History > 2006 > USA > 2006 > Space (IV)
Editorial
Flexing Our Muscles in Space
October 21, 2006
The New York Times
The Bush administration has adopted a jingoistic and
downright belligerent tone toward space operations. In a new “national space
policy” posted without fanfare on an obscure government Web site, and in recent
speeches, it has signaled its determination to be pre-eminent in space — as it
is in air power and sea power — while opposing any treaties that might curtail
any American action there.
This chest-thumping is being portrayed as a modest extension of the Clinton
administration’s space policy issued a decade ago. And so far there is no
mention of putting American weapons in space. But the more aggressive tone of
the Bush policy may undercut international cooperation on civilian space
projects — a goal to which the new policy subscribes — or set off an eventual
arms race in space.
The new policy reflects the worst tendencies of the Bush administration — a
unilateral drive for supremacy and a rejection of treaties. And it comes just as
the White House is desperately seeking help to rein in the nuclear programs of
North Korea and Iran. That effort depends heavily on cooperation from China and
Russia, two countries with their own active space programs.
The administration regards the policy as a necessary update to reflect how
important space is becoming for the American economy and defense. But outside
experts who have parsed the language are struck by how forceful and
nationalistic it sounds.
Whereas the 1996 policy opened with assurances that the United States would
pursue greater levels of partnership and cooperation in space, the new policy
states: “In this new century, those who effectively utilize space will enjoy
added prosperity and security and will hold a substantial advantage over those
who do not. Freedom of action in space is as important to the United States as
air power and sea power.”
The only solace is that the new policy does not endorse placing weapons in space
or fighting in, through or from space, as the Air Force has been urging. But
neither does it rule out these activities.
In keeping with the more muscular stance, the administration is also opposing
any negotiations on a treaty to prevent an arms race in outer space — arguing
that it may impede America’s ability to defend its satellites from ground-based
weapons. That seems shortsighted. An international treaty to keep space free of
weapons might well provide greater security than a unilateral declaration that
we will do whatever we have to do to preserve our own space assets.
Michael Griffin, the NASA administrator, insisted he did not intend to sound
jingoistic when he addressed a conference in Spain this month — but he sure came
across that way. He wondered aloud what language future settlers of the Moon and
Mars would speak. “Will my language be passed down over the generations to
future lunar colonies?” he asked. “Or will another, bolder or more persistent
culture surpass our efforts and put their own stamp on the predominant lunar
society of the far future?”
We fear the old notion that space might provide the perfect arena for
international cooperation may be yielding to a new era of competition — one not
seen since the cold war race to the moon.
Flexing Our
Muscles in Space, NYT, 21.10.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/21/opinion/21sat1.html
Mars Rover Visits Crater, Then Poses for a Picture
October 7, 2006
The New York Times
By WARREN E. LEARY
WASHINGTON, Oct. 6 — NASA’s Opportunity Mars rover spent 22
months trekking almost six miles to a large scientifically promising crater.
Like a tourist who asks a passer-by to take a picture for proof he made it to a
famous site, the robot rover has had another spacecraft snap an image of it
sitting on the rim.
Scientists said Friday that the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, a powerful explorer
that just settled into its ideal scientific orbit, had used its high-resolution
camera this week to spot the golf-cart-size rover sitting on the side of
Victoria Crater.
The remarkably detailed picture, taken on Wednesday from 186 miles above Mars’s
surface, shows the rover and its five-foot-high camera mast at the edge of the
big impact crater and the robot’s tracks.
“This is a tremendous example of how our Mars missions in orbit and on the
surface are designed to reinforce each other and expand our ability to explore
and discover,” Douglas McCuistion, director of the Mars Exploration Program at
NASA, said at a news conference.
Alfred S. McEwen of the University of Arizona, principal investigator for the
orbiter’s high-resolution camera, said the picture of Victoria Crater and its
visitor was one of the first images taken. Mr. McEwen said the image of the
crater’s jagged rock formations was made on the first effort to take a picture
away from the spacecraft’s direction of travel. “It worked fabulously well,” he
said.
The orbiter, the most advanced craft sent to Mars, arrived in March and has been
refining its orbit and testing its six instruments designed to study Mars for
years during a $720 million mission. These include the most powerful telescopic
camera ever sent to another planet, a mineral mapper to identify water-related
areas, radar to investigate for buried ice and water and a weather camera to
monitor the planet daily.
Even after nearly three years on the surface and as new craft arrive to study
Mars, NASA’s durable twin rovers, the Opportunity and the Spirit, are making
major discoveries. Steven Squyres of Cornell, the principal investigator for the
rovers, said the aerial views would enhance operations on the ground,
particularly exploration of Victoria Crater.
“If you were a geologist driving up to the edge of a crater in your jeep, the
first thing you would do would be to pick up the aerial photo you brought with
you and use it to understand what you’re seeing from ground level,” he said.
“That’s exactly what we’re doing here.”
Both rovers have lasted more than 10 times their 90-day mission-design life, Mr.
Squyres said, and scientists decided to send the Opportunity on the trek to
Victoria Crater after it had spent months exploring two other craters. Victoria
Crater, more than a half mile across and hundreds of feet deep, is five times
larger than any other explored crater and may hold evidence of a longer span of
the planet’s history, he said.
Rover researchers are formulating a plan for how the Opportunity will tackle the
crater. The craft will role to the edge of different promontories and do stereo
imaging of the layered cliffs and boulders dotting the depression, Mr. Squyres
said.
Then the robot will do a partial circumnavigation of the crater, aided by images
from the orbiter, to find the best pathway for it to go into the depression and
return without becoming stuck in sand dunes, he said.
“I’m not interested in making a suicide dive into this crater,” Mr. Squyres
said. “It’s perilous terrain, and we want a safe way in and out.”
No one knows how long the Opportunity or the Spirit, which is at Gusev Crater on
the opposite side of the planet, will last, he said, so scientists want to move
quickly but carefully in their explorations.
Mars Rover Visits
Crater, Then Poses for a Picture, NYT, 7.10.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/07/science/space/07rover.html
Americans Win Nobel Prize in Physics
October 3, 2006
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 8:38 a.m. ET
The New York Times
STOCKHOLM, Sweden (AP) -- Americans John C. Mather and
George F. Smoot won the 2006 Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday for work that
helped cement the big-bang theory of the universe and deepen understanding of
the origin of galaxies and stars.
Mather, 60, works at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., and
Smoot, 61, works at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley,
Calif.
The scientists discovered the nature of ''blackbody radiation,'' cosmic
background radiation believed to stem from the ''big bang,'' when the universe
was born.
''They have not proven the big-bang theory but they give it very strong
support,'' said Per Carlson, chairman of the Nobel committee for physics.
''It is one of the greatest discoveries of the century. I would call it the
greatest. It increases our knowledge of our place in the universe.''
Their work was based on measurements done with the help of NASA's COBE satellite
launched in 1989. They were able to observe the universe in its early stages
about 380,000 years after it was born. Ripples in the light they detected also
helped demonstrate how galaxies came together over time.
''The COBE results provided increased support for the big-bang scenario for the
origin of the Universe, as this is the only scenario that predicts the kind of
cosmic microwave background radiation measured by COBE,'' the Royal Swedish
Academy of Sciences in Stockholm said in its citation.
The big-bang theory states that the universe was born billions of years ago from
a rapidly expanding dense and incredibly hot state.
Reached at his home in Berkeley, Smoot told The Associated Press he was
surprised when he got the call from the Nobel committee in the middle of the
night.
''I was surprised that they even knew my number. After the discovery I got so
many calls I unlisted it,'' he said.
''The discovery was sort of fabulous. It was an incredible milestone. Now this
is a great honor and recognition. It's amazing,'' he said.
Mather said he was ''thrilled and amazed'' at receiving the prize.
''I can't say I was completely surprised, because people have said we should be
awarded, but this is just such a rare and special honor,'' Mather said in a
telephone interview with the Nobel committee.
He said he and Smoot did not realize how important their work was at the time of
their discovery.
The COBE project gave strong support for the big-bang theory because it is the
only scenario that predicts the kind of cosmic microwave radiation measured by
the satellite.
The academy called Mather the driving force behind the COBE project while Smoot
was responsible for measuring small variations in the temperature of the
radiation.
With their findings, the scientists transformed the study of the early universe
from a largely theoretical pursuit into a new era of direct observation and
measurement.
''The very detailed observations that the laureates have carried out from the
COBE satellite have played a major role in the development of modern cosmology
into a precise science,'' the academy said.
Phillip F. Schewe, a spokesman for the American Institute of Physics, said he
had expected the two to win the honor.
''It's just a really really difficult experimental measurement to make. ''It's
the farthest out we can see in the universe and it's the farthest back in
time,'' he said in a telephone interview.
Since 1986, Americans have either won or shared the physics prize with people
from other countries 15 times.
Last year, Americans John L. Hall and Roy J. Glauber and German Theodor W.
Haensch won the prize for work that could improve long-distance communication
and navigation.
This year's award announcements began Monday with the Nobel Prize in medicine
going to Americans Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello for discovering a powerful
way to turn off the effect of specific genes, offering new hope for fighting
diseases as diverse as cancer and AIDS.
The winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry will be named Wednesday. The Bank of
Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel will be announced
Oct. 9.
The winner of the peace prize -- the only one not awarded in Sweden -- will be
announced Oct. 13 in Oslo, Norway.
A date for the literature prize has not yet been set.
Alfred Nobel, the wealthy Swedish industrialist and inventor of dynamite who
endowed the prizes, left only vague guidelines for the selection committee.
In his will, he said the prize should be given to those who ''shall have
conferred the greatest benefit on mankind'' and ''shall have made the most
important discovery or invention within the field of physics.''
The prizes, which include a $1.4 million check, a gold medal and a diploma, are
presented on Dec. 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death in 1896.
Associated Press writers Matt Crenson in New York, Mattias Karen in
Stockholm and Brooke Donald in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
Americans Win Nobel Prize in Physics,
NYT, 3.10.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Nobel-Physics.html?hp&ex=1159934400&en=5b48cb3db2a2f5d6&ei=5094&partner=homepage
|