve Beshear highlighted the cost of corrections in his budget speech last
month. He noted that the state's crime rate had increased only about 3 percent
in the past 30 years, while the state's inmate population has increased by 600
percent.
The Pew report was compiled by the Center on the State's Public Safety
Performance Project, which is working directly with 13 states on developing
programs to divert offenders from prison without jeopardizing public safety.
''For all the money spent on corrections today, there hasn't been a clear and
convincing return for public safety,'' said the project's director, Adam Gelb.
''More and more states are beginning to rethink their reliance on prisons for
lower-level offenders and finding strategies that are tough on crime without
being so tough on taxpayers.''
The report said prison growth and higher incarceration rates do not reflect a
parallel increase in crime or in the nation's overall population. Instead, it
said, more people are behind bars mainly because of tough sentencing measures,
such as ''three-strikes'' laws, that result in longer prison stays.
''For some groups, the incarceration numbers are especially startling,'' the
report said. ''While one in 30 men between the ages of 20 and 34 is behind bars,
for black males in that age group the figure is one in nine.''
The nationwide figures, as of Jan. 1, include 1,596,127 people in state and
federal prisons and 723,131 in local jails -- a total 2,319,258 out of almost
230 million American adults.
The report said the United States is the world's incarceration leader, far ahead
of more populous China with 1.5 million people behind bars. It said the U.S.
also is the leader in inmates per capita (750 per 100,000 people), ahead of
Russia (628 per 100,000) and other former Soviet bloc nations which make up the
rest of the Top 10.
------
On the Net:
www.pewcenteronthestates.org .
Record - High Ratio of Americans in Prison, NYT,
28.2.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Prison-Population.html
Op-Ed
Contributor
Go Back
to Black
February
27, 2008
The New York Times
By K. A. DILDAY
London
I’M black
again. I was black in Mississippi in the 1970s but sometime in the 1980s I
became African-American, with a brief pause at Afro-American. Someone, I think
it was Jesse Jackson, in the days when he had that kind of clout, managed to
convince America that I preferred being African-American. I don’t.
Now I live in Britain where I’m black again. Blacks in Britain come from all
over, although many are from the former colonies. According to the last census,
about half of the British people who identify as black say they are black
Caribbean, about 40 percent consider themselves black African, and the rest just
feel plain old black. Black Brits are further divided by ancestral country of
origin, yet they are united under the term black British — often expanded to
include British Asians from the Indian subcontinent.
The term African-American was contrived to give black Americans a sense of
having a historical link to Africa, since one of slavery’s many unhappy legacies
is that most black Americans don’t know particulars about their origins. Black
Americans whose ancestors arrived after slavery and who can pinpoint their
country of origin are excluded from the definition — which is why, early in his
campaign, people said Barack Obama wasn’t really African-American. Yet, since he
has one parent from the African continent and one from the American continent,
he is explicitly African-American.
Distinguishing between American black people based on their ancestors’ arrival
date ignores the continuum of experience that transcends borders and individual
genealogies and unites black people all over the world. Yes, scientists have
shown that black means nothing as a biological description, but it remains an
important signal in social interaction. Everywhere I travel, from North Africa
to Europe to Asia, dark-skinned people approach me and, usually gently but
sometimes aggressively, establish a bond.
When, early on in the race for the Democratic nomination, people wondered if
black Americans would vote for Mr. Obama, I never doubted. During the last two
years I’ve learned to decipher his name in almost any pronunciation, because on
finding out that I’m an American, all other black people I meet, whether they
are Arabic-speaking Moroccans in Casablanca, French-speaking African
mobile-phone-store clerks in the outer boroughs of Paris, or thickly accented
Jamaican black Brits, ask me eagerly about him. Black people all over the world
feel a sense of pride in his accomplishment.
It’s hard to understand why black Americans ever tried to use the term
African-American to exclude people. The black American community’s social and
political power derives from its inclusiveness. Everyone who identifies as black
has traditionally been welcomed, no matter their skin color or date of arrival.
In Britain, in contrast, dark-skinned people who trace their relatives to
particular former colonies can be cliquish. Beyond the fact that blacks make up
a smaller share of the population here, this regional identity may be a reason
that the British black community isn’t as powerful a social and political force.
I’ve never minded not knowing who my ancestors are beyond a few generations. My
partner is an Englishman whose family tree is the sort that professional
genealogists post on the Internet because it can be traced back to the first
king of England in the 11th century. To me, it’s more comforting to know that,
through me, our children will be black, with all of the privileges and pains.
On Mr. Obama’s behalf, American blacks have set aside their exclusive label.
Polls show that about 80 percent of blacks who have voted in the Democratic
primaries have chosen him. And all of the black people in the mountains of
Morocco, the poor suburbs of Paris, the little villages in Kenya and the streets
of London are cheering Mr. Obama’s victories because they see him as one of
their own.
Black Americans should honor that. It’s time to retire the term African-American
and go back to black.
K. A. Dilday is a columnist for the online magazine Open Democracy.
Go Back to Black, NYT, 27.2.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/27/opinion/27dilday.html?ref=opinion
Race Matters Less in Politics of South
February 21, 2008
The New York Times
By ADAM NOSSITER
CULLMAN, Ala. — The racial breakthroughs have come gingerly in Alabama over
the years: a black mayor there, an old Klansman put on trial here, a civil
rights memorial there.
And a few weeks ago, voters in a county that is more than 96 percent white chose
a genial black man, James Fields, to represent them in the State House of
Representatives. It is a historic first, but the moment is full of awkwardness.
“Really, I never realize he’s black,” said a white woman in a restaurant,
smiling.
“He’s black?” asked Lou Bradford, a white Cullman police officer, jokingly.
“You know, I don’t even see him as black,” said another of Mr. Fields’s new
white constituents, Perry Ray, the mayor of one of the county’s villages, Dodge
City.
A woman congratulates Mr. Fields as he stops in traffic, and afterward, he
shakes his head ruefully: “Sometimes, I have to pinch myself: ‘Am I really
black?’ ”
Yet in a state once synonymous with racial strife, there is no denying this
milestone, for all its tentativeness. Everyone — the voter in Cullman, the
Alabama politician, the local historian — is rubbing his or her eyes, a little.
“It strikes me as a real watershed event,” said Samuel L. Webb, a historian at
the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Last fall, another black man, Eric Powell, was elected to the Mississippi State
Senate from a district that is more than 92 percent white, and no one could find
a modern precedent for that, either. Mr. Fields and Mr. Powell are Democrats who
decisively beat white candidates in districts that traditionally support
Republican presidential candidates.
Inevitably, there are questions about what this might mean for Senator Barack
Obama’s candidacy in the Deep South, and the quick answer, perhaps, is not that
much, at least in Cullman County at this moment. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
beat Mr. Obama here, by a margin of four to one, in the Democratic primary this
month, as many here readily point out.
Yet there are parallels. The very quality that voters here highlight, in so many
words, as one of Mr. Fields’s more attractive attributes — that they are at ease
with him — is one of Mr. Obama’s most important selling points. The implications
are not lost on State Senator Zeb Little, the majority leader in the Alabama
Senate and a Democratic power broker in Cullman: black politicians can win in
unlikely districts, transcending history and partisan politics, if voters can
see them as one of their own.
“James is comfortable around white people, and white people are comfortable
around James, and you see the same thing with Obama,” Mr. Little said. (He had
asked Mr. Fields not to run, he recalls, because he did not think a black
candidate could win.)
Granted, the peculiar local circumstances at play in these elections are not
readily duplicated in a national election. Mr. Fields and Mr. Powell were
enmeshed in their communities — hometown heroes, well before their elections.
Mr. Powell, 41, was a football coach in the local schools in Corinth, Miss., and
had played at the University of Mississippi; Mr. Fields, 53, is a former marine
and part-time Methodist minister who worked in the unemployment office here for
years, helping many find jobs. He served on the board of the local electrical
cooperative, was active in the Boy Scouts and was a high school basketball star.
“He’s a dadgum good fellow,” said W. F. Davis, a retired boilermaker, at Jack’s,
a roadside restaurant here, as Mr. Fields basked in congratulations nearby.
“He’s always been one of us.”
The distinction between “one of us” and something else, of course, is always
present in a county where Mr. Fields still sees Confederate flags dotting the
landscape.
“There’s two different races, in that race,” explained James Rice, a white
resident describing black people, as Mr. Fields affably worked voters at Jack’s.
“You got some that don’t want to be nothing, and you got some that want to help.
You don’t find too many like James Fields.”
Still, with many voters here, Mr. Fields has a personal bond dating to the days
before new factories brought a measure of prosperity. Voters — rural white
Alabama voters — smilingly approach the big, open-faced man; they hug him and
joke with him.
“When their sons and daughters needed jobs, they said: ‘You go see James Fields.
You go see that black man down there,’ ” Mr. Fields recalled. “When I returned
from college, my whole life was centered around helping people. I was a public
servant,” he says — a description readily echoed by many he encounters here.
For unsavory historical reasons, it could easily have turned out differently in
a county that is almost entirely white. Mr. Fields inherited a bitter racial
legacy, one he is conscious of though unsoured by. If you drove into Cullman
70-odd years ago, you might have happened on “a neatly-painted sign” by the
roadside, as the New York writer Carl Carmer described it in his book, “Stars
Fell on Alabama,” one bearing a chilling and crude inscription telling blacks:
“Don’t Let the Sun Go Down on You in this Town.”
It had always been a place of few blacks because there were few plantations, and
the whites wanted to keep it that way. The sign has long since passed into
half-remembered folk memory. But the sentiments behind it lingered; the Ku Klux
Klan and Citizens Councils were strong in these hills, and blacks in Cullman
were effectively confined to a forlorn hillside hamlet known as The Colony,
which is where Mr. Fields grew up.
Still, the racial legacy is complicated, as it is everywhere in Alabama: Cullman
was also the home base of Gov. James E. Folsom, whose moderation on race helped
damage his career in the 1950s.
Matter-of-factly, Mr. Fields recounts an early history hemmed in at every turn
by racism, at least until high school years.
In town, on Saturdays, “you didn’t try anything on.”
“You’d look at stuff,” he said. “We literally had nothing going to the cotton
fields, picking cotton, beans.”
His father worked the night clean-up crew at a poultry-processing plant. And
“beyond a shadow of a doubt,” he said, blacks knew they were unwelcome in the
white, white town of Cullman.
When integration came to the schools in the mid-1960s, no one was eager to
embrace the black students. “We were up for auction: who wants the colored
people,” Mr. Fields said, recalling that only a school in another town would
accept them. His parents made him travel a back road to avoid trouble; he
vividly recalls driving up on a Klan rally as a young man.
But then, in high school, things changed. His athletic prowess earned him
friendship among white peers; when rival football teams yelled racial epithets
at him, his own classmates protectively retaliated.
All his life, Mr. Fields says calmly, he has had to deal with white people, in
the fields, at school, and at work. Mr. Powell had a similar experience.
“I spent more time, as a kid, growing up with my white friends in their homes,”
Mr. Powell said. In a county that is 98 percent white, “we were always around
each other,” he said.
People in Cullman talk about Mr. Fields’s excellent connections in the state
capital, Montgomery — he once served as assistant director of the Alabama
Department of Industrial Relations — but they also speak, hesitantly, about
sloughing off an age-old burden.
As Rob Werner, the owner of an outdoor-goods store here, put it: “People said,
‘Of course, James is black. This is great, this will get this off our back.’ ”
Race Matters Less in
Politics of South, NYT, 21.2.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21race.html
Lending laws unenforced
in housing crisis: Jackson
Wed Feb 20, 2008
5:37pm EST
Reuters
By Michele Gershberg
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. mortgage meltdown has its roots in lending
discrimination against African-American and Hispanic communities and requires
federal intervention to prevent it from crippling municipal services, civil
rights activist Rev. Jesse Jackson said on Wednesday.
Jackson told the Reuters Housing Summit in New York that nearly 40 percent of
subprime loans went to black and Hispanic families, many of them in districts
once shunned by discriminatory "redlining" lenders who later devised a way to
profit there by selling a flawed financial product.
"They began to stereotype and target and cluster whole communities. It's kind of
like reverse redlining," Jackson said.
Jackson estimates that nearly half of those borrowers could have been eligible
for regular loan packages, but instead were locked into mortgages that threaten
to balloon out of their ability to pay when the adjustable interest rates reset.
"It suggests that if fair lending laws had been enforced ... we would not have
had this global economic crisis," Jackson said. "But while it started by
unenforced civil rights laws, the bleeding has not stopped there. It's now
engulfing the budgets of cities and counties and states."
Jackson also said that the U.S. Department of Justice was slow to respond, if at
all, to concerns of lending discrimination.
An estimated 1.5 million subprime mortgages, traditionally targeted at borrowers
with poor credit histories, will reset to higher interest rates this year,
putting many owners at risk of losing their homes. Another 500,000 will reset in
2009, according to Federal Reserve estimates.
Jackson said the federal government should institute a halt to foreclosure
proceedings and authorize the Federal Housing Administration or another body to
start a major restructuring of subprime loans, with lower interest rates and
payments spread out over a longer period.
He also called on state attorneys general to subpoena the major lenders on their
loan practices and impose penalties on those who have violated the law.
He described President George W. Bush's plan to offer $152 billion in tax
rebates this year to fend off a possible recession as irrelevant to the needs of
home owners facing foreclosure and ignoring the cause of the crisis.
(Editing by Gary Hill)
Lending laws unenforced
in housing crisis: Jackson, R, 20.2.2008,
http://www.reuters.com/article/Housing08/idUSN2039245920080220
Bush calls
nooses and lynch threats
deeply offensive
Tue Feb 12, 2008
4:33pm EST
Reuters
By Jeremy Pelofsky
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush condemned as "deeply
offensive" on Tuesday a spate of incidents involving the display of hangman's
nooses, a potent symbol of racist lynchings and hatred of blacks in the United
States.
Bush said there was still a long way to go for the country to unite on the issue
of race.
"As a civil society, we must understand that noose displays and lynching jokes
are deeply offensive," Bush said at a White House celebration of
African-American history month. "They are wrong. And they have no place in
America today."
Bush's remarks about race came as the U.S. capital and neighboring Virginia and
Maryland held primary elections in which Democrats were deciding whether Sen.
Barack Obama, who would be the first black U.S. president, or Sen. Hillary
Clinton, who would be the first woman to hold the office, should be the party's
nominee in the November election.
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said there had been more than 70 reports of
incidents involving nooses since December 2006.
One high-profile incident earlier that year focused nationwide attention on
Jena, Louisiana, where three nooses were found hanging from a tree at a high
school.
Six black students were later charged with assaulting a white student at the
school, sparking civil rights leaders to lead national protest marches and offer
support for those facing the criminal charges.
A noose was found on the door of a black professor at Columbia University in New
York, and two were found on the campus of the U.S. Coast Guard Academy.
The trend has even extended more recently into the golf world, when an anchor
for the Golf Channel tried to joke that players bidding to challenge champion
Tiger Woods, who is black, might have to "lynch him in a back alley." Shortly
after that, Golfweek magazine fired an editor for depicting a noose on a cover
last month for a story on the Woods incident.
Bush said some Americans fail to fully understand why the sight of a noose of a
lynching remark sparks outrage.
"For generations of African-Americans, the noose was more than a tool of murder.
It was a tool of intimidation that conveyed a sense of powerlessness to
millions," he said.
(Reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky, editing by Patricia Zengerle)
Bush calls nooses and
lynch threats deeply offensive, NYT, 12.2.2008,
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN1227217020080212
'At Canaan's Edge:
America in the King Years, 1965-68,'
By
Taylor Branch
The Whirlwinds of Revolt
February 5, 2006
The New York Times
Review by ANTHONY LEWIS
We have had nothing like it in this country in living memory: a commanding
moral voice, attached to no political party or public office, that moved
governments and changed social institutions. That was Martin Luther King Jr.
He was despised by many. His ideas were sometimes rejected. He failed as well as
succeeded. But he would not retreat from attacking what he came to believe were
the three great afflictions of mankind: racism, war and poverty. In little more
than a dozen years — from Dec. 5, 1955, when he set the Montgomery bus boycott
on its way, to April 4, 1968, when he was murdered — he changed the face of
America.
This is the last of three volumes in which Taylor Branch chronicles those years.
It is a thrilling book, marvelous in both its breadth and its detail. There is
drama in every paragraph. Every factual statement is backed up in 200 pages of
endnotes.
"America in the King Years," Branch's running title for the trilogy, is not a
mere conceit, a fancy way of describing a biography. It is not a biography of
Dr. King. It is a picture of the country and the times as he intersected with
them.
What a different country it was. I lived through those times, but "At Canaan's
Edge" made me realize that I did not remember how different. It was before the
revolution in women's roles, for example, as Branch tells us in a couple of
quick sketches. Southerners had added a ban on sex discrimination to the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 as a way to mock the bill, and at first it was widely treated
as a joke. A Page 1 article in The New York Times in 1965 raised the question
whether executives must let a "dizzy blonde" drive a tugboat or pitch for the
Mets. In 1966 the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission wondered, in a
newsletter, whether an employer could be penalized for refusing to hire "a woman
as a dog warden."
But of course it is the virulence of Southern racism at that time that is most
striking. This was only 40 years ago, after the passage of the 1964 act, but
racist violence and murder were still widespread in the Deep South. Everyone
knew who the killers were, but juries would not convict — all-white juries. The
openness of the violence was staggering. When Viola Liuzzo, a white woman, came
down from Michigan to Selma, Ala., to help in the protest movement, a Ku Klux
Klan gang pulled up alongside the car she was driving and shot her dead.
Branch has been working on these books for more than 20 years, exploring endless
materials: newspapers, audiotapes, reports, books, personal memories. He has an
incredible command of it all, bringing history to life with a few sentences
here, extended chapters there on something like the march from Selma to
Montgomery. I can pick out only a few themes to indicate the scope of his work.
Selma was about a basic right explicitly guaranteed by the Constitution, the
right to vote without discrimination. In Alabama, Mississippi and large parts of
other states in the Deep South, the right was a myth for blacks. They were
threatened, abused, even murdered if they tried to register or vote; they often
lost their homes or their jobs. Armed white mobs menaced them.
It was in the face of those tactics that King decided to lead a march from Selma
to Montgomery as a protest for the vote. At the first attempt marchers were
brutalized, the march turned back. But they persisted. Branch, usually given to
understatement, lets himself go and speaks of "yearnings and exertions toward
freedom seldom matched since Valley Forge."
Before a second attempt could be made to march to Montgomery, a difficulty
intervened. Judge Frank M. Johnson enjoined the march because of likely
violence. Johnson was a highly respected federal judge who had made many
decisions in favor of civil rights. Justice Department officials pleaded with
King not to violate the order lest he sacrifice the movement's reliance on law
and the Constitution. But the protesters, many of them, did not want to give
way. King did not say what he would do. The march began. He led it onto the
Pettus Bridge at the edge of Selma, faced 500 state troopers — and suddenly
turned and led the marchers back into Selma. He had made the point and desisted,
obeying the law.
There followed a remarkable episode. Judge Johnson was now asked to let the
march go forward and enjoin interference with it. But in a telephone
conversation with the United States attorney general, Nicholas deB. Katzenbach,
he said he would not do so unless the federal government undertook to protect
the marchers. And he wanted that assurance from the president, he said.
Katzenbach gave him the assurance. Lyndon B. Johnson called the Alabama National
Guard into federal service and sent regular Army detachments. On their third
try, the marchers made it to Montgomery.
King believed that if Americans outside the South were aware of its brutal
racism — as few then were — they would want to end it. The violent response to
nonviolent protest made the brutality plain. What Americans read in newspapers
and saw on television shocked them, and jump-started the political process.
Meaningful civil rights legislation made it past Senate filibusters at last.
It was a crucial part of King's thinking to engage the president. As Robert Caro
has demonstrated in his biography, Lyndon Johnson had shown streaks of racism in
his life. But fundamentally he was for equal rights, and he seized the
opportunity presented by the King campaign and the ugly Southern response. In a
speech to the nation on March 15, 1965, he memorably adopted the words of the
civil rights movement: "It's all of us who must overcome the crippling legacy of
bigotry and injustice. And — we — shall — overcome."
L.B.J. is a second object of Branch's penetrating gaze in this volume: not just
what he did on civil rights but his whole whirlwind of activity. Here he is on
the telephone with Attorney General Katzenbach in Alabama, warning him not to
smoke too much during late-night vigils. On one day in 1965 he takes a phone
call from Drew Pearson, the columnist, and lectures him for 15 minutes about
Vietnam. He receives the British foreign secretary, Michael Stewart, and a
delegation, talking long past the scheduled time and telling them — to their
confusion — "Sometimes I just get all hunkered up like a jackass in a
hailstorm." He has a conference call with House leaders about the legislation to
establish Medicare. He gets a telephone report from Selma.
FOR Johnson, race and Vietnam were preoccupations in tandem. In the same month
as the march from Selma to Montgomery, March 1965, the first American combat
units went ashore at Da Nang. King had had a good relationship with the
president, but it broke down over the issue that Johnson rightly feared would
overwhelm his reputation on social justice.
Branch's picture of Dr. King on Vietnam is of a man coming slowly, reluctantly,
but irresistibly to embrace the issue — against the advice of many supporters.
Finally, at Riverside Church in New York on April 4, 1967, he called for the
United States to "set a date that we will remove all foreign troops from Vietnam
in accordance with the 1954 Geneva Agreement."
The Riverside speech drew heavy criticism. John Roche, a Brandeis University
professor who was then on the White House staff, said King had "thrown in with
the Commies." He told the president that King was "inordinately ambitious and
quite stupid (a bad combination)." A Washington Post editorial said, "Many who
have listened to him with respect will never again accord him the same
confidence." But King did not give way. He told a church audience that the press
had been "so noble in its praise" when he preached nonviolence toward white
oppressors but inconsistently "will curse you and damn you when you say be
nonviolent toward little brown Vietnamese children."
Racism in America was not — and is not — confined to the South. Branch reminds
us of that in small ways and large. In 1965, he notes, Mary Travers of the trio
Peter, Paul and Mary kissed Harry Belafonte on the cheek at a rally. CBS
television, which was showing the rally, was besieged by protesting callers, and
took the rally off the air for 90 minutes. In the border state of Kentucky, the
famous basketball coach Adolph Rupp kept his University of Kentucky team all
white. He complained of calls from the university president, "That son of a
bitch wants me to get some niggers in here." A little-noted team from Texas
Western, with five black players starting, upset Kentucky in the 1966
championship game — a story told just now in the movie "Glory Road." Only
slowly, after that, did the bar on black athletes break down in the South. Many
people watching college sports on television today would not have dreamed that
such a policy ever existed.
Chicago dramatized the reality of antiblack feelings in the North. Marches
organized by King to protest segregated housing and unequal government benefits
were met with mob taunts and rocks. "Burn them like Jews!" one white group
shouted at the marchers. Branch concludes that "the violence against Northern
demonstrations cracked a beguiling, cultivated conceit that bigotry was the
province of backward Southerners."
The most chilling passages in this book, for me, are about J. Edgar Hoover, the
F.B.I. director. His hatred of King was not a secret. But Branch shows how far
it went — beyond extremity to morbid depravity.
Hoover instructed all in the bureau not to warn King of death threats. He told
President Johnson that any requests for federal protection of King would come
from subversives, and that King was "an instrument in the hands of subversive
forces seeking to undermine our Nation." He listed King as a prominent target in
an order to all F.B.I. offices "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit or
otherwise neutralize the activities of black nationalist hate-type
organizations." There was no basis in fact for the calumnies. The charge of
subversion hung on the dubious thread of an allegation that Stanley Levison, an
adviser to King, was a Communist agent — an allegation never shown to have any
convincing support.
The low point in the Hoover story may have been his performance on the killing
of Viola Liuzzo. He tried to conceal the fact that one of the Klansmen who shot
at her was an F.B.I. informant, Gary Thomas Rowe — and lied to President Johnson
about it. He urged the president not to speak with the Liuzzo family, telling
Johnson that "the woman had indications of needle marks in her arms where she
had been taking dope; that she was sitting very, very close to the Negro in the
car; that it had the appearance of a necking party." (Liuzzo's arm was cut by a
shard of glass from the shattered car window.) Branch calls Hoover's comments
"slanderous Klan fantasy dressed as evidence."
J. Edgar Hoover was either a profoundly disturbed man by this time or that
rarity, actual evil. The question that Branch leaves unaddressed is why
President Johnson didn't fire him. The familiar explanation is fear of the
poison that Hoover would spew out in response. But Lyndon Johnson could have
handled that.
Under provocation that hardly any other human being could have resisted, King
never gave up on nonviolence. The rise of black-power advocates like Stokely
Carmichael did not move him. "I am not going to allow anybody to pull me so low
as to use the very methods that perpetuated evil throughout our civilization,"
he told a meeting in 1966. "I'm sick and tired of violence. I'm tired of the war
in Vietnam. I'm tired of war and conflict in the world. I'm tired of shooting.
I'm tired of hatred. I'm tired of selfishness. I'm tired of evil. I'm not going
to use violence no matter who says it!"
One cannot read this amazing book without thinking about what King would be
saying if he were with us today. He would surely be pointing to the vast racial
injustice that remains in this country, and to the growing gap between rich and
poor. I think there can be no doubt that he would also be speaking strongly
against the war in Iraq, warning that it was killing Americans and Iraqis,
nurturing terrorism, eroding the world's regard for America.
This third volume of Branch's trilogy deepens a feeling many have had about Dr.
King, a mystery. He moved sometimes as if propelled by a force that others could
not see. He rose to make a speech, and extemporaneous biblical eloquence would
pour forth. His friends and supporters were often uncertain what he would do.
But on the great issues he was right, and brave.
"To the end," Taylor Branch concludes, "he resisted incitements to violence,
cynicism and tribal retreat. He grasped freedom seen and unseen, rooted in
ecumenical faith, sustaining patriotism to brighten the heritage of his country
for all people. These treasures abide with lasting promise from America in the
King years."
Anthony Lewis is a former columnist for The Times.
'At Canaan's Edge:
America in the King Years, 1965-68,' By Taylor Branch, NYT, 5.2.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/books/review/05lewis.html
The Long Run
Clinton’s
Gradual Education
on Issues of Race
February 2, 2008
The New York Times
By MARK LEIBOVICH
WASHINGTON — Growing up in the palest of Chicago suburbs, Senator Hillary
Rodham Clinton had some of her earliest exposures to African-Americans through
field trips. She sat in the back of her father’s Cadillac as he detoured through
the inner city, cautioning her about the fate of people who, in his conservative
Republican view, lacked the self-discipline to succeed.
She took a sociology course at Wellesley College that included a trip through
Boston’s poor areas. On Tuesdays, she went to a housing project in Cambridge to
mentor “underprivileged Negroes,” as she wrote to Don Jones, her minister back
home, who had taken her to hear the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. speak in
Chicago four years earlier.
In a presidential campaign in which race has become a dominant issue, Mrs.
Clinton’s early brush with Dr. King has been a recurring theme, invoked as a
kind of “a-ha” episode to explain her coming of age on race. Yet Mrs. Clinton’s
passage from sheltered Park Ridge, through the ferment of the civil rights era,
to competing for black votes across the South, has been more gradual and
introspective.
She spent 1964 volunteering for the Republican presidential campaign of Barry
Goldwater, a fervent opponent of the Civil Rights Act. She awakened politically
in the combustible 1960s, but took a cooler approach to the civil rights
movement. She demonstrated for racial equality, but it was just one of the items
on her activism list (which included protesting the Vietnam War, agitating to
allow cars on campus and fighting for the legal interests of children).
In promoting her civil rights record, Mrs. Clinton takes a sweeping view,
incorporating a great deal of her work for the vulnerable and underserved —
taking on juvenile-justice issues for the Children’s Defense Fund, leading a
commission on education reform in Arkansas promoting the Family and Medical
Leave Act as first lady. (Her campaign’s two-page list of civil rights
accomplishments begins, at age 14, with the King field trip.)
“I do have a broader definition,” Mrs. Clinton said in an interview. “Civil
rights are what each of us as human beings are entitled to in relationship to
our society. But it really is, at core, about the respect and dignity of each
human being.”
Frayed Good Will
Mrs. Clinton has seen her support among blacks as central to her political
identity. She has had many African-American friends and advisers, racially
diverse staffs and a Senate voting record that has earned straight A’s from the
N.A.A.C.P. Even her rival, Senator Barack Obama, said in a debate that he is
“absolutely convinced” of Mrs. Clinton’s commitment to racial equality.
But that career’s worth of good will became somewhat frayed after supporters of
Mrs. Clinton’s campaign — and chiefly, her husband — were accused of racially
tinged attacks and innuendo against Mr. Obama before the South Carolina primary.
Mr. Obama went on to rout Mrs. Clinton on the strength of strong support from
blacks, a constituency Mrs. Clinton had courted hard.
The tone of the Clinton campaign deeply dismayed some African-Americans who had
been close to the Clintons, including Eric Holder, a former top Justice
Department official and Obama supporter. “It places their legacy at risk,” Mr.
Holder said.
Even as the charged rhetoric of South Carolina subsides, race will no doubt
persist as a theme for as long as Mr. Obama is running, the contest is close and
emotions run raw. “I think everyone is trying to find their way, here,” Mrs.
Clinton said.
Just as Mrs. Clinton has enjoyed the residual benefits of her husband’s
popularity with blacks, she has also been tarred with the perceived failures of
his administration. Any number of African-Americans, despite their support for
Bill Clinton in the 1990s, still bristle over some episodes — from his criticism
of the rapper Sister Souljah during the 1992 campaign to his welfare reform bill
in 1996 to the number of black prisoners incarcerated during his administration.
“The policy record of the Clinton administration on civil rights is more mixed
than people generally acknowledge,” said Christopher Edley Jr., the law school
dean at the University of California, Berkeley, who served in the Clinton
administration. He cited Mr. Clinton’s unwillingness to intervene in Rwanda,
where hundreds of thousands died in tribal war, and his signing of what Mr.
Edley called “a horribly punitive crime bill.” Mr. Edley said he remains fond of
both Clintons but is supporting Mr. Obama.
Circumstances have put Mrs. Clinton in a delicate position: as the main obstacle
to the first African-American with a serious shot of becoming president.
“Hillary’s in a tough spot. We’re all in a tough spot,” said Representative
James E. Clyburn, the Democratic House whip, and influential black leader from
South Carolina. “You have two big dreams converging at the same time.”
While she has built her presidential campaign on “35 years of experience making
change,” her first 25 years were arguably more central to shaping her views.
The city of Park Ridge, 15 miles northwest of Chicago, was mostly devoid of
blacks, Hispanics and liberals — which was fine with Hugh Rodham, who was not
shy about flinging prejudices across the dinner table. “He had the views that
people of that age and time did,” Mrs. Clinton said.
She recalled her father’s driving her through rough parts of Chicago. “We’d go
by skid row, which is what it was called in those days,” Mrs. Clinton said, “and
we’d see some fellow leaning against a lamp post, and my father would start in
on one of his usual lectures.”
Over time, she said, he mellowed. “His experience really undermined and
contradicted” his earlier views on race, she said.
First Awareness
Mrs. Clinton recalled first being aware of racism a half-century ago, at age 10,
when she saw the televised images of black students in Little Rock, Ark., being
blocked from attending school by order of Gov. Orval E. Faubus.
"There were these pictures of these mobs, and these children trying to go to
school, and it seemed so wrong,” she said in the interview, conducted by phone.
“I used to go to Sunday school and sing ‘Jesus Loves the Children of the World,’
and I just couldn’t believe it.”
Her biggest early influence on race was Mr. Jones, who led the youth group at
Park Ridge’s First United Methodist Church. He took the teens to meet with poor
black children at a community center and chaperoned the expedition to see Dr.
King, whose speech that Sunday night bemoaned the indifference of the privileged
to the plight of the poor. The young Hillary Rodham was inspired to volunteer to
baby-sit for the children of migrant farmers.
Still, she adopted her father’s staunch Republicanism, even working for Mr.
Goldwater’s campaign. Today, she laughs off her “Goldwater Girl” period as a
youthful indiscretion — and indeed, she was 16 at the time.
“One of the first things I knew about Hillary was that she was Republican and
had been a Goldwater Girl,” said Janet McDonald Hill, a black Wellesley
classmate. That biographical nugget comes up surprisingly frequently among Obama
backers.
“Being a supporter of Barry Goldwater during the civil rights revolution is
about as close to original sin as I can imagine,” said Mr. Edley, the Berkeley
law school dean, who is African-American.
Mrs. Clinton made her first black friend in college: Karen Williamson, one of
six African-Americans in her freshman class at Wellesley. They went to church
together one Sunday, which upset Mrs. Clinton’s parents and led her to question
her motives. “Look how liberal that girl is trying to be, going to church with a
Negro,” Mrs. Clinton wrote to Mr. Jones, imagining her reaction if she had seen
another white girl doing the same thing.
As a sophomore, Mrs. Clinton volunteered as a “Big Sister” to a 7-year-old black
girl whose mother, a single housekeeper, needed child care. Mrs. Clinton helped
the girl with homework, took her to movies, took her to dinner at Harvard.
Mrs. Clinton brooded over the nature of privilege, suffering and race. In a
letter to a high-school friend, John Peavoy, she spoke of “the depression that
descends on a person, especially one who has led a ‘sheltered suburban life,’
when he is confronted with the realities of city life.”
In the fall of 1966, she attended a “black power” meeting hosted by the Student
Nonviolent Coordinating Committee but disapproved of the group’s extreme
“attitude toward civil disobedience,” as she wrote to Mr. Jones.
After Dr. King’s assassination in 1968, she attended a rally in Boston’s Post
Office Square. Then the college government president, Mrs. Clinton discouraged a
campus organization of black women from initiating a hunger strike to protest
Wellesley’s sparse African-American enrollment and (non-existent) black faculty.
She pushed instead for a two-day student strike.
Mrs. Clinton said she came to believe that “taking to the streets” and “giving
speeches” was not enough to stir real change — a claim that would foreshadow
much of her advocacy work, as well as one of her recurring critiques of Mr.
Obama.
After Wellesley, she went to Yale Law School. Though it teemed with radical
activism in the early 1970s — and New Haven was aflame over a Black Panthers
murder trial — Mrs. Clinton immersed herself in the less inflammatory field of
child advocacy. She provided legal help for victims of child abuse and
volunteered at New Haven Legal Services, spending months on a case involving a
foster mother at risk of losing custody of a 2-year-old girl.
A Move to the South
By the time Mrs. Clinton moved to Arkansas in 1974, she had acquired a number of
African-American friends and colleagues. She also had difficulty accepting what
she saw as remnants of the “Old South.” She was appalled that Mr. Faubus, the
segregationist governor, still had a following and opposed Bill Clinton in the
Democratic primary for governor in 1986. Mr. Faubus lost with 33 per cent of the
vote. (“You could put a chicken on the ballot,” she says now, “and he’d get 30
percent.”)
In the interview, Mrs. Clinton recalled meeting Mr. Faubus in the mid-1970s. She
described him as talented, beginning his gubernatorial career as a progressive
who improved roads, schools and mental hospitals. “And then he made a Faustian
bargain in 1957 because he threw his lot in with the forces of darkness,” she
said.
In Washington, as in Arkansas, Mrs. Clinton viewed civil rights within her
broader portfolio of causes. Maggie Williams, her former chief of staff as first
lady and a current campaign adviser, said that those interests were inevitably
fused. “Low wages, poor health care and lack of educational opportunities
disproportionately impact people of color in this country,” Ms. Williams said.
Professor Lani Guinier of Harvard Law School, who is supporting Mr. Obama, said
the key distinction between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton lies in how they view
their relationship to power. In doing so, Ms. Guinier, whose nomination as
assistant attorney general for civil rights in 1993 was pummeled by conservative
groups and aborted by the White House, referred to their respective biographies.
Mrs. Clinton “is the talented lawyer serving her clients,” Ms. Guinier said. Mr.
Obama is the organizer, she said, “who sees the source of his power as the
ability to inspire people to mobilize.”
Referring to the possibility of the nation’s election of a historic first, a
black or a woman, Mrs. Clinton said last week, “In a way, it’s a good problem to
have. But it is a problem.”
Clinton’s Gradual
Education on Issues of Race, NYT, 2.2.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/02/us/politics/02race.html?hp
Police Shooting
of Mother and Infant
Exposes a City’s
Racial Tension
January 30,
2008
The New York Times
By CHRISTOPHER MAAG
LIMA, Ohio
— The air of Southside is foul-smelling and thick, filled with fumes from an oil
refinery and diesel smoke from a train yard, with talk of riot and
recrimination, and with angry questions: Why is Tarika Wilson dead? Why did the
police shoot her baby?
“This thing just stinks to high heaven, and the police know it,” said Jason
Upthegrove, president of the Lima chapter of the N.A.A.C.P. “We’re not asking
for answers anymore. We’re demanding them.”
Some facts are known. A SWAT team arrived at Ms. Wilson’s rented house in the
Southside neighborhood early in the evening of Jan. 4 to arrest her companion,
Anthony Terry, on suspicion of drug dealing, said Greg Garlock, Lima’s police
chief. Officers bashed in the front door and entered with guns drawn, said
neighbors who saw the raid.
Moments later, the police opened fire, killing Ms. Wilson, 26, and wounding her
14-month-old son, Sincere, Chief Garlock said. One officer involved in the raid,
Sgt. Joseph Chavalia, a 31-year veteran, has been placed on paid administrative
leave.
Beyond these scant certainties, there is mostly rumor and rage. The police
refuse to give any account of the raid, pending an investigation by the Ohio
attorney general.
Black people in Lima, from the poorest citizens to religious and business
leaders, complain that rogue police officers regularly stop them without cause,
point guns in their faces, curse them and physically abuse them. They say the
shooting of Ms. Wilson is only the latest example of a long-running pattern of a
few white police officers treating African-Americans as people to be feared.
“There is an evil in this town,” said C. M. Manley, 68, pastor of New Morning
Star Missionary Baptist Church. “The police harass me. They harass my family.
But they know that if something happens to me, people will burn down this town.”
Internal investigations have uncovered no evidence of police misconduct, Chief
Garlock said. Still, local officials recognize that the perception of systemic
racism has opened a wide chasm.
“The situation is very tense,” Mayor David J. Berger said. “Serious threats have
been made. People are starting to carry weapons to protect themselves.”
Surrounded by farm country known for its German Catholic roots and conservative
politics, Lima is the only city in the immediate area with a significant
African-American population. Black families, including Mr. Manley’s, came to
Lima in the 1940s and ’50s for jobs at what is now the Husky Energy Lima
Refinery and other factories along the city’s southern border. Blacks make up 27
percent of the city’s 38,000 people, Mr. Berger said.
Many blacks still live downwind from the refinery. Many whites on the police
force commute from nearby farm towns, where a black face is about as common as a
twisty road. Of Lima’s 77 police officers, two are African-American.
“If I have any frustration when I retire, it’ll be that I wasn’t able to bring
more racial balance to the police force,” said Chief Garlock, who joined the
force in 1971 and has been chief for 11 years.
Tarika Wilson had six children, ages 8 to 1. They were fathered by five men, all
of whom dealt drugs, said Darla Jennings, Ms. Wilson’s mother. But Ms. Wilson
never took drugs nor allowed them to be sold from her house, said Tania Wilson,
her sister.
“She took great care of those kids, without much help from the fathers, and the
community respected her for that,” said Ms. Wilson’s uncle, John Austin.
Tarika Wilson’s companion, Mr. Terry, was the subject of a long-term drug
investigation, Chief Garlock said, but Ms. Wilson was never a suspect.
During the raid, Ms. Wilson’s youngest son, Sincere, was shot in the left
shoulder and hand. Three weeks after the shooting, he remains in fair condition,
said a spokeswoman at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus.
Within minutes of the shooting, at around 8 p.m., 50 people gathered outside Ms.
Wilson’s home and shouted obscenities at the police, neighbors said. The next
day, 300 people gathered at the house and marched two miles to City Hall.
Many protesters believe they saw snipers atop police headquarters. The men on
the roof were actually photographers, Chief Garlock said.
“The police can say whatever they want,” Tania Wilson said. “Even before they
shot my sister, I didn’t trust them.”
Smaller marches have continued every week since the shooting. The N.A.A.C.P.
will hold a public meeting on Saturday to air complaints about police brutality.
The group will soon request that the Department of Justice investigate the
police department and the Allen County prosecutor’s office, Mr. Upthegrove said.
Junior Cook was a neighbor of Tarika Wilson. He says that he watched from his
front porch as the SWAT team raced across his front yard, and that seconds later
he watched a police officer run from Ms. Wilson’s house carrying a bleeding baby
in a blanket.
“The cops in Lima, they is racist like no tomorrow,” said Mr. Cook, 56. “Why
else would you shoot a mother with a baby in her arms?”
Police Shooting of Mother and Infant Exposes a City’s
Racial Tension, NYT, 30.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/30/us/30lima.html
Obama
Cites
Diversity of Voters in Win
January 27,
2008
Filed at 1:02 a.m. ET
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The New York Times
COLUMBIA,
S.C. (AP) -- An exultant Barack Obama said his overwhelming win in South
Carolina disproved notions that Democratic voters are deeply divided along
racial lines.
''We have the most votes, the most delegates, and the most diverse coalition of
Americans we've seen in a long, long time,'' the Illinois senator told joyful
supporters at a rally. ''They are young and old; rich and poor. They are black
and white; Latino and Asian.''
As if anticipating his remarks, his supporters chanted ''Race doesn't matter''
before Obama took the stage in Columbia, and again as he spoke for 20 minutes.
Obama praised runners-up Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards without naming
them. But he took a veiled shot at the sometimes edgy comments made by the
former first lady and former President Clinton in recent days.
''We're looking to fundamentally change the status quo in Washington,'' Obama
said. ''And right now, that status quo is fighting back with everything it's
got; with the same old tactics that divide and distract us from solving the
problems people face.''
''We are up against the idea that it's acceptable to say anything and do
anything to win an election,'' Obama said. ''We know that this is exactly what's
wrong with our politics. This is why people don't believe what their leaders say
anymore. This is why they tune out. And this election is our chance to give the
American people a reason to believe again.''
The crowd repeatedly chanted, ''Yes we can!''
With wins in heavily white Iowa and in South Carolina, where about half of
Saturday's voters were black, Obama said he has proven he can win in any region.
He said he wants to disprove ''the assumption that young people are apathetic''
and ''the assumption that African-Americans can't support the white candidate;
whites can't support the African-American candidate; blacks and Latinos can't
come together.''
Even as he spoke, Obama got a boost from Caroline Kennedy, daughter of the late
President John F. Kennedy.
''Over the years, I've been deeply moved by the people who've told me they
wished they could feel inspired and hopeful about America the way people did
when my father was president,'' she wrote in the Sunday's edition of The New
York Times. ''That is why I am supporting a presidential candidate in the
Democratic primaries, Barack Obama.''
After his speech, Obama flew to Macon, Ga., where he planned to attend a church
service Sunday before campaigning in Birmingham, Ala. He planned to return to
Washington to attend President Bush's State of the Union address Monday night.
Obama Cites Diversity of Voters in Win, NYT, 27.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Obama.html
Strong
Black Vote Gives Obama Win
January 27,
2008
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 12:19 a.m. ET
The New York Times
WASHINGTON
(AP) -- Landslide margins among black voters powered Barack Obama to his win
Saturday in South Carolina's Democratic presidential primary, allowing him to
overcome the telling edge Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards had among
whites.
Blacks made up 55 percent of the voters in Saturday's contest, slightly more
than turned out in the state's primary four years ago and by far their biggest
share in any presidential contest so far this year. Obama won 78 percent of
their votes, with black men and women supporting the Illinois senator by about
that same margin, according to exit polls of Democratic voters conducted
Saturday for The Associated Press and the networks.
Clinton and Edwards split the white vote about equally, with each getting
support from nearly four in 10 and Obama getting about a quarter. Obama's
high-water mark among white voters so far this year has been the 36 percent he
got in New Hampshire, where he finished second overall to Clinton; he also got a
third of the white vote in the year's first contest in Iowa, enough for him to
win overall in that state.
Highlighting the decisive role race played in Saturday's voting, eight in 10 of
Obama's votes came from blacks. About six in 10 of Clinton's and nearly all of
Edwards' came from whites.
One segment of whites with whom Obama did well was young people. He won backing
from half of white voters under age 30, with Clinton and Edwards splitting the
rest. Young white voters, however, made up only about one-twentieth of those who
voted Saturday.
Racial attitudes were also in play in voters' perceptions of how effective the
candidates would be if elected. Whites were far likelier to name Clinton than
Obama as being most qualified to be commander in chief, likeliest to unite the
country and most apt to capture the White House in November. Blacks named Obama
over Clinton by even stronger margins -- two- and three-to one -- in all three
areas.
Following a week of criticism between the Obama and Clinton campaigns in which
race became a factor, Obama's relatively small share of white supporters in
South Carolina could raise questions about his ability to attract those voters
in the crucial Super Tuesday contests on Feb. 5, when nearly half the country
will vote.
Because of his heavy support from blacks, Obama negated the advantage Clinton
has enjoyed among women in most of this year's contests. He got more than half
the female vote, compared with three in 10 supporting Clinton, the New York
senator.
But the gender breakdown was heavily affected by race. Though Obama won eight in
10 votes of black females, Clinton and Edwards led among white women, getting
about four in 10 of their votes, about double Obama's share.
Edwards, the former North Carolina senator, led among white men, garnering about
four in 10 of their votes, with Clinton and Obama about equally sharing the rest.
In a race featuring candidates who would be the country's first female or first
black president, about three-quarters of Democrats said they thought the country
was ready for either historic event to occur. And in a show of general
Democratic satisfaction with their choices, more than eight in 10 overall said
they would be satisfied if Obama were the nominee, while about three-quarters
said the same about Clinton.
Bill Clinton's campaigning in the state -- in which he engaged in some of the
campaign's sharpest attacks on Obama -- was cited as an important factor by
nearly six in 10 voters, including about equal amounts of blacks and whites.
Overall, those who said it was important voted in favor of Obama, though by
smaller margins than those who said it was unimportant, suggesting his effort
may have helped Hillary Clinton slightly.
As has been the pattern in most of the Democratic contests this year, the
economy was cited as the most important issue facing the nation by far, with
about half naming it. About half of those voters backed Obama and about three in
10 supported Clinton. Obama had an even bigger edge among voters naming health
care or the war in Iraq as the top problem.
In another replay of Democratic sentiment from other states' voting, about half
said they wanted a candidate who can bring change, making it the most
sought-after quality. And once again this was dominated by Obama, who has made
it the leading theme of his campaign, as he won three in four voters who named
it.
Obama and Edwards about evenly split the lead among voters who said they wanted
a candidate who feels empathy for people like them. Clinton, as she has done in
the past, won easily among those favoring experience, but they were a small
share of voters, fewer than one in five.
The poll was conducted for AP and the television networks by Edison Media
Research and Mitofsky International as Democratic voters exited 35 sites in
South Carolina. The poll interviewed 1,905 Democratic primary voters and had a
margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
(This version CORRECTS SUBS graf 9 to correct that Edwards shared lead among
white women.)
Strong Black Vote Gives Obama Win, NYT, 27.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Primary-Exit-Poll.html
Analysis:
Racial Divide Could Hurt Obama
January 27,
2008
Filed at 12:33 a.m. ET
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The New York Times
WASHINGTON
(AP) -- The questions surrounding Barack Obama's victory in South Carolina: Was
the split between white and black voters an anomaly in a state were the
Confederate flag still flies on the statehouse grounds? Or has the Clinton
campaign successfully marginalized him as the ''black candidate?''
What's clear is that for Obama to win the nomination, he will have to improve
his performance among white voters over South Carolina. Being the clear favorite
among blacks won't be enough as the candidates turn to 22 states that hold
contests on Feb. 5.
Obama's overwhelming victory over Hillary Rodham Clinton came with 80 percent of
South Carolina's black voters backing him, but only a quarter of whites. Clinton
and former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards each got about a third of the white
vote.
That's a division Obama will have to close if he is to win the nomination.
''The choice in this election is not between regions or religions or genders,''
Obama said in his victory speech Saturday night, delivered with mostly white
supporters seated behind him. ''It's not about rich versus poor, young versus
old, and it is not about black versus white. It's about the past versus the
future.''
Obama has proven that he has appeal among whites. He won Iowa, one of the
whitest states in the country, and won more than a third of white voters in
multi-candidate contests in New Hampshire and Nevada -- even though Clinton won
both states.
But that changed in South Carolina, where racial tensions still run high. The
state delivered a stunning rejection to Hillary Rodham Clinton and perhaps even
more so her husband, famously regarded as the ''first black president.'' The
black voters of South Carolina said they wanted Obama in the White House instead
of another Clinton.
Bill Clinton was the one who worked the state all week long as Obama's chief
critic, even as his wife turned her attention to the states voting on Feb. 5 in
anticipation of the loss. Voters listened -- more than half said the former
president's campaigning was an important factor in their decision, according to
exit polls collected by The Associated Press and television networks. But people
who said Bill Clinton's campaigning made a difference in their vote still
supported Obama.
Among those voters was Iris Gladden, a self-described news junkie and black
voter who lives in rural Timmonsville, S.C. She struggled all year to decide
whether to support Clinton or Obama. She said the decision was made when she
heard Bill Clinton lambaste Obama for his position on the Iraq war. She said she
was offended by the Clintons' air of entitlement and cast her vote Saturday for
Obama.
''He said, `Give me a break, is this a fairy tale,''' Gladden said. ''Even when
he was advised to cut down on it, he didn't. Based on that negativity, I made up
my mind.''
Asked whether Bill Clinton hurt his wife's candidacy, South Carolina Democratic
Rep. Jim Clyburn said, ''I don't know whether he hurt it or not, but I don't
think it was very helpful. I know the early polls I saw a months ago, she was
leading Obama in the state by double digits. So something happened.''
Clyburn said the campaign should move away from race now to talk about the
future of the country.
''I think those people that were campaigning, drawing attention to this man's
race and trying to get him off message, I think those people were rejected
tonight,'' Clyburn said.
But however much Bill Clinton may have hurt his wife's candidacy, his effort may
also have hurt Obama's image as a candidate who can cross racial lines.
Bill Clinton suggested that Obama's victory was an indicator of black support
and not of real strength. ''Jesse Jackson won South Carolina in '84 and '88,''
the former president said Saturday as voters went to the polls. ''Jackson ran a
good campaign. And Obama ran a good campaign here.''
For example, black voters were just 8 percent of the turnout in the California
Democratic primary four years ago. They were 15 percent in Missouri, 20 percent
in New York, 23 percent in Tennessee and 47 percent in Georgia -- all states
that are among those that will vote 10 days after South Carolina.
''He won fair and square,'' Bill Clinton said of Obama Saturday night. ''Now we
go to February 5 when millions of Americans finally get in the act.''
In South Carolina, race was a more important factor than gender. Obama defeated
Clinton among both women and men, winning just more than half the support of
each gender. Clinton won only about three in 10 women overall.
But the gender breakdown was racially tinged. Clinton got four in 10 white
females, compared with a third for Edwards and one in five for Obama. Edwards
won about four in 10 white males, while Clinton and Obama each won about three
in 10.
But, surprisingly, Obama ran almost even with Clinton among white males -- 29
percent to 27 percent -- which the Obama campaign took as a bright sign going
forward.
------
Nedra Pickler covers the Democratic presidential campaign for The Associated
Press.
Analysis: Racial Divide Could Hurt Obama, NYT, 27.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-South-Carolina-Dems-Analysis.html
Today in
History - Jan. 21
January 21,
2008
Filed at 12:05 a.m. ET
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The New York Times
Today is
Monday, Jan. 21, the 21st day of 2008. There are 345 days left in the year. This
is the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday.
Today's Highlight in History:
On Jan. 21, 1958, Charles Starkweather, 19, killed the mother, stepfather and
half-sister of his 14-year-old girlfriend, Caril Ann Fugate, at her family's
home in Lincoln, Neb. (Starkweather, who had also killed a gas station attendant
the previous November, and Fugate went on a road trip which resulted in seven
more slayings. Starkweather was executed in 1959; Fugate, who maintained she had
been Starkweather's hostage, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life; she
was paroled in 1976.)
On this date:
In 1793, during the French Revolution, King Louis the XVI, condemned for
treason, was executed on the guillotine.
In 1858, Felix Marma Zuloaga became president of Mexico upon the ouster of
Ignacio Comonfort.
In 1908, New York City's Board of Aldermen passed an ordinance prohibiting women
from smoking in public. (However, the measure was vetoed by Mayor George B.
McClellan Jr. two weeks later).
In 1915, the first Kiwanis Club was founded, in Detroit.
In 1924, Russian revolutionary Vladimir Lenin died at age 53.
In 1950, former State Department official Alger Hiss, accused of being part of a
Communist spy ring, was found guilty in New York of lying to a grand jury.
(Hiss, who always proclaimed his innocence, served less than four years in
prison.)
In 1954, the first atomic submarine, the USS Nautilus, was launched at Groton,
Conn. (However, the Nautilus did not make its first nuclear-powered run until
nearly a year later).
In 1968, the Battle of Khe Sahn began during the Vietnam War as North Vietnamese
forces attacked a U.S. Marine base; the Americans were able to hold their
position until the siege was lifted 2 1/2 months later.
In 1968, an American B-52 bomber carrying four hydrogen bombs crashed in
Greenland, killing one crew member and scattering radioactive material.
In 1976, the supersonic Concorde jet was put into service by Britain and France.
Ten years ago: President Bill Clinton angrily denied reports he had had an
affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky and then tried to get her
to lie about it. Pope John Paul II began a historic pilgrimage to Cuba. Actor
Jack Lord of ''Hawaii Five-O'' fame died in Honolulu at age 77.
Five years ago: The Census Bureau announced that Hispanics had surpassed blacks
as America's largest minority group. A powerful earthquake shook west-central
Mexico, killing 28 people and leaving 10,000 homeless. A gunman ambushed two
U.S. defense workers in Kuwait, killing one and wounding another. Colombian
rebels kidnapped an American photographer and a British reporter, the first time
foreign journalists were abducted in Colombia's four-decade-long civil war.
(Scott Dalton and Ruth Morris were freed after 11 days in captivity.)
One year ago: Venzuelan President Hugo Chavez told U.S. officials to ''Go to
hell, gringos!'' and called Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice ''missy'' on his
weekly radio and TV show, lashing out at Washington for what he called
unacceptable meddling in his country's affairs. Lovie Smith became the first
black head coach to make it to the Super Bowl when his Chicago Bears won the NFC
championship, beating the New Orleans Saints 39-14; Tony Dungy became the second
when his Indianapolis Colts took the AFC title over the New England Patriots,
38-34.
Today's Birthdays: Actor Paul Scofield is 86. Actress Ann Wedgeworth is 73.
Blues singer-musician Snooks Eaglin is 72. Golfer Jack Nicklaus is 68. Opera
singer Placido Domingo is 67. Singer Richie Havens is 67. Singer Mac Davis is
66. Actress Jill Eikenberry is 61. Country musician Jim Ibbotson (The Nitty
Gritty Dirt Band) is 61. Singer-songwriter Billy Ocean is 58. Actor Robby Benson
is 52. Actress Geena Davis is 52. Basketball player Hakeem Olajuwon is 45.
Actress Charlotte Ross is 40. Actor John Ducey is 39. Actress Karina Lombard is
39. Rapper Levirt (B-Rock and the Bizz) is 38. Rock musician Mark Trojanowski
(Sister Hazel) is 38. Rock DJ Chris Kilmore (Incubus) is 35. Singer Emma Bunton
(Spice Girls) is 32. Rhythm-and-blues singer Nokio (Dru Hill) is 29. Actress
Izabella Miko is 27.
Thought for Today: ''Too bad all the people who know how to run the country are
busy driving taxi cabs and cutting hair.'' -- George Burns, American comedian
(1896-1996).
Today in History - Jan. 21, NYT, 21.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-History.html
Bush
Honors MLK's Memory
January 21,
2008
Filed at 12:06 p.m. ET
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The New York Times
WASHINGTON
(AP) -- President Bush on Monday hailed the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. as a
towering figure and called on the nation's people to honor the slain civil
rights leader by helping those in need.
''Our fellow citizens have got to understand that by loving a neighbor like
you'd like to be loved yourself, by reaching out to someone who hurts, by just
simply living a life of kindness and compassion, you can make America a better
place and fulfill the dream of Martin Luther King,'' Bush said at a library
named for the slain civil rights leader.
With first lady Laura Bush at his side, Bush spoke briefly on the federal
holiday honoring the birthday of King, who would have been 79 on Jan. 15.
An advocate of peaceful resistance and equality for people of all races, King
was assassinated in April 1968.
Bush said that King's holiday offers a chance to ''renew our deep desire for
America to be a land of promise for everybody, a land of justice, and a land of
opportunity.'' He said it should be a ''day on'' of volunteering -- not a day
off -- and encouraged people to do community service year-round.
The setting for Bush was the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library in downtown
Washington. The building features a colorful mural that depicts scenes from
King's life and celebrates his role in the march toward social justice.
''Martin Luther King is a towering figure in the history of our country,'' Bush
said. ''And it is fitting that we honor his service and his courage and his
vision.''
Bush spoke after participating in a story-time session with a handful of
children who grew shy in his presence. The president posted a few pictures on a
bulletin board as the young students learned how King fought to change unfair
laws.
When the kids were asked how they could make the world a better place, none of
them spoke up. So Bush did for them.
''Love your neighbor,'' he said emphatically. ''Volunteer,'' chimed in the first
lady.
Bush has marked the King holiday in different ways during his presidency. Among
other events, he has viewed the Emancipation Proclamation at a special showing
at the National Archives, placed a wreath at King's grave, spoken at a
predominantly black Baptist church and helped spruce up a high school.
Bush Honors MLK's Memory, NYT, 21.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Bush.html
Hundreds
Honor King at Atlanta Church
January 21,
2008
Filed at 2:14 p.m. ET
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The New York Times
ATLANTA
(AP) -- Hundreds of civil rights leaders and others crowded Martin Luther King
Jr.'s Ebenezer Baptist Church on Monday to celebrate the man and his legacy.
''We would be remiss if we did not commemorate Martin Luther King Jr., a
champion of peace in a time of war,'' said Isaac Newton Farris Jr., a nephew of
King.
The King Center has asked the nation to commemorate his birthday for 40 years --
for more years than the civil rights leader lived, Farris said. King was
assassinated at age 39 on April 4, 1968, while standing on the balcony of a
motel in Memphis, Tenn. He would have turned 79 this year.
Farris urged diplomacy, economic incentives and other nonviolent efforts ''as an
alternative to military intervention to end the war in Iraq.''
Former President Bill Clinton, Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee
and Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin were among the dignitaries attending the
ceremony.
''Martin aimed high, acted with faith, dreamed miracles that inspired a nation.
Can we act on King's legacy without dreaming? I think not,'' she said. ''King's
legacy gives light to our hopes, permission to our aspirations and relevance to
our dreams.''
Clinton told the congregation he appointed more black officials in his
administration than all other previous presidents combined ''not because of me,
but because of the influence of Martin Luther King in my life.''
''He freed us all to fight the civil rights battle, to fight the poverty battle,
to fight all these battles and do it together,'' Clinton said. ''He made a place
at the table for all of us. He made the beloved community possible.''
Clinton noted the diverse presidential race that includes a Mormon, a black man
and a Baptist preacher as well as his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
''Isn't this interesting? I mean, how cool is it? You know, we've got all these
different people seeking the presidency,'' he said. ''And guess what? It's all
possible because of Martin Luther King's vision of the beloved community.''
The holiday has been observed at Ebenezer Baptist Church -- where King preached
from 1960 until 1968 -- every year since his death. But it holds a new political
significance this week because it falls closer to primary elections than in past
years, since many states moved up their balloting.
South Carolina, which has a large black electorate in the Democratic primary,
votes on Jan. 26. And King's home state, Georgia, will be part of the Super
Tuesday voting on Feb. 5, along with California, New York and 22 other states.
King's actual birthday is Jan. 15, but the federal holiday is observed on the
third Monday in January. It has been a national holiday since 1986.
His widow, Coretta Scott King, worked for more than a decade to establish her
husband's birthday as a federal holiday. She died in 2006 at age 78.
------
Associated Press writers Daniel Yee and Greg Bluestein in Atlanta contributed to
this report.
Hundreds Honor King at Atlanta Church, NYT, 21.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-King-Holiday.html
Leaders
gather to honor King's legacy
21 January
2008
USA Today
From wire reports
Nearly 40
years after he was assassinated, civil rights and political leaders Monday are
commemorating the life of Martin Luther King Jr. on the holiday that bears his
name.
At Ebenzer
Baptist Church in Atlanta, where King once preached, hundreds of people gathered
to celebrate his legacy.
"We would be remiss if we did not commemorate Martin Luther King Jr., a champion
of peace in a time of war," said Isaac Newton Farris Jr., a nephew of King.
King was
assassinated at age 39 on April 4, 1968, while standing on the balcony of a
motel in Memphis He would have turned 79 this year.
Farris urged diplomacy, economic incentives and other non-violent efforts "as an
alternative to military intervention to end the war in Iraq."
Former president Bill Clinton, Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee
and Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin were among the dignitaries attending the
ceremony. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama spoke at the church
Sunday.
The holiday has been observed at the church — where King preached from 1960
until 1968 — every year since his death. But it holds a new political
significance this week because it falls closer to primary elections than in past
years, since many states moved up their balloting.
South Carolina, which has a large black electorate in the Democratic primary,
votes Jan. 26. And King's home state, Georgia, will be part of the Super Tuesday
voting on Feb. 5, along with California, New York and more than 20 other states.
The top three Democratic presidential contenders planned to join thousands of
others Monday in a march in Columbia, S.C. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Obama and
John Edwards planned to appear at an NAACP-sponsored march to the state Capitol,
where the Confederate flag still flies on the grounds.
In Washington, President Bush hailed King as a towering figure and called on the
country to honor his legacy by showing compassion to those in need.
"It's fitting that we honor his service and his courage and his vision," Bush
said during a visit to the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library with first
lady Laura Bush.
The president said that the federal holiday in King's memory is "an opportunity
to renew our deep desire for America to be a land of promise to everybody."
King's actual birthday is Jan. 15, but the federal holiday is observed on the
third Monday in January. It has been a national holiday since 1986.
His widow, Coretta Scott King, worked for more than a decade to establish her
husband's birthday as a federal holiday. She died in 2006 at age 78.
Contributing: Associated Press; Kathy Kiely in Columbia, S.C.
Leaders gather to honor King's legacy, UT, 21.1.2008,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-01-21-mlk-monday_N.htm
Historians Fear MLK's Legacy Being Lost
January 21,
2008
Filed at 9:23 a.m. ET
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The New York Times
NEW YORK
(AP) -- Nearly 40 years after the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King
Jr., some say his legacy is being frozen in a moment in time that ignores the
full complexity of the man and his message.
''Everyone knows -- even the smallest kid knows about Martin Luther King -- can
say his most famous moment was that 'I have a dream' speech,'' said Henry Louis
Taylor Jr., professor of urban and regional planning at the University of
Buffalo. ''No one can go further than one sentence. All we know is that this guy
had a dream. We don't know what that dream was.''
King was working on anti-poverty and anti-war issues at the time of his death.
He had spoken out against the Vietnam War and was in Memphis when he was killed
in April 1968 in support of striking sanitation workers.
King had come a long way from the crowds who cheered him at the 1963 March on
Washington, when he was introduced as ''the moral leader of our nation'' -- and
when he pronounced ''I have a dream'' on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.
By taking on issues outside segregation, he had lost the support of many
newspapers and magazines, and his relationship with the White House had
suffered, said Harvard Sitkoff, a professor of history at the University of New
Hampshire who has written a recently published book on King.
''He was considered by many to be a pariah,'' Sitkoff said.
But he took on issues of poverty and militarism because he considered them vital
''to make equality something real and not just racial brotherhood but equality
in fact,'' Sitkoff said.
Scholarly study of King hasn't translated into the popular perception of him and
the civil rights movement, said Richard Greenwald, professor of history at Drew
University.
''We're living increasingly in a culture of top 10 lists, of celebrity biopics
which simplify the past as entertainment or mythology,'' he said. ''We lose a
view on what real leadership is by compressing him down to one window.''
That does a disservice to both King and society, said Melissa Harris-Lacewell,
professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University.
By freezing him at that point, by putting him on a pedestal of perfection that
doesn't acknowledge his complex views, ''it makes it impossible both for us to
find new leaders and for us to aspire to leadership,'' Harris-Lacewell said.
She believes it's important for Americans in 2008 to remember how disliked King
was before his death in April 1968.
''If we forget that, then it seems like the only people we can get behind must
be popular,'' Harris-Lacewell said. ''Following King meant following the
unpopular road, not the popular one.''
In becoming an icon, King's legacy has been used by people all over the
political spectrum, said Glenn McNair, associate professor of history at Kenyon
College.
He's been part of the 2008 presidential race, in which Barack Obama could be the
country's first black president. Obama has invoked King, and Sen. John Kerry
endorsed Obama by saying ''Martin Luther King said that the time is always right
to do what is right.''
Not all the references have been received well. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton came
under fire when she was quoted as saying King's dream of racial equality was
realized only when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of
1964.
King has ''slipped into the realm of symbol that people use and manipulate for
their own purposes,'' McNair said.
Harris-Lacewell said that is something people need to push back against.
''It's not OK to slip into flat memory of who Dr. King was, it does no justice
to us and makes him to easy to appropriate,'' she said. ''Every time he gets
appropriated, we have to come out and say that's not OK. We do have the ability
to speak back.''
Historians Fear MLK's Legacy Being Lost, NYT, 21.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-MLK-Legacy.html
Hundreds
Gather
at King's Atlanta Church
January 21,
2008
Filed at 1:00 p.m. ET
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The New York Times
ATLANTA
(AP) -- Hundreds of civil rights leaders and others crowded Martin Luther King
Jr.'s Ebenezer Baptist Church on Monday to the celebrate the man and his legacy.
''We would be remiss if we did not commemorate Martin Luther King Jr., a
champion of peace in a time of war,'' said Isaac Newton Farris Jr., a nephew of
King.
The King Center has asked the nation to commemorate his birthday for 40 years --
for more years than the civil rights leader lived, Farris said. King was
assassinated at age 39 on April 4, 1968, while standing on the balcony of a
motel in Memphis, Tenn. He would have turned 79 this year.
Farris urged diplomacy, economic incentives and other nonviolent efforts ''as an
alternative to military intervention to end the war in Iraq.''
Former President Bill Clinton, Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee
and Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin were among the dignitaries attending the
ceremony.
''Martin aimed high, acted with faith, dreamed miracles that inspired a nation.
Can we act on King's legacy without dreaming? I think not,'' she said. ''King's
legacy gives light to our hopes, permission to our aspirations and relevance to
our dreams.''
Clinton told the congregation he appointed more black officials in his
administration than all other previous presidents combined ''not because of me,
but because of the influence of Martin Luther King in my life.''
''He freed us all to fight the civil rights battle, to fight the poverty battle,
to fight all these battles and do it together,'' Clinton said. ''He made a place
at the table for all of us. He made the beloved community possible.''
Clinton noted the diverse presidential race that includes a Mormon, a black man
and a Baptist preacher as well as his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
''How cool is it? You got all these different people seeking the presidency,''
he said. ''And guess what? It's all possible because of Martin Luther King's
vision of the beloved community.''
The holiday has been observed at Ebenezer Baptist Church -- where King preached
from 1960 until 1968 -- every year since his death. But it holds a new political
significance this week because it falls closer to primary elections than in past
years, since many states moved up their balloting.
South Carolina, which has a large black electorate in the Democratic primary,
votes on Jan. 26. And King's home state, Georgia, will be part of the Super
Tuesday voting on Feb. 5, along with California, New York and 22 other states.
King's actual birthday is Jan. 15, but the federal holiday is observed on the
third Monday in January. It has been a national holiday since 1986.
His widow, Coretta Scott King, worked for more than a decade to establish her
husband's birthday as a federal holiday. She died in 2006 at age 78.
Hundreds Gather at King's Atlanta Church, NYT, 21.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-King-Holiday.html
40 years
after the riots,
King's vision 'unfinished'
20 January
2008
USA Today
By Marisol Bello and Judy Keen
Four
decades later, the rioting sparked by the assassination of civil rights icon
Martin Luther King Jr. is a fading memory to many Americans, preserved on grainy
photographs and film.
In many of
the 125 cities that were hit by violence, however, the images remain vivid —
especially the fires and destruction that symbolized the outrage in mostly
African-American neighborhoods, and that continue to reshape them today. At a
time when whites were leaving cities for the suburbs, the rioting that left 46
people dead, 2,600 injured and 21,000 arrested hastened the departure of
middle-class black families — and made King's dream of equality and opportunity
seem more distant in the very neighborhoods where his message had resonated.
Today, some
of the neighborhoods hit hardest by the rioting are experiencing a rebirth.
Others are still struggling to heal.
In Washington, the once-charred corridors along H Street Northeast and 14th
Street Northwest have condos and nightclubs that attract young singles, whose
arrival has energized the area — but raised concerns that the remaining black
families won't be able to afford to stay as redevelopment continues.
Elsewhere, the outlook is less encouraging: On Kansas City's east side, poverty
and blight have overwhelmed hopes of restoring a once-vibrant neighborhood
devastated by the rioting after King was assassinated in Memphis on April 4,
1968.
And in Chicago's North Lawndale area, there is disappointment that a community
of historic homes where King himself once lived has not rebounded in a
significant way.
The riots were the crest in a wave of civil unrest in the 1960s that led a
national commission to warn a month before King's slaying that the USA was
"moving toward two societies, one white, one black — separate and unequal."
At the time of his death, King had been planning a campaign against poverty.
Today, the neighborhoods in Washington, Kansas City and Chicago reflect the
challenge of his dream of equal opportunity for minorities and the poor.
"Dr. King's final battle was a battle of economics," says Marc Morial, president
of the National Urban League. "Disparity in America has to be at the top of the
national agenda again. Dr. King said it in 1968, and it remains true. This is
his unfinished work."
As
Americans commemorate King's birthday, USA TODAY asked those who endured the
rioting in Washington, Kansas City and Chicago to describe the progress and
challenges in their neighborhoods.
Hope in
Washington
The once-vibrant H Street corridor, decimated by the riots, is coming back. Just
ask Anwar Saleem.
The 53-year-old entrepreneur grew up in the predominantly black neighborhood
surrounding H Street NE. He owns a hair salon and two buildings on the strip.
Saleem was 13 when the looting and violence erupted. He remembers the smoldering
buildings that stood untouched for years. As an adult, he saw the crime and drug
problems fueled by the neglect.
Today, he sees change.
During the past two years, bars and indie-rock venues have opened next to hair
braiding salons, barber shops and mom-and-pop retailers. A 476-unit luxury
apartment complex is scheduled to be completed by next month, and Saleem and
other business owners are trying to attract a high-end grocery store.
Prices for the old retail buildings are up from an average of $125,000 five
years ago to about $500,000 today, says Saleem, who founded a group called H
Street Main Street to promote local businesses.
"I think Dr. King would have wanted any neighborhood to be economically viable,"
he says. "And in H Street, people of all races do business together. I think Dr.
King's legacy is playing out here now."
About 60% of the stores on H Street today are black-owned, and about half of
those owners also own their buildings, Saleem says. "We didn't have that
opportunity in '68," he says. "We have it now."
The business district's re-emergence — aided by its closeness to downtown
Washington and a subway system that has been built since the riots — has created
what amounts to two neighborhoods.
By day, many African-Americans who moved away maintain their ties to H Street in
errands to banks and pharmacies. They frequent the black-owned barber shops and
salons and the dwindling number of familiar stores.
"I used to know every store owner," says Michael Watts, 35, who grew up a block
from the strip and worked part-time in several of the stores when he was a teen.
"Now it's different. There are a lot of changes on H Street."
At night, new residents in the neighborhood seem to take over, cramming the hip
bars and restaurants. The newcomers are mostly young, professional and white.
Dakota Bixler, 24, raised on a farm in South Dakota, and Michelle Warren, 25,
from suburban Maryland, have rented a partly renovated five-bedroom house off of
H Street since September.
"A few years ago, it was not so wise to live here, but they're really cleaning
it up," says Bixler, a U.S. Senate aide.
The revival brings hope but also worries for longtime residents and business
owners such as George Butler. After the riots, Butler opened his men's store,
George's Place, at 10th and H streets NE with the help of a government grant.
He's happy that the transformation means more police patrols, new store facades
and cleaner sidewalks, but he fears that King's dream of equal opportunity will
be threatened if blacks are pushed out as the neighborhood gentrifies.
"The neighborhood now has taken a different type of turn because what they're
trying to do here is to bring another Georgetown to this area," says Butler, 68,
referring to Washington's tony historic neighborhood.
Such concerns about H Street's revival stem from what has happened in
Washington's other riot corridor, the area around 14th and U streets NW. Trendy
bars and expensive condos have replaced family-owned stores, which were pushed
out by rising taxes and high-end stores.
"Hardly any African-Americans live on 14th Street," says Walter Fauntroy, who
grew up near 14th and U and was King's representative in Washington.
"If you go to every major city in the country where low- and moderate-income
people lived on valuable city land, it's now being gentrified," he says. "They
are moving all those people out. … If ever we needed the kind of programs that
Martin Luther King Jr. had in mind, we need them now."
Butler, who also is concerned that black residents are being "priced out of this
city, and this corridor," doesn't want his business to be left behind. He plans
to sell more polo shirts, button-down collared shirts and khakis that he hopes
will appeal to the new residents.
"I've got to change my operations," he says. "I've got to do a whole lot of
shifting if I'm going to stay on this corner."
In Kansas
City, it 'all fell apart'
On the forlorn streets in parts of Kansas City's east side, where one-third of
the mostly black residents live in poverty and one-fifth of the buildings are
vacant, King's dream labors under crushing unemployment and poverty.
It wasn't always this way. Back when Rep. Emanuel Cleaver moved to the city in
1968 and worked as an organizer for the Southern Christian Leadership
Conference, low- and middle-income blacks lived together on the east side.
Doctors, dentists, teachers, even a few pro football players for the Kansas City
Chiefs lived in the same neighborhood.
As fair housing laws were passed and blacks had more options, those who could
afford it started moving out. The riots of 1968 accelerated the exodus, says
Cleaver, who in 1991 became Kansas City's first black mayor. Eventually, those
left behind were poor blacks.
"Things that were meant for good in turn created bad," Cleaver says.
"Middle-class African-Americans were gone from the urban core, and that wreaks
havoc in the lives of the people remaining."
Today, the areas destroyed in 1968 have seen little change. One of the rioting
hot spots, at 31st and Prospect streets, was rebuilt with a library, fast-food
joints and a strip mall, but other areas have not recovered. Vacant lots
dominate the landscape, broken up by shuttered or run-down buildings and an
occasional small store.
Three days of rioting left six dead and 312 buildings damaged. The violence
began April 9 after police fired tear gas at 1,000 high school students who had
gathered at City Hall to protest schools staying open the day of King's funeral.
The areas that saw the most unrest are in the 3rd District, which has lost 60%
of its population since 1960, more than any other part of the city. Now, 70,000
people live there, down from almost 170,000 in 1960.
Opal Blankinship, 78, moved out seven years ago after her home was burglarized
three times in 13 months. She and her husband, former city councilman G.
Lawrence Blankinship, lived there 48 years. As families left, crime worsened.
Shirley Briscoe has seen the impact of white and middle-class black flight. The
community spirit that bound the residents of her block has unraveled, she says.
When Briscoe and her husband bought their four-bedroom bungalow 42 years ago in
a working-class neighborhood called Ivanhoe, it was on a street of
well-manicured lawns, moms who joined the PTA and movies in a nearby park.
"There's a lot of history here, but that all fell apart after the riots," says
Briscoe, 74. "As the years went by, families moved in and out. It was more
transient."
Overall, blacks in Kansas City haven't fared well since 1968, says Gwendolyn
Grant, president of the Urban League of Kansas City. "In every quality-of-life
area, health, education, economics, social justice, we lag behind. … None of the
things Dr. King dreamed of reached this place."
In Kansas City, she says, blacks are three times more likely than whites to be
unemployed and half as likely to have access to quality health care, a pattern
consistent with what nationwide studies have found. "We have a whole lot more
work to do," Grant says, "to make Dr. King's dream a reality."
Impatience
in Chicago
Driving through North Lawndale reminiscing about the shoe stores, dress shops
and theaters that once prospered in the Chicago neighborhood, Art Turner lists
the reasons the area should be booming again: The Loop, as Chicago's downtown is
known, is 10 minutes away. Two interstates and three El (rail) lines are nearby.
Historic greystone houses line the streets.
He's frustrated and disappointed by the lack of progress since 1968. "There has
been some improvement," he says, "but no one would have thought it would take 40
years."
Turner grew up in North Lawndale, watched as scores of businesses burned in the
riots, left to attend college in Indiana, then came home.
"The scars were still there," says Turner, 57, a Democrat who represents the
neighborhood in the Illinois House. "I always felt that all those vacant lots,
all those old burned-out buildings would eventually be businesses again. It
never happened."
No other Chicago neighborhood has more vacant lots. In 1960, 124,937 people
lived in North Lawndale. Today, there are 41,768. More than 40% of them are in
families with incomes below the federal poverty line, about $20,650 for a family
of four.
Every few blocks, there are a couple of new condos or a restored old home, but
the housing slump has left many unsold. On South Hamlin Avenue, where King lived
briefly in 1966 during a fair housing campaign, litter clutters the vacant lot
where his tenement stood.
There's a new community center and a health clinic in the neighborhood. There
are new small businesses. A high school is being built. On Roosevelt Road, a new
Starbucks is near a large chain grocery.
There's concern, Turner says, that the grocery might close soon — another
potential setback, because other franchises won't move into the neighborhood
unless such anchor stores are there already. Strip malls have been lured into
the neighborhood by tax incentives, then the stores quickly found they couldn't
make it, Turner says.
It's difficult to attract people without basic services such as groceries and
good schools. The blinking blue lights that identify police surveillance cameras
in high-crime areas also seem to discourage potential newcomers from settling in
North Lawndale.
When Zelma McMillan moved to North Lawndale in the 1950s, she thought her family
was "moving up in the world." Unlike their old neighborhood closer to downtown,
there were grand stone houses, thriving shops and people of all races. She felt
safe. She had never seen so many trees and flowers.
Things began to change in the early 1960s. Many white families moved away, but
everything you needed was within a few blocks, people still looked after each
other and "everybody had a mother and father in the household."
Then King was assassinated. The neighborhood erupted, and the North Lawndale
that McMillan loved was consumed by rage and flames.
David Dawley, a white community organizer in North Lawndale during the riots,
remembers how the unrest began: "It was spontaneous combustion. The sidewalks
were full of students shaking their fists and walking. … Then they started
attacking white-owned stores. I saw a friend throw a trash barrel through a
window. Pretty soon there were walls of flame everywhere."
McMillan, 60, is still waiting for her neighborhood's rebirth. A full-time
volunteer at Operation Brotherhood, a community center, she walks six blocks
from home to work feeling grateful for the cops who often are parked on the
corner. King's message of hope feels distant to her now. "He's not a force in
our lives," she says.
Many of North Lawndale's problems exist in other inner-city neighborhoods in
Chicago and across the country, but longtime residents say King's death and the
riots were catalysts for North Lawndale's decline.
"Our community just went down with the fires," says Sandrel Scott, 59. "That's
what started our … deep hopelessness. We just didn't build ourselves back up.
We've never had another leader like him to instill pride in us."
Willie Brooks, 55, a daughter of Mississippi sharecroppers who moved to the
neighborhood when she was 13 and already in awe of King, still believes in his
dream. She's less certain about North Lawndale's future, though.
"It's coming back," she says, "but it will never be like it was before."
40 years after the riots, King's vision 'unfinished', UT,
20.1.2008,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-01-20-riots-cover_N.htm
Obama's
rise
stuns observers
of U.S. race relations
Mon Jan 7,
2008
11:40am EST
Reuters
By Matthew Bigg -Analysis
MANCHESTER,
New Hampshire (Reuters) - Barack Obama's sudden ascendancy to front-runner
status among Democrats vying for the White House has opened what could be a new
chapter in race relations in America.
Observers of the U.S. debate over race say that however fleeting this may be,
Obama's victory in last week's Iowa caucuses shatters an assumption about black
Americans in national politics. Iowa is largely white and rural.
The Illinois senator would be the first black president and several commentators
and voters said the excitement over his candidacy has led them to imagine a
softening of their long-held skepticism about black-white relations in the
United States.
"Obama has stepped up out of the script and we are in uncharted waters," said
William Jelani Cobb, history professor at Atlanta's Spelman College and the
author of a recent book of essays on contemporary black culture.
Obama, 46, leads Sen. Hillary Clinton, 60, in opinion polls in New Hampshire,
which votes on Tuesday in the state-by-state process of choosing Republican and
Democratic candidates for November's election to succeed President George W.
Bush.
Cobb said Obama's win in Iowa was striking because historically the first blacks
to break into fields traditionally dominated by whites succeeded by offering
continuity rather than reform.
Obama's campaign has stood for change.
RACIAL GAP
The sharp gap between America's white majority and blacks who make up around 13
percent of the population challenges the nation's sense of itself as a place of
boundless opportunity.
African Americans on average experience higher mortality rates than whites and
lower life expectancy despite a black middle class that has grown since the
civil rights movement in the 1960s. They also earn far less on average and are
more likely to be arrested, charged and incarcerated.
Those disparities are most stark in inner cities and have stoked debate between
civil rights leaders and others who highlight prejudice as a cause.
Conservatives say blacks should take responsibility for solving their problems.
Obama's appeal to white voters stems in part from his multicultural heritage as
a child of a white American mother and a Kenyan father who grew up in Hawaii and
Indonesia, commentators and voters said.
That and his optimistic message set him apart from other black politicians and
helps him appear non-threatening, allowing many Democratic voters to feel good
about his Iowa victory as a heartwarming story.
"To become that first black president, he doesn't seem to be looking at it from
that point of view. He just wants people to vote for him because he's the right
candidate," said Francis Charfauros, a coffee shop manager in Scottsdale,
Arizona.
Obama has also followed Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick and other black
politicians who distanced themselves when they ran for office from civil rights
leaders such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson who crusade primarily for racial
justice.
"He (Obama) is not fire-and-brimstone like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. He's
an individual like the rest of us. We're not going to a revival meeting," said
Al Bourque, a white retiree living in Portsmouth, N.H.
"I don't even think of him as being black. I'm looking at him as an individual.
He appears thoughtful and exudes a lot of confidence," said Bourque, who
supports Obama after vacillating between him and Clinton.
"RACE
NEUTRALITY"
One effect of that "race neutrality" is that voters might consider him an
exception, said author and commentator Earl Ofari Hutchinson, who has written
books on race and politics.
"Obama is able to elevate himself to the broader American public," he said.
"There's always been this thing of black exceptionalism, to take and elevate
some African Americans and say: 'You are different. You are well spoken,
intelligent.'"
The next major Democratic primary after New Hampshire is on January 26 in the
southern state of South Carolina, where Clinton has built a strong base in the
large black community, which traditionally votes for Democratic candidates.
A brutal system of racial segregation prevailed in the South until the 1960s and
no black has been elected to the U.S. Senate from the region for over a century.
Some older black leaders were reluctant to embrace Obama because they viewed
so-called progressive whites such as Clinton as the best avenue for black
interests while younger black voters were more likely to embrace Obama, analysts
said.
But he might struggle to appeal to white voters in the South and parts of the
country with a higher percentage of blacks than Iowa and New Hampshire, they
said.
"As you get a larger number of black people in a community then you get racial
tensions and divisions and racial attitudes harden," said Juan Williams, who has
written books and made films about black history.
"Obama is giving us a brilliant demonstration of progress in race relations but
to suggest that his success is proof that race is no longer an issue is naive or
deceptive," he said.
(Additional reporting by Mark Egan and Fred Katayama in New Hampshire, Andrea
Hopkins in Cincinnati, Peter Bohan in Chicago and Tim Gaynor in Phoenix)
(Editing by Howard Goller)
Obama's rise stuns observers of U.S. race relations, R,
7.1.2008,
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0739754020080107
Daring
to Believe,
Blacks Savor Obama Victory
January 5,
2008
The New York Times
By DIANE CARDWELL
For Sadou
Brown in a Los Angeles suburb, the decisive victory of Senator Barack Obama in
Iowa was a moment to show his 14-year-old son what is possible.
For Mike Duncan in Maryland, it was a sign that Americans were moving beyond
rigid thinking about race.
For Milton Washington in Harlem, it looked like the beginning of something he
never thought that he would see. “It was like, ‘Oh, my God, we’re on the cusp of
something big about to happen,’ ” Mr. Washington said.
How Mr. Obama’s early triumph will play out in the presidential contest remains
to be seen, and his support among blacks is hardly monolithic.
But in dozens of interviews on Friday from suburbs of Houston to towns outside
Chicago and rural byways near Birmingham, Ala., African-Americans voiced pride
and amazement over his victory on Thursday and the message it sent, even if they
were not planning to vote for him or were skeptical that he could win in
November.
“My goodness, has it ever happened before, a black man, in our life, in our
country?” asked Edith Lambert, 60, a graduate student in theology who was having
lunch at the Faneuil Hall Marketplace in Boston.
“It makes me feel proud that at a time when so many things are going wrong in
the world that people can rise above past errors,” added Ms. Lambert, who said
she had not decided whom to vote for. “It shows that people aren’t thinking
small. They’re thinking large, outside the box.”
Other black presidential candidates, like Shirley A. Chisholm and the Rev. Jesse
Jackson, have excited voters in the past. Mr. Jackson won primaries in 1984 and
1988.
Over and over, blacks said Mr. Obama’s achievement in Iowa, an overwhelmingly
white state, made him seem a viable crossover candidate, a fresh face with the
first real shot at capturing a major party nomination.
“People across America, even in Iowa of all places, can look across the color
line and see the person,” said Mr. Brown, 35, who was working at the reception
desk at DK’s Hair Design near Ladera Heights, a wealthy Los Angeles suburb.
Describing himself as a “huge, huge supporter,” of Mr. Obama, Mr. Brown added:
“So many times, our young people only have sports stars or musicians to look up
to. But now, when we tell them to go to school, to aim high in life, they have a
face to put with the ambition.”
Mildred Kerr, 68, a Republican who took her granddaughter to the salon for a
trim and added that she did not plan to vote for Mr. Obama, said she was
nonetheless happy that he had won, because he “can now have the encouragement to
go on and pursue a victory.”
George F. Knox, 64, a lawyer and civic leader in Miami who supports Mr. Obama’s
candidacy, made a similar point.
“The notion is mind-boggling,” Mr. Knox said. “When a virtual mandate to
continue comes out of a place like Iowa, with only a 2 percent black population,
it’s very important.”
Several blacks said Mr. Obama’s victory with a campaign not based on race could
herald the emergence of a new political calculus.
“I think he’s already made a significant change in the mindset of people,” said
Mike Duncan, 55, an Amtrak manager in Abingdon, Md. “Across the board, I’m glad
to see that whites and blacks are beginning to understand that blacks can
represent them and also be successful at it.”
Shannon Brown, 17, a high school senior on the South Side of Chicago, said she
was thrilled that she would be eligible to vote by Election Day.
“I’ve actually seen him around the neighborhood and had conversations with him,”
Ms. Brown said, calling Mr. Obama’s candidacy “history in the making” and “a
wonderful experience for us as a people.”
She added, “It’s something I will be able to tell my kids when I grow up, that I
voted for the first black president.”
Several supporters of Mr. Obama said they liked him for reasons other than race,
including what they saw as his interest in stemming injustice and his projection
of sincerity.
“I identify just because everything they ask, he is straightforward,” said
Charlette Fleming, 26, an insurance agent who was buying lunch at a mall in The
Woodlands, a suburb 30 miles north of Houston. “They put him on the spot because
he did marijuana. I’ve never done drugs before. But he was: ‘O.K., I did it. I’m
not going to deny that I did it.’ He’s not trying to hide anything he’s done.
He’s out in the open.”
Some voters said Mr. Obama’s heritage as the son of a white mother and an
African father meant that he was not exactly black, but added that it allowed
him to appeal to more people.
“He’s demonstrated that a mixed-race guy with a Muslim name can get far,” said
Tony Clayton, 43, as he had his shoes shined at the Metro station at L’Enfant
Plaza in Washington. Mr. Clayton was referring to Mr. Obama’s middle name,
Hussein.
“He has crossover appeal,” Mr. Clayton said, “and because of that he could win
in a general election.”
Others looked to the emotional force that an Obama presidency could wield for
African-Americans and dismissed the notion raised by some analysts that his
background would make it difficult for American blacks to identify with him.
“The psychological advantage of waking up knowing and seeing almost every day
the leader of the free world as a member of your own tribe brings pride even to
the most cynical critic,” said Michael Eric Dyson, 49, a professor at Georgetown
University and an Obama supporter who has studied racial identity. “Maybe this
psychic, internal emotional turmoil that black people struggle against will
somehow be lessened by seeing the image of a black man in charge.”
Even amid the joy over the dawning sense that Mr. Obama could indeed become
president there were hesitancy and doubt.
“Right now, it’s too good to be true, and I think most of us don’t want to get
our hopes up too high,” said Eboni Anthony, 28, manager of Carol’s Daughter,
which sells scented candles, soaps and moisturizers across the street from Fort
Greene Park in Brooklyn. “I think racism is as alive as it was 30 years ago.
“I would love to believe in a fairy tale of having a black president. But I
don’t believe the whole United States would agree to it.”
In Harlem, Mr. Washington, a 37-year-old manager of business development for a
medical health research company, expressed similar skepticism.
“Listen, I’ve lived in the sticks, so I know how this country is,” said Mr.
Washington, who is half Korean and has lived in Mississippi, Oklahoma, Indiana
and Virginia. “In the beginning, it was like, ‘I’d love a black dude, especially
a black dude like that in the office.’ But I didn’t think it was possible.”
At the Bessemer Flea Market near Birmingham, Jasper V. Hall, 69, said: “I was
hoping he didn’t win. I didn’t want him to get shot.”
Mr. Hall, an electrical worker who said he had changed his party affiliation
from Republican to support Mr. Obama, added, “Hopefully he can win and stay
alive.”
He said he felt Mr. Obama was the candidate who best represented him and
understood his struggles.
“You know that ceiling,” Mr. Hall said. “You’re not going to see it flashing
back at you, but you know it’s up there. No matter how good, how smart, how much
money you have. You’re going to see that ceiling that’s going to reflect and
stop you.
“It’s the same ceiling that gets poor people, Hispanic people. It’s the same
ceiling. I’m ready for someone to break that ceiling.”
Reporting was contributed by James Barron, Timothy Williams and John Eligon from
New York; Lakiesha R. Carr and Holli Chmela from Washington; Rebecca Cathcart
from Los Angeles; Brenda Goodman from Birmingham, Ala.; Rachel Mosteller from
Houston; Susan Saulny from Chicago; Kirk Semple from Miami; and Katie Zezima
from Boston.
Daring to Believe, Blacks Savor Obama Victory, NYT,
5.1.2008,
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/05/us/politics/05race.html
|