History > 2007 > UK > Nature / Weather (II)
'I don't want to die'
screams drowning teenager
July 31, 2007
From Times Online
David Byers
A teenager stranded in the floods climbed a tree in pitch darkness and
screamed to passers by before a branch snapped and he plunged into the water and
drowned, it was disclosed today.
Mitchell Taylor, 19, who could not swim, was caught by surprise on his way home
from a night out in Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire, in the early hours of Saturday,
July 21, after months of rainfall fell in an overnight deluge and left him
stranded in a submerged field near the town's historic abbey.
As he struggled up a tree and clung to a branch, Mitchell shouted: "I can't
swim. Please help me. I don't want to die."
A couple walking nearby, Andy and Vicki Haines, revealed today that they heard
him shout but could not see where his voice was coming from in the darkness.
After calling 999, the couple waded into the water along with two others in an
attempt to try to find him as a Sea King helicopter searched overhead, but
no-one could see where the shouts were coming from.
"Then we heard a branch crack and a splash and we went mad, and shouted at him
to speak to us. It seemed like forever," Mrs Haines, 31, told the Western Daily
Press newspaper today.
"He kept saying ’I can’t swim, please help me, I don’t want to die’ and my
friend Angela said ’We don’t want you to die. Just hold on and we’ll save you;
it’ll be ok’.
"We tried again to give directions to the 999 operator saying which abbey window
he was near.
"After about three more exchanges after the branch cracked we didn’t hear from
him again, and it went quiet."
Cold and distraught, the four eventually went back home knowing it would be too
dangerous to swim out to the teenager.
The next day they returned to the scene, but could not reach the trees where
they last heard his cries because of rising flood waters.
Today, Gloucestershire Police confirmed that the body that had been discovered
in receding floodwaters in Tewkesbury last weekend was that of missing Mitchell.
It is believed he had been walking across the playing field, which had flooded
suddenly as the deluge of rainwater fell, on his way back home after a night out
at a bar in the town.
The teenager, known as Mitch, is believed to have worked as a part-time barman
and was hoping to go to university.
Flowers and tributes were today seen to have been left the near the scene, which
lies just a few hundred metres away from Tewkesbury Rugby Club, where Bram Lane,
64, and his son Chris, 27, were found dead last Thursday morning. The pair had
worked through the night to clear flood water from the cellar of the clubhouse,
but were overcome with fumes from a petrol powered pump.
As the youngster's identity was confirmed today, Severn Trent Water disclosed
that the majority of the 140,000 households in Gloucestershire cut off when the
Mythe water treatment works in Tewkesbury flooded had now seen their water
supplies restored. However, those whose supply has been restored were still
being warned that it was not yet safe to drink.
"We understand people still without water are anxious to learn when their water
is coming back on, but it’s very difficult to give exact timescales and specific
locations," Martin Kane, Severn Trent’s director of customer services, said
today.
"We are aiming to have 80 per cent of homes back on supply within 24 hours. We
must remind customers that when water is restored, it must not be used for
drinking, even after boiling."
It can be used for showering, bathing, flushing toilets and washing clothes, he
added.
In the meantime, emergency drinking water will continue to be supplied from
bowsers, or water tanks, and bottles in the area. Severn Trent said there are
1,000 bowsers in affected areas and five million litres of bottled water were
being handed out every day.
'I don't want to die'
screams drowning teenager, Ts online, 31.7.2007,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2174272.ece
Mains water to return
to some flooded homes
Monday July 30, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Roxanne Escobales
After 11 days of deluges and shortages, residents in flooded
Gloucestershire today received some good news, of sorts, with news that water
supplies would start flowing to almost half of the properties cut off from the
mains supply.
Residents are being warned, however, that the water cannot be
used for drinking or cooking, even if boiled: it is exclusively for sanitary
purposes, such as bathing, flushing toilets and washing clothes.
Water will start flowing to around 60,000 homes through 1,000 miles of empty
pipes. Severn Trent Water's Martin Kane said the company aimed to get all
130,000 properties without running water reconnected by August 5.
But it remained unclear how long it would take to get safe drinking water into
homes and businesses. Mr Kane urged people affected to "please be patient while
we work through this plan".
Gloucestershire's chief police constable, Tim Brain, said: "Please show patience
and forbearance. Supplies are returning; it may be a few hours or a few days
away."
Water supplies were cut off after the water treatment plant at Mythe, in
Tewkesbury, was submerged.
The police, the water company and representatives from the local and public
health authorities stood side by side as they announced the latest developments.
All services thanked the army for managing the rescue and aid efforts. The
military will withdraw and hand over control of the area to the local
authorities by 8pm.
More than 2m litres of bottled drinking water have been handed out since the
floods struck, on July 20. Julie Girling , of Gloucestershire County, said extra
recycling facilities would be set up so plastic bottles could be disposed of
properly.
The reconnected mains supply in Cheltenham and nearby areas will be pumping
water from tomorrow.
From this afternoon, pumping will begin in the following areas:
· Quedgely
· Bishop's Cleeve
· Prestbury
· Gloucester
· Churchdown
· Eastern Ave
· Longlevens
· Treadworth
· Abbeymead
· Abbeydale
· Barnwood
· Tuffley
· Podsmead
· Sandhurst
Mains water to return to
some flooded homes, G, 30.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2137906,00.html
Leading Article:
Questions now the rain has stopped
The Independent
Published: 30 July 2007
It seems safe to say that the worst of the flooding that afflicted central
and western England is now over. The weekend rain was not as heavy as forecast,
and yesterday the sun came out. Running water was restored to several hundred
people, although it is not yet safe to drink, and some may have to wait two
weeks before full service is resumed.
But the subsiding of the water is only the beginning of an aftermath that will
be long and costly. For many households, the disruption of not having a
habitable home will be aggravated by the unavoidable dealings with insurers,
builders and banks. And revelations about the bonuses paid to officials at the
Environment Agency are hardly likely to lift their mood.
Pay arrangements for agency officials and the precise demarcation of
responsibilities between this quango and the Environment department are both
questions that now cry out to be asked. But there are many others.
The obvious one, exemplified by the water treatment plant that was inundated and
the power station that very nearly was, relates to the siting of crucial parts
of the infrastructure. Another - equally obvious - is how quickly flood warnings
should be acted on and where flood protection apparatus should be kept. It is no
excuse for ministers to say that this is not relevant because the water would
have run over the floodgates. It is relevant, although the quality of the
protection also needs review.
While the emergency effort seems generally to have gone well, some aspects were
better than others. For instance, demand for water after the treatment plant
failed seems far to have exceeded what was envisaged.
Regrettably, contingency planning also appears to have underestimated the likely
scale of vandalism and profiteering. Mobile water tanks proved particularly
vulnerable. For the Government, it was unfortunate that the worst of the
flooding coincided with publication of its housing White Paper, which accepted
that some new homes would still be built on flood plains. The coincidence,
however, had the benefit of exposing an arrangement according to which insurers
had been allowed to spread the risk between those who faced a high risk and
those in areas where the risk was negligible.
If climate change means that flooding will become more frequent, it is hard to
see how such risk-sharing can continue. And it is not just the financial aspect
but the disruption and danger to lives. Already, flood-weary householders are
talking of moving away; if departures gather pace, such housing will lose its
value. In this case, developers and councils will have to look to
buildelsewhere. The re-think cannot start too soon.
Leading Article:
Questions now the rain has stopped, I, 30.7.2007,
http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article2816656.ece
Weather gives
flood-ravaged area a break
as engineers work
to restore water supply
· Sunshine brings relief to battered Tewkesbury
· Storm builds over bonuses for flood agency chiefs
Monday July 30, 2007
Guardian
Martin Wainwright and Tania Branigan
Devastated areas of the Severn valley had their first reprieve for over a
week as heavy rainfall tracked away from the area and water engineers made
unexpected progress in restoring domestic supplies.
Overnight showers in battered Tewkesbury raised fears of further misery but
clearer weather pushed them east before dawn and the town basked in warm
sunshine most of yesterday, along with much of the rest of the country.
But the political fallout from the floods continued as Lady Young, head of the
Environment Agency, was forced to defend bonuses paid to her and other senior
executives at the quango.
A huge emergency operation at the crippled Mythe water treatment plant near
Tewkesbury has now restored supplies to 10,000 local homes, and 54,000 in
Gloucester should be reconnected by tonight, with Cheltenham following tomorrow.
The scale of the work was highlighted by Severn Thames Water, which is having to
fill 54 miles of large mains and 1,200 miles of smaller pipes to avoid airlocks
before taps can be turned on.
Andy Smith, the company's director of water services, said: "Significant
progress was made on Saturday when an intensive testing and commissioning
process made sure all damaged and flooded equipment was operational and fully
repaired. The controlled process of refilling more than 1,000 miles of empty
water pipes and reconnecting 130,000 homes is now in its early stages.
"However, this does not mean that customers will have water at their taps
immediately. Ahead of water being reconnected, a Health and Safety advice notice
is being issued by gold command [the police HQ for the stricken area]. We ask
for everyone's continued patience as we head into this critical next phase."
Repeated warnings are being given that the water will initially not be safe to
drink, even after boiling, and should only be used for washing and flushing the
toilet until further announcements.
Gloucestershire's chief constable, Tim Brain, who helped lead the recovery
effort, said: "The restoration of water supply is beginning very slowly and
cautiously ... But there is clearly that light beginning to glimmer at the end
of the long tunnel."
Relief at the improving situation was tempered by irritation at the bonuses for
nine executives at the Environment Agency. John Edwards, 63, who was queueing
for bottled water at Quedgeley, near Gloucester, said: "They should hand it back
and use the money for flood defences or to help people who have lost
everything."
The chief executive, Lady Young, received a £24,000 performance bonus on top of
her £163,000 salary last year, despite criticisms of the agency in a recent
National Audit Office report and an attack from Edward Leigh, chair of the
Commons public accounts committee. He said the poor quality of many flood
defences was an indictment of her time at the agency.
But the Labour peer said the NAO report showed the agency had made progress and
met most of its targets, adding: "I'm jolly proud of the way our folks have
worked over the last three weeks, in very difficult circumstances. There's no
doubt they have done well - the forecasting was very good; the flood defence
warnings went out; the defences performed to standard.
"The flooding was created by incredibly high rainfall, not by us screwing up. It
would be bizarre to say we should hand our money back because of an act of God."
Lady Young said the government "desperately need" to decide who deals with
surface water - responsible for many of the recent problems. The Department for
the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs is consulting on proposals that the
agency should oversee the work of councils and water companies in maintaining
drainage systems as well as dealing with river and coastal flood threats.
She also said that services ranging from power supplies to the police needed to
reconsider whether their installations were adequately protected and that
councils had to take agency warnings about inappropriate building "very
seriously". Last year local authorities approved 10 major developments against
the agency's advice, but under new rules the secretary of state can call in such
projects.
Forecasters meanwhile boosted hopes of some real summer, with John Hutchinson of
MeteoGroup UK saying: "There is likely to be quite a bit of sunshine around."
A body found near Tewkesbury Abbey by Italian specialist rescue teams using a
hovercraft was named locally as that of Mitchell Taylor, 19, who was last seen a
week ago. He is the third victim in Tewkesbury.
In numbers - so far
£3bn
Estimated cost of flood damage covered by insurance
£3bn
Estimated cost of flood damage not covered by insurance - only 25% of Britons
have home contents protection
500,000
Houses affected nationwide
10,000
Homes wrecked in Hull
340,000
People in Gloucestershire left without running water for over a week
387.6mm
Average rainfall across England and Wales from May to July 22, more than twice
the average
£600m
Existing budget for flood protection
£14m
Cut from the Environment Agency's flood protection budget last year
£1bn
Figure the Environment Agency says it needs per year
15%
Real-terms cut in flood defence budget since 2000
25
Warning reports ignored by the government since 1997 on need for UK flood
defences to be improved
30
How many more times costly it is on average to clear up your house after a flood
than a burglary
Weather gives
flood-ravaged area a break as engineers work to restore water supply, G,
30.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2137644,00.html
5.15pm update
Yet more heavy rain forecast
for the weekend
Friday July 27, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
James Sturcke and agencies
The Met Office today warned that more heavy and persistent rain would return to
southern Wales and England this weekend, bringing the risk of further flooding.
Forecasters issued another severe weather warning, saying rain would sweep
across south Wales late tomorrow and spread eastwards across central and
southern parts of England on Sunday.
Up to 40mm of rain was expected in some areas, such as on exposed hills, during
a nine-hour period.
"The Environment Agency is warning that everywhere in England and Wales is
currently saturated and there is the risk that any further heavy rainfall will
run off the ground and go straight into the rivers," the Met Office said.
"As a result, we could see the levels in watercourses responding very quickly,
so we urge people to remain vigilant as the unsettled period of weather is set
to continue. There is also the possibility of flash flooding caused by surface
water."
Water levels in the rivers Severn and Thames were currently stabilising or
falling, the agency said.
The head of Gloucestershire police, Tim Brain, told a press conference that it
was "essential" that people listened to forecasts over the coming days.
""We have been advised the rain will have the potential to cause localised
flooding. The flood levels are not expected to be as high as those recorded last
weekend."
He urged residents to be patient as the county recovered from the floods. He
said 6m litres of water were being distributed daily to the 300,000 people
without tap supplies. But that was only a fraction of the 120m litres
Gloucestershire normally uses.
Martin Kane, of Severn Trent Water, said distributing water with the help of the
army was working well and the company was "very confident" it could replenish
bowsers adequately until tap supplies were restored.
It expects to have a timetable for that after tomorrow, when engineers complete
their assessment of the damage at the Mythe water treatment plant. The plant,
shut last weekend when it was flooded, has now been completely pumped free of
water, Mr Kane said.
However, he warned that once operational again, it would take a "number of days"
to recharge the network.
Severn Trent pledged to refill the bowsers up to five times a day, as it
continued its battle to get the flooded Mythe treatment plant back online.
More than 300,000 people have been told they still face a wait of over a week
before they get water through their taps again.
Julie Girling of Gloucestershire county council said many services were
beginning to return to normal and assessment of the damage was under way. The
county's road network had taken an "unprecedented battering" and its repair is
expected to cost £25m, equivalent to the county's annual road maintenance
budget.
"We have 100 significant sites needing major repair," she said.
One week after torrential rain triggered some of the worst flooding in modern
history, the mayor of Gloucester, Harjit Gill, today launched an appeal to help
those affected.
The council was launching the fund, which has already raised over £73,000, in
part to help those uninsured against flood damage.
"As you will all know, Gloucestershire has faced the worst peacetime crisis in
the UK in living memory," Mr Gill said. "The people need our help and if you do
support this fund it will help get life back to normal for people."
He said the appeal had been driven by the people of Gloucestershire, who had
phoned and written in offering help and assistance.
Paul James, the leader of Gloucester city council, said the cash would go to
people not insured against flood damage and others affected by the crisis.
"We have seen lots of evidence of people in need. There has been some households
within the county which have been flooded for a second time in three weeks and
they will have to pay out two insurance excesses; some don't have insurance and
face having all their possessions ruined."
More than 1,000 bowsers were sited across the county, but residents were still
finding many of them empty.
In the Coney Hill area of Gloucester, some people complained that young thugs
were urinating in the mobile tankers and breaking off taps, although police said
they had yet to substantiate the reports.
The Prince of Wales met victims of the recent flooding in some of the
worst-affected towns today.
Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall met businesspeople and members of the
public in Upton-upon-Severn, Worcestershire, before moving on to Tewkesbury.
The Prince's Highgrove mansion near Tetbury, Gloucestershire, escaped being hit
by the floods.
Yet more heavy rain
forecast for the weekend, G, 27.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2136316,00.html
11.30am
Rain causes havoc
to countryside calendar
Friday July 27, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Martin Wainwright
The biggest weekend in Britain's countryside calendar has been
ruined by pouring rain and fields like glue, causing a string of cancellations
and the loss of millions of pounds to the rural economy.
Days of battling churned-up mud in Yorkshire has forced the
abandonment of the hugely popular annual Game Fair, alongside hundreds of
smaller agricultural shows, village fetes, gymkhanas and regattas.
It marks a new level of misery for the battered rural economy, which has
witnessed serious disruption since early June. Heavy rainfall began disrupting
the traditional season six weeks ago, with even the flagship Royal Show closing
a day early, amid scenes reminiscent of Glastonbury in a monsoon year.
"Just about every visitor's car had to be towed out by a tractor on the day they
decided to call a halt," said Matthew of Natural England, the Government body in
charge of countryside interests, which takes a major stall at the showground in
Stoneleigh, Warwickshire. "It was also striking how few people went this year,
not surprisingly."
According to organisers, the last-minute cancellation of the Game Fair at
Harewood House, near Leeds, means a loss of £50 million in business deals for
the vast tented city, and in particular, hotel bookings and visitor services.
The fair's chairman Vincent Hedley Lewis said: "We were not defeated by foot and
mouth in 2001 but the rain has defeated us this summer. Our hearts go out to all
the people whose livelihood is going to be affected by our not being able to go
ahead but we have done everything we could. To go ahead would have been a health
and safety risk."
The sodden ground and flood damage to infrastructure has forced similar
decisions on major farming shows from Penrith to South Devon - in almost every
case because hired fields would have turned into quagmires. Sales of everything
from tractors to corn dollies apart, the collapse of the system means a
disastrous interruption to networking among farmers and agricultural traders.
Richard Cuzens of the Association of Show and Agricultural Organisations said:
"Without doubt this is the most difficult show season ever. Since mid June, the
weather has caused more cancellations and more disruptions to outdoor events
than has ever been recorded."
His own New Forest Show is among the casualties, with the serious implications
for future events that face others in the sector.
He said: "We made every effort to run all three days to attempt to give
beleaguered trade stands the opportunity to be commercially viable in this most
difficult year.
"But by the last day, all the rings were destroyed and turned into ploughed
fields by 3pm. The difficulty facing all shows that have run under wet
conditions is how to recover and restore their showground in time for their next
event."
Some of the most hallowed venues in the season's calendar have been affected,
including Badminton, which features on the lengthening list of cancellations by
members of the British Show Jumping Association. As well as wrecking
much-enjoyed days out, the weather is threatening the carefully timed program
that sorts out British competitors for international events, including the
Beijing Olympics.
Tim Stockdale, international rider and marketing chairman of the BSJA said: "The
weather has severely disrupted the season for us to the point where we are in a
continual compromise situation. The outdoor summer season plays an important
part in assisting us to produce horses which we hope will go on to have British
Team success.
"Even with shows that are still able to continue we face the dilemma of whether
we should risk competing. Your horse's welfare is of paramount importance and
the last thing anyone would want to do is risk injury. It's left us all in one
of the most demoralizing positions since foot and mouth."
Shows that are going ahead include the annual gathering at Bakewell in the Peak
District and Heckington Feast Week near Sleaford in Lincolnshire, which has
opened its gates - rain or shine - for 900 years.
Rain causes havoc to
countryside calendar, G, 27.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2136201,00.html
Reaping what we've sown
July 27, 2007 10:30 AM
The Guardian
Graham Harvey
In Britain's waterlogged fields, farmers are struggling to salvage crops
damaged by floods and the seemingly endless rain. Although there's a way to go
before you'd call the 2007 harvest a write-off, there's likely to be a lot less
grain going into store this year. The quality doesn't look like being up to much
either.
For those with some knowledge of Britain's agrarian history, it's hard not to
draw parallels with the 1870s. In the 10 years from 1871, the country suffered a
series of unusually wet summers, leading to a run of crop failures. It was this
climatic cycle that tipped British agriculture into more than half a century of
recession, a slump that ended only with the second world war and the postwar
consensus that led to the state take-over of farming.
It would be comforting to think that, in the brave new world of microprocessors
and nano-technology, food production would be less vulnerable to such natural
disasters. Unfortunately, the reverse is the case. If the recent floods and
rainstorms prove anything, it's that at the start of the 21st century our food
supplies remain worryingly insecure and precarious.
As far as the countryside is concerned the main accomplishment of the European
Union - and its poisonous offspring, the common agricultural policy (CAP) - has
been to increase massively the grain-growing area at the expense of grassland.
Since we joined the EU in the early 1970s, Britain's wheat-growing area has
doubled. Instead of grazing livestock on pasture, many cattle farmers
concentrated their animals in sheds and fed them on the cheap, subsidised grain.
Compared with traditional pastoral farming systems, wheat-growing is highly
unstable. It relies on energy-rich inputs of chemical fertilisers and sprays,
many of them imported. It demands a decent spell of weather at harvest time if
the crop is to be got in. And, even under favourable conditions, it depends on
squadrons of diesel-burning monster machines to do the job.
Environmentally, it's a disaster. While pasture farming builds up organic matter
levels in the soil - together with the myriad flora and fauna that make use of
it - grain-production damages soil life. Under cereal crops, the level of soil
organic matter steadily drops. This makes the soil far less able to hold
moisture, paradoxically making food production more vulnerable to both drought
and flooding.
Clearly, the UK needs to grow the wheat, oats and rye we need for human foods
such as bread, cakes and biscuits. But at present, almost half our annual cereal
crop is fed to livestock, many of them ruminant animals adapted to grazing
grass.
Damaging our soils and landscapes in the production of animal products that
could be raised more cheaply and sustainably on grassland makes no sense at all.
The fact that we've arrived in such a daft situation is a mark both of the poor
understanding of agriculture by the policy-makers, and the power of agribusiness
companies, particularly the fertiliser and agrochemical firms.
This summer's incessant rains and flooding are a warning that our food
production needs to be made more secure and disaster proof. This wouldn't be
difficult. It's what British farmers have been doing throughout history whenever
cereal crops have failed. They've put their land down to grass and allowed
fertility to return through the natural magic of grasses, clovers and
deep-rooting herbs.
After the excesses of the CAP period, Britain and Europe need to take their
animals out of the dismal sheds they've been confined to for the past three
decades and put them back on pasture. That way, we'll make our food production
as close to disaster-proof as it's possible to be. As a bonus, it'll also be
better for our health.
Reaping what we've sown,
G, 27.7.2007,
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/graham_harvey/2007/07/reaping_what_weve_sown.html
Heritage
Floods threaten
ancient and historic sites
Severe weather is washing away
thousands of years of heritage in the UK.
Maev
Kennedy surveys the damage
to Silbury Hill and Rotherwas Ribbon
Friday July 27, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Maev Kennedy
Rain was falling remorselessly on Silbury Hill yesterday, pooling on the
sodden fields at its foot, and dangerously seeping down into the core of the
most enigmatic prehistoric monument in Europe. The entire hill near Avebury in
Wiltshire is artificial, built around 4,500 years ago by stupendous human effort
with an estimated 35m baskets of chalk. Yesterday, archaeologists and engineers
were engaged in urgent discussions on how to save Silbury, after the torrential
rain caused further damage to a structure already weakened by earlier floods.
The engineering contractors Skanska, who were carrying out structural repairs
for English Heritage, pulled its miners off the hill on Monday, fearing that the
40-year-old tunnel in which they were working might collapse. A few days ago
their temporary access track was under a metre of water.
"We cannot go back in until the weather improves, but we fear there have been
further collapses within the voids left by earlier archaeological
investigations," project director Rob Harding said yesterday. "Ironically, I
consulted local rainfall records in planning this work, to choose the driest
part of the year, but we have really had a huge amount of rain, and we believe
it has caused further damage." At best, work originally planned to finish within
weeks has been delayed by months. At worst, the stability of the whole structure
has been weakened.
Silbury's purpose - observatory, ritual platform or simply awe-inspiring
demonstration of power and wealth - is still guesswork. No original chamber or
passage has ever been detected. The site is wreathed in folklore of treasure
hoards, which have attracted centuries of treasure-hunters.
In floods five years ago, a chasm opened at the top of the hill, where a poorly
filled 200-year-old shaft collapsed, and water poured down into the structure,
seeping into voids left by generations of later diggers, including the tunnels
from a major excavation in the 1960s. The plan, now left in chaos by the
weather, was to empty those tunnels completely of their previous loose fill, and
then pack them solidly again with chalk. Instead rain is still seeping into the
mound, from the summit where the earlier domed repair has already partly washed
away, causing damage which can't even be fully assessed until the rain stops.
Silbury is not alone. As well as the human tragedies, the floods have been
washing away thousands of years of history, across a swath of central and
southern England. Silbury has been unmissable for millennia, but in Hereford,
rain has been scouring away parts of a mysterious structure uncovered only a few
weeks ago: the Rotherwas Ribbon, a serpentine path surfaced with deliberately
burned stones, winding up a shallow hill - slap in the path of an unpopular new
road plan.
English Heritage archaeologists have inspected the site - which some believe is
a ritual pathway, almost as old as Silbury - and are considering whether it
merits becoming a scheduled ancient monument, which would give it official
protection. Meanwhile they described the remains as "extremely fragile".
The council's proposals to bury the path and proceed with the road have provoked
local uproar: eight people, including residents, two archaeologists and the
secretary of the local branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, appeared
in court this week charged with disrupting a council meeting. A further
demonstration is planned at today's council meeting when a motion will be put
demanding the abandonment of the road plan until the path is fully excavated.
Meanwhile, the rain is washing stones out of the stretch already exposed.
Council plans to install a temporary protective cover yesterday were abandoned.
"The site was so wet we were advised we would do more harm than good," a
spokesman said.
Conservation experts from both English Heritage and the National Trust were
already urgently assessing the impact of climate change on fragile buildings and
structures, from eroded field monuments to sodden walls of ancient houses, whose
gutters and down pipes cannot cope with the recent volume of rainfall.
English Heritage chief executive Simon Thurley said: "Whether the torrential
rain we have seen is caused by climate change or not is irrelevant - we do know
that these weeks are going to bring many more buildings onto our at risk
register."
However, one archaeologist believes climate change could provide a unique
opportunity. "Much of the best preserved and most interesting evidence for
ancient and historic activity, around the world, lies around the coastline and
rivers and on low lying land," said Mike Pitts, editor of British Archaeology
and an archaeologist who has excavated at Stonehenge and Silbury. "This is where
people lived when drinking water did not come out of taps and boats were the
most efficient means of travel." Pitts continued: "Storms and rising seas will
destroy a lot of this evidence. But they will also, if we take advantage of the
opportunity, allow us to investigate and learn a great deal."
Floods threaten ancient
and historic sites, G, 27.7.2007,
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/art/heritage/story/0,,2136400,00.html
11.45am update
Two die
while trying to pump floodwater
Thursday July 26, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Mark Tran and David Batty
Two people have died after trying to pump floodwater out of a rugby club in
Tewkesbury in Gloucestershire, the emergency services said today.
The two appear to have been overcome by fumes from the petrol pump they were
using.
Terry Standing, chief fire officer in the county, told
thisisgloucestershire.co.uk: "It is a real tragedy that we have suffered two
fatalities in the past 24 hours which were most likely due to people attempting
to remove flood water."
He urged the public to think "safety first" when trying to pump out floodwaters
Despite widespread devastation, there have been few flood-related deaths so far.
On Tuesday, the body of a man in his 40s was pulled out of the river Great Ouse,
and a woman stranded in the floods in Tewkesbury lost her newborn twins at the
weekend despite efforts of the RAF to save the premature babies.
News of the deaths came as thousands of Britons already hard-hit by the worst
flooding for decades, today faced more downpours in the wettest early summer on
record.
The Met Office confirmed that the period from May to July was the soggiest since
records began in 1766 - even before July has ended. According to the Met,
387.6mm (16 inches) of rain has already fallen across England and Wales, double
the average.
The worst of the day's heavy rain is expected to fall south of the areas
currently worst affected. But flood-hit communities in Gloucestershire,
Berkshire and Oxfordshire also faced heavy spells.
However the Met Office said this particular spell of rain should pass through
relatively quickly in most places.
Even as Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service confirmed that waters in Oxford had
begun to subside, experts warned of the dangers of disease from the muck left
behind.
Floods expert, Professor Ian Cluckie, told reporters: "People need to realise
this is raw sewage they are walking around in. I've seen pictures of kids
walking around in the flood water. For God's sake don't let them."
The health and protection agency said: "The floodwater affecting your home or
other property may have been contaminated with sewage, animal waste and other
contaminants. However infection problems arising from floods in the UK are
actually rare."
The agency also advised people to avoid contact with the floodwaters. A
spokeswoman said: "We would discourage people from walking around in the murky
waters. They won't be able to see obstacles in the water, which could cause
injury, and there's a risk of contamination from untreated sewage."
Water levels are now believed to have peaked on the River Severn and on the
Thames although the Environment Agency said five severe flood warnings were
still in place.
Flooding could still affect areas near Oxford, where some 900 homes have already
been hit, but the agency said significant problems were unlikely despite the
expectation of more rain.
In Gloucestershire, officials were still struggling to distribute water supplies
to 350,000 people left without running tap water.
Bowsers, or street tanks known, set up in almost 1,000 locations, were beginning
to run dry in some places as Severn Trent Water said there had been difficulties
filling them up as regularly as planned."We have had 34 tankers on the road to
refill bowsers. We do know there are problems trying to achieve the four or five
fills that are our target," David Wickens, Severn Trent's environmental manager,
told BBC radio.
He said the issue had arisen because large tankers were struggling to navigate
small streets while there was a lack of smaller tankers or qualified tanker
lorry drivers.
The Red Cross, which has raised 500,000 pounds through its national floods
appeal, will also deliver 400 food parcels to the most vulnerable people
affected.
The latest floods have caused an estimated £3bn of damage to homes and
businesses. Last month, flooding also hit swathes of central and northern
England. Farmers said the torrential rain and flooding has devastated crops and
dairy farms.
Two die while trying to
pump floodwater, G, 26.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2135017,00.html
10am
More rain forecast
in Britain's wettest ever early summer
Thursday July 26, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Mark Tran
Thousands of Britons already hard-hit by the worst flooding for decades today
faced more downpours as the Met Office confirmed that Britain experienced its
wettest early summer on record.
Figures showed that the period from May to July was the soggiest since
records began in 1766 - even before the month is over. According to the Met
Office, 387.6mm (16 inches) of rain has already fallen across England and Wales.
The worst of the day's heavy rain is expected to fall south of the areas
currently worst affected. But flood-hit communities in Gloucestershire,
Berkshire and Oxfordshire also faced heavy spells.
But the Met Office said this particular spell of rain should go through
relatively quickly for most places.
Even as Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service confirmed that waters in Oxford had
begun to subside, experts warned of the dangers of disease from the muck left
behind.
Floods expert, Professor Ian Cluckie, told reporters: "People need to realise
this is raw sewage they are walking around in. I've seen pictures of kids
walking around in the flood water. For God's sake don't let them."
More rain forecast in
Britain's wettest ever early summer, G, 26.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2135017,00.html
Long history
of fighting the Thames tides
July 26, 2007
From The Times
Alan Hamilton
Father Thames is a crotchety and unreliable old man. No one in their right
mind would build a capital city on his floodplain.
Forget, for a moment, the recent freak weather. Just extend your little finger
across the breakfast table and contemplate its height. High water at London
Bridge increases by that much every year. Piffling, you will say, but it adds up
to two feet a century.
You can blame Scotland, as you often do. Relieved of its weighty burden of the
last Ice Age, the northern kingdom is still rising, and as a consequence the
whole island is on the tilt; southern England from the Wash to the Severn is
sinking.
At the same time London is settling into its own plastic foundation of clay, and
the decline of industry, which used to extract vast amounts of groundwater,
means that the water table is rising. London Underground pumps the equivalent of
3,000 swimming pools out of its tunnels a day.
Surge tides from the North Sea are London’s traditional enemy, which is why in
1982 the Thames Barrier was opened at Woolwich. This brilliant and unimaginably
expensive engineering feat protects London for now, but in not much more than 20
years it will have to be made higher.
An unfettered Thames had been bursting its banks for centuries. In medieval
times it regularly overflowed from the City to Westminster, creating a vast and
fetid lake fed additionally by its stinking tributary, the Fleet.
There was a mighty inundation in 1236, recorded by John Stow in his Chronicles
of England.
“The River Thames, overflowing its banks, caused the marshes all about Woolwich
to be all a sea wherein boats and other vessels were carried by the stream, so
that besides cattle a great number of inhabitants there were drowned, and in the
great Palace of Westminster men did row with wherries in the midst of the Hall.”
It happened again in 1663, as recorded by Samuel Pepys in December 7. “There was
last night the greatest tide that ever was remembered in England to have been in
this river, all Whitehall having been drowned.”
Constrained by the building of the Victoria Embankment in the 19th century, the
river behaved itself a little better, until on January 6, 1928, the tide in
central London rose to 1.8m (6ft) above the predicted level.
Flood reports started coming in from Battersea, Poplar and Greenwich. The
embankment at Temple station was awash, as was the whole of Old Palace Yard,
Westminster.
The embankments could not contain the water. The first section to give way was
at Millbank; the Tate Gallery was flooded almost to the tops of its ground-floor
doors, and its collection of Turners was damaged. Lots Road power station near
Chelsea, Wandsworth gasworks and the Blackwall Tunnel were all partly flooded.
But the worst consequence was the failure of a 25m stretch near Lambeth Bridge,
drowning 14 people and leaving another 4,000 homeless.
Central London escaped the worst effects of the great flood of 1953, but the
barriers subsequently erected around East Anglia merely moved the problem,
forcing even more water up the Thames and making construction of the Barrier
ever more urgent.
London had another wake-up call as recently as September 2000, when a tributary
of the Thames, the Roding, overflowed its defences and flooded 320 properties in
the Wanstead and Woodford areas of East London.
One way to protect London would be to raise the riverside defences until they
are as high as the lampposts. The idea has been consistently rejected on the
ground that Londoners would not be able to see the river that both threatens and
enchants them.
Long history of fighting
the Thames tides, Ts, 26.7.2007,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2141375.ece
On the night watch
waiting for water to rise
July 26, 2007
From The Times
Lucy Bannerman
Purley on Thames was the latest town in the South East where residents went
to bed last night wondering if they would wake up under the Thames this morning.
The town, outside Reading, has been put on red alert by the Environment Agency.
There is an imminent threat that the storm drains will finally be defeated by
the onslaught of a rising river and unwelcome rain.
One resident, Tony King, has gained shortlived comfort from the pump that he has
just installed in his front room. A hose gushes a steady stream of water out
through the French windows into the swollen river at the bottom of the garden.
He said that by yesterday there were three inches in the house. “I’ve now got
two pumps, including a submersible, which will keep the levels at four to five
inches, but I don’t think they will last much longer,” he said.
“That’s why I’ve asked this guy to borrow his massive pump for an hour later
on.”
His neighbour, Mark Dixon, stood at his side with the confidence one would
imagine from a man who has the luxury of a large, mechanical flood device
originally used by a fire engine.
Original warnings put the estimated peak time at 4.15am yesterday. But the worst
is yet to come, according to the local authorities.
With a pot of damp seal in one hand, and protected up to the waist with
waterproofs, Mr King waded towards a wooden post that marks the historic river
levels.
“People have been saying it’s going to be the worst for 100 years. Maybe for
England, but not for Purley. If the estimates are right this time, the waters
will rise between 6pm and midnight. I will be relieved as long as it is not
worse than 2003.”
He marks the 2003 watermark on the post with the side of his hand: 15.6ft from
the river bed, still well above current levels. “And if it reaches 1947 levels,”
he indicated his waist, “we are all in trouble.”
Mr King said that he believed such extreme conditions were unlikely. His mood
remained cheery and upbeat, probably because he is a maintenance engineer and
better prepared than most. However, Vaughan King, another resident, surveyed
Winteringham Way with a look of concern.
“That one is about to go any minute now,” he said, pointing to the furious whirl
above a drain cover in a nearby puddle. “Then that one, then that one, and the
whole street will be covered. The drains just can’t take any more.”
At the Purley Park Social Club, chairs were balanced on the pool table, and
crews from Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service rolled their orange waterproof
suits down to the waist to enjoy a cup of tea before the predicted storm. One
rescue worker said: “We’ve had a quiet few days here but tonight is going to be
the test.”
The bar manager, who declined to be named, said that she was worried about the
long-term effect on property prices and the difficulty of finding insurance in
the future.One drinker said with a mixture of cynicism and impatience: “We keep
being told about this surge and yet it never comes.”
Another regular, Craig Brown, said he was confident that his own house farther
uphill would be spared. But he lamented the flooding in his boss’s garden. “I
just helped landscape that, with patios and rockeries and everything. Now, it’s
all gone.”
With their own house sandbagged and secured, Helen and Iain Baines dug out
wellington boots so that they and their two young boys could monitor the floods.
Mr Baines said: “We keep getting conflicting information. You get geared up for
these different times when the surges are expected and then nothing.” His wife
said: “Rather that than the other way round.”
On the night watch
waiting for water to rise, Ts, 26.7.2007,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2141381.ece
An early morning knock on the door
and evacuation for Oxford residents
as water levels predicted to rise again
Thursday July 26, 2007
Guardian
Rachel Williams
Dozens of people in Oxford were woken in the small hours yesterday by a knock on
the door from police offering to evacuate them and warning that the situation
could get worse.
With up to 4ft of water surging past in the worst-hit places, about 120 people
were ferried from the Botley Road area to the west of the city centre in 4x4s
and dinghies, either to stay with friends and relatives or at an emergency
shelter set up at Oxford United's Kassam Stadium.
By the afternoon, firefighters said the water level appeared to have stabilised
but warned it could get worse again if further rain fell today. Residents
estimated it had been rising by an inch every hour at its most vigorous. Some
reported up to 2ft of water in their ground floor rooms.
Meanwhile, firefighters were pumping water from an electricity substation in
nearby Ferry Hinksey Road. Power to hospitals was rerouted. Fire crews said they
were getting more water out than was getting in and there was no immediate risk
to power.
A spokesman for Southern Electric, which owns the substation, said: "We are
monitoring a number of substations across the area which are potentially at risk
from flooding. A limited number of people would be affected."
At the Kassam Stadium about 150 evacuated residents, including 50 elderly people
from Abingdon, were given dry clothing, toiletries and even massages by
volunteers from the St John Ambulance and the Red Cross. Some were taken to the
cinema and bowling alleys at a nearby entertainment complex, while families made
temporary homes in the stadium's corporate boxes.
In Botley Road and many of the surrounding streets, residents splashed through
the murky water in wellies, barefoot or by bike. The door of St Frideswide's
church stood open as water lapped around it from all sides, and on the river
itself the fast-flowing water, already over the banks, pushed menacingly at
walls of sandbags.
Outside the Osney Arms, Fiona Paltreeman relaxed in the rain with a glass of
white wine as she prepared to wade through thigh-high water to reach her
ground-floor flat.
"We're not flooded yet but the car park is," she said. "I saw a goldfish in
there earlier. The police came round this morning to ask if we wanted to leave.
They explained it could get worse, but nobody is really sure what it's going to
do. We decided to stay. It's your home, you just want to stay."
Water levels are expected to remain high for the next 24 hours and match those
seen in the December 2003 floods.
Abingdon is still under the threat of a severe flood warning. There is also a
severe flood warning in force from Eynsham Lock, Eynsham, to Sandford Lock,
Sandford-on-Thames, and from there down to Days Lock on the river Thames.
An early morning knock
on the door and evacuation for Oxford residents as water levels predicted to
rise again, G, 26.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2134802,00.html
Brown praises
firefighters and marines
for turning tide
Thursday July 26, 2007
Guardian
Owen Bowcott
The prime minister saw at first hand the damage inflicted by
flood waters yesterday when he met firefighters and Royal Marines who battled to
save an electricity station near Gloucester.
Gordon Brown, making his second visit to flood-stricken areas in
recent days, arrived at the Walham sub-station, where the river peaked just two
inches below the top of hastily erected emergency defences. If water had poured
into the plant, electricity supplies to 500,000 homes would have been cut off.
Mr Brown thanked volunteers and rescue workers who worked through the night to
hold back the deluge.
"Thank you so much. People were really depending on you," he told them. "We've
got to get the supplies stepped up.
"We will get more tankers in, we will get more bowsers in, we will get more
regular filling of them, and at the same time, more bottled water will be
provided."
The prime minister, who watched Royal Marines fill sandbags, was accompanied by
Gloucestershire's chief constable, Tim Brain, and the city's MP, Parmjit Dhanda.
They stopped to talk to Royal Marines who took a short break from shovelling
sand into bags to speak about what they were doing.
Corporal David Hill, from 42 Commando Royal Marines, said he had just returned
from Afghanistan and admitted that this task was relatively stress-free in
comparison.
"It is hard work," he said. "We have got about 20 or 30 blokes filling about
1,000 bags an hour, which will be used on the flood defences. We only got back
from Afghanistan three months ago so we are quite used to filling sandbags.
Usually we are being shot at as we do it, so this is a breeze."
Residents from flood-threatened homes in west Oxford staged a climate change
demonstration on the flooded Botley Road last night.
Blaming recent extreme weather on high carbon emissions, they marched with
banners saying Gordon Stop Climate Change, and Floody Hell Gordon.
Brown praises
firefighters and marines for turning tide, G, 26.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2134879,00.html
Horses given house room
as village becomes an island
Locals return home by boat to check on animals saved from flooded fields
Thursday July 26, 2007
Guardian
Steven Morris
Tricky the Palomino pony was busy licking the Farrow & Ball paint - a tasteful
powder blue - off the walls. Charlie and Molly were busy too, snaffling food
from the antique wash basin and slurping from the bucket perched on the rattan
table.
Such was the scene inside Dawn Melvin and Andy Green's 17th century farmhouse
in Gloucestershire. Needs must in times of disaster. As the flood waters crept
ever closer to their home, Dawn and Andy moved their horses on to ever high
ground.
And when the high ground had been inundated, they did what any horse lover would
do - invited them into the house, the boot room, to be precise, normally the
home of the washing machine and the children's muddy shoes.
Dawn and Andy live in Sandhurst. Though Gloucester Cathedral is visible only a
few miles away this village has turned into one of the most isolated areas, cut
off from both sides by murky floodwater.
The Guardian yesterday joined Dawn and Andy on an extraordinary trip up
Sandhurst Lane - normally a tree-lined country road, now a fast-flowing river -
on an inflatable with a team from the voluntary rescue organisation Rapid UK.
Amazingly, some people on Sandhurst Lane have refused to be evacuated though
their homes were full of water. Des Lawrence, for example, was living in the
first floor of his semi. He had stayed to look after his neighbour, 82-year-old
Doris Lewis. "She has no relatives so I've decided not to go. We're OK. The
emergency services are making sure we have enough food."
And, to maintain the animal theme, Mr Lawrence is also looking after a
neighbour's macaque monkey, Pugsey. The water is lapping around Pugsey's
enclosure. "But he seems happy enough," said Mr Lawrence. "We've got enough
fruit for him."
The inflatable boat skips around a sunken JCB and boats that have been flipped
over. A Mini is stuck in the White Horse pub car park. A classic motorcycle that
was being lovingly restored lies sodden in a driveway.
Ironically, given the shortage of drinking water, hundreds of bottles of water
were floating near the pub - apparently a load had tipped off the back of an
army lorry as they tried to deliver supplies. And, worryingly, a large plot of
land on the flood plain just sold off for building houses lay several metres
under water.
In Sandhurst itself many thousands of pounds of damage has been caused to a
thatched cottage belonging to Dave Munn and Sandra Wickenden a little further
on. They reluctantly left their home when the waters charged into their living
room. They have been back - by rowing boat - to find devastation.
"We've spent five years refurbishing our place, then this. We had a flood plan
all worked out but the water kept climbing and we had to get out." They have
witnessed one amazing sight - a farmer, Mike Smith, donning his wet suit and,
helped by friends in canoes, swimming three cows out on to higher ground because
they were about to calve.
And so to Dawn and Andy's home, Abloads Court. They and their three children
were finally forced to leave the ponies behind on Sunday night when the water
gushed into their house - the only time it has reached their property since it
was built in the 1600s.
They were back yesterday to check the ponies in the boot room were content and
well.
Archie, the helmsman on the inflatable, could easily spot their driveway. It was
several feet under water but the tops of a line of cherry trees marked its
boundaries. Happily, the water had retreated from the front door and the living
room.
Dawn was worried that the ponies might be a bit frisky at the sight of so many
strangers. But they were calm and friendly. "I think they are relieved just to
see somebody," she said.
The couple looked ruefully at their drenched orchard and half submerged
children's play equipment. They were glad, however, that the idea of jamming
apples into the cars' exhausts had kept the water out of them.
But most of all they were relieved that the ponies were healthy. "They seem
fine," said Andy. "It's a bit cramped in there but we've got loads of hay on the
flagstones. They should be all right."
The couple picked a bottle of wine they had left behind and got back into the
Rapid UK boat to be taken back from the island. They will return for good in the
next few days. "We'll go and fetch some provisions and come back as soon as we
can to start cleaning up," said Dawn. And, of course, get the ponies out of
their boot room.
Horses given house room
as village becomes an island, G, 26.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2134804,00.html
2.45pm update
Police chief warns over flood disorder
Wednesday July 25, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Mark Tran and Matthew Weaver
Police said today they would not tolerate disorder, amid reports of profiteering
following floods that have left 350,000 people in Gloucestershire without water.
"No exceptions will be taken in any cases of disorder," said Tim Brain, the
chief constable of Gloucestershire.
His warning followed incidents in which people have been trying to resell water
being distributed from bowsers - portable water containers - a ploy described by
Mr Brain as theft.
With drinking water unlikely to be restored for another seven to 14 days, the
supply of bottled water and water from bowsers has become a key issue for the
emergency services.
While officials in Gloucestershire grappled with the distribution of drinking
water, hundreds of people were evacuated from newly flooded homes in Oxford as
residents in vulnerable towns along the river Thames were warned that water
levels could peak today.
After last-ditch efforts yesterday to save power supplies in Gloucestershire,
attention switched to protecting substations in Oxfordshire from rising water
levels.
Emergency services took people from 250 homes in the Osney area, west of Oxford,
to emergency shelter at the Kassam football stadium. In the flooded area of the
city, water levels were expected to remain high for the next 24 hours and to
match levels seen in the December 2003 floods.
Firefighters blocked off Earl Street, off Botley Road in Oxford, which was up to
1.2 metres (4ft) under water. Police reported some loss of power to homes in the
area.
This afternoon, the prime minister, Gordon Brown, will make another visit to
Gloucestershire, where he made a brief visit on Monday.
At question time in parliament, Mr Brown announced that help for the
flood-stricken areas of England would be boosted to £46m.
"We have substantially raised the funds available so that local authorities are
in a better position to respond," Mr Brown said. He said infrastructure needs
for the future would have to be looked at, and warned that more money would have
to be invested to prevent floods in coming years.
Last night there were fears that Oxford's Osney Mead substation could be
breached, but the plant, which powers tens of thousands of homes, was still
working today. Police said there was now "no immediate risk" that it would
flood.
Geoff Bell, of the Environment Agency, said water from the flood plain west of
Oxford was working its way from the fields outside the city into the residential
area.
Thames tributaries in the area such as Bullstake stream were now spilling over
and compounding the flooding, he said. The Thames itself was only expected to
rise about 2.5cm this morning.
Abingdon, in Oxfordshire, was still under threat of further flooding and river
levels remained high there. Henley was expected to flood this afternoon.
Pangbourne, Purley and Mapledurham were bracing themselves for a peak this
evening and flooding was expected to start in Reading and Caversham tonight.
The flood peak was forecast to reach Marlow, Cookham, Datchet, Wraysbury,
Staines, Laleham and Shepperton later in the week, but with only limited
flooding.
The towns of Windsor, Eton and Maidenhead will be protected from the floodwaters
by the Jubilee and Cookham flood defences, according to the Environment Agency.
In Gloucestershire, the task of returning water supplies to 140,000 homes
continued as engineers began assessing the flood damage at the deluged Mythe
water treatment plant, in Tewkesbury.
Many homes near the plant were still inundated with floodwater. But water levels
were continuing to recede, with many people hoping to return to their homes and
start the process of cleaning up.
Shoppers in a Tesco supermarket in Quedgeley, Gloucestershire, were being
rationed to three loaves of bread and 16 litres of water, in an attempt to stop
panic buying.
"People should exercise patience and forbearance," Mr Brain said. "We urge
people to conserve water supplies. We are in an emergency and people are going
to have use a miminum amount of water. The vast majority of people in
Gloucestershire are doing that. Exercise common sense and be a good neighbour."
Gloucestershire is doubling the number of bowsers available to 1,050 and is
asking the government for additional tankers and drivers. Four million litres of
bottled water were brought into Cheltenham yesterday to be distributed
throughout the county, and 5.5m today. With sanitation also becoming an issue,
1,400 emergency toilets were being brought in.
There was still no word on the Tewkesbury teenager Mitchell Taylor, who has not
been seen since the height of the floods.
Yesterday, fire crews rescued a man and a boy from the Ouse at Godmanchester,
Cambridgeshire, after the pair were spotted clinging to a branch.
The environment secretary, Hilary Benn, said the recent flooding - the worst for
more than 60 years - was far from over and had caused "considerable human
distress".
Police chief warns over
flood disorder, G, 25.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2134234,00.html
12.45pm update
Rising floodwaters
force Oxford evacuations
Wednesday July 25, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Matthew Weaver and agencies
Hundreds of people have been evacuated from newly flooded homes in Oxford as
residents in vulnerable towns along the river Thames were warned that water
levels could peak today.
After last-ditch efforts yesterday to save power supplies in Gloucestershire,
attention has switched to protecting substations in Oxfordshire from rising
water levels.
Emergency services took people from 250 homes in the Osney area, west of Oxford,
to emergency shelter at the Kassam football stadium. In the flooded area of the
city, water levels were expected to remain high for the next 24 hours and to
match levels seen in the December 2003 floods.
Firefighters blocked off Earl Street, off Botley Road in Oxford, which was up to
1.2 metres (4ft) under water. Police reported some loss of power to homes in the
area.
This afternoon, the prime minister, Gordon Brown, will make another visit to
Gloucestershire, where he made a brief visit on Monday.
In prime minister's questions today, David Drew, the Labour MP for Stroud, told
Mr Brown it "cannot be right" that his constituents had been told they faced a
14-day wait for water supplies to be restored. Mr Brown told the Commons he
wanted to see water supplies in flood-hit areas restored "as soon as possible".
Commentators say Mr Brown is trying to avoid accusations of inaction that dogged
the US president, George Bush, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
Last night there were fears that Oxford's Osney Mead substation could be
breached, but the plant, which powers tens of thousands of homes, was still
working today. Police said there was now "no immediate risk" that it would
flood.
Geoff Bell, of the Environment Agency, said water from the flood plain west of
Oxford was working its way from the fields outside the city into the residential
area.
Thames tributaries in the area such as Bullstake stream were now spilling over
and compounding the flooding, he said. The Thames itself was only expected to
rise about 2.5cm this morning.
Abingdon, in Oxfordshire, was still under threat of further flooding and river
levels remained high there. Henley was expected to flood this afternoon.
Pangbourne, Purley and Mapledurham were bracing themselves for a peak this
evening and flooding was expected to start in Reading and Caversham tonight.
The flood peak was forecast to reach Marlow, Cookham, Datchet, Wraysbury,
Staines, Laleham and Shepperton later in the week, but with only limited
flooding.
The towns of Windsor, Eton and Maidenhead will be protected from the floodwaters
by the Jubilee and Cookham flood defences, according to the Environment Agency.
In Gloucestershire, the task of returning water supplies to 140,000 homes
continued as engineers began assessing the flood damage at the deluged Mythe
water treatment plant, in Tewkesbury.
Engineers from Severn Trent Water, which owns the site, today hoped to enter the
plant for the first time. Once inside, they could gain an idea of when the water
might be turned back on. The damage assessment is expected to take two to three
days.
Many homes near the plant in Tewkesbury were still inundated with floodwater.
But water levels were continuing to recede, with many people hoping to return to
their homes and start the process of cleaning up.
Shoppers in a Tesco supermarket in Quedgeley, Gloucestershire, were being
rationed to three loaves of bread and 16 litres of water, in an attempt to stop
panic buying.
There was still no word on the Tewkesbury teenager Mitchell Taylor, who has not
been seen since the height of the floods.
Yesterday, fire crews rescued a man and a boy from the Ouse at Godmanchester,
Cambridgeshire, after the pair were spotted clinging to a branch.
The environment secretary, Hilary Benn, said the recent flooding - the worst for
more than 60 years - was far from over and had caused "considerable human
distress".
The government has pledged a further £10m to help battle the floods, in addition
to the £14m initially promised by Mr Brown earlier this month.
Rising floodwaters force
Oxford evacuations, G, 25.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2134234,00.html
Mark Steel:
Well, if the Romans built on flood plains...
We can't take their advice
- they also built a city at the bottom of Mount
Vesuvius
Published: 25 July 2007
The Independent
Maybe this really is a new period of government with no PR spin, because no
one concerned with their image would announce building 20,000 houses on flood
plains in the middle of the country's worst-ever floods.
And the housing minister, Yvette Cooper, tried to justify this by saying that
York was a fine place to build houses because "The Romans built it on a flood
plain". We can't take advice on this issue off the Romans - they built a city at
the bottom of Mount Vesuvius and look what happened to that. When she was
criticised, she claimed this was an attack on "affordable housing". By this
logic she could announce 10,000 cheap houses are to be built in containers full
of nuclear waste and, if anyone complained, she could say: "How dare you attack
the concept of affordable housing?"
Maybe we'll at last see the benefits of the war in Iraq, and 10,000 affordable
town houses for young families will be built on a brown-field site in Basra.
Even then they'd probably be bought by bankers, who'd then let them out to
jihadists as somewhere to keep people they'd kidnapped until the value had
doubled.
Anyway, if the floods keep coming, they'll transform the housing market. Because
the safest place to live will be the highest point possible. Estate agent
adverts will boast "STAR OFFER ... VERY desirable property in highly sought
after location *** This NINETEENTH floor flat in Moss Side tower block MUST BE
SEEN ... ALL LIFTS BUSTED so no chance of soaking-wet people making their way to
your level ... £3,000,000 ... no reduced offers considered." And five-bedroom
houses in Maidenhead will be on a hard-to-let register and used for putting up
refugees from Somalia.
One inevitable line of whining has been the one pursued by a columnist in the
Mail, who complained: "If this biblical flooding was happening in some far-flung
Third World country, pop stars would be falling over themselves to record a
charity single." And someone in The Sun said: "If this was happening anywhere
else in the world, the Government would be sending wads of our cash."
Which seems to be getting things a little out of perspective. It's doubtful
whether Live Aid would have taken off quite as much as it did, if the song had
been: "The river banks burst / So the carpets went first / And one woman's
fridge / Is now under the bridge. / It's a tale of endurance / But they should
get most of it back / On the insurance."
It is almost as if they're angry at how Middle England has suffered most, as if
this were a politically correct flood that once again attacks the decent, silent
majority, because these days a flood daren't devastate an inner-city area, in
case someone accuses it of being racist!
But the irony is it's these same people who are most damning about the probable
cause of the floods, which is global warming. It's possible this would have
happened anyway, but the floods are almost exactly as predicted by
climate-change scientists. Those people who remain certain there's no global
warming could have been on the Ark, and they'd have said: "Oh, bloody hell Noah,
don't tell me even you've fallen for this nonsense about God being angry - this
is all just part of a natural pattern."
Once things start turning out exactly as the theorists said they would, surely
you have to accept they've got a point. If, for example, there was a thunderclap
followed by live coverage on Sky news of a lamb opening seals and then four
horsemen who brought with them war, famine, pestilence and death, I'd swallow my
pride and accept that the Christians had been right after all.
The Government accepts that global warming is the likely cause, but seems
incapable of doing anything to curb it. For example, one billion pounds is being
removed from subsidies to the privatised train companies which sum will be made
up in increased fares, which therefore must increase the use of cars.
Similarly, the private water companies were discouraged from building larger
drains and sewage systems, because this would have increased water charges. And
no one dare suggest decreased water or rail company profits. And the same
profit-driven logic will apply to the building of new houses.
So, as the floods get worse, the next move will be to privatise the flood
relief, as this is the only way to attract much-needed investment into the
emergency industry. Advertisers will divert the river, so the chimneys sticking
above the water spell "DFS sofas". And, as residents are hoisted out of their
upstairs bedroom window, they'll be asked: "Would you like a pastry with your
rescue?" Meanwhile, the housing minister will justify with history why she can
spend her day fiddling.
Mark Steel: Well, if the
Romans built on flood plains..., I, 25.7.2007,
http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_m_z/mark_steel/article2798497.ece
Deborah Orr:
Amid this latest apocalypse,
the prophets of doom
are all peddling their own agendas
Each generation feels
its own fears about the future
are more urgent than any
that have gone before
Published: 25 July 2007
The Independent
One of the oddest tributes to the imaginative ingenuity of the human mind is
its capacity to take the facts and manufacture from them, regardless of what
they are, a narrative that corresponds with whatever our own view of the world
happens to be. There's a great deal of that sort of thing going on at the
moment, and while the process is nothing new, each generation, no doubt, feels
that its own set of fears and worries about the future is more real and more
urgent than any that has gone before.
Those of us lucky enough to be consuming the spectacle of Britain in flood from
the comfort of warm, dry homes are now, broadly, of the opinion that this is a
consequence of man-made climate change. My friend Charles, a farmer in the Vale
of Evesham, is not one of the fortunate majority for whom the floods are
something to maintain a mere watching brief on. His home is flooded with
backed-up sewage, the crops in his fields are ruined, and what's left of last
year's harvest, stored in his barn, is wrecked as well.
Of all he has witnessed in the last few days, he says that the most surreal
scenario came about when he went to rescue a recalcitrant elderly man who was
refusing to leave his flood-threatened home, only to find him sitting in a state
of single-minded concentration, watching news of the deluge on television, while
the water in his own living room advanced smartly towards him. Sometimes the
ability to persuade ourselves that disaster is what happens to other people is
powerful indeed.
Charles has been convinced of the reality of climate change for some years now.
Those few among us who remain loath to join the apocalyptic throng do so for
political reasons. The left, the deniers suspect, disappointed by the failure of
socialism, have switched to a politics-of-envy meta-narrative. The downside of
capitalism is no longer as local a difficulty as violent revolution. The
downside is the destruction of the planet itself. Interestingly, their messianic
defence of capitalism has backed them into a corner more dystopian than that of
the most miserablist of lefties. The end of the world may well be nigh, they now
grudgingly admit, but this is nothing a reordering of human priorities can have
any bearing upon.
In his latest book, Black Mass, the philosopher John Gray traces the history of
Western millenarianism, and suggests that the war in Iraq is no more or less
than the latest in a long line of apocalyptic fantasies, rooted in religion and
embarked upon under the misapprehension that a world-changing event can bring
history, with all its conflicts, to an end. This particular fantasy, of course,
was the neo-conservative enthusiasm for the idea that liberal democracy is an
irresistible force in and of itself. Such projects, Gray wearily counsels, will
always end in tears.
For Gray, it is utopianism itself that is the problem. He suggests that "it is
dystopian thinking we most need." We must, if we seek to understand our present
condition, he says, "turn to Huxley's Brave New World or Orwell's Nineteen
Eighty-Four, Wells's Island of Dr Moreau or Philip K Dick's Do Androids Dream of
Electric Sheep?, Zamiatin's We or Nabokov's Bend Sinister, Burroughs' Naked
Lunch or Ballard's Super-Cannes - prescient glimpses of the ugly reality that
results from pursuing unrealisable dreams."
Actually, there's not even a need to trawl back five or so years to the
publication of Super-Cannes, stunning a read though it is. Dystopian futures
have of late become a staple of mainstream contemporary literature. While
Ballard is for me quite possibly the pre-eminent living English novelist, he has
long been considered as foremost a sci-fi writer rather than a proper literary
type, with only his naturalistic memoirs Empire of the Sun and The Kindness of
Women awarded the unequivocal reverence all his work deserves. Suddenly, though,
sci-fi has acquired literary credibility. We are now so comfortable with the
idea of a post-apocalyptic future that such subject matter has seamlessly become
part of the until-now unyieldingly naturalistic mainstream English literary
scene.
Most garlanded and most widely read is Cormac McCarthy's The Road, which
achieved the satisfying double whammy of intellectual and populist top marks by
winning this year's Pulitzer Prize for Fiction and being featured on Oprah's
book club. His story is of the struggle of a man and his son for survival in a
US made desperately savage by climate catastrophe, and offers the sobering
message that under such circumstances it would be foolhardy to expect anything
more than the tiniest minority to behave with any decency at all.
Sarah Hall, whose first novel, Haweswater, won the Commonwealth Writers' Prize,
and whose second, The Electric Michelangelo, was shortlisted for the Booker, is
poised to publish The Carhullan Army, a futuristic fantasy in which a group of
radical feminists make a stand against a Britain in repressive, authoritarian
economic collapse. She joins a modest tradition, since Margaret Atwood and Doris
Lessing, to name but two, have each offered similarly cautionary tales. The big
shift from genre, though, is that her book is not being marketed as either
"sci-fi" or "feminist", any more than McCarthy's is as "sci-fi" or
"masculinist".
Even children's literature, dominated as it is by the über-fantasy of Harry
Potter, has offered up a naturalistic post-apocalyptic classic, in the form of
Meg Rosoff's How I Live Now, shortlisted for the Orange Prize for new writers.
It has echoes of Iain Seraillier's wonderful Second World War story The Silver
Sword, since it involves a group of children separated from adults in a time of
war, but of course distinguishes itself by being set during a war that is yet to
come.
So, Gray can rest assured that cultural workers of the highest order are all
indulging like mad in dystopian thinking, and that no one is turning a hair. In
these novels we are offered three very distinct future dystopias, one triggered
by environmental collapse, another by economic meltdown, and a third by a new
world war. So far so good (in a way).
But what's touchingly obtuse about all three of these books is that, even as
they square up unflinchingly to a grim new world, they each indulge in their
different ways in a type of wish-fulfilment that can be described, if not as
utopian, at least as hopelessly romantic. McCarthy posits a future in which
fathers and sons will reconnect at a manly and silent spiritual level through
their travels in the not-so-great outdoors. Hall grasps the hope that women will
prove themselves as warriors far pluckier than rubbishy men, while Rosoff sticks
with the lovely notion that human love can survive all pain and suffering.
Each of these is an arrogant dystopia, in which everything changes except the
beliefs that their creators and their protagonists hold dearest. The end of the
world may be nigh. But somehow, we'll all survive it, integrity and
value-systems reassuringly intact. As if that, of course, is not the very reason
why humans might just find themselves quite, quite unable to change the
unpromising course of their future.
Deborah Orr: Amid this
latest apocalypse, the prophets of doom are all peddling their own agendas, I,
25.7.2007,
http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_m_z/deborah_orr/article2798494.ece
What lies beneath the floods
As the filthy flood waters begin to subside, they are revealing a scene of
devastated homes. Now there are warnings of a mounting health risk from toxic
chemicals and fatal bugs left behind in the wake of the deluge
Published: 25 July 2007
The Independent
By Jonathan Brown
The filthy brown flood waters may have been subsiding yesterday but the tide
of human misery they have left in their wake was relentlessly swelling.
Few aspects of everyday life across huge swathes of central England have been
unaffected by the unprecedented deluge of last weekend. It will be many weeks
before normality returns.
The grim task of sifting through possessions was already under way yesterday. A
steadily mounting pile of soaked and soiled items seemed to stand guard at every
front door, waiting to come under the calculating eye of the insurance loss
adjustor.
For more than 350,000 people in Gloucestershire the most pressing issue was not
the loss of possessions, many of them prized. The biggest problem remains the
lack of clean water after the county's main treatment plant was knocked out.
And it emerged last night that in the event of the flooding of Walham power
station which escaped being hit by waters from the Severn by two inches in the
early hours of yesterday ministers had drawn up plans to carry out evacuations
inn Cheltenham and Gloucester. Yesterday in communities which only a few days
ago were coping with little more than the inconvenience of the wretched British
summer, residents were told it could be up to two weeks before they are
reconnected to the mains water supply.
In the meantime they must queue for bottled water or fill containers at 900
bowsers in Gloucester, Cheltenham and Stroud. The council also issued an urgent
plea for portable lavatories.
There were warnings of a mounting health risk from thousands of gallons of
sewage and toxic chemicals that have spilled into homes, gardens and streets in
recent days. The Health Protection Agency urged people to keep out of the water
to avoid contact with potentially fatal microbes such as E.coli. The agency also
warned of a sharp rise in stress-related illnesses as a result of the flooding.
A pregnant woman stranded in the floods lost her twins despite being airlifted
to hospital. The woman gave birth to the premature twins in her Tewkesbury home
moments before RAF rescue helicopters arrived. She was taken by one helicopter,
and her babies were carried in another, to Cheltenham General Hospital where the
babies died. The woman was 21 weeks pregnant and her family had called 999 on
Saturday morning, but floods blocked the ambulance.
Tewkesbury, cut off by the flooded Severn and Avon rivers, yesterday remained
little more than a ghost town with hotels ordered to close to guests, many of
them stranded tourists, because of the lack of flushing lavatories. Joe Bishop,
a manager at the Bell Hotel, where water continued to lap around the historic
building, said staff had worked round the clock to stay open.
"The water level is going down a bit but we've run out of water, food, beer and
linen and we've been told to close as a hotel. We've still got quite a few
guests so I don't know where they are going to sleep tonight," he said.
John Healey, the Flood Recovery minister, who visited the market town as it
suffered its fifth day under water yesterday, said it was impossible to rule out
a repeat of the severe weather. The Government pledged a further £10m to
alleviate the crisis.
The Association of British Insurers said its members had received 8,000 new
claims since Saturday, 80 per cent of them from those whose homes had been
flooded; that figure was set to rise. The cost of the summer floods in damage to
property and loss of business rose to £2bn, insurers said, although one analyst
put the figure at £3bn for repairs to damaged roads, railway lines and bridges
alone.
In Gloucester, half of the city's shops were closed due to a lack of fresh water
as the main A40 route into town remained impassable to traffic. Council offices
were also shut as were the courts and major businesses.Non-urgent operations
were cancelled at the Gloucestershire Royal and at the Cheltenham General.
There were also concerns over Gloucester City football club after its ground,
Meadow Park, was flooded to the height of the crossbars. In Cheltenham, the Army
is handing out bottled water at the racecourse. " We've got two babies aged six
months and 18 months so obviously it's incredibly difficult not being able to
bath them you don't realise how often you need to use the water until it's
gone," said Kelly Davis.
The spa town's pubs, restaurants and cafes currently at the height of the
tourist season were severely affected. Those that had built of reserves of water
were doing a thriving trade in the much-needed sunshine, though most were
expected to close as stockpiled supplies ran out.
The first cracks also started appearing in the much-lauded community spirit.
Police were forced to deal with reports of bowsers being vandalised while
opportunist thieves tried to steal flood defences. Sir Nick Young, the chief
executive of the British Red Cross, which has launched an appeal, said morale
was in danger of collapsing. "You know, the Dunkirk spirit was very evident last
night in the places that we visited, but it would be a miracle if it held up for
14 days."
More rain is forecast for today.
The main developments of the day
River Severn area
Flooding in the river Severn area appears to have passed its peak. In
Gloucester, floodwater has receded, with levels falling by more than six inches
in Tewkesbury. Electricity has been restored to 48,000 homes.
River Thames area
This is the main area of concern. Vulnerable towns include Henley, Reading,
Marlow and Windsor. The peak in Pangbourne, Purley and Reading was expected
early today. At risk are Datchet, Horton, Wraysbury, Cookham, Bisham and Hurley.
Drinking water
At least 350,000 people are without water. Severn-Trent Water said it would
provide three million litres a day, and advised against panic buying. It could
take up to two weeks to restore supplies.
Health warnings
Professor Kevin Kerr, consultant microbiologist and honorary clinical professor
of microbiology, warned of gastro-related illness, vomiting and diarrhoea,
although he said they would not necessarily be life threatening. He said people
wading in floodwater should cover cuts.
Flood victims
A middle-aged man died yesterday in the Great Ouse, at Bedford. Mitchell Taylor,
19, from Tewkesbury has not seen since Saturday. A woman in Tewkesbury lost
newborn twins despite being rescued.
Official responses
The Government last night pledged a further £10m, in addition to an initial
£14m. The Queen has also sent a message of support. The Red Cross has launched
an appeal.
What lies beneath the
floods, I, 25.7.2007,
http://environment.independent.co.uk/climate_change/article2798519.ece
Brown announces
extra cash for flooded areas
Published: 25 July 2007
PA
The Independent
The Prime Minister announced today that help for the flood-stricken areas of
England is to be boosted to £46 million.
Mr Brown told the Commons at question time: "We have substantially raised the
funds available so that local authorities are in a better position to respond."
He said infrastructure needs for the future would have to be looked at and
warned that more would have to be invested to prevent floods in future.
Mr Brown, who is to visit the Gloucester-Tewkesbury areas later today, promised
an extensive report on the situation later this year after the independent
review.
The aftermath of recent storms dominated the last question time exchanges
before the summer recess.
Tory leader David Cameron expressed sympathy for those hit by the floods and
praised the emergency services.
He called for better co-ordination to prevent a repetition of the problem amid
jeers of derision from Labour backbenchers, who taunted him for being out of the
country on a visit to Rwanda over recent days.
David Drew, Labour MP for Stroud, told Mr Brown it "cannot be right" that his
constituents had been told they faced a 14-day wait for water supplies to be
restored.
Mr Brown said the Government was doing everything it could to get supplies
restored as quickly as possible.
Mr Drew thanked ministers for their efforts and paid tribute to the emergency
services for the "superb" work they had done.
"However, can it be right that we are being told that it will take 14 days to
get back our main drinking supplies.
"There is great misinformation about who is currently off from the mains supply
and who is likely to be off.
"Businesses, farms and individual households do want some certainty and it
cannot be the case that we have to wait so long in this day and age."
The Severn Trent water company, he said, had to move quicker.
Mr Brown expressed sympathy for those in the area who had suffered "an enormous
amount of inconvenience" and paid tribute to the police, fire services and army.
"You are right that the water station failed. You are right that we would like
it back to use as quickly as possible.
"You are also right that all the civil engineering capacity that can be brought
to bear, is being brought to bear, to stop a situation where the water works
were polluted and there is a danger that the water would contaminate local
people.
"We have made it clear to Severn water company that it has got to provide the
bowsers for the area - 900 have already been provided, 900 will be provided in
the next day.
"I think the company has discharged its duty in making sure that water is
available. Obviously we want the water station back as quickly as possible.
"I will visit the area later today and I've invited the MPs for Gloucester and
Tewkesbury to join me - and we will see at first hand how things are
progressing.
"We will do everything we can to get supplies restored as quickly as possible."
Brown announces extra
cash for flooded areas, I, 25.7.2007,
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2800556.ece
'You can't stop it,
so you just get your stuff
out of the way'
Published: 25 July 2007
The New York Times
By Terri Judd
The pub sign of a snail inching towards Noah's Ark was a fitting emblem for
the people of Wraysbury as they awaited the onslaught of the floods. The name
was equally apt - The Perseverance.
Wraysbury Dive School may have been offering scuba lessons but no one seemed to
be panicking yesterday. Most of the occupants of this quiet riverside community
are seasoned flood veterans. Yet, even for them, something was strange about
this latest crisis. It was the wrong season; they may be used to the Thames
encroaching every so often, but not at the height of summer. "It is quite an odd
feeling," said Tritia Tompkins. "My memories [of floods] are of quite frosty
days in winter."
Wraysbury is no rural outpost but a Middlesex village under Heathrow's flight
path. Yet yesterday it was on the Environment Agency's danger list, the most
at-risk spot in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead.
Julia Bruzas had her canoe ready for the worst possible scenario. Her home, a
countryside cottage beneath a windmill, had been swamped in 2003 and already the
gentle stream beside it was gorged with fast-flowing water. "We are waiting for
it to happen," said the 37-year-old caterer. "You can't stop it so you just
prepare yourself and get your stuff out of the way."
At the nearby pub, the new managers Pete and Sandy Smith - flood novices
compared to their neighbours - were watching with trepidation. "We are just
hoping we only get a bit of it in the garden. Excuse the pun but we are banking
on it not coming into the pub," said Pete. In the last major flood, four years
ago, locals had to use boats to cross the cricket pitch yards away from the bar.
On Friary Island, flanked by the Thames and a canal, June Hendry, 73, was
watching water engulf her garden and quietly thanking the surveyor who suggested
building six feet higher when her home was gutted in the 2003 floods. Other
homes nearby were not going to be so lucky. After four decades without a serious
flood, she said, this was her third since the millennium: "The river is up three
feet; it's terrible."
Local authorities are operating the Jubilee River Flood Alleviation Scheme and a
self-help flood group is standing by. Sandbags have been distributed and
everyone informed of the threat. Many residents, however, say the new Jubilee
system is having a detrimental impact on smaller villages. A Horton and
Wraysbury councillor, Colin Rayner, said: "This is not a time for blame. If you
are on Titanic and you have hit an iceberg, you focus on getting everyone off
before you shoot the captain."
'You can't stop it, so
you just get your stuff out of the way', I, 25.7.2007,
http://environment.independent.co.uk/climate_change/article2798520.ece
Flood victims told not to panic
as bowsers run dry
Heroic efforts to restore power praised
but sewage contamination threatens
disease
Wednesday July 25, 2007
Guardian
Steven Morris, Rachel Williams and Karen McVeigh
Police, health experts and utility chiefs yesterday urged members of the
public not to panic as concerns over water supply and sanitation escalated in
the worst-hit flooding areas.
The number of homes facing a fortnight without water is expected to grow and
people more than 40 miles away from Gloucester, at the centre of the disaster,
have been asked to cut their water usage.
Although Severn Trent insisted there was enough to go round, many people in
Gloucestershire complained that bottles of drinking water were not reaching them
and bowsers - portable water containers - were running dry. Health chiefs were
making contingency plans to deal with infections caused by the shortage of clean
water and sewage mixing with river water and inundating homes and streets.
As the waters of the River Severn finally began to recede, Hilary Benn, the
environment secretary, told MPs the government would top up the £14m flood
recovery fund with a further £10m. He praised the "heroic" efforts of the armed
forces in saving a power station from flooding but said the emergency was "not
yet over".
A British Red Cross appeal for flood victims raised more than £300,000 in its
first hour, with donations from Tesco, Halifax and GlaxoSmithKline, and £100,000
from the charity's disaster fund.
The Queen sent a message of support to victims of the floods and said she was
"shocked and deeply concerned" by the extent of the damage.
After Monday night's operation to save Walham station, engineers restored power
to 48,000 homes in Gloucester and Tewkesbury as Castle Meads sub-station was
repaired. But the chief constable of Gloucestershire, Tim Brain, said the crisis
was "effectively a wartime situation".
More than 250 soldiers and sailors are helping the emergency services, some of
whom were said to be exhausted after weeks of floods. There are 700 firefighters
working round-the-clock in Gloucestershire, where calls have totalled a quarter
of the usual 8,000 a year.
Yesterday 140,000 homes in Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury were still
without tap water after the inundation of the Mythe treatment centre, near
Tewkesbury. Supplies were being stretched at two other treatment plants, in the
Forest of Dean and at Strensham, north of Bristol, threatening homes further
afield.
Alan Payne, senior engineer at Severn Trent, asked people in Worcestershire and
Warwickshire not to hoard water and to use as little as possible. "If people
panic then there will be a knock-on effect."
Supported by military personnel, engineers were hoping to get into the swamped
treatment centre yesterday. But it will be two weeks before it is operational
again.
Mr Payne insisted there was water for everyone. Up to 3m bottles of drinking
water were available each day and by this morning 900 bowsers were set to be on
street corners. Eighty water tankers were keeping them topped up.
Still, in some places they ran out and volunteers began rationing supplies - two
1 litre bottles to households where young children and elderly people lived.
Police supervised handing out of bottled water in the car park at Tesco in
Quedgeley, Gloucester, as hundreds queued.
Some residents in Cheltenham complained supplies had been slow to reach them and
the MP for Tewkesbury, Laurence Robertson, said villages in his constituency
were short of clean water.
The director of public health at Gloucestershire Primary Care Trust, Shona
Arora, said sanitation was becoming an issue. She urged residents not to put
human waste into bins but only to flush when absolutely necessary.
Six severe flood warnings and 28 other flood warnings were still in place
yesterday, and people in towns along the Thames valley were warned to expect
further flooding. Possible heavy rain later in the week meant some flood
warnings were likely to remain in place.
Three of the severe warnings apply to the Severn, at Gloucester, Tewkesbury, and
between Tewkesbury and Worcester, and three in Oxfordshire, two on the Thames
and one on the River Ock. Blackspots included Pangbourne, Purley and the Reading
area, where the river was expected to peak at about 7am.
There were growing calls for the government to seek EU help, as Mr Benn faced
more pressure to explain whether it had failed to implement successive reports
proposing the Environment Agency take charge of all flooding responsibilities.
Peter Ainsworth, the shadow environment secretary, said at least 25 official
reports since 2000 had given warning on Britain's flood preparedness.
Flood victims told not
to panic as bowsers run dry, G, 25.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2134046,00.html
Power station
'I was sure water and electricity don't mix,
but I didn't
dwell on it'
Wednesday July 25, 2007
Guardian
Steven Morris
It was, according to the chief constable of Gloucestershire, Tim
Brain, "a superhuman effort". For two days firefighters, military personnel and
civilian engineers worked in murky, waist-deep water to prevent the Walham
electricity substation in Gloucester going underwater and power being cut to a
quarter of a million homes across the south-west.
In the end the water was just two inches away from the top of the
makeshift barriers that they had built when the level stopped rising. Captain
Mike Postgate, a Royal Marine, said: "We were confident that we would do it. It
was just a matter of getting enough sand in there."
In the final four hours of the operation on Monday night the rescue workers
loaded 36 tonnes of sand into bags, piling them against a temporary metal fence
to keep the water out. They could hear hisses and buzzes as electricity met the
river water but carried on regardless. "I did think at once that I was sure that
water and electricity don't mix," said one worker. "But it didn't do to dwell on
that."
Some of the rescuers also had to plunge under the water to locate manhole covers
to help the water drain away. "The water was surprisingly warm," said Lieutenant
Pamela Jackson, who is based on the assault ship HMS Ocean. "But the river water
was mixed up with sewage which wasn't so pleasant."
Ocean has just returned from the Caribbean, where it took on anti-smuggling
missions. "But the hurricanes didn't come out there," said Lt Jackson. "It's a
bit of an irony that as soon as we got back we're up in Gloucestershire doing
that sort of work."
As well as the sailors and marines, Gurkhas, Royal Engineers and members of the
Royal Logistic Corps were involved in the operation. While they shored up the
substation with sandbags, firefighters used eight huge pumps to flush out the
water already in there. At the height of the operation 150 firefighters were at
work on the site.
The waters stopped rising shortly before midnight on Monday.
It emerged yesterday that GCHQ, the government's high-tech listening post, is
supplied by Walham electricity switching station. The news has led to
speculation about the reason for the massive effort that went into saving it
from the floods. But yesterday a spokesman for GCHQ said it had a back-up
generator.
With experts unsure if the water level has peaked, Sarah Harris, a spokeswoman
for the National Grid, which owns the Walham site, says they are "remaining
watchful lest it rises again".
'I was sure water and
electricity don't mix, but I didn't dwell on it', G, 25.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2134047,00.html
9.45am
Power station saved
as floodwaters recede
Tuesday July 24, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Matthew Weaver and agencies
A power station in Gloucestershire that supplies 500,000 homes has been saved
from flooding after a major operation involving hundreds of firefighters and
personnel, as the worst of the flooding appears to be over.
The situation was so critical last night that cabinet's emergency
committee Cobra was warned the Walham substation was in danger of being swamped.
But the crisis was averted despite some breaches in the emergency flood defences
erected last night.
Nick Windsor, the director of electricity transmission at National Grid Group,
told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "The situation on site is stable currently
because of the fantastic work done by hundreds of people from the fire brigades,
army and navy to get up boundaries to stop floodwater coming into the site and
bring in heavy pumping equipment to pump out water that did get in."
He added: "We have got some floodwater in there, which will need mopping up, but
the power is fully on load at the moment."
There are still six severe flood warnings in place, down from eight. Three are
on the river Severn, two on the Thames and one on the River Ock in Oxfordshire.
Waters peaked below danger levels in some of the areas worst hit, but hundreds
of thousands of homes still remain without power and water.
The Environment Agency (EA) said the River Severn at Gloucester had peaked 50mm
(2in) below the main quay wall, which protects the city centre.
"If the flood waters topped over the main quay wall, Gloucester city centre
would be at serious risk of flooding, but it stopped short by 50mm," the
spokesman Adrian Westwood said.
The agency said flooding overnight from the swollen river Thames in Oxford and
Abingdon was less severe than predicted.
But it warned the forecast for unsettled weather over the next few days could
cause more problems. More showers are predicted this week, with heavy rain on
Thursday.
Around 350,000 homes were without running water and 50,000 were without power as
the flooding crisis continued.
Severn Trent Water warned that some 150,000 households could be without water
for up to two weeks because of the flooding of its treatment plant.
It said it had set up 400 bowsers, or mini water tankers, in locations in
Cheltenham, Gloucester and Tewkesbury, and was handing out 1 million free
bottles of water to residents.
A spokesman for the company urged people to only use the alternative water
supplies for essentials purposes to ensure there was enough to go around.
With river levels "slowly" falling in the early hours, emergency services
managed to restore electricity to more than 48,000 houses hit by the flooding of
Castlemeads substation north of Gloucester.
The water levels of both the Thames and Severn have exceeded those of the floods
in 1947.
Waters levels peaked on the Thames at Abingdon and Henley, with the highest
levels at Oxford expected in the early hours of today.
Floods are expected to peak on the river Great Ouse at Bedford this morning and
on the Thames at Reading in the early hours of tomorrow and Windsor on Thursday.
Power station saved as
floodwaters recede, G, 24.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2133463,00.html
Q&A:
What to do if your house is flooded
Tuesday July 24, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Hilary Osborne
The floods that have cut off parts of Gloucestershire and
Herefordshire and are a growing threat to Oxfordshire could affect up to 10,000
homes across the country, the environment secretary, Hilary Benn, warned
yesterday. So what should you do if you are one of the victims?
There's water everywhere - what should I do?
Well, if your home is actually underwater it's too late to worry about saving
existing items, but you can start thinking about what to do once the waters
start to recede. Your first step should be to call your insurance company - most
have 24-hour emergency helplines and are putting on extra staff to help deal
with the increased volume of calls.
However, some companies are warning of delays and are urging homeowners
unaffected by the floods to think twice before reporting claims for
non-essential items so they can focus their attention on emergency cases. Direct
Line, for example, has asked policyholders making accidental damage claims on
household items to wait for a few days while it deals with flooding claims.
What if I can't find my policy document?
Don't panic - your insurer should be able to find you on its database. Look on
its website or call a directory enquiries line to get its number. Remember that
your building and contents cover may be with different companies so you may need
to put in two calls. If you car is under water too, you will also have to call
your motor insurance company. Bear in mind you will only be able to make a claim
if you have fully comprehensive cover.
What should I do next?
If you are able to stay in your property but need help to prevent further
damage, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) recommends you speak to your
insurer before arranging emergency repairs, and that you keep any receipts for
work done so you can claim for the cost. Where possible, take photographs to
record the damage as this could help with your insurance claim.
Also remember that water and electricity don't mix, so make sure the electrics
are checked out before you flick any switches - you should be able to claim for
this on your buildings policy. Don't just throw things out, even if you think
you will need to replace them. For example, you may be able to claim for new
kitchen units if your current ones have soaked up water and are beyond repair,
but you should try to dry them out and keep them until a loss adjuster has seen
them.
A loss adjuster will be sent round by your insurer to assess what damage has
been done and to work out how much your pay out should be. Insurers have sent
teams of loss adjusters to the flooded areas, but they will be unable to visit
homes until after the flood waters have receded.
What if I have had to leave my property?
In the first instance, you may have been moved to emergency shelter by the
rescue services, but after that you may need to move somewhere else while work
is done to make your house habitable again. Building and contents insurance will
usually include provision for alternative accommodation if the damage is so
great that you are unable to stay at home. If you have both types of policy,
your building insurer will be expected to take care of your claim for somewhere
to stay.
Most insurers will ask you to approve the accommodation with them before your
stay begins. Sadly, they are unlikely to sanction a stay in the Ritz -
alternative accommodation is supposed to be in keeping with your normal
lifestyle, so for most people that will mean a standard hotel or B&B, at least
in the short term.
Your policy is likely to have a limit on how much will be paid out for
alternative accommodation - according to the ABI, this is typically around 20%
of the sum insured. If you spend more than that, you will be liable for the
cost.
What if I can't move back for a long time?
Insurers say some homeowners may not be able to move back into their properties
before Christmas. The 20% limit stands, even if long-term shelter is needed, but
if you don't want to stay in a hotel or B&B you should be able to arrange some
accommodation that feels a bit more like home.
After the recent floods in Hull, many homeowners decided they would like to stay
in mobile homes on their drives so they could still use the top floors of their
homes and have easy access to anything they might need. This is an option, as is
staying in a flat. "It is up to the individual policyholder what they want to
do, and the insurance company will pay for it," says Kelly Ostler, a spokeswoman
for the ABI. "It will either send you a cheque or pay for it directly."
And what if I have been burgled?
Sadly, empty homes and cars seem to be a temptation for looters, so if you are
forced to leave your property you should do your best to secure it.
Unfortunately, if you leave in a hurry and don't lock your doors or windows then
you will not be able to claim for any items that are stolen.
"There has to be a break in for a claim to be successful - it's exactly the same
as if there isn't a flood," says Ostler. If your home has been broken into, your
insurer will pay for the missing items as well as those damaged by the
floodwater.
When will I receive a pay out?
It could take months for insurers to process claims and arrange payouts, but
some are offering interim payments to help people buy essentials. NFU Mutual,
for example, is giving immediate payments of £500 to help policyholders with
short-term expenses.
Direct Line is also offering interim payments, but warns that getting a loss
adjuster to a property may take at least five days, while a full settlement may
take months. Spokeswoman, Emma Holyer, says: "The worst thing to do is to make a
quick payment because the property could be much more badly damaged than is
obvious at first."
Will I be able to get cover again?
Insurers have said they will carry on offering flood cover to as many homeowners
as possible, and many have said they will allow customers to renew existing
cover. The problem may come if you try to shop around, as no insurer is obliged
to take your business. You may be offered a policy that would pay out in other
circumstances, but not if you end up under water again, which will be little
comfort when you know how disruptive a flood can be.
If you stay with your existing insurer you could find that when you come to
renew your policy your premiums have risen, and other terms such as the level of
excess have changed. If this is the case you should shop around for a new
policy, but you may find you have little choice but to pay up.
Q&A: What to do if your
house is flooded, G, 24.7.2007,
http://money.guardian.co.uk/insurance_/home/story/0,,2133625,00.html
A 21st century
catastrophe
Published: 24 July 2007
The Independent
By Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor
Flood-ravaged Britain is suffering from a wholly new type of civil emergency,
it is clear today: a disaster caused by 21st-century weather.
This weather is different from anything that has gone before. The floods it has
caused, which have left more than a third of a million people without drinking
water, nearly 50,000 people without power, thousands more people homeless and
caused more than £2bn worth of damage - and are still not over - have no
precedent in modern British history.
Nothing in the past hundred years, in terms of flooding caused by rainfall, has
been as bad. According to the Environment Agency, even the previous worst case,
the extensive floods of spring 1947, which were aggravated by the vast snow melt
that followed an exceptionally hard winter, has been surpassed.
"We have not seen flooding of this magnitude before," said the agency yesterday.
"The benchmark was 1947, and this has already exceeded it." And the 1947 floods
were said to have been the worst for 200 years.
Most remarkable of all is the fact that the astonishing picture the nation is
now witnessing - whole towns cut off, gigantic areas underwater, mass
evacuations, infrastructure paralysed and grotesquely swollen rivers, from the
Severn and the Thames downwards not even at their peaks yet - has all been
caused by a single day's rainfall. A month's worth and more in an hour. It is
obvious that the Government and the civil powers, from Gordon Brown down to the
emergency services, are struggling to cope, not only with the sheer physical
scale of the disaster itself, but with the very concept of it. It is entirely
unfamiliar. It is new. Yet it is exactly what has been forecast for the past
decade and more.
No one can yet attribute the flood events of the past week, or indeed, those of
June, when Yorkshire suffered what Gloucestershire and Worcestershire are
suffering now - again from one single day's rainfall - directly to global
warming. All climates have a natural variability which includes exceptional
occurrences.
But the catastrophic "extreme rainfall events" of the summer of 2007, on 24 June
and 20 July, are entirely consistent with repeated predictions of what climate
change will bring.
It is nearly 10 years since the scientists of the UK Climate Impacts Programme
first gave their detailed forecast of what global warming had in store for
Britain in the 21st century - and high up on the list was rainfall, increasing
both in frequency and intensity.
This was thought most likely to happen in winter, with summers predicted to be
hotter and dryer. But yesterday Peter Stott of the Met Office's Hadley Centre
for Climate Prediction and Research, an author of a new scientific paper linking
increases in rainfall to climate change, commented: "It is possible under
climate change that there could be an increase of extreme rainfall even under
general drying."
The paper by Dr Stott and other authors, reported in The Independent yesterday,
detects for the first time a "human fingerprint" in rainfall increases in recent
decades in the mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere - that is, it finds they
were partly caused by global warming, itself caused by emissions of greenhouse
gases.
The public as a whole appears not to have taken the extreme rainfall predictions
on board, thinking of climate change in terms of hotter weather. But the science
community has been fully aware of it, and has steadily reinforced the warnings.
One of the most important came from a group of experts commissioned to look at
the risks by the Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir David King, under the
Government's Foresight Programme, in 2004. Their report, Future Flooding, said
that unless precautions were taken, more severe floods brought about by climate
change could massively increase the number of people and the amount of property
at risk. Yet once again, this hardly penetrated the public consciousness.
Amidst all the news of communities being overwhelmed by water yesterday, one
very significant announcement, from Gordon Brown and the Secretary of State for
the Environment, Hilary Benn, was that the Government is setting up an
independent inquiry to look at the flood events of June and July.
Its report will be immensely important and may prove a milestone in terms of the
British public's appreciation of the reality of climate change. It will
doubtless focus on the key problem in terms of flood response - there is no one
minister, or other person, in overall charge - but it may also take a view of
the disaster in terms of global warming, and may well come to the conclusion
that we are already witnessing the future. The floods of 2007 may eventually be
regarded as a wake-up call to the warming climate's rapidly approaching effects.
Nobody saw them coming. But that appears to be the way of a changing climate. In
April 1989 Margaret Thatcher, then Prime Minister, gave her Cabinet a seminar on
global warming at No 10 and one of the speakers was the scientist and green guru
James Lovelock. A reporter asked him afterwards what would be the first signs of
global warming. He replied: "Surprises." Asked to explain, he said: "The
hurricane of October 1987 was a surprise, wasn't it? There'll be more."
The floods of 2007 were a surprise as well, and if Dr Lovelock is right,
there'll be more of them too. Welcome to the weather of the 21st century.
The flood of 1947
The Great Flood of 1947, the previous worst inundation caused by rainfall in
Britain, swamped almost all of the rivers in the South, Midlands and the
North-east, submerged 700,000 acres of land and caused an estimated £4bn worth
of damage (in today's money).
The deluge was predominantly caused by the rapid thaw of snow and ice that had
covered much of England after a particularly long and cold winter. The weather
patterns that caused the thaw also caused a number of torrential downpours,
exacerbating the flooding.
The timing could not have been worse; Britain was still recovering from the war.
Rationing was harsh, deprivation widespread and the economy was teetering. What
made the catastrophe even more unfortunate was that it occurred before the era
of flood insurance.
The flooding started across the South, from Somerset to Kent, as many rivers
broke their banks. By 14 March, parts of west and north-east London had been
submerged. The next day, the river Thames overflowed its banks at Caversham,
near Reading, and around the Lea Valley to the east of London.
By the end of the month, an estimated 100 000 homes had been flooded, hundreds
of thousands of people displaced and the year's crops largely wiped out.
A 21st century
catastrophe, I, 24.7.2007,
http://environment.independent.co.uk/climate_change/article2795635.ece
Geoffrey Lean:
Get used to floods
- the worst is yet to come
It is salutary that Gordon Brown has been faced with a climate-driven crisis
so early in his premiership
Published: 24 July 2007
The Independent
If there is one thing we Britons should surely be able to cope with, it's the
rain. We may be wearily resigned to the apparent inability of the nation that
invented the steam engine to run a railroad. We may, perhaps, be persuaded by
successive governments that our public services are continually in need of
"reform". We may even believe that we can excuse being caught unawares, as last
year, by drought. But this damp island, slap in the path of the wet westerlies,
is awfully used to getting a drenching.
Yet here we are, after a few days of heavy downpours, bang in the middle of a
national crisis. The rains brought transport to a standstill. A whole town is
cut off by water from the rest of the world. Hundreds of thousands of people
have lost or may lose their water supplies. Hundreds of thousands more face
losing electric power. And we are told that the worst is yet to come.
Things have changed - and we have been caught out because we were not prepared
... We have, of course, had severe floods before; the worst killed 2,000 people
when the Severn burst its banks in 1606, while an area the size of Kent was
inundated across the country in the spring of 1947. But they have become more
frequent - more than doubling over the past century.
This is mainly down to the weather. We are used to miserable summers - but this
month is expected to be the wettest-ever July, following the wettest-ever June.
We have also experienced torrential rains before - in July 1955 an unmatched 10
inches fell in Martinstown, Dorset, in just 24 hours. But these, too, are
becoming more common.
Research at Newcastle University last year concluded that downpours have become
twice as intense over the past 40 years, and that the worst come four times more
often. And the Environment Agency predicts that heavy rainfall will become three
or four times more common in coming decades, increasing flooding tenfold.
This is only to be expected as the world heats up, injecting more energy in the
climatic system and evaporating more water from the sea. As The Independent
reported yesterday, a new scientific paper will tomorrow firmly make the link
between heavier rainfall and global warming.
The more precipitous the downpour, the less chance the rain has to be absorbed
by the ground and vegetation, and the more likely it is to race down drains and
into rivers, making them overflow. We have made this worse by paving over more
and more of the countryside for housing, roads - and even driveways and garden
patios.
This is the second thing that has changed over the past decades. We have built
over a great deal more land. And that has not merely made flooding worse but
aggravated its effects, by putting homes right in the way of the rising waters.
Half of all housing built in Britain since the Second World War - covering a
total area the size of the West Midlands - has been sited on land prone to
flooding. Councils and ministers have constantly disregarded warnings from the
Environment Agency about unwise developments. The consequences are plain to see;
most of the houses inundated in this summer's floods have been relatively new,
erected in the wrong place.
Yet, even now, nearly one in every six new buildings is being placed in flood
zones - and present plans suggest that this will rise to almost one in three
between 2016 and 2021. The Association of British Insurers wants houses planned
for much of the Thames Gateway to have their living areas on the first floor to
keep them dry.
To compound the danger, successive governments have neglected Britain's flood
defences. A report by the National Audit Office last month concluded that only
57 per cent of them - and just 46 per cent of those most important ones, such as
those protecting towns, are in good condition.
Worse, ministers have consistently refused to give the Environment Agency the
money it needs to build enough new ones, causing vital schemes to be delayed for
years. Last year, they even cut the budget. In the wake of this summer's floods
they have increased it by a third; but this won't take effect until 2010 and
will still fall far short of what is required.
All these factors mean that the number of British homes at risk of flooding is
projected to rise from two million to 3.5 million over coming decades.
Of course, global warming is the most important of these factors. If the climate
were not changing, it could be argued that it would be wrong to build costly
defences against rare events, and we might have got away with building on flood
plains. But the increased flooding that will accompany a warmer world makes a
change of course imperative.
Perhaps it is salutary that Gordon Brown should be confronted with a
climate-driven crisis so early in his premiership, for he has so far shown
little sign that he has fully grasped the importance of global warming. He
looked decidedly uncomfortable having to devote most of his first prime
ministerial press conference to the floods yesterday. He may care to remember
that it was the flooding of New Orleans that first put the skids under President
Bush, and to reflect that how he copes with the downpour - and addresses the
climate change that brought it - will affect those vital first impressions of
his own reign.
Geoffrey Lean is environment editor of The Independent on Sunday
Geoffrey Lean: Get used
to floods - the worst is yet to come, I, 24.7.2007,
http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article2795649.ece
Ministers under fire
as experts warn of worse to come
Published: 24 July 2007
The Independent
By Martin Hickman, Andrew Grice and Colin Brown
The greatest flooding of modern times was predicted to worsen today as rivers
burst their banks and deluged more people, buildings and countryside with storm
water and sewage.
As water invaded hundreds of homes and left 350,00 without basic supplies
yesterday, the Environment Agency warned overflowing rivers would swell further
in the coming 72 hours.
The River Severn, which has left Gloucester resembling a ghost town, and the
River Great Ouse threatening Bedford, are set to reach maximum flow this
morning. Last night Walham power station, which serves half a million homes,
escaped flood water from the Severn by two inches.
In Oxford where a football stadium has been turned into emergency accommodation
for residents the Thames still had to reach its peak. The river will be at its
height at Reading tomorrow morning and at Windsor on Thursday.
Closer to the capital, rising waters may threaten Shepperton. The damage from
the flooding could top £2bn. At Westminster, ministers came under fire from
opposition parties over the failure of the Environment Agency to install
defences in areas known to be at risk.
Gordon Brown defended the agency at Downing Street after visiting some of the
flood-hit areas. The Environment Secretary Hilary Benn announced a full
independent inquiry. He told the House of Commons: "I must emphasise that this
emergency is far from over. Further flooding is very likely as the Thames and
the Severn fill with floodwater from within their catchments."
The inquiry will look at the impact of the changing weather for coastal and
river flood defences and drainage systems, whether the bodies involved should be
better co-ordinated and the siting of water and power works.
Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrats' environment spokesman, said it was " daft"
for ministers to go back to square one because a review only three years ago had
recommended the agency be given an over-arching role in handling floods. The
idea had been accepted by the Government but not implemented.
Yesterday, the Environment Agency had 50 flood warnings and eight severe weather
warnings in force; four on the Severn, three on the Thames and one on the Great
River Ouse.
After touring Gloucestershire, Mr Brown said "19th century" infrastructure was
having to cope with a level of rainfall expected only once in every 150 years.
Denying that flood defence budgets had been cut, he insisted that spending had
already doubled to £600m and would rise to £800m, with further increases if
necessary. "Like every advanced industrialised country, we are coming to terms
with the issues surrounding climate change," he said.
Ministers under fire as
experts warn of worse to come, I, 24.7.2007,
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2795658.ece
Ministers warned three years ago
over flood defence failings
Water levels still rising
as thousands hit by worst floods in modern British
history
Tuesday July 24, 2007
Guardian
Patrick Wintour and Karen McVeigh
The government has been accused of failing to act on its own advice to overhaul
UK flood defences and drainage systems which first highlighted deep-seated
problems three years ago.
As large tracts of central and southern England remained under water, leaving
tens of thousands of homes without power or drinking water, the environment
minister, Hilary Benn, announced an independent review into what is being billed
as the worst episode of flooding in modern British history.
But it emerged last night that the government was warned in two separate reports
that the plans in place to tackle flood risks were "complex, confusing and
distressing for the public". In July 2004 the government said it needed to
improve coordination between water companies, councils and the Environment
Agency; then in 2005, the government also agreed to "work towards giving" the
agency "an overarching strategic overview across all flooding and coastal
erosion risks".
Ministers promised to transfer this responsibility by 2006.
An analysis by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has
concluded that the current divisions of tasks lead to:
· A lack of information for those affected by flooding, with people passed
between organisations and no one taking responsibility.
· Insufficient risk assessment because no single organisation has the incentive
to carry it out.
· Development planning decisions being taken without a full understanding of the
risks of urban flooding.
· Separate organisations making investment decisions based on priorities in
their own area of responsibility without considering the wider drainage issues.
Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat environment spokesman, said: "The government
has been looking at an integrated approach for more than three years, but did
not act on its own analysis in 2005. Ministers have been in and out of the
revolving door at the department, and now we are to have another review to look
at exactly the same issues again."
The concerns were raised as the Environment Agency warned the crisis would
worsen and persist for at least another 24 hours.
Eight severe warnings remained in place covering the rivers Thames, Severn and
Ouse, in particular for the towns of Gloucester, Tewkesbury, Oxford, Abingdon,
Reading and Bedford, amid the worst flooding in 60 years. Fifty other flood
warnings were in place across England and Wales.
So far up to 350,000 homes have lost, or are at risk of losing, water supplies
in Gloucester, Tewkesbury and Cheltenham as a result of flooding of the Mythe
treatment plant, which remains out of action.
The water company Severn Trent sent more than 400 mini-tankers of water to areas
in Gloucestershire. It handed out 150,000 litres of bottled water at various
places in the area. Emergency services ferried in bottled supplies to trapped
residents. Each "at risk" person has been given three days' supply. The company
asked for water to be used sparingly.
A total of 45,000 homes were without power, including at Castle Mead and
Tewkesbury, after an electricity substation was turned off due to the rising
water.
Mr Benn told the Commons up to 10,000 homes have been, or could be, flooded
across the country, and 200,000 homes face losing power if Walham switching
station in Gloucester is flooded. Armed forces were drafted in to help fire
service and Environment Agency staff build a temporary barrier around the site
and start pumping out 45cm (18in) of floodwater. The situation remained
"serious".
The Atomic Weapons Establishment at Burghfield, Berkshire, was also flooded but
there has been no escape of radioactive materials.
After visiting Gloucester, Gordon Brown used his first monthly press conference
to link the situation to climate change and pledged to invest in coastal and
flood defences. The government has promised an extra £200m to the Environment
Agency over the next three years to improve flood defences, but the agency has
said that £1bn a year is needed.
Ministers warned three
years ago over flood defence failings, G, 24.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2133420,00.html
Delays and shortages
as claims bill exceeds £2bn
Tuesday July 24, 2007
Guardian
Miles Brignall
Insurers were yesterday warning those affected by the flooding that they face a
long wait to make their homes habitable, as the industry is still struggling to
cope with last month's unprecedented deluge.
With the total payout due to summer flooding likely to be more
than £2bn, insurers were bringing in extra staff and ordering specialist
equipment from Italy and the US to deal with a new round of claims. The
Association of British Insurers originally predicted a flooding bill of £1.5bn,
but that was before the rains on Friday. "It's clear this weekend's events will
add several hundred million pounds to that total," said a spokeswoman.
The ABI said about 93% of homeowners have buildings and contents cover, but up
to a quarter of all those in rented homes were uninsured. It said it was too
soon to say if premiums would have to rise. Insurers paid out £1.3bn for
flooding in 2000, but premiums had remained static.
David Stoddard, head of customer service at Lloyds TSB Insurance, said the
industry was "already showing some signs of strain" before the latest torrential
rain. "It's clear we are now going to be fighting on several fronts. The demand
for alternative accommodation is already outstripping supply," he said.
"There are real shortages of vital equipment, and the number of available
contractors is shortening daily. We are moving staff from other areas on the
business to deal with claims, and contractors are coming in from other areas.
But we will manage."
Norwich Union, Britain's largest insurer, said staff were similarly making their
way to the affected areas to be present as the waters recede. "We are bracing
ourselves for the next wave of claims. Only once we are able to get claims staff
inside the affected homes will we be in a position to say how bad things are,"
said senior claims manager Jason Harris.
Insurance assessors were predicting yesterday that shortages of vital equipment
would delay building work.
All Seasons Hire, based in Hampshire, said dehumidifiers used to dry homes were
already in short supply.
"We ran out three weeks ago, but the phones have been going mad. We're importing
new models from Italy in a bid to meet demand," said a spokeswoman.
Meanwhile motor insurers were also bracing themselves for a big increase in
claims. The ABI said people with third party, fire and theft cover are not
insured if floodwater wrecks their car.
Delays and shortages as
claims bill exceeds £2bn, G, 24.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2133317,00.html
'We just want it to stop.
Please let it stop'
Power cuts, deluged homes
and queues for bottled water in swamped Gloucester
Tuesday July 24, 2007
Guardian
Steven Morris
Leia Rosenberg and her 10-year-old son, Connor, surveyed the remains of their
kitchen in the Longlevens area of Gloucester, reduced to a soggy, smelly wreck
for the second time this summer.
"We had just dried out from when we flooded last month. Now we have got to
start the whole thing again - the insurance claims, the mopping up, the drying
out. It's so very depressing. It was bad last time, it's just awful this. I
could cry."
A mile away in Sandhurst Lane, nine-year-old Sarah Royles could not stop her
tears. She and her seven-month-old cousin, Montana, were plucked from their home
by firefighters as the water lapped into their living room. "I was so scared. I
can't really swim," sobbed Sarah. "The water was so deep, it was horrible. I
never want to go back there."
In the sunshine on Sunday many of those caught as the river Severn burst its
banks were enjoying the adventure. By yesterday the mood was much more sombre as
the extent of the floods became clear.
The towns of Upton upon Severn in Worcestershire and Tewkesbury in
Gloucestershire were still ringed with brown, muddy water but attention switched
to the city of Gloucester, where hundreds of homes were flooded and the misery
of residents was compounded by cuts to the power and water supplies.
Scores of people, young and old, were rescued by boat and helicopter, while
others refused to leave even though their taps had run dry and they were left
without lights or heating, worrying that their homes would be looted if they
deserted them.
In Alney Terrace, close to the city centre, Dave and his friends, were sipping
beer as they sat knee-deep in flood water. "I know it's a miserable thought, but
I reckon if we go, this place will be ransacked. So we're staying put," he said.
And still the water continued to rise, threatening to engulf homes and
businesses in the historic dock area and the city centre itself, a ghost town
yesterday with most shops and businesses closed.
Police emphasised that the water would not reach its peak until today and their
focus was still on making sure people were safe rather than recovering from the
devastation.
An extraordinary day began with a visit by the prime minister. Gordon Brown's
helicopter flew over some of the affected areas and he spent more than an hour
at Gloucestershire police's headquarters speaking to the teams coordinating the
rescue efforts. But the chief constable, Tim Brain, advised him not to go into
the city centre, less than 10 minutes away, for fear he would get stuck.
Not everyone was impressed. Dave Smith, 34, helping a friend mop out his house
near the city centre, said: "He ought to have come and spoken to some of the
people affected. Of course it's tricky to get around because there's lots of
water here. That's the point."
While Mr Brown was being briefed, half a mile away at the Tesco car park in
Quedgeley the first of the lorry-loads of bottled water brought in for people
whose taps had run dry was running out. People were asked to take only six
bottles but many kept returning for more until their cars were full. "It's every
man for himself," said Gemma, 34. "I've got two boys and a husband to look
after. We need all the water we can get."
A second lorry was many hours away - and those who had missed out were forced to
join a long queue to try to buy water from Tesco, in darkness because of the
power cut.
Severn Trent tried to stop the panic, sending more than 300 bowsers - portable
water tanks - to the county. But most were sent to the city centre and residents
of some outlying areas complained they had been left out. Not only were they
without drinking water but they were not able to flush toilets, let alone wash.
By yesterday evening, many of the bowsers were also running dry.
The lack of water and power was most critical for the very young and very old.
Trinity Church hall in Longlevens was opened as a refuge for mothers struggling
to feed children and elderly people who were not able to cook themselves a hot
meal or even make a cup of tea.
Heroics were performed by 250 military and emergency service personnel to
prevent the Walham substation in Gloucester from being overwhelmed. Firefighters
and soldiers had to wade through waist-deep water then dive to reach manhole
covers.
Last night, crowds of people gathered on Westgate Bridge to survey the scene.
"It's surreal, isn't it?" said Rob Green. "It's just water as far as you can
see. The worrying thing is, the water's still rising. They're talking about
evacuating people to Bristol or Birmingham now. We just want it to stop. Please
let it stop."
'We just want it to
stop. Please let it stop', G, 24.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2133305,00.html
Going under
Britain is world-renowned for its depressingly damp climate. We are used to
suffering week upon week of rain. So why have a few heavy showers caused such
devastation around the country this summer? Aida Edemariam reports
Tuesday July 24, 2007
Guardian
Aida Edemariam
Anyone attempting to take a train to or from the southwest of England this
weekend could be forgiven for wondering if they had accidentally strayed on to
the set of a disaster movie - or perhaps an episode of the BBC's recent exercise
in futurology, If. Trains appeared on boards and then simply vanished.
Announcers on the London Underground pronounced litanies of lines progressively
going out of service. As for those who had to watch their homes and businesses
succumb to the rising tide, among them there was a general sense of disbelief.
Disbelief that a downpour so short should wreak such havoc, disbelief that such
scenes should be occurring at all.
The disbelief is justified. This, after all, is a country famed for its
wetness. Rain is our national weather. Snow - well, we all know what happens
when Britain is dusted with a few millimetres of snow. Excessive heat, like last
summer's, causes difficulties, too - but rain? Given our extensive experience,
surely we should lead the world in rain management.
Alas, it seems not. Thousands had to be evacuated over the weekend, thousands
more are trapped in their homes. That's thousands to add to those still unable
to go home after floods in the north of England last month, which killed eight
people - and untold millions to add to a national insurance bill eventually
expected to top £2.5bn. Evesham, in Worcestershire, the worst-hit town this
weekend, experienced floods of up to 16 feet. And it isn't over yet: at the time
of going to press there were warnings that flood waters weren't expected to peak
until tonight, and Oxford and Bedford and Gloucestershire were bracing
themselves to be the next major areas hit. All are entitled to ask how such
relatively short bursts of rain - just one hour in London, somewhat longer in
places such as Oxfordshire - could have such devastating results.
In fact, the answer lies partly in how quickly it all happened. Brize Norton in
Oxfordshire received 121.2mm of rain between midnight Thursday and 5pm Friday -
a sixth of what it would expect for the whole year. South Yorkshire got a
month's worth of rain on June 25. "It's extremely unusual to have such a high
depth of rainfall in such a short duration," says professor Adrian Saul,
research director of the Pennine Water Group at Sheffield University, an expert
in urban drainage systems and one of the authors of the 2004 Flood and Coastal
Defence Project, the most wide-ranging analysis of future flood risk ever
conducted in the UK. He also points out that prevailing pressure systems have
been dropping rain on to the country for weeks now, "and the ground is very wet,
so immediately you get rainfall, you get runoff".
It isn't just a case of the ground not being able to absorb so much so fast -
drainage systems can't either, and have simply been overwelmed. "When you design
a system you have to take a level of risk, and generally the level of risk is
sufficient to protect our communities," says Saul. "But once the design criteria
have been beaten, the systems become overwhelmed and the defences are
overtopped. It's very fortunate that the Victorians built the systems as big as
they did. In London in particular, [they] had the foresight to see that there
would be change and it's protected London ever since." Which is, of course,
impressive, and true, but it is also true that they were built when London's
population was a quarter of what it is now - and last Friday, they simply didn't
hold up.
"Our sewers are not designed to deal with that capacity of water flowing through
them," says Nicola Savage, a spokeswoman for Thames Water. They are also not
designed for the way we currently treat them. We each, personally, use far more
water than ever before. There is also "a tendency for the public to use the
sewers as a litter bin," Savage adds. People flush nappies down toilets,
sanitary products, tights; in particular "we need to encourage people not to be
pouring stuff down the sink - for example, fat, oil and grease. The sewers were
never designed to cope with this sort of material. They were only ever designed
for rainwater and foul water." Fat, liquid when it's hot and poured away by
fast-food outlets, for example, coagulates as it cools. "Increasingly, our sewer
flushers' time is being taken up clearing deposits of fat, oil and grease out of
the sewers, which is obviously impeding the free flow of liquid through them,"
says Savage. The arteries of the city of London, it seems, are furred with
cholesterol, and its citizens are suffering the consequences.
Thames Water says that it is spending £323m upgrading its sewers but, as Dr Jean
Venables, chief executive of the Association of Drainage Operators, puts it,
carefully, large-scale investment in sewers has not generally been the order of
the day in this country. "There is a need for the water companies to be allowed
... to invest not only in replacing the drains because they've come to the end
of their life, but also to extend the system to cope with the new development
that's taking place, and our increased use of water. Until recently, Ofwat [the
economic regulator for the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales] has
been reluctant to allow very much investment by water companies, because they
wanted to keep water bills down."
Partly as a result of his work on the Foresight report, Saul has for the past
three years been involved in £5.6m project called the Flood Risk Management
Research Consortium, which is attempting to come up with both short- and
long-term solutions to a problem that climate change means will only get worse.
Saul manages research into urban flood risk and is attempting to come up with
mathematical models that might predict the potent interactions of surface, sewer
and river flows that cause urban flash floods - "trying to better understand how
we can manage the floods, channel them away from urban areas".
But overloaded urban drainage systems are only one of a complex set of reasons
why we have been overwhelmed with water. The consortium is also looking into
land use management - essentially, how farmers can control the flow of water off
land, which can be affected by all sorts of things. The direction a farmer
ploughs, for example - if he or she goes across hills rather down them - can
decrease runoff. Strategically placed trees can trap it. Stocking levels can be
adjusted: the more animals there are on a piece of land, the more they pack the
ground down, and the less able it is to absorb water. "Stocking densities and
drainage patterns have been changed already [in response to the floods in the
north in June]," says Dr Venables, "particularly in upland areas."
Unfortunately, this hasn't happened soon enough to avoid "a considerable amount
of crop damage". At the moment farmers in some areas can't access their crops to
see if they might be salvageable, and "that's going to be showing up very
quickly in our shops". This weekend the RSPCA spoke of growing fears for
intensively farmed animals - no drinking water for 48 hours will mean widespread
livestock death, which might also in turn affect the price of food.
The consortium, which will learn in the next week or so whether it has secured
more funding with which to continue its work, is also looking at the
infrastructure of British rivers - whether embankments are high enough, whether
there are ways to divert floods when they occur - and attempting to use
modelling to predict how floods move and change the landscape. (When a river
floods, for example, the topograpy of the river bed changes, and thus the
behaviour of the river changes.) It is also looking at small-scale ways in which
individuals can help reduce a problem that, in fact, they have helped create:
adding extensions to houses, paving driveways, car parks - all of this activity
decreases the amount of soft ground that water can disappear into, and increases
the amount of runoff into drains and rivers. "In essence, the latest thinking is
that anything that runs off the house should be stored locally," says Saul. This
can mean rainwater harvesting systems, which ensure that rainfall doesn't go
straight into the sewerage system; it can be collected - in storage tanks under
driveways, for example - and used to flush toilets or run washing machines or
regulate the sewerage system. Small trenches called soakaways can be dug in
gardens and filled with stones, which trap the water and release it into the
ground a bit more slowly. Every little helps.
For the fact remains that while what Britain has experienced over the past month
is, as experts keep pointing out, a series of freak weather events, our changing
climate means that there may well be more of them, more frequently. Today
Oxfordshire and Gloucestershire are having to rush to the barricades, to get out
the sandbags and evacuate the citizens. Tomorrow, next month, next year - who
knows?
Going under, G,
24.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2133230,00.html
Sodden Oxfordshire
is braced for worse to come
· 41 roads expected to flood as run-off swells rivers
· Residents refuse to leave homes for fear of looting
Tuesday July 24, 2007
Guardian
Rachel Williams
Oxfordshire was bracing itself for the fallout from the weekend's torrential
rain last night as vast quantities of water running off the land swept along the
swollen Thames, threatening to burst its banks.
Abingdon, where householders have already suffered flooding from the River
Ock, emerged as a likely crisis point, with residents evacuated or trying to
safeguard their homes under threatening grey skies.
The Thames rose three feet (0.9 metres) in less than 12 hours in the historic
town yesterday and was expected to reach its peak overnight. Oxfordshire council
said 41 roads were likely to flood, and some holidaymakers stranded on narrow
boats for days, including a man who had run out of essential medication, were
rescued by fire crews in dinghies amid fears the swollen waters would break
their moorings.
By yesterday afternoon residents were reporting difficulties getting hold of
sandbags, with lorries bringing further supplies being besieged. "A lorry pulled
up with a couple of pallets of sandbags and within seconds they were all gone,"
one man said. "There's no such thing as an orderly queue at the moment."
Another resident, Ernie Russell, said he had seen some panic buying at the
town's convenience stores, people leaving with several loaves of bread and
crates of bottled water.
Fifty people from retirement flats overlooking the Ock and a care home in
Abingdon were moved on Sunday to Oxford's Kassam Stadium and sleeping at a
neighbouring hotel. The stadium was stocked with food and bedding for up to
1,500 people as authorities prepared to take in residents from around the
county.
On Abingdon's Ladygrove Estate, where grimy tide marks on doors and walls
revealed the extent of the flooding at the weekend, residents surveyed lapping
water that seemed to be rising again, then set about barricading their doors
with sandbags, plastic sheets and bricks.
They had been told evacuation might be necessary, but Helen Bennett, whose
carpets, washing machine, tumble dryer and freezer were ruined by weekend
floods, said she was determined not to leave for fear of losing more possessions
to looters.
In Abingdon town centre, an architect, Mike Cleary, employed a builder to seal
his front door with spray foam and block up drill holes in bricks with plastic
sealant. "I have a friend who ... told me sandbags are no use," he said.
The Environment Agency said the Thames was not expected to reach the levels it
did in the 1947 floods in Abingdon and Oxford, but could be worse than in 2003.
Sodden Oxfordshire is
braced for worse to come, G, 24.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2133122,00.html
Houses can be built on flood plains,
minister insists
Tuesday July 24, 2007
Guardian
Tania Branigan, political correspondent
The waters inundating swaths of central and western England are
no reason to block urgently needed new homes, including developments built on
flood plains, the housing minister said yesterday.
Yvette Cooper warned critics not to "play politics" with the
floods as she unveiled the green paper on housing, which promises £8bn of
investment in affordable housing and explains how the government will build 3m
more homes by 2020. She warned that without action housing could become one of
the greatest sources of social inequality.
A broad coalition - including council leaders, unions and housing campaigners -
welcomed the commitment to increase the supply of homes, but questioned whether
the government had pledged enough money for affordable accommodation.
Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that development had always taken
place on flood plains and that the key was proper planning and protection. Rules
were toughened last year.
She said: "I don't think that misinformation being used just to whip up
hostility against housing is fair on those people who desperately need
affordable housing now."
The Lib Dem leader, Sir Menzies Campbell, said it was extraordinary not to
reconsider development on flood plains, and Grant Shapps, shadow housing
minister, accused Labour of building "the sink estates of tomorrow".
He said: "Labour's Whitehall planning targets, imposed on local communities with
the threat of financial penalties on top, threaten to increase the likelihood of
flooding."
Speaking in the Commons later, Ms Cooper warned that demand was outstripping
supply and said the government wanted decent homes "for the many, not the few".
She pledged that at least 70,000 affordable houses a year would be built by
2010-11, including 45,000 social homes; more than double the amount built in
2004. The government will also invest an additional £300m in transport
infrastructure.
It will crack down on councils which resist development and developers who buy
land but hold off building because they hope property values will rise.
A new grant will reward local authorities which find suitable sites and deliver
new housing. But the green paper warns: "Where councils have not identified
enough land, planning inspectors will be more likely to overturn their decisions
and give housing applications the go ahead on appeal ... The secretary of state
will not hesitate to use her powers to recover planning appeals and take
decisions herself."
Councils will be encouraged to build housing themselves because in future they
will be able to keep full rents from the new homes they build and get all the
cash back if the homes are sold to tenants. Shared ownership schemes will be
expanded for those seeking to climb on to the property ladder.
Two-thirds of the homes will be built on brownfield sites and spare public
sector land will be used where possible; the Ministry of Defence has already
identified six sites with the potential for 7,000 homes.
Ms Cooper said houses should be more environmentally friendly and better
designed in future. The green paper asks for bids from councils and developers
to host five new zero-carbon "eco-towns".
But the Local Government Association warned that reaching affordable housing
targets would take at least £11.6bn, not £8bn, and the National Housing
Federation described the government's calculations as "dangerously wrong".
Sir Simon Milton, chair of the LGA, praised the government for giving councils
greater freedom to provide affordable homes. But he added: "It is important that
densely populated areas are not penalised just because they have less land for
development."
The TUC general secretary, Brendan Barber, said: "The new government deserves
congratulations not just for the contents of today's green paper but also for
putting housing once again at the top of the political agenda ... Too many
responses to today's plans will say we need more homes, but not round here ...
If we are to build new eco-towns and achieve the other targets set out today
then ministers will have to tackle the Nimbys."
At a glance
· Three million new homes to be built by 2020 (two million by 2016).
· A housing grant and infrastructure fund to encourage developments.
· Two-thirds of all new homes to be built on brownfield land.
· Councils to create new local housing companies to use their own land.
· All new homes zero-carbon from 2016. Developers to bid for five new eco-towns
of up to 20,000 homes.
· £8bn investment towards 45,000 more social homes a year by 2010-11, plus
25,000 shared ownership.
· Councils to keep full rents from new homes and cash from sales.
· Affordable homes in rural areas.
· A review of shared equity products for first-time buyers and a new 17.5%
government loan for key workers.
Houses can be built on
flood plains, minister insists, G, 24.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2133392,00.html
‘We have to protect the things we love.
We’re staying put’
The river is rising and swimming costumes are ready.
Our correspondent finds resolute residents
beside the Thames in Abingdon
July 24, 2007
From The Times
Lucy Bannerman
Jan Ulyatt has taken off her wellingtons to dismantle the grandfather clock.
She and her husband, Brian, have only six hours left to barricade their listed
home on the banks of the River Thames in Abingdon against the waters that are
getting nearer and nearer to their oak-panelled living room.
The 15th-century converted malt house, which they share with another family, is
one of more than 400 vulnerable properties in Oxfordshire that have been placed
on red alert as the floodwaters continue the surge downstream. With sandbags in
place, carpets rolled up and the clock dismantled, the Ulyatts can only wait.
“If there’s more than a few feet of water, it’s going to come in,” said Mrs
Ulyatt, a retired teacher, her eyes fixed on the floodline. “Unless it surges up
the slipway, in which case it will come at us in all directions.”
Their home, which was renovated less than three years ago, lies in what is — in
drier times — an enviable position metres from the river bank. The steps that
usually lead from their garden to the river could no longer be seen. The weeping
willow sagged under the weight of its submerged branches and the river rose
perilously close to their home.
There was limited relief last night when the Environment Agency said at about
11pm that waters had peaked in both Abingdon and Henley. But nobody was letting
their guard down.
The homes of all 12 local firefighters have already been flooded after the Ock
tributary swelled unexpectedly, and at St Helen’s Wharf, where the Ulyatts’ home
lies in the shadow of the steeple of the town’s historic church, Mr Ulyatt said:
“I’m very apprehensive.” He added:
His road is one of 90 streets in Abingdon that emergency services had expected
to be flooded next. He spent the day barricading the garden steps. The local
council has supplied three bags of limestone per door to each house, so Mr
Ulyatt’s mission to find extra sandbags began before 8am with an emergency trip
to B&Q, where the store had left customers to help themselves to a pile of sand,
some bags and a shovel. The next stop was a local authority building where he
encountered a scrum of local residents.
“There were only 50 bags and about 60 people, so it was a case of getting your
hands on them and into the car as soon as possible. I have bagged up the
airbrick hollows under the floor at both the back and the front of the house.
We’re putting up defences and protecting the property as well as we can.
“It’s about protecting the things that you love, the photo albums, the books,
the ornaments and pictures that are irreplaceable.”
And if all else fails, he added: “I’ve got the chest-waders in the garden shed.”
Next door, in the second half the conversion, aptly named Ducks Landing, James
Openshaw, 68, and his partner Frances Scaddan, 63, were clearing out the rooms
most at risk.
“This is our pride and joy,” said Mr Openshaw, entering the riverside
conservatory where the waters flowed faster and faster beyond the books and
framed photographs.
Ironically, these canal-boat enthusiasts have spent the past two months on the
English waterways witnessing at first hand the damage caused around Leeds and
Doncaster. But the flooding closer to home yesterday meant that the holiday was
cut short and his narrow boat, the Umfazi, which is usually moored by the garden
picnic table, had to be abandoned in nearby Banbury. “We decided to abandon
ship,” Ms Scaddan said. They refused, however, to abandon home.
Voicing his concerns over looting, Mr Openshaw said: “We’re certainly not going
to move out. Call it the bulldog spirit.”
His partner agreed. “You’ve lost control then,” she said.
And so coffee-table books were stacked above cabinets and cushions crowded the
tops of wardrobes. Rugs were rolled up upon the tabletops, the television waited
to be disconnected. “If they are not protected at that height we are all in
trouble,” she added. “By then we will have to get our swimming costumes on.”
She has only recently retired after 14 years at Thames Water. The last time the
floods damaged the property, according to documents, was in 1894.
“I’m hoping we will get away with it, but lots of other people haven’t, so why
should we? It’s the surge I’m worried about, because when that comes up we could
be in a spot of bother. It will come down in a wave, which means you have a lot
more water coming in.”
Flooding forecasts
River Thames
Abingdon River levels were expected to peak at 11pm last night
Oxford Peak is expected this morning
Wallingford Peak at 3.15pm today
Pangbourne, Purley and Mapledurham Will start flooding today with peak expected
at midnight tomorrow
Reading and Caversham: Risk of flooding from mid-afternoon today. Peak in early
hours tomorrow
Henley, Wargrave and Shiplake Flooding started yesterday, peaking on Thursday
afternoon
Cookham, Marlow, Datchet, Wraysbury, Staines, Laleham and Shepperton Flood peak
forecast later this week
No flooding is expected below Shepperton
River Severn
Gloucester Peaks today at 11am
In the danger zone
Oxford Shops sold out of wellington boots and waterproofs. Dean Silence, from
the Go Outdoors store, said: “In your average weekend in July we might sell the
odd pair of wellies to a festival-goer, but certainly nothing like this”
Tewkesbury The 12th-century Abbey was flooded for the first time in memory.
Drinkers at the nearby Bell pub helped to place sandbags. Canon Paul Williams
said: “I am told that in 1760 the vicar had to row down the aisle to perform his
service”
Upton upon Severn The Blues Festival was not a total washout despite most of the
musicians being unable to reach the town. Those who did hosted an impromptu
street party
Stafford A motorist was arrested for allegedly ignoring the closure of a flooded
road. The 49-year-old driver was charged with failing to stop and resisting
arrest. A police spokeswoman said: “Drivers must stick to the rules”
Hereford Archaeologists were inspecting the 4,000-year-old Rotherwas Ribbon for
damage. Campaigners have said that the monument was left uncovered over the
weekend and has “probably been damaged”
England Emergency calls to the AA were 67 per cent higher than usual in the
flood region over the weekend. Mechanics were sent to 3,700 stuck motorists
West Mercia Increasing numbers of drivers were returning to trapped cars to find
that they had been flooded and looted, police said. “The longer they are left
unattended, often in remote locations, the more likely they are to be targeted,”
a spokesman said
‘We have to protect the things we love. We’re
staying put’, Ts, 24.7.2007,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2127626.ece
A catastrophe
with mankind's footprints
stamped on it
July 24, 2007
From The Times
Mark Henderson, Science Editor
Global warming is generating heavier rainfall over Britain of the sort that
has triggered this week’s floods, scientists have confirmed for the first time.
While it has long been suspected that climate change is contributing to
increased precipitation over midlatitude countries such as Britain, research has
now conclusively linked greenhouse gases to heavier downpours.
The findings, from an international team including several British scientists,
do not prove that this week’s flooding is the direct result of global warming:
it is linked to weather patterns that have been known before.
It is consistent, however, with a much broader trend towards more rainfall, on
which researchers have now found an unambiguously human fingerprint.
“The paper is saying there is a significant human influence on global rainfall
patterns and this includes an increase of precipitation north of 50 degrees
northern latitude, an area that includes the UK,” said Peter Stott, a climate
scientist at the University of Reading who took part in the study.
In the study, which is to be published in the journal Nature, the scientists
compared recorded changes in rain and snowfall over land with changes that are
predicted by climate models that account for global warming caused by greenhouse
gases.
The actual pattern of changes, with increased precipitation in latitudes north
of 50 degrees, corresponds remarkably closely with the patterns that emerged
from 14 different models. This suggests strongly that human-induced climate
change has been responsible.
For the European region that includes Britain, the research team estimates that
human activity has accounted for about two thirds of the observed trend. Other
natural factors, such as volcanic activity, have also had an influence, but this
is much smaller than that from people.
Dr Stott said that the study did not examine seasonal trends, but that other
predictions suggest Britain will in general suffer wetter winters and drier
summers, rather than multiple repeats of this year’s summer downpours, though
significant uncertainties remain.
It is currently impossible to say whether the current bad weather is a result of
global warming, and more research is needed into the origins of such extreme
events.
“We looked at annual rainfall trends rather than any particular season,” Dr
Stott said. “In the UK wetter winters are expected which will lead to more
extreme rainfall, whereas summers are expected to get drier. However, it is
possible under climate change that there could be an increase of extreme
rainfall even under general drying.”
— There is no easy way to say this — summer is shaping up to be one of the most
depressing in memory (Paul Simons writes). The weather forecast models for the
next seven days look truly horrible, with more showers midweek and even more
misery next weekend, with only brief respites. One ray of hope is a hint of some
fine weather in early to mid-August, but even this may prove to be a false hope.
Britain is caught in something of a meteorological sandwich, stuck between high
pressure systems to the north in Iceland and to the south in the Azores. Storm
clouds are squeezing through a gap in between these two huge anticyclones,
riding underneath the high altitude jet stream wind. The weather pattern is
stuck in a rut and refuses to budge.
It is tempting to blame the appalling weather on climate change, which is
believed to increase the chances of extreme rainfall events. But one wet summer
on its own proves very little. In fact, the top ten wettest Julys all happened
two or three centuries ago.
No, if there is a sign of climate change at work in all this misery it shows up
in the truly remarkable temperatures this month. Despite all the rain,
temperatures have averaged 15.5C (59.9F) for Central England up to July 22, only
0.5C below normal for the month. There is a good chance that without global
warming we might be suffering an even worse summer.
A catastrophe with
mankind's footprints stamped on it, Ts, 24.7.2007,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2127599.ece
A flying visit is as close
as Brown gets to misery
faced by
thousands
July 24, 2007
From The Times
Steve Bird in Upton upon Severn
If homeowners in some of the worst-hit areas of Worcestershire and
Gloucestershire had looked skywards at around breakfast time yesterday, they may
have seen the helicopter containing the Prime Minister.
At 7.15am Gordon Brown took an airborne tour of the brown patchwork of towns and
villages before visiting the police co-ordination centre. It was as close as he
got to the misery faced by thousands of people after the swollen rivers Severn
and Avon laid waste to much of the two counties.
In Upton upon Severn, the small Worcestershire town into which all four roads
are cut off by fast-moving waters, residents felt that his trip was simply a
public relations exercise.
Karl Hooton, 40, who helped in the rescues over the weekend, said: “He should
have got out into the streets and visited the people who are suffering. He
should have asked them what they wanted and needed. He can look down at the
water from on high, but he doesn’t know how deep it is or how fast flowing it
is. He can’t see what’s happening to people’s homes.”
Richard Myers, 51, a member of the Mercia Inshore Search and Rescue, said: “He
really should have visited us. He could have landed here with ease. A helicopter
landed at the school yesterday to deliver medical supplies.”
Rodney Miles, 56, added: “It would have been good of him to talk to those who
have been involved in the rescue out in the water, or residents who have been
affected.”
The Severn burst its banks at Upton on Friday night, devastating the town’s
weekend blues festival. Many of the pubs, now under 6ft (1.8m) of water, had
been refurbished for the event. Some of those who did turn up brought caravans
which were then swept away.
Residents are angered that Environment Agency flood barriers, which were meant
to arrive on Friday, got stuck on the M5. However, it is generally accepted that
they probably could not have held back the rising waters.
Tim Brain, Chief Constable of Gloucestershire, said that he had taken the
decision that Mr Brown should not visit Gloucester and the surrounding areas
because routes from the police base were impassable. “I advised him,” he said.
“The closest place he could visit was Gloucester city centre. It was my
professional advice that we couldn’t have the Prime Minister stuck on a flooded
road.”
Parmjit Dhanda, the Labour MP for Gloucester, believed that Mr Brown’s visit
offered hope to those whose homes have been wrecked.
The Prime Minister said that a review of the flooding would focus on drainage
and how the infrastructure could be protected against more rain. But the
priority was to help the most vulnerable and worst affected. He said: “We have
got to meet the longer-term challenges and we have set up a review into what’s
happening both with climate change and the effect of that on the services and
what is happening here.
“I want to give support and sympathy to all those who have suffered as a result
of the floods, to all those who have been displaced, to those who have had
operations cancelled in hospitals, to all those worried about what might happen
in the future. I want to say that the emergency services are doing an absolutely
wonderful job.”
Peter Bungard, chief executive of Gloucestershire County Council, will write to
Mr Brown to ensure that the authority could keep up the rescue and clean-up
efforts. “He’s a busy man,” he said. “I’m grateful that he fitted us in. He was
in listening mode. He took notes and appeared to really want to know what was
happening.”
Meanwhile, in the high street in Upton upon Severn a cheer went up when one
lorry driver managed to drive through the floods to deliver milk and bread to
the local shop.
Protecting your home
To find out if you ar at risk of flooding, call the Floodline on 0845 9881188 or
visit www.environment-agency.gov.uk/ subjects/flood
If you are
— Put plugs in sinks and weigh down with something heavy
— Place a sandbag in toilet bowl and block washing machine drain
— Turn off gas, electricity and water supplies at the mains
— Disconnect cookers and washing machines from rigid pipes
— Smear silicone sealant around window and door frames. Then close and lock
— Cover doors, windows and airbricks with plywood or sandbags
— Move furniture and electrical items upstairs, or place on bricks
— Weigh down or tie immovable furniture to stop it floating
Afterwards
— Call insurance company helpline
— Keep a record of the flood damage with photos and videos
— Commission immediate emergency pumping/repair work
— Open doors and windows
— Get power supplies checked before turning them on
— Wash taps and run them for a few minutes before use
And in future
— Use waterproof sealant on exterior walls
— Use water-resistant paint for internal ground floor decoration
— Seal cracks in walls
— Paint skirting boards of both sides before fitting
— Tile and seal the ground floor properly
— Solid flooring is more resistent to flood damage than boards
— Choose rugs rather than fitted carpet on ground floor
— Buy airbricks with removable covers
— Install anti-backflow valves to drains and sewers
— Place boilers and hot water cylinders in loft or first floor
Source: Environment Agency
A flying visit is as
close as Brown gets to misery faced by thousands, Ts, 24.7.2007,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2127595.ece
10,000 homes flooded,
50,000 without power
and 150,000 have no
water
July 24, 2007
From The Times
Valerie Elliott and David Brown
Servicemen and firefighters were battling to protect the electricity supplies
of half a million people last night as the highest flood waters in memory
continued to rise.
The Government announced an independent inquiry as water levels in the Thames
and the Severn exceeded those of the devastating floods of 1947 and were
forecast to rise to 20ft (6m) higher than normal.
More than 10,000 families have been left homeless in the West Country and Thames
Valley over the past four days and thousands of others have been told to leave
their homes as a mass of water surges down river. Electricity supplies to 50,000
homes have been cut and 150,000 homes have been left without water.
The Times was told last night that the utility companies were warned by the
Government seven years ago that they needed to make key facilities flood-proof
to protect supplies. The Castlemeads power station near Tewkesbury,
Gloucestershire, was shut down yesterday morning, however, leaving more than
50,000 homes without electricity. Supplies to a further 500,000 homes were under
threat as a 250-strong force of military personnel and firefighters attempted to
prevent rising waters overwhelming the Walham substation.
There was a glimmer of hope last night when the Environment Agency said that the
Severn appeared to have peaked two inches below the level that would have
overwhelmed the substation. An agency spokesman warned, however, that it was
still a “dangerous situation”.
The level of the Thames in Oxford may not peak until early Wednesday. Eight
severe flood warnings and 50 other flood warnings remained in place last night
as further rain added to the misery. Emergency planning teams met in
Cambridgeshire after a flood warning was placed on the Great Ouse and the police
prepared for possible floods around St Neots.
Hundreds more troops have been put on standby to help the police and fire
services to rescue trapped families and provide humanitarian aid to villages
that have been cut off since Friday night. Defence sources said that regional
commanders were working at police headquarters in the worst-affected areas and
providing troops and equipment whenever requested.
More than 350,000 people in Gloucester were told that they would be left without
water after a treatment plant was overwhelmed by the floods. The police were
called to guard supplies of bottled water at supermarkets after fights between
customers. Severn Trent Water said last night that the households could be
without water for up to two weeks.
Elliott Morley, Floods Minister from 1997 until last year, told The Times that
he had been assured by the utility industries that key sites would be
flood-proofed. “I remember previous flooding incidents where substations were
vulnerable and there were power cuts,” Mr Morley said. “We really must now
ensure that key installations are flood-proof so we do not descend into chaos
every time there is some flooding.”
The utility companies had also been asked by the former Department of Trade and
Industry, now the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulation, to review
the robustness of their sites against a one-in-a-hundred risk of flooding.
Nick Goodall, chief executive of the Energy Networks Association, which
represents the nine power companies and the National Grid, said: “The companies
are working to identify areas prone to flooding. This work is feeding into the
companies’ network replacement plans, but this work is only possible with
planning consent and regulatory approval.”
Gordon Brown, who visited Gloucestershire briefly yesterday, said that planning
had to presume more extreme weather conditions. He said that a review would have
to consider the siting of infrastructure because of the impact on water and
electricity supplies. The review of the emergency in the West Country and last
month’s floods in Yorkshire would have to cover the location of big
constructions, drainage and flood defences.
Mr Brown defended the response of the Government and authorities. He said that
funds to tackle the problem had risen from £300 million to £600 million and now
to £800 million.
Peter Ainsworth, the Tory environment spokesman, said: “These events are
increasing in ferocity and our infrastructure has to catch up with it.”
10,000 homes flooded,
50,000 without power and 150,000 have no water, Ts, 24.7.2007,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2127616.ece
Eyewitness > 22.07.07 > Tewkesbury
Tewkesbury Abbey stands amid the waters
which cut off roads after the Severn and
Avon rivers flooded
Photograph: Daniel Berehulak/Getty Images
The Guardian
pp. 20-21 23.7.2007
5.15pm update
County by county:
the areas worst hit by flooding
Monday July 23, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Staff and agencies
The flooding crisis in western and central England continued to
disrupt hundreds of thousands of people's lives today, with power cut to
thousands of homes and damage to the supply of drinking water.
Two of the worst hit areas were Gloucestershire and Oxfordshire,
with the banks of the rivers Severn and Thames coming under considerable
pressure as water rose to a "critical level", the Environment Agency said.
The agency had nine severe flood warnings in place across Gloucestershire and
Oxfordshire, and with waters in the rivers Severn and Thames not expected to
peak until tomorrow the number of flood warnings may increase.
There were four severe flood warnings located along the river Severn in
Gloucester, Tewkesbury and Worcester.
There were two severe flood warnings along the river Thames from Eynsham to
Sandford Lock, near Little Wittenham. A further severe warning has been placed
on the river Ock from Charney Bassett to Abingdon, in Oxfordshire, and there was
a severe warning on the river Great Ouse in Bedfordshire, from Turvey to
Sharnbrook.
Oxfordshire
Twelve centimetres fell in the county on Friday - the largest daily rainfall
since records began for the area in 1968 - and though a surge in the Thames
expected last night did not transpire, the Environment Agency was still warning
that the Thames would break its banks, possibly flooding Oxford's city centre
tomorrow.
Oxfordshire council predicted flooding on 41 roads in particular, and water
levels were expected to rise further in Oxford's Botley Road where houses were
already flooded. Overnight rain also raised water levels on the river Ock, which
has already burst its banks in Abingdon, and the river Evenlode at Witney, where
many properties have been engulfed by the overflowing river Windrush.
A sports stadium on Oxford's outskirts was being used to shelter 50 elderly
people. In the event of an evacuation from the city centre and Abingdon area, it
could hold 1,500 people, officials said. The council said it was making
available sandbags from police stations and schools.
Gloucestershire
The county that the prime minister, Gordon Brown, visited today has been the
scene of wide-scale evacuation. The famous town of Tewkesbury has been turned
into an island by flooding from the river Thames, which was rising by 1cm an
hour and was expected to reach its highest level since 1947.
Despite the erection of flood barriers by emergency services last night, one
electricity substation was submerged overnight, blacking out 48,000 homes. A
steel barrier has been built around a second substation that supplies 500,000
people.
Water treatment units have been damaged, which Severn Trent Water said would
leave 150,000 homes in the county without water. The firm said an estimated
350,000 people - the residents of Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury - would
lose their water supply from this afternoon. The supply would be disrupted for
72 hours, the Press Association reported.
For larger-scale water needs, around 600 water bowsers have been drafted in with
military help. Water from these new sources should be drunk with care;
Gloucestershire's director of public health today warned of a small risk of
infection from the floodwaters.
The county's routine hospital treatments have been cancelled, and all magistrate
and court hearings have also been postponed. Though the flooding was already
bad, the Environment Agency predicted it would not peak in the county until late
on Wednesday.
Bedfordshire
The Environment Agency has issued severe flood warnings for villages along the
Great Ouse in north Bedfordshire.
Many roads were under water and five bridges in the county have been shut, but
there were signs that the floods would spread down the river during the course
of today, reaching the city of Bedford this evening. Homes and businesses in
Buckingham were flooded on Friday.
Berkshire
The Berkshire-based Atomic Weapons Establisment (AWE), responsible for the final
assembly of nuclear warheads, was hit by flood damage. With several parts of the
Burghfield site affected, including its sewage treatment works, AWE staff were
instructed by the Environment Agency to monitor the floodwater for escaped
radioactive materials. They must report all results to the agency.
Twenty miles away from Oxford, the villages of Purley and Pangbourne have been
severely affected and the Environment Agency predicted that the nearby city of
Reading would be flooded in the next 48 hours. Reading city council predicted
waters would reach their high point at 2am tomorrow morning.
Herefordshire
Rivers have flooded in the area, with 100 roads blocked and the 80 inhabitants
of Hampton Bishop evacuated after the overflowing of the river Lugg. County
officials were hopeful the worst was over, with officials saying only a couple
of properties in the north of the area were without power. It was still
recommended that people boil water before drinking it.
Surrey
Sutton and East Surrey Water warned 80,000 households and businesses within its
Sutton supply area to boil tap water before drinking it, after the firm
discovered rain had leaked into a tank of water that went out to customers.
County by county: the
areas worst hit by flooding, G, 23.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2132954,00.html
4.45pm update
350,000 homes lose water supplies
as flood misery grows
· Households face two-week wait for tap water
· Thames and Severn rivers set to rise further
· Emergency services battle to protect power supplies
Monday July 23, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
James Sturcke, Matthew Weaver and agencies
Thousands of homes could be without tap water for up to two weeks, police
said today, as the flooding in parts of Britain was described as the worst in
modern history.
Gordon Brown accepted that more money needed to be spent on defence work. The
environment secretary, Hilary Benn, announced a review headed by an "independent
person" and said the "emergency was far from over".
The Environment Agency issued nine severe flood warnings and said the flooding
would spread as runoff from Friday's torrential rainfall reached rivers in
southern England.
Severe flooding has affected the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) at
Burghfield in Berkshire, which is responsible for the final assembly of nuclear
warheads. "Several parts of the site, including a number of buildings and the
site's sewage treatment works, have been affected," the Environment Agency said
in a statement.
"AWE staff have been sampling and analysing the floodwater from the site. They
have confirmed that there has been no escape of radioactive materials from the
site."
AWE is required to continue with extensive sampling and monitoring of the
floodwaters, reporting all results to the agency.
David Griffiths, the team leader of the agency's nuclear regulation group, said
flooding had affected the site for three days and he would be demanding that AWE
reassesses its flood defences.
An AWE spokesman, Alan Price, confirmed there had been flooding at both the
Burghfield and Aldermaston sites during heavy rainfall on Friday which affected
"one or two" buildings. He refused to say which buildings were affected, and
said there was no current flooding at either site.
The RAF said the flooding of the past few days had resulted in its largest ever
peacetime operation.
Homes and businesses near the river Severn have been particularly affected,
while the water level in the Thames was rising. Severn Trent Water confirmed
that 350,000 homes would be cut off from mains supplies by the end of today.
Oxford and Reading were likely to be flooded in the next 48 hours, the
Environment Agency said.
More than 48,000 homes in Gloucester were without electricity after waters
entered the Castlemeads substation, which provides power to half the city.
Another 70,000 houses were without tap water after the flooded Mythe treatment
plant was shut down.
"The best-case scenario is that it will be seven days before Mythe is working,
and it may be 14 days before it is fully operational," said Tim Brain, the
Gloucestershire police chief constable, at a press conference.
He said emergency flood defences around Walham substation, which provides power
for 500,000 people, were "holding for the time being".
"The situation is unprecedented. There are high levels of water and there is
more to come. We have by no means passed the peak."
More than 250 bowser tanks were dispensing water to homes cut off from mains
supplies in the Gloucester area. Local supermarkets were giving out 150,000
litres of bottled water.
Shona Arora, the director of Gloucestershire public health, said there was a
small risk of infection from the floodwaters and advised parents to keep their
children away. Water from bowsers should be boiled as a precaution, she said.
Environment Agency spokesman Anthony Perry said: "We have not seen flooding of
this magnitude before. The benchmark was 1947 and this has already exceeded it."
Terry Standing, chief officer of Gloucestershire fire and rescue, said the
situation across the county remained "critical".
"We have had about 2,500 calls during this crisis - to put that in context we
normally have 8,000 a year," he said.
Hundreds of people, including many in care homes, have been airlifted to safety
by the RAF. In Oxford, Kassam stadium, on the outskirts of the city, was being
used as a temporary shelter for up to 1,500 people.
A council spokesman said: "We have currently got 50 elderly people here. We are
waiting to see if there will be any further evacuations from Oxford, Abingdon
and the south of the county. If there are, they will all come here."
Around 150 firefighters and servicemen from RAF Innsworth were trying to protect
electricity substations north of Gloucester supplying power to 500,000 homes.
West Mercia police said people forced to abandon their cars in south
Worcestershire faced having them broken into by opportunist thieves.
The government and emergency services have been criticised for their slow
response. The environment secretary, Hilary Benn, told GMTV today that the
government had doubled investment for future flood defence over the last 10
years.
"We've seen unprecedented levels of rainfall and flooding that people haven't
seen for 60 years," he said.
"The trouble is, when you get that amount of rain in that concentrated a time,
even the best flood defences in the world are going to be overtopped, and that's
what we've seen in many places."
350,000 homes lose water
supplies as flood misery grows, G, 23.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2132767,00.html
Two months of rain in just one day
· Met Office: deluge in south is worst in living memory
· Battered north braced for more as front advances
Saturday July 21, 2007
Guardian
Fred Attewill, Martin Wainwright and Riazat Butt
Some of the heaviest rainfall in living memory deluged southern Britain
yesterday, inundating places with up to one sixth of their entire annual
rainfall in less than 24 hours.
Downpours knocked out satellite communications, cut power, forced schools and
homes to be evacuated, and badly disrupted roads and railways.
Emergency services were severely stretched, while one wedding party was last
night preparing to bed down in a church after they were surrounded by rapidly
rising floodwaters.
London saw its luck run out after having avoided the worst of the recent
downpours, while north-east England, parts of which are still suffering from
June's monsoon conditions, braced itself for more damage as the rain moved
north.
The wettest part of the UK was Brize Norton in Oxfordshire, which received
121.2mm of rain from midnight Thursday until 5pm yesterday - three times its
average rainfall for July and a sixth of what it would expect for the whole
year.
Steve Randall, a forecaster for the Met Office, said: "I've never seen anything
like it, and I've been in the Met Office for 34 years. It's an extraordinary
amount, more like you would expect in a tropical rainforest."
At Barry in south Wales, residents were trapped in their homes as sewage poured
into the street. Firefighters used a boat to rescue three people from knee-high
water in one building; a man was briefly trapped in his car in a dip below a
road bridge. In Sussex, flooding in the Haywards Heath area led to serious train
delays, while in Worthing the hospital was flooded to a depth of 18 inches.
The Thames Valley was also hard hit, with Reading and Maidenhead town centres
flooded; there were long delays on the M4 after a landslip caused by heavy rain
left just one lane open on the eastbound carriageway.
Parts of south-west London saw floods two-feet-deep, and the Underground was
badly disrupted.
At Heathrow, 141 flights were cancelled as air traffic controllers grounded
aircraft in the worst of the downpours.
A severe weather warning will remain in force today for north Wales and the west
Midlands, but the rain is expected to ease off overnight. Summer has no plans to
return, however. Sunday is forecast to be showery and dull in most areas, and
heavy rain may return to the south on Monday.
The only bright spot was that the worst of the rain kept away from the battered
north, where a huge recovery operation is installing thousands of temporary
homes for people whose houses have already been wrecked. Only a short-lived
outrider of today's storms reached the devastated areas of Yorkshire and
Humberside, penetrating as far as Richmond, North Yorkshire, where the sudden
volume of water burst the banks of Skeeby beck, flooding homes in six villages.
In Cheltenham, one couple's plans for the perfect wedding went down the drain as
they and 100 guests were marooned in their church by floodwaters 5ft deep.
As Sarah Parfitt, 34, married Andy Holtom, 31, at Holy Trinity, torrential rain
caused a stream next to the church to swell and burst its banks, sending filthy
brown water churning towards the church building. They were confronted by
floodwater on stepping out for photographs, and, after calling the fire service,
were told to stay put. The new Mrs Holtom said: "When I imagined my wedding day
as a little girl, I always thought it would be sunny and totally perfect - I had
no idea it would end up like this."
Two months of rain in
just one day, G, 21.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2131580,00.html
4.15pm update
Rain, rain and yet more rain hits UK
Friday July 20, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
Martin Wainwright and Mark Oliver
More heavy rain swept across Britain from the Atlantic today,
triggering flash floods to add to more than £1.5bn worth of damage caused by
storms in the past three weeks.
A blanket severe weather warning was issued by the Meteorological
Office for the whole of Wales, the Midlands and East Anglia and everywhere in
southern England except Cornwall.
Forecasters said the downpours could dump up to 10cm (4in) of rain in less than
24 hours in some areas, with central and southern England and Wales the worst
affected.
Five people trapped on the first floor of a building in Barry, south Wales, were
rescued by firefighters amid a busy day for the emergency services.
Brief heavy showers passed in successive belts as council flood controls and
insurance call centres doubled staff for the weekend.
Berkshire was among the worst hit areas. In Hampshire, where scores of roads
were closed, the Fire and Rescue Service said it had received more than 200
calls.
There were appeals for the public not to call emergency numbers unless life was
in danger or there was a risk of serious damage to property.
Electrical cables were brought down in Basingstoke and a BMW car left stranded
in 60cm (2ft) of floodwater that hit large parts of the town.
The only piece of good news was that the worst of the rain kept away from the
battered north, where a huge recovery operation is installing thousands of
temporary homes for people whose houses have been wrecked.
More than 1,000 caravans have been installed in Hull and a complete new caravan
park is being built at Toll Bar, near Doncaster in South Yorkshire, where 80% of
properties were badly damaged in June.
Plans to use a cruise ship as a floating shelter have been drawn up in Hull, in
case evacuees currently staying with friends and family need a home later in the
year. Many damaged houses will take eight months to dry out and redecorate.
Only a short-lived outrider of today's storms reached the devastated area,
penetrating as far as Richmond in North Yorkshire, where the sudden volume of
water burst the banks of Skeeby beck, flooding homes in six villages.
Phil Rothwell, head of flood risk policy at the Environment Agency, said:
"Everyone should stay fully aware of the weather situation over the weekend.
Where there is the danger of rivers rising people should check for flood
warnings in their area."
The Highways Agency warned drivers to use headlights and double the distance
between cars because of the level of rain and spray.
Severe weather warnings will remain in force tomorrow for north Wales and the
West Midlands. Sunday is forecast to be showery and dull in most areas, and
heavy rain may return to the south on Monday.
The Conservative leader, David Cameron, was visiting Lincoln this afternoon to
meet victims and rescue workers, including salvage teams who were shifting
mounds of ruined furniture and belongings to landfill sites.
In one of the worst-hit areas, Doncaster, a couple said their flooded home in
Adwick le Street had been burgled twice since waist-high water filled it a
fortnight ago.
Simon Young, 35, the director of a multimedia firm, said he and his wife,
Cheryl, 28, had nothing left. "They've taken the kiddies' money box, Cheryl's
grandmother's jewellery, the newborn's clothes, even nappies. I think we need to
put a sign up outside - 'burgled twice, please don't bother'."
Rail travel has also been disrupted throughout Wales, south-west England and
southern England, and some firms have been forced to provide bus replacement
services.
The Virgin Cross Country service had to suspend its services between Birmingham
New Street and Gloucester because of the flooding. Other train firms affected
were Arriva Trains Wales, Chiltern Railways, First Capital Connect, First Great
Western, South West Trains, Southeastern and Southern.
Parts of the London underground system have been also been affected and at one
stage 15 stations were closed. Transport for London's website was updating
details of which services were disrupted.
Police in London warned motorists to avoid the Wandsworth area, especially where
there are roads that pass under bridges.
Rain, rain and yet more
rain hits UK, G, 20.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2131208,00.html
Reports of the death of summer
are greatly exaggerated,
say
forecasters
After the wettest June on record,
better weather is promised - but not just
yet
Saturday July 7, 2007
Guardian
Alok Jha, science correspondent
On Tuesday hailstones the size of 20p pieces smacked into the streets of
south London; later in the week, officials at Wimbledon considered extending
play into a third week because of the miserable weather; meanwhile, much of
northern England is recovering from a deadly spate of heavy flooding.
The apocalyptic June weather has even led some people, notably former weather
presenter John Kettley, to suggest that the British summer was over in April.
The Met Office confirmed this week that it has been the wettest June since
records began in 1914. But reports of the death of summer have been greatly
exaggerated: despite inherent uncertainties in making long-term weather
forecasts, the Met Office says that Britain will enjoy a relatively warm, dry
summer in the coming months, although more unsettled weather lies ahead for the
next few weeks.
"The heavy rainfall we have seen through June has been due to the jet stream
across the Atlantic - a ribbon of strong winds in the upper part of the
atmosphere - being much further south than it would normally be," said Dave
Britton of the Met Office. "This jet stream steers weather systems across the
Atlantic. As it is further south these are being pushed across the UK rather
than steered further north between the UK and Iceland." Britain's rainfall
average last month was 134.5mm (5.3in), beating the previous high in 1980 of
121.2mm (4.8in).
The country's changeable weather is a result of its location - with the Atlantic
on one side and a large continent on the other, subtle changes in the wind
direction can bring marked changes in the weather, making predictions difficult.
According to the Met Office, the "UK also lies near the 'battleground' of warm
air from the tropics and cold air from the poles, which spawns the vigorous
depressions and quiet anti-cyclones that also bring marked changes in weather."
Weather forecasting begins with a detailed measure of the current state of the
atmosphere. Scores of instruments on weather balloons, satellites and ground
observatories around the country make continuous measurements of sunshine, air
pressure, wind direction and temperature. The numbers are then fed into a
mathematical model running on a supercomputer that is roughly equivalent in
power to 8,000 desktop PCs.
"They do lots and lots of simulations with slightly different initial conditions
just to see the range of possible outcomes, called an ensemble," said Ralf
Toumi, an atmospheric scientist at Imperial College London. "From the ensemble
they deduce the most likely outcome."
It is not an exact science because weather systems are governed by chaos theory,
which says that small changes can lead to highly unpredictable disruptions later
down the line.
The Met Office carries out forecasts for the next five days, which are available
to the public. The European Centre for Medium-Range Forecasts, a collection of
all the meteorological centres across Europe, also carries out medium-range
forecasts for five to 10 days. "The errors grow exponentially - you will not
find credible forecasts even for the large scale that go past 10 days," said Dr
Toumi.
The Met Office also advises on likely trends up to 15 days ahead and provides an
outlook for the month ahead. "We have recently begun producing seasonal
forecasts. Like the monthly forecasts these do not say whether a specific day
will be good or bad, wet or dry, but give an idea how the season may be in terms
of temperature and rainfall against long-term averages," said Mr Britton. In the
past decade computers have become more powerful. The Met Office says its
forecasts for the day ahead are correct six times out of seven, and its
three-day forecasts are as accurate as one-day forecasts were 20 years ago.
As for reports of the demise of summer, Mr Britton urges some optimism. "I
wouldn't write the summer off yet -there's a reasonable chance of seeing some
spells of good weather into the summer. We've got two months to go yet."
What's in store
The Met Office produced its summer forecast in April, updating it with new
information every month since. "The latest updates suggest temperatures will
still be above the 1971-2000 average, which fits with what happened in June,
which was 1.5C above average," said Dave Britton of the Met Office. The south
will see rainfall around average and the north will get rainfall at average or
just above average levels. In the shorter term, expect things to remain
unsettled. "As far as we can see, in the next 15 days, there's nothing to
suggest that anything's going to settle down," said Mr Britton.
Reports of the death of summer are greatly
exaggerated, say forecasters, G, 7.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2120903,00.html
Floods caused 50%
more damage than estimated
· Prime minister to visit affected areas today
· Promises 'comprehensive' recovery programme
Saturday July 7, 2007
Guardian
Steven Morris and Will Woodward
The prime minister, Gordon Brown, will visit areas devastated by the flooding
today as insurers said the crisis would cost them £1.5bn and civic leaders
warned that some people may not be able to move back into their homes until
2009.
Mr Brown promised a "comprehensive" programme not just to help the hundreds
of people who are still unable to return to their homes but to help communities
recover.
The prime minister's spokesman denied the government had been slow to react.
"The prime minister spoke directly to the local authority leaders involved some
days ago. We've been looking at financial assistance and what we can do to
follow on from that in the last week or so."
The scale of the challenges faced was only becoming clear yesterday. The
Association of British Insurers said the floods would cost the industry an
estimated £1.5bn - 50% more than it originally thought. It said insurers were
dealing with claims from around 27,500 homes with an average value of £30,000
and from 7,000 businesses averaging £100,000.
The mayor of Doncaster, Martin Winter, said 3,000 people were evacuated from
their homes during the flooding and about 700 were still unable to return. "It
may be six to 18 months for some people before we can actually get them back in
their homes, if at all," he said. "We've got to do a full condition assessment
to look at whether some of these houses are safe to get people back into.
"We need to look at whether or not, in terms of long-term risk assessment, in
some of these areas we do rebuild them or whether we rebuild on higher ground.
"It has been the biggest evacuation since the war, the biggest national disaster
that Doncaster has dealt with in the last 60 years."
Mr Winter said a large number of people were without insurance but he said some
householders had told him they were not granted insurance because they were
living on a flood plain.
In Hull civic leaders, who this week said theirs was a "forgotten city", said
they were facing a bill that could top £200m. Around 17,000 properties in Hull
have been affected by the floods and 10,500 homes evacuated.
Speaking in Hull, the Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, said a "swift" response
from the government was vital, emphasising that many of the victims were "really
vulnerable people".
"The council and all the agencies have done a wonderful job in coordinating the
immediate relief but what needs to happen now is to make sure that those who
lost their homes can be sorted out pretty quickly," he said. "So I'm hoping that
the insurance companies will do it quickly, I'm hoping the mortgage companies,
where people have got to re-mortgage their houses, will be more gracious, and
I'm hoping that the central government will match up to what the council is
trying to do. The response should be quick, fast and swift."
Mr Brown's spokesman said the government was looking at how it could provide
additional assistance through the Bellwin scheme, under which local authorities
are given funds to help clear up after disasters. This money could be used for
setting up temporary offices, hiring additional vehicles, initial highway
repairs, clearing the drainage systems, the provision of emergency food aid and
so on.
The spokesman said the government was also considering further help for
individuals most at risk, through crisis loans, community grants and local
authority support.
Ministers were also in discussion with the insurance industry to ensure claims
from people affected by the flooding were dealt with as quickly as possible.
In the longer term the government was also looking at how to strengthen the
country's flood defences.
Speaking on BBC1's Breakfast programme, Mr Brown said: "There will be a
comprehensive programme to deal with not just the immediate problem where people
are homeless, where people are in centres, where people have been displaced, but
also to deal with the recovery programmes."
Hundreds of mourners gathered yesterday to pay their last respects to
14-year-old Ryan Parry, who was swept away to his death in Sheffield.
His form tutor, Hossein Yazdi, said: "To me my students are like young plants,
growing stronger every day, and Ryan has been cut down long before his prime."
Floods caused 50% more
damage than estimated, G, 7.7.2007,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/Story/0,,2120862,00.html
|