History > 2006 > USA > Race relations
R.J. Matson
NY, The New York Observer and Roll Call
Cagle 18.1.2006
http://cagle.msnbc.com/politicalcartoons/PCcartoons/matson.asp
Martin Luther King.
Hip-Hop Is Spoken Here,
but With a Queens Accent
May 21, 2006
The New York Times
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE
There is not much racism in Howard Beach, say young people in
Howard Beach. Just look at our clothes. Listen to our music. Listen to how we
talk.
"In this neighborhood, it doesn't matter what color you are," said Lorenzo Rea,
as he sat outside Gino's Pizzeria on Cross Bay Boulevard. "Everyone's listening
to hip-hop, wearing G-Unit."
It has been two decades since a gang of whites here chased a black man to his
death, and about a year since Nicholas Minucci was accused of fracturing the
skull of a black man with a baseball bat. Howard Beach is still a mostly white,
mostly Italian neighborhood, with a lingering and, people there insist, unfair
reputation for prejudice.
But it is now also a neighborhood where the mostly white, mostly Italian kids
favor the same style and music as their peers over in East New York and New
Lots.
There may still be a few people around here "who have a problem," Mr. Rea
allows.
"But if they don't like black people," he said, "they're still dressing in the
clothes, listening to the music."
Whether such emulation is heartfelt or superficial is always up for debate, and
it is in the hate-crime trial of Mr. Minucci, who admitted to investigators that
he called out a too-familiar word beginning with the letter "n" to the man said
to be his victim, preceded by the greeting "What up?"
His lawyers maintain that Mr. Minucci, 19, was defending himself against a
robbery attempt, and during jury selection last week, they suggested that the
word was not meant as an insult.
Most teenagers in Howard Beach, of course, weren't even born when the Rev. Al
Sharpton led a march through their neighborhood to protest the 1986 episode, to
jeering and taunting from the locals. During their adolescence, the city's name
ceased to be synonymous with violent crime and racial tension. Where their
parents feared the ghetto, they romanticize it, idolizing the swaggering culture
and music born there.
"I got friends from all over," said Matt Martocci, a carrot-topped, buzz-cut
18-year-old, horsing around with some of them near a Howard Beach park on
Thursday.
"We all listen to hip-hop. Look at how we're dressed," he said, pointing his
thumbs at his immaculate navy Sean John track suit and gold chain.
Some of his friends live in New Howard, the neatly kept, almost entirely white
district west of Cross Bay Boulevard where last year's attack took place. Some
live in Old Howard, on the other side of the brackish creek spilling into
Jamaica Bay. Many hail from Ozone Park or Lindenwood, more racially and
ethnically diverse neighborhoods on the other side of the Belt Parkway.
But they have hip-hop in common. They listen to Snoop Dogg, Eminem, Cam'Ron, and
Fabolous. They wear G-Unit, Sean John and other hip-hop labels like Rocawear,
the same brand-new baseball caps, stickers still affixed to the brims, cocked
sidewise. Some stick hair-picks in their headbands, though few of them, truth be
told, have hair kinky enough to need one. Like any number of white suburbanite
kids, they favor black slang, embellished with the Queens accents of their
parents.
"Sometimes, when I'm talking to my friends, it'll come out," said Mr. Martocci.
"It's just slang. It's the way we talk. You know, I'm like, 'What up, my
brutha.' "
His friends all nodded.
There are no high schools in the neighborhood, so when kids get older, they
drift off to public high schools in Forest Hills or Ozone Park, or Catholic
schools like Christ the King, all of them more racially and ethnically diverse
than Howard Beach. Mr. Martocci attends Forest Hills High School, where, he
said, his friends include black and Hispanic kids.
"The younger kids, they're not racist at all," Mr. Martocci said. "Everyone's
gotten over it."
A few blocks away, in New Howard, a half-dozen or so young men were playing
around near an elementary school, talking and wrestling. "We don't live in a
bubble," one of them called out. Anthony Borzacchiello, 19, who goes to John Jay
College of Criminal Justice in Manhattan, and hopes to be a defense attorney,
agreed. "I went to Christ the King," he said. "It's white and black. Everyone
gets along."
Still, there are limits. Mr. Rea, who grew up in Ozone Park and works for a
trash hauler, lives in Howard Beach with a Puerto Rican roommate. He listens to
a lot of 50 Cent. Some kids call the rapper Fitty. "But I call him Fifty," Mr.
Rea says, with a meaningful look. "I try not to go overboard. I don't like my
jeans too baggy."
Hip-Hop Is Spoken
Here, but With a Queens Accent, NYT, 21.5.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/21/nyregion/21howard.html
Tolerance for a Racial Slur Is a Test for Potential Jurors
May 18, 2006
The New York Times
By COREY KILGANNON
Potential jurors for the trial of a 19-year-old charged in a
bias attack in Howard Beach last summer have been asked some unusual questions
during jury selection: Do they listen to rap music? Are they familiar with
hip-hop culture? Yesterday, the prosecution and defense asked them how they feel
about a certain longstanding epithet denigrating black people.
The epithet or "the N-word," as the lawyer representing the defendant,
Nicholas Minucci, repeatedly described it in court may well be the crux of
this racially charged and high-profile case.
Prosecutors in the trial, in State Supreme Court in Queens, will try to
establish that Mr. Minucci, who is white, uttered the word as he chased down and
beat a 22-year-old black man, Glenn Moore, with a baseball bat on June 29,
fracturing Mr. Moore's skull. Mr. Minucci is charged with assault as a hate
crime and 18 other counts and faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted on all
of them.
Mr. Minucci told police investigators in a videotaped interrogation after the
incident that he said, "What up?" followed by the epithet in addressing Mr.
Moore as he approached him, and that Mr. Moore responded by saying, "What up?"
Mr. Minucci has maintained that his subsequent actions were self-defense against
a robbery attempt.
If Mr. Minucci is convicted in the attack, but the jury decides it was not
motivated by racial hatred, then he will face a lower sentence.
Prosecutors hope to prove the attack was motivated by such a bias. The defense,
meanwhile, is expected to suggest that a young man growing up in a mixed
neighborhood in New York City uses "the N word" as a matter of course and that
the word no longer carries the racially charged overtones it has historically.
Mr. Minucci's friends and family have said that the word is uttered today more
in collegiality than hatred, and that its proliferation in rap music and
everyday conversation among young people of various races and ethnicities has
changed its meaning and impact.
At one point yesterday, Mr. Minucci's lawyer, Albert Gaudelli, surveyed 11
potential jurors, four of whom were black. He turned to a black man from Queens
Village and asked him what he thought about "the N word," explaining that "the N
word is going to be an issue in this case, and its use."
The man responded, "It depends on who's saying it and how it's being used."
Mr. Gaudelli said, "At one time, it had only one meaning, as a pejorative term,
but today it means many things, or can mean many things." He motioned toward the
prosecutors and said of the case, "They have to prove that it is bias."
He told the jury pool, "The word in and of itself dose not establish bias. Does
everyone agree with that?" This elicited a murmur of faint agreement.
However, for all the assertions that the word has become harmless, neither Mr.
Gaudelli nor anyone else in the courtroom actually uttered it.
Outside the courtroom, Mr. Minucci's mother, Maria Minucci, discussed the word
in explaining his actions. She calls the case politically motivated and charges
that prosecutors have seized upon the word to justify a grandstanding
prosecution of her son to get publicity for the Queens district attorney.
She said her son grew up in the ethnically diverse neighborhood of Lindenwood,
where his friends were and still are the black and Hispanic children from
nearby housing projects.
The pejorative has become a form of address, Ms. Minucci said.
"Every kid in the neighborhood uses it," she said. "It doesn't mean the same
thing anymore. They all say it all day long, no matter what race. They all grow
up saying it now."
She added, "All of Nick's friends black, white, Spanish, Chinese they all
use the word. You should hear when they talk on the phone to him in jail. "
Ms. Minucci suggested that such a shift has been "the best thing possible for
that word" because through its use "it's lost a lot of its power and hatred."
Clearly, not all prospective jurors felt that way. At one point, Mr. Gaudelli
objected to the possible selection of one black woman who "felt that the use of
the N-word is automatically biased and prejudiced," he said.
Under questioning by Justice Richard L. Buchter, she said, "I guess I'm from the
old school. I still find it offensive when I hear it."
She eventually acknowledged that under certain circumstances she might see it
otherwise.
Not surprisingly, prosecutors seemed to be looking for jurors who still hear
poison in the word. One prosecutor, Michelle Goldstein, asked potential jurors
it they were familiar with hip-hop terminology.
"Do you listen to rap music?" she asked a woman who appeared to be under 30. The
woman nodded.
"Sure you do," Ms. Goldstein said. "It's all over the place. Clearly, there are
offensive words. Just because rap artists use a word does not mean it is not
offensive to people."
She turned to a white man in the jury pool who said the word must be evaluated
in context.
"You have to look at who is communicating the word," he said. "Words have
different meanings and annoy different people."
She asked a white male schoolteacher, "Wouldn't you agree that certain words are
more commonplace today than 20 years ago when they were pejoratives?"
"Not in my classroom," the man snapped back, prompting laughter.
Suggesting that the word has not lost its sting, Ms. Goldstein compared it to
"sweetheart," saying it means one thing when used by one's fiancι but something
very different if uttered by a stranger to a woman on the street.
The defense and the prosecution both asked the jury pool if they would be biased
against Howard Beach, which two decades ago was the location of another
high-profile racial attack.
In the end, the jury of 12 was picked: four blacks, four whites, three Hispanics
and one Asian. Two of the five alternates are black.
Tolerance for a
Racial Slur Is a Test for Potential Jurors, NYT, 18.5.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/18/nyregion/18howard.html
Schools Plan in Nebraska Is Challenged
May 17, 2006
The New York Times
By SAM DILLON
In a constitutional challenge to a state law
that would divide the Omaha public schools into three racially identifiable
districts, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People sued
the governor of Nebraska and other state officials yesterday in federal court in
Omaha, arguing that the law "intentionally furthers racial segregation."
Gov. Dave Heineman, a Republican, called the suit "a distraction" to recent
talks intended to bring an accommodation among warring school superintendents.
His spokesman said Nebraska's attorney general, Jon Bruning, also a Republican,
would represent Mr. Heineman and the education officials named as defendants.
That task, however, may put Mr. Bruning in an awkward position. Before lawmakers
passed the legislation and Mr. Heineman signed it on April 13, Mr. Bruning wrote
that he expected legal challenges because its provisions dividing the Omaha
district could violate the federal Constitution's equal protection clause.
"We believe the state may face serious risk due to the potential constitutional
problems raised" by the law, Mr. Bruning wrote in a letter distributed to
lawmakers. Mary Nelson, a spokeswoman, said yesterday that the attorney general
had not yet read the lawsuit and would not comment.
The law, intended to resolve a boundary dispute between the Omaha schools and
largely white suburban districts, created a learning community of area school
districts that would operate with a common tax levy and required them to draw up
an integration plan for metropolitan Omaha.
An amendment that passed late in the legislative session required that the Omaha
public schools be split by 2008 into three districts following the attendance
areas of existing high schools. The lawsuit argues that because Omaha is
racially segregated by neighborhood, dividing the district that way would create
one largely black, one largely white and one mostly Hispanic district.
The suit says the law violates the constitutional principle that in public
education "the doctrine of separate but equal has no place."
The prime force behind the provision of the law under challenge was Senator
Ernie Chambers, Nebraska's only black legislator, who argued that Omaha schools
were already segregated and that the plan would allow blacks to control a
district in which their children were a majority.
Theodore M. Shaw, director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational
Fund Inc., who filed the suit on behalf of the Omaha branch of the N.A.A.C.P.,
said he respected Mr. Chambers's effort to give minority communities increased
control over school administration.
"But we disagree with actions that will exacerbate segregation in the public
schools," Mr. Shaw said. "I mean this is 2006, in a society that is diverse and
multicultural."
Schools Plan in Nebraska Is Challenged, NYT, 17.5.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/17/us/17naacp.html
Clyde Kennard with his sister, Sara Tarpley,
at O'Hare Airport in Chicago after his 1963 release from a Mississippi prison.
He died that year.
Corbis/Bettmann NYT
May 4, 2006
Pardon Unlikely for Civil Rights AdvocatE
NYT 4.5.2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/04/us/04pardon.html
Pardon Unlikely for Civil Rights Advocate
May 4, 2006
The New York Times
By ADAM LIPTAK
Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi acknowledges that Clyde
Kennard suffered a grievous wrong at the hands of state officials more than 45
years ago. But he says he will not grant a posthumous pardon to Mr. Kennard, a
black man who was falsely imprisoned after trying to desegregate a Mississippi
college.
Mr. Kennard moved home to Hattiesburg, Miss., after seven years in the Army in
Germany and Korea and three years as an undergraduate at the University of
Chicago. He wanted to finish his education at the local college.
But because that college, Mississippi Southern, was reserved for whites, state
officials not only rejected Mr. Kennard's repeated applications but also plotted
to kill him.
They kept him out of college by convicting him of helping to steal $25 of
chicken feed based on what the sole witness now says was perjury. The 1960
conviction drew a seven-year prison term, and Mr. Kennard died of cancer in
1963.
Last month, Mr. Kennard's supporters asked Governor Barbour, a Republican, for a
pardon. The state parole board must first make a recommendation, but Mr. Barbour
has already said he will not consider granting one.
"The governor hasn't pardoned anyone, be it alive or deceased," said Mr.
Barbour's spokesman, Pete Smith. "The governor isn't going to issue a pardon
here."
Mr. Smith added that a pardon would be an empty gesture.
"The governor believes that Clyde Kennard was wronged, and if he were alive
today his rights would be restored," Mr. Smith said. "There's nothing the
governor can do for Clyde Kennard right now."
Mr. Kennard's case, which was the subject of a recent three-month investigation
by The Clarion-Ledger of Jackson, Miss., has also been pursued by students at
Adlai E. Stevenson High School in Lincolnshire, Ill., and the Center on Wrongful
Convictions at Northwestern University's law school, in Chicago. Several of the
students involved said they were baffled by Mr. Barbour's response.
"Please," said Mona Ghadiri, 17, a senior at Stevenson High, addressing Governor
Barbour, "if you are going to say no, at least give us a decent reason."
The only evidence against Mr. Kennard was the testimony of a black man named
Johnny Lee Roberts, then 19, who said that Mr. Kennard, 33, had asked him to
steal the chicken feed. Mr. Roberts, who did the stealing, received a suspended
sentence. Mr. Kennard, convicted as an accessory, got a year for every $3.57 of
feed.
Mr. Roberts has recanted, first to Jerry Mitchell of The Clarion-Ledger and then
in a sworn statement before a judge.
"Kennard did not ask me to steal," Mr. Roberts said in the sworn statement.
"Kennard did not ask me to do anything illegal. Kennard is not guilty of
burglary or any other crime."
"I have always felt bad about what happened to Clyde," Mr. Roberts continued.
"He was a good man."
Joyce A. Ladner, a sociologist, remembered being mentored by Mr. Kennard when
she was a teenager. "He was a quiet, very dignified guy, a real gentleman," Ms.
Ladner said of Mr. Kennard.
Aubrey K. Lucas, the director of admissions at the college when Mr. Kennard
applied, recalled in an interview that it was the governor, J. P. Coleman, who
decided against admitting Mr. Kennard.
That was a mistake, said Mr. Lucas, who went on to be president of what became
the University of Southern Mississippi. "Kennard would have been the perfect
person to integrate this university," Mr. Lucas said. "He didn't bring attorneys
with him. He didn't bring the N.A.A.C.P. leadership."
There was little question of Mr. Kennard's qualifications.
"Everybody who knew him refers to him as brilliant not as a smart man but as a
brilliant man," said Barry Bradford, the teacher at Stevenson High who directed
its project on Mr. Kennard, available at www.clydekennard.org.
State authorities had a different reaction. The files of the Mississippi
Sovereignty Commission, the state's segregationist spy agency, show that killing
or framing Mr. Kennard was openly discussed as preferable to allowing him to
enroll at the college.
March 30 was Clyde Kennard Day in Mississippi, and Governor Barbour issued a
proclamation. He urged citizens to remember Mr. Kennard's "determination, the
injustices he suffered, and his significant role in the history of the civil
rights movement in Mississippi."
There has apparently never been a posthumous pardon in Mississippi, but there
have been such pardons in 10 other states and in the federal system. Yesterday,
Gov. Brian Schweitzer of Montana posthumously pardoned 78 people convicted of
sedition early in the last century.
Mr. Lucas said pardoning Mr. Kennard might cost Mr. Barbour a few votes.
"There are some people around here still," Mr. Lucas said, "who think we should
be separate as races and who refuse to see the errors of our past. But I can't
imagine it would be a factor in his re-election."
Pardon Unlikely for
Civil Rights Advocate, NYT, 4.5.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/04/us/04pardon.html
New York dispatch
Guess who's coming to dinner?
In the first of his weekly dispatches from New York,
Paul Harris reveals how casual racism among the white middle classes is still
rife in parts of the United States
Thursday April 20, 2006
Guardian Unlimited
Lizzie was charming and fun in the way only old ladies from
the Deep South can be. Her voice was not so much tinged by a lilting accent as
positively laden with it. She was 80 years old and as full of life as someone a
quarter of her age. She was funny and warm, kind and intelligent. She had
studied political science at college and then travelled the world. She was
deeply Republican but her opinions could surprise. On the hot button
conservative issue of the day - abortion - she was keenly pro-choice, loudly
declaring that she could not stand it when men told women what to do. 'And it is
ALWAYS men who talk about abortion,' she said with a glint in her eye. 'Well,
it's none of their damned business.' She was, in short, the perfect dinner
guest.
Until she started talking about 'the niggers'. And 'how lazy'
they were. It is hard to underestimate the shock value of the N word in American
polite society. Or impolite society come to that. There is nothing so offensive.
To hear Lizzie - especially someone as seemingly sweet and fun as Lizzie - use
the word openly was a gobsmacking experience. It also raised some fairly
unexpected questions when it comes to table manners. How do you react?
Especially as she was a neighbour invited to a family dinner party. Cowardice
won the day. Nervous glances were exchanged. The subject was changed.
But Lizzie did, inadvertently, reveal some truths about the American experience
that are too often glossed over. White people - especially intelligent and
educated white people - calmly describing their fellow American citizens as
niggers is too often portrayed as a thing of the past. Or of ignorant red necks.
That all ended in the 1960s, the official version goes. Martin Luther King and
JFK put a stop to it. The truth is far different. Things have changed hugely
since the 1960s but that period of time is not yet history.
For the really scary thing about Lizzie talking about 'niggers' was not that she
had those opinions. It was that she clearly was unaware voicing them would be
shocking. It was a useful reminder of how close some 'history' really is. There
are people alive today who have been involved in lynching black Americans or
those working for their civil rights.
Recently several prominent cases have been reopened, most notably in
Mississippi. Just taking one look at the de facto segregation of many American
cities into black and white neighbourhoods shows how far there is to go. As do
incidents like that surrounding the resignation of Republican Senator Trent Lott
in 2002. Lott had spoken of his admiration for pro-segregationist presidential
candidate Strom Thurmond in the 1960s. At Thurmond's 100th birthday party Lott
had declared: 'When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're
proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't
have had all these problems over all these years, either.'
Again what is shocking is not the bar room prejudice. Let's face it, few of us
are entirely prejudice free. No, what is horrifying about that comment is the
casualness with which it was doled out. Like Lizzie's, it is a sentiment born
not of secret and furtive dislike, but of open and casual racism. So casual, in
fact, that it is assumed to be the norm. It is a way of saying: Well, we all
think that don't we?
Luckily the majority of Americans don't. I know black Britons far more at ease
in America than back home in the UK. They see more opportunities here, and more
acceptance. In the shape of Condoleezza Rice (and before her, Colin Powell)
Americans have black politicians that could (if only they had wanted to)
conceivably win the White House. By contrast a black PM in Downing Street still
seems a long way off.
But it is always useful to be reminded of how far America has got to go in terms
of race as well as how far America has come. To remember that current events
take a very long time to fossilise into history and that until then we still
have to live with them. So for that, Lizzie, I thank you.
Guess who's coming to
dinner?, G, 20.4.2006,
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/columnists/story/0,,1757533
Alabama Legislature OKs pardon for Rosa Parks, others
Updated 4/18/2006 9:03 AM ET
USA Today
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) The Alabama Legislature gave final
approval to a bill that sets up a process to pardon civil rights icon Rosa Parks
and hundreds of others arrested for violating segregation-era laws.
The sponsor of the bill, Democratic Rep. Thad McClammy, said
the legislation could lead to pardons for Parks, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
Jr. and hundreds of others convicted of violating laws aimed at keeping the
races separate. McClammy said the arrests date back as far as the early 1900s.
The bill, named "The Rosa Parks Act" was amended in the Senate to allow museums
such as The Rosa Parks Library and Museum in Montgomery to continue to display
records of the arrests.
Parks was arrested 50 years ago for refusing to give up her seat on a Montgomery
city bus, an event that sparked the historic Montgomery bus boycott.
"This would grant pardons on request to anyone convicted under the Jim Crow
laws," McClammy said, referring to the name often used to refer to the
segregation-era laws.
The House voted 91-0 to approve Senate changes and pass the bill late Monday,
about two hours before the 2006 regular session of the Legislature was scheduled
to end.
The legislation now goes to Gov. Bob Riley, who has not said if he plans to sign
it. Spokesman Jeff Emerson said Riley would review the bill and then decide.
Some black lawmakers have questioned whether Parks and other civil rights
figures should be pardoned when the laws they violated have been ruled
unconstitutional.
"Martin Luther King and the others were arrested with pride," said Rep. John
Rogers.
Alabama Legislature
OKs pardon for Rosa Parks, others, UT, 18.4.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-04-18-parks-pardon_x.htm
Two athletes charged in race-tainted rape case
Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:35 PM ET
Reuters
RALEIGH, North Carolina (Reuters) - Two white lacrosse players
from elite Duke University were arrested on Tuesday and charged with raping a
black woman at a team party, in a case that has freshly exposed race and class
tensions in America.
The two 20-year-old men, Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty, surrendered on
charges of rape, sexual offense and kidnapping and were booked into the Durham
County Jail in North Carolina. Bond was set at $400,000 for each and Seligmann
was released on bond a few hours later, a jail official said. Through their
lawyers, both have maintained their innocence.
The two arrested students are accused of raping a student from the predominantly
black North Carolina Central University in Durham, who had been hired to dance
at a March 13 party at an off-campus home shared by three of the players.
The 27-year-old mother of two told police the next day that she had been raped
by three white men at the party. A news report quoted a neighbor as saying at
least one man hurled a racial taunt from the house as the woman was leaving.
"It's a perfect storm," Duke law professor James Coleman said earlier this month
of the case. "It involves race, privilege ... It involves arrogance, sex,
athletes, the South," Coleman said on NBC television, after he was named to lead
a university probe of the lacrosse team's culture.
Both arrested men played on the nationally ranked Duke lacrosse team. Lacrosse,
a sport originated by American Indians, has long been associated with exclusive
schools but its popularity has spread widely in recent years.
Defense attorneys demanded that prosecutor Mike Nifong drop the case after DNA
tests of 46 players on the team failed to connect them with the accuser. Nifong
refused and a state court judge sealed an indictment in the case on Monday.
The coach of Duke's men's lacrosse team resigned and the university canceled the
team's season after weeks of protests that supported either the lacrosse players
or the woman.
The case has sparked intense U.S. media coverage and highlighted tensions in
Durham, where the annual cost of tuition and board at Duke exceeds the average
annual income of city families.
"The entire world is watching Durham and North Carolina," said William Barber,
the state head of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored
People. "How we handle this will determine what kind of community we are," he
told a news conference earlier this month.
Nifong, who is seeking reelection, has defended his handling of the case.
"The reason that I took this case is because this case says something about
Durham that I'm not going to let be said," he said in a candidates debate,
according to local WRAL television. "I'm not going to allow Durham's view in the
minds of the world to be a bunch of lacrosse players at Duke raping a black girl
from Durham."
Rape cases have long been a feature of U.S. racial debates. Accusations that
black men raped or even leered at white women prompted lynchings and
high-profile trials in the century that followed the 1861-1865 U.S. Civil War.
A 1987 allegation by black teenager Tawana Brawley in New York that she was
assaulted by a group of six whites sparked a national debate over her
truthfulness and helped propel civil rights activist Rev. Al Sharpton to
national prominence. A grand jury threw out the case, citing lack of evidence
and inconsistencies in her story.
Two athletes charged
in race-tainted rape case, R, 18.4.2006,
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyid=2006-04-18T163521Z_01_N18351588_RTRUKOC_0_US-CRIME-LACROSSE.xml
Race a focal point in Duke scandal
Posted 4/16/2006 4:43 AM ET
USA Today
DURHAM, N.C. (AP) Mayor Bill Bell is black. So are Police
Chief Steven W. Chalmers, City Manager Patrick Baker and a majority of the city
council. Durham's population is almost as black as it is white. So why is it
that some blacks like Preston Bizzell, a 61-year-old Air Force veteran who said
he's never experienced racism in his 30 years in Durham, believe justice here is
swifter and harsher for a black man than a white one?
Bizzell sat on his bicycle recently and stared at the house
where a black stripper claims she was raped and beaten by three white Duke
University lacrosse players. He's convinced if the alleged attackers had been
students at historically black North Carolina Central University, and their
accuser white, "that same day, somebody would have been arrested."
"They wouldn't have spent that money (on DNA tests) over at that black
university over there just to make sure they didn't do that," said Bizzell, a
resident of the Walltown neighborhood, where some blacks still refer to the Duke
campus as "the plantation." "No, no. If them girls had said, 'Him and him,'
you're going to jail."
Without question, the case has racial overtones. But after a month of intense
media scrutiny, it's hard to tell whether the coverage has shone a spotlight on
existing racial tensions in Durham, or is creating those tensions.
Bell bristles at the suggestion that the rape allegations have somehow turned up
the heat on simmering racial tensions in Durham. He says Durham has no more
racial trouble than any city its size.
To him, comments like Bizzell's are more about the state of the country as a
whole, where blacks are represented in jails and prisons out of proportion to
their percentage in the population, as they are among the poor and poorly
educated.
"I think it tends to be more out of frustration, with wanting to say something,"
he said. "I think it's more based on history."
Attorney Kerry Sutton, who represents one of the players, said it is outsiders
who are injecting race into the story.
"They've made it a much bigger element than it ever should have been," she said.
On March 13, two black women went to an off-campus house to perform for members
of the lacrosse team, which has only one black member. The accuser, a
27-year-old student at N.C. Central, has reportedly said she was subjected to
racial slurs, and told police she was dragged into a bathroom and raped.
At a forum last week on the Central campus, a vocal, mostly black crowd peppered
District Attorney Mike Nifong with questions about why no one has been charged
and why the FBI has not been called in to help investigate this as a hate crime.
Joe Cheshire, who represents one of the team captains, characterized much of
what was said as, "We black people are mistreated by the criminal justice
system, so what we need to do now is go out and mistreat white people."
Sutton finds it ironic that anyone would suggest Nifong was dragging his feet
because the players are white, especially when he is taking so much heat for
pursuing the case at all.
"I've never known Mike Nifong to make a decision based on the race of a victim
or a defendant or an attorney or the judge or anybody," she said. "That is
simply not a factor."
Bell, a former city council chairman and three-term mayor, said he's seen Durham
reduced in news reports to "a city of poor blacks ... and you've got Duke off to
its own a white university, a wealthy university."
In truth, he said, Durham's unemployment rate is just 4.4%. It's home to
Research Triangle Park and its many high-tech companies. Two black-owned banks
and the nation's largest black-owned insurance company are also based in Durham.
"We do have poverty," Bell said of his city of 187,000 residents. "But what city
this size doesn't?"
As for the so-called racial tension he's read so much about, Bell hasn't seen it
in the racially mixed crowds that have peacefully protested the alleged rape.
"I'd say given the demographics of this community, I think you'll find more
people are united on issues than are divided," he said.
But in a recent interview with The Associated Press, the Rev. Jesse Jackson said
history can't help but loom large over this case. It is particularly horrible
because these white men hired black women to strip for them.
"That fantasy's as old as slave masters impregnating young slave girls," he
said.
Cheshire found Jackson's comment odd, since the lacrosse players did not
specifically ask for black strippers.
"There is no slave-master mentality here, and that's just another perfect
example of ... self-absorbed race pandering," Cheshire said.
Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh has suggested that Jackson and
the Rev. Al Sharpton haven't visited Durham because of its "possibility of being
a Tawana Brawley situation." He was referring to the 15-year-old black girl who
claimed in 1987 she was raped, smeared with feces and scrawled with racial slurs
by six white law enforcement officials a claim championed by Sharpton but
later discredited.
Jackson and others have suggested that even if the rape allegations are proven
false, the racial slurs are enough to make this case worthy of such a national
dialogue. One witness has said someone at the party shouted, "Hey bitch! Thank
your grandpa for my nice cotton shirt."
That it happened at a university as prestigious as Duke, and among "some of its
choice young men," makes that dialogue all the more necessary, Jackson said.
"The character of this thing is chilling," he said. "Something happened that
everybody's ashamed of, nobody's proud of ..."
Even if some racial epithets were used, people "do say stupid things," Sutton
said. When announcing the negative DNA results, even Cheshire acknowledged that
doesn't mean there are not moral and ethical issues raised by the case.
Jackson said he's been too busy with immigration issues and the upcoming New
Orleans election to visit Durham, but plans to come at some point. Sharpton had
planned to attend a rally outside the party house this Sunday but canceled after
its organizer asked him to stay away for now.
"We don't want our good to be turned into a racial issue," said Bishop John
Bennett of the Church of the Apostolic Revival International. "I just think his
coming may stir some people up."
There has been speculation of violence should no one be charged. Bell calls that
expectation another sign of bias, recalling that last summer, when three
seven-foot crosses were burned around town, whites and blacks came together to
denounce the acts.
Bell arrived in Durham in 1968, the week the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was
assassinated. He said the city was an oasis of calm and civility during that
crisis.
"We did not have the looting, the burning, the rioting," he said. And today, no
matter what happens in the Duke lacrosse case, "I have no fear of that."
Race a focal point in
Duke scandal, UT, 16.4.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-04-16-duke-race_x.htm
Nebraska goes back to dividing schools on racial lines
Saturday April 15, 2006
Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington
Guardian
Fifty years after America abolished segregated schools, the
state of Nebraska was yesterday accused of seeking to carve up its largest
school district along broadly racial lines: white, African-American and
Hispanic.
Under a new measure signed into law by the governor, Dave
Heineman, on Thursday night, Omaha's highly regarded public school system would
be divided into three racially distinct entities.
North-eastern Omaha would have a mainly African-American school district,
south-eastern Omaha would be largely Hispanic, and the relatively wealthy
sections in the west of the city would be packaged into a largely white school
district. The changes take effect from July 2008.
The division, which was proposed by the only African-American member of the
state legislature last week, was adopted at breakneck speed.
Its provisions represent one of the most sweeping challenges to the
desegregation of American state schools mandated by the supreme court in 1954.
Nebraska's attorney general, Joe Bruning, warned that it could be in violation
of the constitution, and would be challenged in the courts.
The measure has been opposed by a powerful coalition of business leaders -
including Warren Buffett, the billionaire Omaha-based financier who is the
world's second richest man after Bill Gates - as well as civil rights
organisations.
"Basically, it is state-sanctioned segregation," said state senator Patrick
Bourne who voted against the bill. "This sets race relations back a long way,
and we are going to be spending a lot of money on lawyers' fees that we should
be spending on our kids."
However, Ernie Chambers, who proposed the division, argued that local schools
have been effectively segregated for years and that the stated aim of
integration - to give black and white children an equal education in government
schools - had been discredited.
"There has always been segregation. There is now, and always will be so rather
than go through all this worthless talk that has gone on now for generations
about integration, let's talk about getting better schools," he told the
Guardian.
He said the system in Omaha discriminated against children in poor, largely
African-American neighbourhoods, by denying those schools adequate resources. He
said the new law would improve the quality of public schools.
But others are sceptical, noting that state schools are financed by property
taxes, which would put schools in poor neighbourhoods at a disadvantage.
"They have opened a Pandora's Box. I don't think they are going to be able to
solve this without having a lot of blood on the floor," said Jonathan
Benjamin-Alvarado, a political science professor at the University of Nebraska
in Omaha. "It's segregation just trimmed around the edges."
Nebraska goes back to
dividing schools on racial lines, G, 15.4.2006,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1754360,00.html
A Former Trooper's Take on His Race Profiling Case
April 5, 2006
The New York Times
By DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI
HAMILTON, N.J., April 1 Twice every workday, John I. Hogan
drives past Milepost 63 on the New Jersey Turnpike and feels his pulse begin to
quicken.
These days, he makes the trip as a civilian, just another commuter, as he heads
between his home in Bordentown and his job as a salesman in Jamesburg. Eight
years ago, though, Mr. Hogan was a decorated New Jersey state trooper who
patrolled the turnpike and called himself "King of the Big Road," when a brief
encounter near Exit 7A changed his life, the lives of others and police policy.
It was late one spring night in 1998 when Mr. Hogan and a trooper named James
Kenna maneuvered their police cruiser alongside a minivan carrying four young
men, three of them black and one Hispanic, and ordered the driver to pull over.
It was supposed to be an ordinary traffic stop, but then the van rolled backward
and the troopers fired 11 shots, wounding three of the four men inside.
Because the young men were unarmed and the State Police had long been accused of
stopping and searching drivers solely because of their skin color, the shooting
set off a political uproar about the use of racial profiling in the war on
drugs.
Mr. Hogan and Mr. Kenna were seen as national symbols of police discrimination
and were indicted for attempted murder and aggravated assault. Those charges
were eventually dropped, but the troopers were forced to resign after pleading
guilty to lying to investigators about the shooting and repeatedly falsifying
documents to conceal the fact that they stopped minority drivers because of
their race. They each paid a $280 fine.
Now, after years of living with that case as a stigma "that just won't go away,"
Mr. Hogan, 37, is trying to put the experience in a different perspective by
publishing a book, "Turnpike Trooper." Mr. Hogan writes that he and Mr. Kenna
were victims of fate, which placed them at the scene of the shooting, then of
a long line of elected officials, civil rights leaders and law enforcement
officials angling for political gain.
Mr. Hogan's book contradicts so many statements he made to investigators in 1998
and in court when he pleaded guilty in 2002 that he had difficulty finding a
publisher, and he finally decided to pay to have it published. Since the book's
publication several months ago, he has also struggled to find an audience for
it.
"I'm at peace with what happened," he said last Wednesday in an interview
outside his office. "Sometimes, though, I think people just want this whole
thing to go away."
In "Turnpike Trooper" Mr. Hogan writes that he was raised in a small,
predominantly white town, loved sports, saluted the flag and considered troopers
the equivalent of "Greek gods." He excelled once on the force, winning a
prestigious assignment to the turnpike, and was nominated for trooper of the
year.
In the book, Mr. Hogan says no one encouraged him to pick out minority drivers,
flatly contradicting his own court testimony in 2002. Although New Jersey has
since stiffened its guidelines against racial profiling and many experts say it
is both unconstitutional and ineffective, he defends the practice, arguing that
while drug use cuts across racial lines, his experience led him to believe that
drug trafficking was dominated by blacks and Latinos.
Mr. Hogan also writes that he found it useful to his work as a trooper to listen
to rap performers like Nas, N.W.A. and Notorious B.I.G.
"Staying cool, composed and speaking to individuals in a language they
understood, and even began to trust, helped me be successful," he writes.
That was of little assistance on the night of April 23, 1998, when he and Mr.
Kenna stopped the minivan.
Mr. Hogan writes that he fired only after the driver had backed up, struck his
leg and knocked him over, and that he feared the young men were drug dealers
trying to kill him and Mr. Kenna. (The driver said the minivan slipped into
reverse.)
When he pleaded guilty in 2002 he acknowledged that he had lied to investigators
about the circumstances that led to stopping the minivan and about crucial
details of the shooting. He also testified that 75 police officers had urged him
to lie and that some even took him back to the scene so he could prepare a more
plausible story.
Mr. Hogan, who maintains the same close-cropped hair and chiseled build that he
had as a trooper, explains the contradictions between the book and his earlier
statements by saying he no longer has any motivation to lie.
"This is, every word of it, the truth," he said. "I just want the truth to come
out."
"Turnpike Trooper" may be a bid for redemption, but it offers little in the way
of remorse.
It makes acerbic references to the state's payment of $12.9 million to the four
young men to settle the case, and it makes little mention of the injuries three
of the men suffered. In the interview, he suggested that he felt as much
sympathy for himself and Mr. Kenna as he did for them.
"There were a lot of people whose lives were affected that night," he said.
"It's unfortunate that it happened, but there's no way to change the past."
Peter Neufeld, the lawyer who represented two of the shooting victims in their
civil suit, said it was outrageous for Mr. Hogan to portray himself as a victim.
"These young men still have bullets in them," Mr. Neufeld said. "And it happened
because Hogan and Kenna stopped them for no reason other than the color of their
skin. Then they lied about it."
The omissions and discrepancies in Mr. Hogan's book seemed of little concern to
the people who appeared on Thursday at a book signing in Hamilton Township,
about five miles from where the shooting occurred. Sitting with his fiancιe as
he autographed a few dozen copies, Mr. Hogan said he appreciated the friendly
welcome, especially after the indifference he had encountered while trying to
promote the book.
Taking a microphone, Mr. Hogan asked if there were any questions from the 60
people in the audience, all of whom were white and several of whom wore New
Jersey State Police T-shirts or hats. A man in a Nascar shirt asked whether he
had made any television appearances. (A few local cable programs, but no luck
with the networks or affiliates.)
Then a retired trooper, Walt Catlidge, asked his former colleague whether he
planned a sequel.
"No," Mr. Hogan said, shaking his head. "I think this was enough for me."
A Former Trooper's
Take on His Race Profiling Case, NYT, 8.4.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/05/nyregion/05trooper.html
Mother builds legacy for son slain in Ohio
Updated 4/7/2006 1:17 AM
By Dan Horn, The Cincinnati Enquirer
USA Today
People think they know Angela Leisure's son.
They hear the name Timothy Thomas, and right away they've
taken measure of his short life: He is a martyr who was shot by a police
officer. Or, he is a criminal who caused his own death by running from police.
GALLERY: Ohio mother honors slain teen
Thomas, a 19-year-old black man, was shot and killed April 7, 2001, by a white
police officer. The shooting sparked a period of unrest in Cincinnati that led
to race riots.
Leisure has struggled the five years since her son's death to build a life
without him and to preserve memories that involve something other than riots and
race relations.
"People think they know him, but they don't," Leisure says. "I see him only as
my child."
Since her son's death, Leisure, 39, has spoken at public gatherings about racial
tolerance and pursued a lawsuit against Cincinnati that ended with a settlement
of more than $1 million. Now she is trying to focus on repairing her family.
"Living in Cincinnati, there wasn't any place I could go where people didn't
know me, or think they knew me," Leisure says. "It made my heart hurt. I
couldn't repair the damage."
She left the city with her daughter, Tangelisa, 15, to a location she doesn't
disclose.
Some people tell her the time away will help her heal, but she says they don't
understand how much she has lost.
Opinions about Timothy Thomas formed quickly after his death.
Some saw him as the victim of racial profiling. Others saw him as a bad kid who
ran from police.
Thomas did run from police and had run at least twice before but the 14
misdemeanor charges against the teen were all related to traffic violations.
The off-duty officers who started the chase April 7 weren't looking for Thomas
but recognized him and knew about the traffic violations. Officer Steven Roach
joined the chase, followed the unarmed Thomas into a dark alley and fired a
single, fatal shot.
Roach did not return calls seeking comment. But he has said he feared for his
life when he fired.
Cincinnati police officials have said race did not play a role in the case.
Roach was later acquitted of negligent homicide charges, but he lost his job
after an internal investigation found he gave conflicting explanations for the
shooting.
He initially said he fired because he thought Thomas had a gun. He later said he
was startled and fired accidentally.
"It was a complex situation," says Walter Reinhaus, president of the
Over-the-Rhine Community Council. "But immediately following it, there were a
lot of judgments made."
Leisure tried to tell people her son was neither the hero nor the villain.
In the months before his death, Thomas had earned a GED and landed a
construction job. He was getting his life in order, Leisure says, because of the
birth of his son, Tywon, in early 2001.
When young people told her they were destroying property "for Timothy" during
the riots, she scolded them.
"He would not be like this," she told them. "He would not be doing this."
Leisure was determined to define her son's life on her terms by collecting
photos, copying family videos and talking about fond memories.
The endeavor took on greater importance two years ago, when Tywon started asking
questions about his dad. Her grandson, now 5, was 3 months old when his father
died.
"Where's my daddy?" he asked shortly after his third birthday. "How come my
daddy's not here?"
Leisure struggled to keep her composure in front of her grandson, saying only
that "God needed him."
Leisure made a copy of her wedding video last year so Tywon could see his dad on
a happy day. Tywon loved it and quickly learned to run the VCR himself.
Since leaving the city, Leisure worries about her relatives in Cincinnati,
especially her 21-year-old son, Terry.
"I tell him, 'Be careful, be careful, be careful,' " says Leisure, who fears her
family's notoriety will somehow cause trouble for Terry.
Her hope is that Cincinnati's collaborative agreement a court-supervised plan
to improve police-community relations will lead to lasting change for the
city. This, Leisure says, should be her son's legacy.
Mother builds legacy
for son slain in Ohio, UT, 7.4.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-04-06-ohio-mom_x.htm
A.C.L.U. Says Ethnic Bias Steered Georgia Drug Sting
April 6, 2006
The New York Times
By KATE ZERNIKE
The American Civil Liberties Union is accusing federal
prosecutors of ethnic bias in a sting last summer in which South Asian owners of
convenience stores in Georgia were charged with selling household ingredients
that could be used to make methamphetamine, a highly addictive drug.
In a legal filing, the A.C.L.U. said yesterday that prosecutors ignored
extensive evidence that white-owned stores were selling the same items to
methamphetamine makers and focused instead on South Asians to take advantage of
language barriers.
The sting sent informants to convenience stores in six counties in rural
northwest Georgia beginning in 2003 to buy ingredients that can be used to make
the drug ordinary household items like Sudafed, matches, aluminum foil and
charcoal.
Prosecutors said the clerks should have known that the ingredients would be used
to make methamphetamine because the informants who bought them said they needed
the items to "finish up a cook," slang for making the drug.
But several South Asians said they believed that the informants were talking
about barbecue.
Forty-four of the 49 people charged were Indian, and 23 out of 24 stores in the
sting were owned or operated by Indians.
Documents filed by the A.C.L.U. yesterday include a sworn statement from an
informant in the sting, saying that federal investigators sent informants only
to Indian-owned stores, "because the Indians' English wasn't good." The
informant said investigators ignored the informant's questions about why so many
South-Asian-owned stores were visited in the sting.
Other filings said prosecutors had several tips that more than a dozen
white-owned stores were selling the same ingredients, but failed to follow up on
them. According to a sworn statement from a witness, law enforcement officials
tipped off a white store owner about the investigation and recommended ways to
avoid scrutiny.
David E. Nahmias, the United States attorney for the Northern District of
Georgia, denied any bias. "We prosecute people based on the evidence and the
law," Mr. Nahmias said in a statement, "not their race or ethnicity."
To date, he said, 23 defendants have pleaded guilty, and eight cases have been
dismissed. Some of those cases were dismissed because prosecutors charged the
wrong people because of confusion over names; more than 30 of the defendants
share the common Indian surname Patel.
Of 629 convenience stores in the six-county area in the sting, 80 percent are
owned or operated by whites, according to the A.C.L.U.'s court filing, but fewer
than 1 percent of the stores in the sting are white-owned or operated. The
filing said the clerk at the only white-operated store was known widely as a
methamphetamine addict whose husband was in prison for making the drug. None of
the Indians charged are accused of using or making methamphetamine.
Mr. Nahmias noted that several defendants had already filed motions claiming
selective prosecution and that the court had rejected them.
But the A.C.L.U. said that the United States District Court in Rome, Ga.,
rejected the motions because the group had not provided any evidence. Since
then, lawyers have spent $60,000 to track down evidence, hiring private
investigators and searching 10,000 documents, according to the A.C.L.U. filing.
A.C.L.U. Says Ethnic
Bias Steered Georgia Drug Sting, NYT, 6.4.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/06/us/06sting.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Martin Luther King shooting tapes released online
April 05, 2006
Times Online
By Sam Knight
Thirty-eight years after he was assassinated on a motel
balcony, photographs, recordings and police files that describe the death of
Martin Luther King Jr. have been placed on the internet.
On yesterday's anniversary of Dr King's death, the Shelby
County Registers office in Memphis, Tennessee, made available hours of tapes,
including hurried police calls from the scene of the crime, hundreds of
photographs and thousands of pages of files and transcripts of the trial of
James Earl Ray, the man found guilty of the shooting.
Dr King was shot in the jaw while he spoke to supporters from his balcony
outside Room 306 of the Lorraine Motel in downtown Memphis in the early evening
of April 4, 1968. He was in the city, and under police surveillance, trying to
lead a peaceful protest of sanitation workers. He died an hour later.
The assassination was witnessed by dozens of people, including a clutch of
police officers and firefighters who were watching Dr King from the locker room
of Fire Station No 2, across the road from the motel.
Recordings of their first radio calls to the Memphis emergency despatcher were
released yesterday. Through the scramble of voices come the words: "a shooting
has occurred.... I'm at the Lorraine in the car... it has been verified that
Reverend King has been shot... it has been confirmed that Reverend King has been
shot."
The subsequent hour of calls, edited to 18 minutes on the website, show the
rapid pace of events that later became the US Government's case against Ray, who
first admitted shooting Dr King before recanting and insisting for the rest of
his life, with the support of the King family, that he was framed for the crime.
Within moments, police officers can be heard saying that the fatal shot was
fired from a run-down flophouse across the road from the motel: "The Reverend
King has been shot from a brick building, it's a brick building directly east
from the Lorraine Motel."
Then the description of a suspect and a make of car that became crucial evidence
in the case against Earl Ray: "Got a description? A young white male, well
dressed, a young white male, well dressed, running south from 424 South Main."
Officers are then told to look out for a "late model white Mustang". Minutes
later a "bundle" containing a rifle was found outside a record shop.
Ray, an armed robber on the run after escaping from prison in Missouri in April
1967, was arrested in London two months after the shooting. He was held at
Heathrow travelling under the name "Ramon George Sneyd" and his fingerprints
were found to match those on the rifle found outside the Memphis record shop.
Ray confessed to the assassination, saying he stood in the bathtub of the
communal bathroom in the flophouse to take the shot, and was sentenced to serve
99 years in prison. He died in jail in 1998 after four investigations, including
a review by the Department of Justice, failed to find evidence to support a
theory that Dr King was shot on the orders of a Memphis bar-owner.
Tom Leatherwood, the Register of Shelby County, said that the files surrounding
the death of Dr King, including photographs of the flophouse, of Earl Ray and
the "bundle", had been kept for years in the county archives before being moved
to the register last year.
"I have younger children ranging from 5 to 13," he said. "And they are just not
aware of the cost of the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King gave his life
for civil rights and so many people in America today just take that for
granted."
"These files and the despatch tape, especially, are a real slice of history.
When I heard it for the first time it was very chilling to me. It can make it
very real for a new generation."
Martin Luther King shooting tapes released
online, Ts, 5.4.2006,http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-2120209,00.html
Voting Rights Act pointed in a new direction
Updated 4/3/2006 10:19 PM
USA TODAY
By Bill Nichols
MACON, Miss. Lean, lanky and a fast-talking blur of
perpetual motion, Noxubee County Democratic Chairman Ike Brown has roamed the
political landscape of eastern Mississippi for 25 years with one clear aim:
electing Democrats who are really Democrats.
Brown has no time for moderate white Democrats who might get elected but who
would then support Republican policies. "To hell with 'em," Brown says of people
he calls "Dixiecrats." "They're not doing me one bit of good."
Brown's lawyer, Wilbur Colom, says he is simply "a tough politician." But the
U.S. Justice Department says Brown's take-no-prisoners brand of politics has
crossed the line into discrimination against white voters and candidates.
The Justice Department has launched a landmark lawsuit against Brown the first
time the federal government has used the 1965 Voting Rights Act to allege racial
discrimination against whites.
Brown calls the suit, which is expected to come to trial this summer, a
"nickel-and-dime lawsuit," an effort by the Bush administration to end his
successes in building black voter turnout and electing black officials.
Justice Department spokesman Eric Holland accused Brown of "blatant and
outrageous violations of the Voting Rights Act." Holland said Brown had
committed actions "with the racially discriminatory purpose of defeating
candidates that white voters support ... and with the intent of discriminating
against black voters and black community leaders who support and work in
coalition with whites."
'Extremely remarkable'
Some legal analysts say the suit marks a striking change of focus by the Bush
administration on voting rights cases, which until now have centered on
discrimination against blacks and other minorities.
"What's going on here in using the Voting Rights Act in this manner by the
Justice Department is unprecedented and extremely remarkable," says Steven
Mulroy, an assistant professor at the University of Memphis Law School who was a
lawyer in the Justice Department's voting rights section from 1991 to 2000.
"It's hard to imagine a more dramatic symbol of the change of orientation under
the current administration."
The lawsuit has prompted soul-searching within the civil rights community
nationally over whether the Voting Rights Act, signed into law by President
Johnson in 1965, should be used to protect whites.
"We oppose discrimination against any race," says Derrick Johnson, president of
the Mississippi NAACP. He expresses deep concern about the Noxubee lawsuit
because of the historic pattern of voting rights abuses including voter
intimidation and registration challenges against blacks in Mississippi. He
says those abuses continue and still have not been sufficiently investigated.
"Macon is almost 80% black and the current mayor is white ... and the black
community supported him. That does not reek of racial discrimination that
reeks of a community choosing candidates they think will best serve their
interests," Johnson says.
Holland rejects that assessment and says the Justice Department has filed
enforcement actions under the Voting Rights Act to "protect the rights of black
voters in at least 58 of the state's 82 counties, often with multiple actions
within the same county."
Brown, who the Justice Department points out served 21 months in prison in the
mid-1990s on charges of income tax fraud, says his efforts to elect blacks are
no different than the hardball political tactics white politicos have used in
Mississippi for generations.
Noxubee County, which is roughly 70% black, has gone from one black elected
official to 44 since Brown came here in 1980.
Members of the Noxubee County Board of Supervisors, also named in the initial
Justice Department complaint, have signed a consent decree agreeing to take
steps to avoid future discrimination against whites. Board President William
Oliver says he's seen no evidence of past transgressions.
"If you could find three white people in this county who say black people
discriminated against them," Oliver says, "I would like to know."
Angered by 2000 race
Brown acknowledges a fiercely partisan streak he says was sharpened by his fury
after watching then-vice president Al Gore lose the 2000 election through a
controversial recount in Florida.
"I got angry, upset and everything else," says Brown, who receives no salary in
his political post and runs a recycling business. "Everything in my life became
colored by R's and D's" party identifiers.
He says he has no problem supporting whites for office he campaigned for
current Macon Mayor Bob Boykin, who is white. He chuckles when noting that
Noxubee has only one white official elected countywide: prosecutor Ricky Walker.
"If I could find a black lawyer who lives in the county, we'd get him, too,"
Brown says with a sly grin.
Colom describes Brown as a character, a political street fighter whose local
knowledge is so encyclopedic that he can tell a candidate how many family
members including distant cousins and kin by marriage his opponent can claim
in a particular district.
The Justice Department lawsuit takes a dimmer view of Brown's actions. Some of
the suit's allegations:
Brown recruited black candidates to run in Noxubee knowing that they did not
meet state residency requirements.
Brown has excluded whites from participating in county Democratic affairs,
using such tactics as moving the sites of meetings.
Brown has attempted to prohibit whites from voting in Democratic primary
elections by challenging their registrations and absentee ballots.
Brown and county election officials working with him have discriminated against
white voters by rejecting absentee ballots cast by whites on grounds that they
are defective while counting black voters' absentee ballots that contained
similar defects.
Brown does not rebut specifics of the suit but gives a blanket dismissal:
"Bogus."
He also waves off a lawsuit against the Noxubee County Sheriff's Department
filed late last year by former deputy Kendrick Slaughter, who is black.
Slaughter says charges of disorderly conduct and reckless driving were filed
against him by the department in retaliation for his cooperation with the
Justice Department on the lawsuit.
Slaughter "is just trying to save his hide," says Brown, who says he knows
nothing about the case. Slaughter declined to comment through his lawyer, Jim
Waide. A U.S. District Court judge in Jackson has ordered that Slaughter's
prosecution be halted. His request for damages is still pending.
Noxubee County Sheriff Albert Walker denies Slaughter's charges.
Precedent potential
Mulroy, the law professor, says the Brown case would result in a significant
legal precedent, given that it marks a novel use of the Voting Rights Act.
In tiny Noxubee County population 12,202, according to a 2005 Census Bureau
estimate it is viewed more as a referendum on Brown, a man everyone seems to
know and have a strong opinion about, pro or con.
Take Colom, Brown's lawyer in nearby Columbus. Colom is one of Mississippi's
best-known black Republicans. He was a delegate at the 2004 GOP national
convention and ran unsuccessfully for state treasurer in 1987. Colom readily
acknowledges his concerns about Brown's hard-edged partisanship.
"Ike knows that I think he's probably a net negative influence on the politics
of this area," says Colom, who has taken Brown's case without pay. "I don't like
his politics. I don't like his view of the world."
But Colom says he believes Mississippi needs less, not more, racial polarization
in its political parties. He acknowledges that view mirrors the stance of the
Justice Department suit, but he says the suit is not only baseless but also
risks widening the state's racial split by making a political martyr of Brown.
"What they complain about Ike Brown doing, I see whites do in every county in
Mississippi in every election and the Justice Department does nothing about it,"
Colom says.
Brown says the situation is simple: If voters in Noxubee's black majority
support a candidate and work to get him elected, they expect him to vote and
govern as a Democrat. Period.
"Let me tell you what the black folks in this part of the state say," Brown
says. "They say: 'We do the voting. And when somebody we support wins, we don't
want to be forgotten. When we win, we expect to really win.' "
A HISTORY OF VOTING RIGHTS
Baker v. Carr (1962). Ruled that judges can review disputes
over legislative redistricting, abandoning a view that such cases were political
questions beyond court authority.
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966). Struck down the
use of the poll tax.
South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1966). Ruled that Congress has
the authority to prevent racial bias in voting and that the Voting Rights Act is
a legitimate response to the insidious and pervasive evil that denied blacks the
right to vote.
Perkins v. Matthews (1971). Blocked Canton, Miss., from
carrying out an annexation that added new white residents to offset growth in
black voting strength.
Georgia v. United States (1973). Prohibited states that once
deprived blacks of the right to vote from making changes in voting procedures
without first submitting the changes to the U.S. attorney.
Sources: American Civil Liberties Union; USA TODAY research
Voting Rights
Act pointed in a new direction, UT, 3.4.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-04-03-voting-lawsuit_x.htm
Some ask: Why seek a pardon for Rosa Parks?
Posted 3/20/2006 5:50 PM Updated 3/20/2006 8:00 PM
USA Today
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) During the 50th anniversary of the
Montgomery bus boycott last year, civil rights leaders called for a pardon of
Rosa Parks over her arrest for refusing to give up her seat to a white man.
The Feb. 22, 1956 file photo shows Rosa Parks after she was arrested during the
bus boycott in Montgomery, Ala.
AP
But now, some including the pastor of the church Parks attended in Montgomery
are coming out against the idea.
With a bill moving through the Alabama Legislature to pardon Parks and perhaps
hundreds of others for violating segregation-era laws, they say a pardon implies
she did something wrong.
"Why would brave people like this need to get a pardon from anyone? Someone
needs to tell them that we treated you wrong," the Rev. Joseph Rembert, pastor
of St. Paul A.M.E. Church, said Monday. "I want my grandson to know what she
did."
However, Mary Smith Ware, 69, urged passage of the pardon legislation. The black
woman was arrested and fined $10 for refusing to give up her seat on a crowded
city bus about two months before Parks' arrest.
"I should be pardoned because I feel I didn't have to get up and give my seat to
anyone," Ware said.
State Rep. Thad McClammy, a black Montgomery Democrat and sponsor of the bill,
said the pardons will spell out that they are being issued because the Jim Crow
laws were wrong. "I'm in no way trying to compromise history," McClammy said.
The idea of pardoning Parks, who died in October at age 92, and others was
raised during the December celebrations in Montgomery honoring the 50th
anniversary of her arrest and the start of the Montgomery bus boycott. (Vote:
Should violators of Jim Crow laws be pardoned?)
Montgomery Mayor Bobby Bright said he would be uncomfortable pardoning Parks and
others.
"They came up and resisted unethical, illegal and inhumane laws. I feel horribly
inadequate to pardon someone who did nothing wrong," said Bright, who is white.
"We should be asking them to pardon us for the way we treated her and others in
that period."
The national president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Charles
Steele, said he would like to see the Legislature pardon Parks and others.
Steele, a former member of the Alabama Senate, said he fears that if the arrests
remain on the books, someone in the future will look at the records and not
understand the moral context of the arrest.
Lillie Mae Bradford, 75, said she was arrested in 1951 after walking to the
front of a bus to ask a driver to ask for a different transfer. He said the
driver used a racial slur in ordering her to the back. She said that arrest has
caused her difficulties over the years.
"It caused me a lot of problems when I tried to get state, federal and city jobs
because I had a police record," Bradford said.
The pardons, which would have to be applied for by those arrested or by a family
member, would be available to people who were arrested for violating various
segregation-era laws, like the prohibition against entering whites-only
restaurants and other public places.
Some ask: Why seek a
pardon for Rosa Parks?, UT, 20.3.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-03-20-parks-pardon_x.htm
Plight Deepens for Black Men, Studies Warn
March 20, 2006
The New York Times
By ERIK ECKHOLM
BALTIMORE Black men in the United States face a far more
dire situation than is portrayed by common employment and education statistics,
a flurry of new scholarly studies warn, and it has worsened in recent years even
as an economic boom and a welfare overhaul have brought gains to black women and
other groups.
Focusing more closely than ever on the life patterns of young black men, the new
studies, by experts at Columbia, Princeton, Harvard and other institutions, show
that the huge pool of poorly educated black men are becoming ever more
disconnected from the mainstream society, and to a far greater degree than
comparable white or Hispanic men.
Especially in the country's inner cities, the studies show, finishing high
school is the exception, legal work is scarcer than ever and prison is almost
routine, with incarceration rates climbing for blacks even as urban crime rates
have declined.
Although the problems afflicting poor black men have been known for decades, the
new data paint a more extensive and sobering picture of the challenges they
face.
"There's something very different happening with young black men, and it's
something we can no longer ignore," said Ronald B. Mincy, professor of social
work at Columbia University and editor of "Black Males Left Behind" (Urban
Institute Press, 2006).
"Over the last two decades, the economy did great," Mr. Mincy said, "and
low-skilled women, helped by public policy, latched onto it. But young black men
were falling farther back."
Many of the new studies go beyond the traditional approaches to looking at the
plight of black men, especially when it comes to determining the scope of
joblessness. For example, official unemployment rates can be misleading because
they do not include those not seeking work or incarcerated.
"If you look at the numbers, the 1990's was a bad decade for young black men,
even though it had the best labor market in 30 years," said Harry J. Holzer, an
economist at Georgetown University and co-author, with Peter Edelman and Paul
Offner, of "Reconnecting Disadvantaged Young Men" (Urban Institute Press, 2006).
In response to the worsening situation for young black men, a growing number of
programs are placing as much importance on teaching life skills like
parenting, conflict resolution and character building as they are on teaching
job skills.
These were among the recent findings:
ΆThe share of young black men without jobs has climbed relentlessly, with only a
slight pause during the economic peak of the late 1990's. In 2000, 65 percent of
black male high school dropouts in their 20's were jobless that is, unable to
find work, not seeking it or incarcerated. By 2004, the share had grown to 72
percent, compared with 34 percent of white and 19 percent of Hispanic dropouts.
Even when high school graduates were included, half of black men in their 20's
were jobless in 2004, up from 46 percent in 2000.
ΆIncarceration rates climbed in the 1990's and reached historic highs in the
past few years. In 1995, 16 percent of black men in their 20's who did not
attend college were in jail or prison; by 2004, 21 percent were incarcerated. By
their mid-30's, 6 in 10 black men who had dropped out of school had spent time
in prison.
ΆIn the inner cities, more than half of all black men do not finish high school.
None of the litany of problems that young black men face was news to a group of
men from the airless neighborhoods of Baltimore who recently described their
experiences.
One of them, Curtis E. Brannon, told a story so commonplace it hardly bears
notice here. He quit school in 10th grade to sell drugs, fathered four children
with three mothers, and spent several stretches in jail for drug possession,
parole violations and other crimes.
"I was with the street life, but now I feel like I've got to get myself
together," Mr. Brannon said recently in the row-house flat he shares with his
girlfriend and four children. "You get tired of incarceration."
Mr. Brannon, 28, said he planned to look for work, perhaps as a mover, and he
noted optimistically that he had not been locked up in six months.
A group of men, including Mr. Brannon, gathered at the Center for Fathers,
Families and Workforce Development, one of several private agencies trying to
help men build character along with workplace skills.
The clients readily admit to their own bad choices but say they also fight a
pervasive sense of hopelessness.
"It hurts to get that boot in the face all the time," said Steve Diggs, 34.
"I've had a lot of charges but only a few convictions," he said of his criminal
record.
Mr. Diggs is now trying to strike out on his own, developing a party space for
rentals, but he needs help with business skills.
"I don't understand," said William Baker, 47. "If a man wants to change, why
won't society give him a chance to prove he's a changed person?" Mr. Baker has a
lot of record to overcome, he admits, not least his recent 15-year stay in the
state penitentiary for armed robbery.
Mr. Baker led a visitor down the Pennsylvania Avenue strip he wants to escape
past idlers, addicts and hustlers, storefront churches and fortresslike liquor
stores and described a life that seemed inevitable.
He sold marijuana for his parents, he said, left school in the sixth grade and
later dealt heroin and cocaine. He was for decades addicted to heroin, he said,
easily keeping the habit during three terms in prison. But during his last long
stay, he also studied hard to get a G.E.D. and an associate's degree.
Now out for 18 months, Mr. Baker is living in a home for recovering drug
addicts. He is working a $10-an-hour warehouse job while he ponders how to make
a living from his real passion, drawing and graphic arts.
"I don't want to be a criminal at 50," Mr. Baker said.
According to census data, there are about five million black men ages 20 to 39
in the United States.
Terrible schools, absent parents, racism, the decline in blue collar jobs and a
subculture that glorifies swagger over work have all been cited as causes of the
deepening ruin of black youths. Scholars and the young men themselves agree
that all of these issues must be addressed.
Joseph T. Jones, director of the fatherhood and work skills center here, puts
the breakdown of families at the core.
"Many of these men grew up fatherless, and they never had good role models,"
said Mr. Jones, who overcame addiction and prison time. "No one around them
knows how to navigate the mainstream society."
All the negative trends are associated with poor schooling, studies have shown,
and progress has been slight in recent years. Federal data tend to understate
dropout rates among the poor, in part because imprisoned youths are not counted.
Closer studies reveal that in inner cities across the country, more than half of
all black men still do not finish high school, said Gary Orfield, an education
expert at Harvard and editor of "Dropouts in America" (Harvard Education Press,
2004).
"We're pumping out boys with no honest alternative," Mr. Orfield said in an
interview, "and of course their neighborhoods offer many other alternatives."
Dropout rates for Hispanic youths are as bad or worse but are not associated
with nearly as much unemployment or crime, the data show.
With the shift from factory jobs, unskilled workers of all races have lost
ground, but none more so than blacks. By 2004, 50 percent of black men in their
20's who lacked a college education were jobless, as were 72 percent of high
school dropouts, according to data compiled by Bruce Western, a sociologist at
Princeton and author of the forthcoming book "Punishment and Inequality in
America" (Russell Sage Press). These are more than double the rates for white
and Hispanic men.
Mr. Holzer of Georgetown and his co-authors cite two factors that have curbed
black employment in particular.
First, the high rate of incarceration and attendant flood of former offenders
into neighborhoods have become major impediments. Men with criminal records tend
to be shunned by employers, and young blacks with clean records suffer by
association, studies have found.
Arrests of black men climbed steeply during the crack epidemic of the 1980's,
but since then the political shift toward harsher punishments, more than any
trends in crime, has accounted for the continued growth in the prison
population, Mr. Western said.
By their mid-30's, 30 percent of black men with no more than a high school
education have served time in prison, and 60 percent of dropouts have, Mr.
Western said.
Among black dropouts in their late 20's, more are in prison on a given day 34
percent than are working 30 percent according to an analysis of 2000
census data by Steven Raphael of the University of California, Berkeley.
The second special factor is related to an otherwise successful policy: the
stricter enforcement of child support. Improved collection of money from absent
fathers has been a pillar of welfare overhaul. But the system can leave young
men feeling overwhelmed with debt and deter them from seeking legal work, since
a large share of any earnings could be seized.
About half of all black men in their late 20's and early 30's who did not go to
college are noncustodial fathers, according to Mr. Holzer. From the fathers'
viewpoint, support obligations "amount to a tax on earnings," he said.
Some fathers give up, while others find casual work. "The work is sporadic, not
the kind that leads to advancement or provides unemployment insurance," Mr.
Holzer said. "It's nothing like having a real job."
The recent studies identified a range of government programs and experiments,
especially education and training efforts like the Job Corps, that had shown
success and could be scaled up.
Scholars call for intensive new efforts to give children a better start,
including support for parents and extra schooling for children.
They call for teaching skills to prisoners and helping them re-enter society
more productively, and for less automatic incarceration of minor offenders.
In a society where higher education is vital to economic success, Mr. Mincy of
Columbia said, programs to help more men enter and succeed in college may hold
promise. But he lamented the dearth of policies and resources to aid single men.
"We spent $50 billion in efforts that produced the turnaround for poor women,"
Mr. Mincy said. "We are not even beginning to think about the men's problem on
similar orders of magnitude."
Plight Deepens for
Black Men, Studies Warn, NYT, 20.3.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/20/national/20blackmen.html?hp&ex=1142917200&en=6ca3ed1b3c6b74ca&ei=5094&partner=homepage
K. Leroy Irvis, First Black Chosen as Speaker of
Pennsylvania House, Dies
March 18, 2006
The New York Times
HARRISBURG, Pa., March 17 (AP) K. Leroy Irvis, a civil
rights pioneer and a speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, died
on Thursday at a Pittsburgh hospice.
State House records indicated that Mr. Irvis was 86, although his biographer
said birth and school records showed that he was 89.
His death was reported by Clancy Myer, the state parliamentarian.
Robert Hill, producer of the 2004 television documentary "K. Leroy Irvis: The
Lion of Pennsylvania," said Mr. Irvis was the first black to become speaker of a
state house of representatives since shortly after the Civil War.
Mr. Irvis served as a Democratic member of the House from 1959 to 1988 and was
elected speaker four times.
Mr. Irvis was born in Saugerties, N.Y., and graduated from the University of
Pittsburgh School of Law.
He led groundbreaking demonstrations against discriminatory hiring and sales
practices by downtown Pittsburgh department stores in 1947, and gained national
attention when he sued a white-males-only Moose lodge in Harrisburg for refusing
to serve him a meal. The Supreme Court ruled against him in the Moose case in
1972.
Mr. Irvis was a teacher and prosecutor before winning a seat in the House, where
he gained a reputation as a persuasive orator. He was elected speaker in May
1977. An office building in the Capitol complex that houses legislative offices
and the Commonwealth Court bears his name. He was a trustee emeritus of the
University of Pittsburgh, where a library reading room is also named for him.
He was a renowned builder of model airplanes and created masks and statues
featuring African motifs.
Survivors include his wife, Cathryn, and two children.
K. Leroy Irvis, First
Black Chosen as Speaker of Pennsylvania House, Dies, NYT, 18.3.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/18/politics/18irvis.html
FBI passes Emmett Till case to district attorney
Posted 3/16/2006 7:14 PM Updated 3/17/2006 12:00 AM
USA TODAY
By Laura Parker
The FBI report on the reopened investigation into the 1955
murder of Emmett Till was handed over Thursday to a Mississippi prosecutor who
could file state criminal charges or finally lay the case to rest.
Mississippi District Attorney Joyce Chiles said her staff
would have to scrutinize the report to determine whether state charges should be
filed. She said that the FBI report was delivered in multiple boxes and that she
has not yet examined their contents.
"It's going to take time for our reviewers to look at it," Chiles said.
The Justice Department reopened the case in 2004 after a documentary filmmaker
convinced federal prosecutors that the original investigation was incomplete and
that some people still living may have been involved.
No federal charges will be filed because the five-year statute of limitations on
federal civil rights violations expired long ago, said John Raucci of the FBI's
office in Jackson, Miss. Raucci issued a statement saying the 22-month
investigation, which included the exhumation of Till's body, was "exhaustive."
Till, 14, was visiting relatives in Mississippi when he was
dragged from bed, beaten, shot and dumped into the Tallahatchie River. He had
purportedly whistled at a white woman named Carolyn Bryant at a store. Her
husband, Roy, and his half brother, J.W. Milam, were acquitted by an all-white
jury but later admitted to the murder in an interview published in Look
magazine.
Photos of Till's open-casket funeral in Chicago, where he lived with his mother,
prompted outrage around the world.
Chiles said she will not discuss the contents of the FBI report and has not
decided whether to make the report public if she concludes that no criminal
charges are warranted.
"That question is too far down the road," she said. "I don't have any idea what
we'll do in the future." Among the charges that could still apply in the
51-year-old case, she said, are murder or manslaughter.
Many of the principles and witnesses, including Roy Bryant and Milam, are dead,
but Carolyn Bryant still lives in Mississippi.
FBI passes Emmett
Till case to district attorney, UT, 16.3.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-03-16-emmett-till_x.htm
Alabama bill would pardon violators of segregation laws
Posted 3/16/2006 5:19 PM
USA Today
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) Alabama lawmakers are considering
pardoning hundreds, possibly thousands, of people who were arrested decades ago
for violating Alabama's segregation laws.
The idea of a mass pardon gained traction after the death last
year of civil rights icon Rosa Parks, who had refused to give up her bus seat to
a white man half a century earlier.
Even though the law allowing segregated seating on city buses was eventually
overturned, Parks conviction is still on the record, said Rep. Thad McClammy.
"This is something that's long overdue. It's something aimed at giving the state
a forward look," he said.
His proposed "Rosa Parks Act" would pardon everyone ever arrested under the
state's segregation laws, which date back to the state's 1901 constitution. A
House committee approved the bill Thursday, sending it to the full House for
debate.
The old segregation laws required that blacks attend separate schools, use
separate water fountains and theater entrances, and made it illegal for whites
and blacks to marry, among other things.
There was no opposition to the proposed legislation in the House Judiciary
Committee on Thursday, where the plan was praised by Republicans and Democrats.
"I think it's wonderful. There were 89 people arrested during the bus boycott
and I think every one of them should be pardoned because of the contribution
they made to the state and the nation," said Rep. Alvin Holmes, a Democrat and
veteran of the civil rights movement.
The Legislature is in the final 10 days of the 2006 session, but the committee
chairman, Rep. Marcel Black, said he believes there's enough time to pass the
bill.
"I can't imagine anyone opposing this," said Republican Rep. Steve McMillan.
Alabama bill would
pardon violators of segregation laws, UT, 16.3.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-03-16-rosa-parks-pardons_x.htm
Alabama church bombed in '63 named national landmark
Posted 2/20/2006 9:16 PM Updated 2/20/2006 9:20 PM
USA Today
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) The church where four black girls died
in a racist bombing in 1963 was honored as a national landmark Monday, with
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales recalling their memory amid a new string of
attacks against churches in Alabama.
Speaking at the pulpit of Birmingham's Sixteenth Street
Baptist Church, Gonzales compared the deadly bombing of the old brick building
to a string of arson fires that have hit rural Baptist churches since Feb. 3.
(Related story: Authorities: New fire not linked to arsons)
The fires, Gonzales said, are a reminder "there is still work to be done" in
ensuring equal justice and fighting discrimination.
Gonzales called the building "a catalyst for the cause of justice" as he
referred to the children killed when a Ku Klux Klan bomb went off at the
Sixteenth Street church on Sept. 15, 1963.
"We protect this place for them," Gonzales said during a ceremony where Interior
Secretary Gale A. Norton signed a proclamation adding the church to a list of
about 2,500 places that carry the title of National Historic Landmark.
The audience included relatives of the four girls who were killed Addie Mae
Collins, Carole Robertson and Cynthia Wesley, all 14, and Denise McNair, 11.
Sixteenth Street Baptist Church was an important meeting place for activists
during the civil rights era, and the bombing became a worldwide symbol
illustrating the depth of racial hatred in the South at the time. Three Klansman
were convicted in the blast, the last in 2002.
Gonzales also was briefed during his trip on a string of fires
that has scores of federal and state agents in Alabama checking out hundreds of
leads. Investigators have said there does not appear to be a racial motive to
the church fires. Some of the churches have had white congregations and others
black memberships.
Ten rural, Baptist churches were damaged or destroyed by arsonists in central
and west Alabama between Feb. 3 and Feb. 11, and investigators believe at least
nine of the blazes were set by two suspects identified as men in their 20s or
30s.
Gonzales called the fire investigation a "very intensive, collaborative effort."
"We're working as hard as we can to try to get to the bottom of this," Gonzales
said in a news conference. "Am I satisfied with the progress? I'll be satisfied
when we find out who is responsible for these crimes and they're brought to
justice."
The regional director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Jim
Cavanaugh, said investigators believe a fire at a small church in northeast
Alabama on Sunday was started by someone from the area and does not appear to be
related to the other fires. And a fire at a Methodist campus ministry at the
University of Alabama likely was accidental, he said.
The church fire task force also is still investigating a fire that destroyed a
warehouse that housed a Christian-themed apparel business on Friday night, but
Cavanaugh said agents are not sure what started the blaze.
Sixteenth Street Baptist is undergoing an extensive renovation to shore up its
foundation, but Norton said the historic designation does not make the building
eligible for new funding.
Alabama church bombed
in '63 named national landmark, UT, 20.2.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-02-20-birmingham-church_x.htm
Crowds greet coffin of Coretta Scott King
Posted 2/4/2006 3:29 AM Updated 2/4/2006 4:57 PM
USA Today
ATLANTA (AP) Cheered by hundreds of people, the body of
Coretta Scott King was carried through the streets by horse-drawn carriage
Saturday to Georgia's state Capitol, where she became the first woman and first
black person to lie in honor.
King's four children, Gov. Sonny Perdue and his wife Mary, and
Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin escorted the casket inside to the Rotunda as a
bagpipe played Amazing Grace.
"Coretta Scott King was a gracious and courageous woman, an inspiration to
millions and one of the most influential civil rights leaders of our time,"
Perdue said. "She was absolutely an anchor and support for her husband."
It was a striking contrast to the death of Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, when
then-Gov. Lester Maddox, an outspoken segregationist, was outraged at the idea
of state flags, then dominated by the Confederate Cross, flying at half-staff in
tribute to a black man. He ignored King's death, refusing to authorize a public
tribute.
Coretta Scott King died Monday at an alternative medical clinic in Mexico at the
age of 78. Immediately after, the state flag she helped to change no longer
bearing the Confederate battle emblem was ordered lowered by Perdue.
For most of Monday, King's casket will lie in Ebenezer Baptist Church, where her
husband preached in the years before his death. Her funeral will be held at New
Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Lithonia, where the Kings' youngest child,
Bernice, is a minister.
Few details have been released about the funeral, including who will deliver the
eulogy. However, the American Jewish Committee said the King family invited the
executive director of its Atlanta chapter to deliver remarks.
The King legacy is a major draw to Atlanta. The King Center, which is the site
of Martin Luther King Jr.'s tomb, attracts thousands, along with his nearby
birth home and Ebenezer Baptist Church.
When Martin Luther King Jr. died, segregation was openly accepted in the South,
even though it was on its last legs, said Akinyele Umoja, an African-American
studies professor at Georgia State University.
"Lester Maddox had a strong base. Now, you don't have that constituency," Umoja
said.
State Rep. Tyrone Brooks, who was a young activist in King's Southern Christian
Leadership Conference, said Maddox was the epitome of Jim Crow, racist
segregation.
"It became a national insult to Dr. King and the King legacy and the whole civil
rights movement that was sweeping across the South, bringing about significant
change," he said.
Crowds greet coffin
of Coretta Scott King, UT, 4.2.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-02-04-king-tributes_x.htm
King funeral, tributes reflect gains of civil rights
movement
Posted 2/4/2006 3:29 AM Updated 2/4/2006 12:07 PM
USA Today
ATLANTA (AP) King's four children, Gov. Sonny Perdue and his
wife Mary, and Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin stood on the Capitol's steps,
ready to escort the casket inside.
It was a striking contrast to the death of Martin Luther King
Jr. in 1968, when then-Gov. Lester Maddox, an outspoken segregationist, was
outraged at the idea of state flags, then dominated by the Confederate Cross,
flying at half-staff in tribute to a black man. He ignored King's death,
refusing to authorize a public tribute.
Coretta Scott King died Monday at an alternative medical clinic in Mexico at the
age of 78. Immediately after, the state flag she helped to change no longer
bearing the Confederate battle emblem was ordered lowered by Perdue.
She is the first woman and first black person to lie in honor in Georgia's state
Capitol.
About 70 people stood at one downtown street corner in cold, windy weather
waiting for the carriage to pass.
"I want to pay respects to the family and the difference they made to people
across the globe," said Wayne Thomas, 48, of Lithonia, Ga.
Saturday's tribute was just one of several her husband, the famed civil rights
leader, never received in a climate of segregation.
"This is not just a salute to Mrs. King. It's a tribute to her and her husband,
and to all they stood for and did," said U.S. Rep. John Lewis.
Gov. Sonny Perdue planned to escort the casket into the Capitol alongside King's
four children. That would be a striking contrast to the 1968 death of Martin
Luther King Jr., when then-Gov. Lester Maddox was outraged to see state flags,
then dominated by the Confederate Cross, flying at half-staff in tribute to a
black man and refused to authorize a public tribute.
King died Monday at an alternative medicine clinic in Mexico. Immediately after,
the state flag she helped to change no longer bearing the Confederate battle
emblem was lowered by Perdue.
For most of Monday, King's casket will lie in Ebenezer Baptist Church, where her
husband preached in the years before his death. Her funeral will be held at New
Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Lithonia, where the Kings' youngest child,
Bernice, is a minister.
Few details have been released about the funeral, including who will deliver the
eulogy. However, the American Jewish Committee said the King family invited the
executive director of its Atlanta chapter to deliver remarks.
The King legacy is a major draw to Atlanta. The King Center, which is the site
of Martin Luther King Jr.'s tomb, attracts thousands, along with his nearby
birth home and Ebenezer Baptist Church.
When Martin Luther King Jr. died, segregation was openly accepted in the South,
even though it was on its last legs, said Akinyele Umoja, an African-American
studies professor at Georgia State University.
"Lester Maddox had a strong base. Now, you don't have that constituency," Umoja
said.
State Rep. Tyrone Brooks, who was a young activist in King's Southern Christian
Leadership Conference, said Maddox was the epitome of Jim Crow, racist
segregation.
"It became a national insult to Dr. King and the King legacy and the whole civil
rights movement that was sweeping across the South, bringing about significant
change," he said.
King funeral,
tributes reflect gains of civil rights movement, UT, 4.2.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-02-04-king-tributes_x.htm
Death of King leaves a likely unfillable void
Posted 2/2/2006 11:44 PM Updated 2/2/2006 11:51 PM
USA TODAY
By Larry Copeland and Melanie Eversley
ATLANTA With the death this week of Coretta Scott King, the
civil rights movement loses its best-known name and most familiar face.
King's passing also marks the end of an era. Her role as a
moral and symbolic leader was unique, and black activists say it is unlikely
that anyone will pick up the torch she carried for almost four decades after the
1968 assassination of her husband, civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.
"She was singular in the role that she played, and she can't be replaced," says
Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League, one of the oldest and
largest civil rights groups.
Today, Morial and others say, there is no compelling black leader with the
national stature of Coretta Scott King or her late husband. Instead,
African-Americans have attained leadership roles in many areas of society.
There are more than 9,000 black elected officials, including 43 members of
Congress.
"Back in the 1960s, the 10 or 12 (black) members were all national figures,"
Morial says. "Now, people will look more to people that are much closer to them
and more local. The African-American leadership is much broader and more diverse
than it's ever been."
Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., an early leader of the civil rights movement who was
close to the Kings, agrees.
"We have more of a group leadership, not just two or three people, or the 'Big
Six' like we did in the '60s," he says, referring to leaders of the nation's six
major civil rights groups who planned the 1963 March on Washington. "We have ...
all these very successful entertainers and business people ... that have
emerged, so I don't think we have a lack of leadership."
Black people today are at the top in many fields, from Oprah Winfrey in
entertainment, to Time Warner CEO Richard Parsons in business, to Sen. Barack
Obama, D-Ill., in what is sometimes called "the world's most exclusive club."
Ironically, the success of the movement that Martin Luther King led starting
with the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955-56 defeated the forces that made that
kind of leadership possible, says Manning Marable, professor of history and
public affairs at Columbia University.
"Segregation was always a curse, but it was a perverse blessing in that black
Ph.D.s and black street sweepers alike were forced to ride at the back of the
bus," Marable says. "That created a unity among African-Americans because we all
knew and understood what we were fighting against. That unity no longer exists
because we have now won nominal civil rights."
Since Martin Luther King's death in 1968, "African-Americans have earned
positions higher within white society than any person black or white could have
dreamed possible in he segregated 1950s," Henry Louis Gates Jr., chairman of
Harvard University's African and African-American Studies Department, wrote in
his 2004 book America Behind the Color Line. "The black middle class has
tripled, as measured by the percentage of families earning $50,000 or more.
(Yet) the percentage of black children who live at or below the poverty line is
almost 35%, just about what it was on the day that Dr. King was killed."
Today, Marable says, one-third of all black households have a negative net
wealth, and the average black household has only about 8% the wealth of the
average white household.
It is these "newer, tougher issues of economics, money and jobs" that today's
black leaders must confront, Morial says.
Another issue galvanizing many blacks as they honor Coretta Scott King is a
national push to extend and strengthen the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which
outlawed practices that discouraged or prevented minorities from voting. Several
provisions of the law are scheduled to expire next year.
Even before Coretta Scott King died, Georgia's black elected officials had been
touting a "Save the Voting Rights Act" conference Saturday at her husband's old
church here as a critical step toward protecting civil rights gains. Now,
organizers are pushing the meeting as the ideal way for King's admirers to honor
her.
"I don't think we need to look for anybody to replace Mrs. King," says the Rev.
Joseph Lowery, an Atlanta activist who was one of her husband's contemporaries
in the civil rights movement. "We need to just put her on the pedestal where she
belongs, put her bust in the Capitol and extend the Voting Rights Act in her
name."
Contributing: Eversley reported from McLean, Va.
Death of King leaves
a likely unfillable void, UT, 3.2.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-02-02-king-void_x.htm
King Funeral Has Surprise in Site Choice
February 3, 2006
The New York Times
By BRENDA GOODMAN
ATLANTA, Feb. 2 Coretta Scott King's funeral will be held
not at Ebenezer Baptist Church, where her husband once preached, but at a much
larger suburban megachurch where her youngest daughter is an elder, funeral
planners said Thursday.
Thousands of people, including world leaders and celebrities, are expected to
attend the service at noon on Tuesday at New Birth Missionary Baptist Church,
the funeral director, Willie A. Watkins said.
The news surprised many people who had assumed that the funeral would be held at
Ebenezer Baptist, the historic chapel in the Sweet Auburn neighborhood, where
the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and his father and grandfather preached, and
where Mrs. King was a board member until she died on Monday at age 78.
In a statement on Tuesday, the Rev. Raphael G. Warnock, senior pastor of
Ebenezer, had said he "fully expected" Mrs. King's funeral to be at his church.
On Thursday, Mr. Warnock said that he supported the family and that a viewing, a
memorial service and a musical tribute would be held for Mrs. King at Ebenezer
on Monday.
The Associated Press, citing a family statement, also reported that a public
viewing would take place at the State Capitol on Saturday.
Ebenezer is next to the King Center on Auburn Avenue in downtown Atlanta, a
neighborhood that is the nexus of the civil rights movement. "It's not my call,
whatever that's worth," the Rev. Joseph Lowery said of the site for the funeral.
"I would not have placed it at New Birth."
But Mr. Lowery, who helped found the Southern Christian Leadership Conference
with Dr. King, said space had been a major consideration.
"To have a public funeral where people can't get in wouldn't be fair," he said.
New Birth, a modern 10,000-seat church with its own school, computer laboratory
and gym 15 miles east of Atlanta, is a dramatic contrast to Ebenezer's scarlet
carpets and scratched wooden pews, and its sanctuary that still smells like
furniture polish and aftershave.
It was not immediately clear why New Birth was chosen over Ebenezer, although
Mrs. King's daughter Bernice King preaches there occasionally, said Erik Burton,
a spokesman for the church.
Bishop Eddie Long, senior pastor at New Birth, sent a private plane to
California on Tuesday to take members of the King family back to Atlanta and
extended an invitation to them to hold the funeral in his sanctuary.
"I see why people think it should be held at Ebenezer," said Lynn Cothren, Mrs.
King's executive assistant for 23 years. "But one thing Mrs. King was about was
change. She was not so drenched in history that she could not change."
King Funeral Has
Surprise in Site Choice, NYT, 3.2.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/03/national/03king.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Coretta
Scott King with her husband, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., after leaving court in
Montgomery, Ala., in March 22, 1956.
Rev. King was found guilty of conspiracy to boycott city buses in a campaign to
desegregate the bus system,
but a judge suspended his $500 fine pending appeal.
Gene
Herrick/Associated Press NYT
30.1.2006
Coretta
Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies
NYT 31.1.2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-coretta.html?hp&ex=
1138770000&en=435a2f7d3bf7b954&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Dr. King
and Mrs. King led off the final lap to the state capitol at Montgomery, Ala. in
March 25, 1965.
Thousands of civil rights marchers joined in the walk, which began in Selma,
Ala., on March 21, demanding voter registration rights for blacks.
Associated
Press NYT
31.1.2006
Coretta
Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies
NYT 31.1.2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-coretta.html?hp&ex=
1138770000&en=435a2f7d3bf7b954&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Mrs. King
and her daughter, Bernice,
at the funeral for Dr. King on April 9, 1968, in Atlanta, Ga.
Moneta J.
Sleet, Jr./Associated Press NYT
31.1.2006
Coretta
Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies
NYT 31.1.2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-coretta.html?hp&ex=
1138770000&en=435a2f7d3bf7b954&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Mrs. King
spoke at an anti-war demonstration
in Sheep Meadow in Central Park on April 27, 1968.
She did not hesitate to pick up her husband's civil rights efforts after his
death
Michael
Evans/The New York Times 30.1.2006
Coretta
Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies
NYT 31.1.2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-coretta.html
Mrs. King led a picket line to protest
apartheid in South Africa, in Nov. 29, 1984, at the South African Embassy in
Washington, D.C.
Charles Tasnadi/Associated Press
NYT 30.1.2006
Coretta
Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies
NYT 31.1.2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-coretta.html
Mrs. King marched with President Bill
Clinton across the Edmund Pettus bridge in Selma, Alabama on March 5, 2000
for the 35th anniversary of the march called 'Bloody Sunday,' which led to the
Voters Rights Act of 1965.
Mr. Clinton was the first president to commemorate the event.
Larry Downing/Reuters
NYT 31.1.2006
Coretta
Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies
NYT 31.1.2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-coretta.html?hp&ex=
1138770000&en=435a2f7d3bf7b954&ei=5094&partner=homepage
If picking up Dr. King's mantle, in the end,
was something of an impossible task, both of them described a relationship that
was truly a partnership.
"I think on many points she educated me," Dr. King once said.
John Bazemore/Associated Press
NYT 31.1.2006
Coretta
Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies
NYT 31.1.2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-coretta.html?hp&ex=
1138770000&en=435a2f7d3bf7b954&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Coretta Scott King, 78,
Widow of Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr.,
Dies
January 31, 2006
The New York Times
By PETER APPLEBOME
Coretta Scott King, first known as the wife of
the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., then as his widow, then as an avid
proselytizer for his vision of racial peace and non-violent social change, has
died, her sister in law, Christine King Farris, said this morning.
She was 78 and had been in failing health since suffering a stroke and heart
attack last August. Mrs. King appeared at a Martin Luther King Day dinner on
Jan. 14, but did not speak.
Andrew Young, the former United Nations ambassador and longtime family friend,
said at a news conference this morning that Mrs. King died in her sleep. "She
was a woman born to struggle," Mr. Young said, "and she has struggled and she
has overcome."
In a statement, the King family said that "Mrs. Coretta Scott King, first lady
of human and civil rights, died overnight." Mrs. King rose from rural poverty in
Heiberger, Ala., to become an international symbol of the civil rights
revolution of the 1960s and a tireless advocate for a long litany of social and
political issues, ranging from women's rights to the struggle against apartheid
in South Africa, that followed in its wake.
She was studying music at the New England Conservatory of Music in Boston in
1952 when she met a young graduate student in philosophy, who on their first
date told her: "The four things that I look for in a wife are character,
personality, intelligence and beauty. And you have them all." A year later she
and Dr. King, then a young minister from a prominent Atlanta family, were
married, beginning a remarkable partnership that ended with Dr. King's
assassination in Memphis on April 4, 1968.
Mrs. King did not hesitate to pick up his mantle, marching before her husband
was even buried at the head of the garbage workers he had gone to Memphis to
champion. She then went on to lead the effort for a national holiday in his
honor and to found the Martin Luther King Jr. Center for Non-Violent Social
Change in Atlanta, dedicated both to scholarship and to activism, where Dr. King
is buried.
Aside from the trauma of her husband's death, which left her alone with four
young children, Mrs. King faced other trials and controversies over the years.
She was at times viewed as chilly and aloof by others in the movement. The King
Center was criticized first as competing for funds and siphoning energy from the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which Dr. King had headed. In recent
years, it has been widely viewed as adrift, characterized by intra-family
squabbling and a focus more on Dr. King's legacy than continuing his work. And
even many allies were baffled and hurt by her campaign to exonerate James Earl
Ray, who in 1969 had pleaded guilty to her husband's murder, and her contention
that Ray did not commit the crime.
But more often, Mrs. King has been seen as an inspirational figure around the
world, a dogged advocate for her husband's causes and a woman of enormous
spiritual depth who came to personify the ideals Dr. King fought for.
"I think the way I will remember her is as a totally faithful, totally devoted
wife and mother who nevertheless found time to offer her leadership skills and
be involved with other children in need all over the world," Mr. Young said
today.
"She'll be remembered as a strong woman whose grace and dignity held up the
image of her husband as a man of peace, of racial justice, of fairness," said
the Rev. Joseph Lowery, who helped found the Southern Christian Leadership
Conference with Dr. King and then served as its president for 20 years. "I don't
know that she was a civil rights leader in the truest sense, but she became a
civil rights figure and a civil rights icon because of what she came to
represent."
Coretta Scott was born April 27, 1927, the middle of three children born to
Obadiah and Bernice Scott. She grew up in the two-room house her father built on
land that had been owned by the family for three generations.
From the start there was nothing predictable about her life. The family was
poor, and she grew up picking cotton in the hot fields of the segregated South
or doing housework. But Mr. Scott hauled timber, owned a country store and
worked as a barber. His wife drove a school bus, and the whole family helped
raise hogs, cows, chickens and vegetables. So by the standards of blacks in
Alabama at the time the family had both resources and ambitions out of the reach
of most others.
Some of Coretta Scott's earliest insights into the injustice of segregation came
as she walked to her one-room school house each day, watching buses full of
white children kick up dust as they passed. She got her first sense of the world
beyond rural Alabama when she attended the Lincoln School, a private missionary
institution in nearby Marion, where she studied piano and voice, had her first
encounters with college-educated teachers and where she resolved to flee to a
world far beyond the narrow confines of rural, segregated Alabama.
She graduated first in her high school class of 17 in 1945 and then began
attending Antioch College in Yellow Springs, Ohio, where two years earlier her
older sister, Edythe, had become the first black to enroll. She studied
education and music and after graduation went on to the New England Conservatory
of Music, hoping to become a classical singer and working as a mail order clerk
and cleaning houses to augment the fellowship that barely paid her tuition.
Her first encounter with the man who would become her husband did not begin
auspiciously. Dr. King, very much in the market for a wife, called her after
getting her name from a friend and announced: "You know every Napoleon has his
Waterloo," he said. "I'm like Napoleon. I'm at my Waterloo, and I'm on my
knees."
"That's absurd," Ms. Scott, two years his elder, replied. "You don't even know
me."
Still, she agreed to meet for lunch the next day, only to be put off initially
that he wasn't taller. But she was impressed by his erudition and confidence and
he saw in this refined, intelligent woman what he was looking for as the wife of
a preacher from one of Atlanta's most prominent ministerial families. When he
proposed, she deliberated for six months before finally saying "yes" and they
were married in the garden of her parents' house on June 18, 1953. The 350
guests, elegant big-city folks from Atlanta and rural neighbors from Alabama,
made it the biggest wedding, white or black, the area had ever seen.
And even before the wedding she made it clear she intended to remain her own
woman. She stunned Dr. King's father, the Rev. Martin Luther King, Sr., who
presided over the wedding, by demanding that she wanted the promise to obey her
husband removed from the wedding vows. Reluctantly, he went along. After it was
over, the bridegroom fell asleep in the car back to Atlanta while the new Mrs.
King did the driving.
Mrs. King thought she was signing on for the ministry, not ground zero in the
seismic cultural struggle that would shake the South when he became minister of
the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery in 1954. But just over a year
later the Montgomery bus boycott brought Dr. King to national attention and then
like riders on a runaway freight train, the minister and his young wife found
themselves in the middle of a movement that would transform the South and ripple
through the nation. In 1960, the family moved back to Atlanta, where he shared
the pulpit of the historic Ebenezer Baptist Church with his father.
With four young children to raise Yolanda born in 1955, Martin 3d in 1957,
Dexter in 1961 and Bernice in 1963 and a movement culture dominated by men,
Mrs. King, for the most part, remained away from the front lines. But the
recognition of danger was always there, including a brush with death when Dr.
King was stabbed while autographing books in Harlem in 1958.
What role she would play was a source of some tension between them. While
wanting to be there for their children, she also wanted to be active in the
movement. He was, she has said, very traditional in his view of women and balked
at the notion she should be more conspicuous.
"Martin was a very strong person, and in many ways had very traditional ideas
about women," she told The New York Times Magazine in 1982. She continued: "He'd
say, "I have no choice, I have to do this, but you haven't been called,' " "And
I said, "Can't you understand? You know I have an urge to serve just like you
have.' " Still, he always described her as a partner in his mission, not just a
supportive spouse. "I wish I could say, to satisfy my masculine ego, that I led
her down this path," he said in a 1967 interview. "But I must say we went down
together, because she was as actively involved and concerned when we met as she
is now."
Instead, she mostly carved out her own niche, most prominently through more than
30 "Freedom Concerts" where she lectured, read poetry and sang to raise
awareness of and money for the civil rights movement.
The division disappeared with Dr. King's assassination. Suddenly, she was not
just a symbol of the nation's grief but a woman very much devoted to carrying on
her husband's work. Exactly how to do that was something that evolved over time.
Marching in Memphis was a dramatic statement, but Ralph Abernathy, one of Dr.
King's lieutenants, was chosen to take over his movement. In stepping in for her
husband after his death, Mrs. King at first used his own words as much as
possible, as if her goal were simply to maintain his presence, even in death.
But soon she developed her own language and own causes. So when she stood in for
her husband at the Poor People's Campaign at the Lincoln Memorial on June 19,
1968, she spoke not just of his vision, but of hers, one about gender as well as
race in which she called upon American women "to unite and form a solid block of
women power to fight the three great evils of racism, poverty and war." She
joined the board of directors of the National Organization for Women as well as
that of his Southern Christian Leadership Conference and became widely
identified with a broad array of international human rights issues rather than
being focused primarily on race.
That broad view, she would argue, was completely in keeping with Dr. King's
vision as well. And to carry on that legacy, she focused on two ambitious and
daunting tasks. The first was to have a national holiday in his honor, the
second was to build a nationally recognized center in Atlanta to honor his
memory, continue his work and provide a research center for scholars studying
his work and the civil rights era. The first goal was achieved despite much
opposition in 1983 when Congress approved a measure designating the third Monday
in January as an official Federal holiday in honor of Dr. King, who was born in
Atlanta Jan. 15, 1929.
President Ronald Reagan, who had long opposed the King Holiday as too expensive
and inappropriate, signed the bill, but pointedly refrained from criticizing
fellow Republicans such as Sen. Jesse Helms of North Carolina, who continued to
denigrate Dr. King, saying he had consorted with Communists. The holiday was
first observed on Jan. 20, 1986.
The second goal, much more expensive, time consuming and elusive remains to this
day a work in progress and a troubled one at that. When Mrs. King first
announced plans for a memorial in 1969, she envisioned a Lincolnesque tomb, an
exhibition hall, the restoration of her husband's childhood home, two separate
buildings for institutes on non-violent social change and Afro-American studies,
a library building an archives building and a museum of African-American life
and culture. And she envisioned a center that would be a haven both for scholars
and a training ground for advocates of non-violent social change.
Even friends say it may have been too ambitious a goal. Building the center was
an enormous achievement in itself. But many of Dr. King's allies, particularly
the leaders of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, grumbled that the
center was draining scarce resources from the movement. And over the years the
center struggled to find its mission. Critics worried it had become too much a
family enterprise with her two sons, Dexter and Martin 3d vying to be its
leader. Those problems became particularly acute after she suffered a stroke and
heart attack in August 2005 and the two brothers struggled for control over the
center while she was recuperating. As a result, many feel it has not become the
scholarly resource it could have become, while never becoming a center for civil
rights activism.
And many supporters were saddened and baffled by the family's campaign on behalf
of James Earl Ray, who confessed to the murder, then recanted and died in 1998
while still seeking a new trial. After his death, Mrs. King issued a statement
calling his death a tragedy for his family and for the nation and saying that a
trial would have "produced new revelations about the assassination of Martin
Luther King Jr. as well as establish the facts concerning Mr. Ray's innocence."
Still, to the end Mrs. King remained a beloved figure, often compared to
Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis as a woman who overcame tragedy, held her family
together and became an inspirational presence around the world. Admirers said
she bore her own special burden being expected somehow to carry on her
husband's work and teachings with a sense of spirit and purpose that made her
more than just a symbol.
If picking up Dr. King's mantle, in the end, was something of an impossible
task, both of them described a relationship that was truly a partnership. "I
think on many points she educated me," Dr. King once said. And she never veered
from the conviction, expressed throughout her life, that his dream was hers as
well. "I didn't learn my commitment from Martin," she once told an interviewer.
"We just converged at a certain time."
Coretta Scott King, 78, Widow of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Dies, NYT,
31.1.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-coretta.html?hp&ex=1138770000&en=435a2f7d3bf7b954&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Coretta Scott King dies at 78
Posted 1/31/2006 7:52 AM Updated 1/31/2006
12:40 PM
USA TODAY
By Larry Copeland
ATLANTA Coretta Scott King, whose determined
activism after her husband's assassination in 1968 helped cement the civil
rights movement's commitment to non-violence, has died, her family said Tuesday.
She was 78.
Mrs. King had been partially paralyzed after
suffering a stroke and heart attack in August 2005. Her last public appearance
was Jan. 14, when she received a standing ovation from 1,500 at a dinner
celebrating her husband's birthday.
She was the widow of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., a role that shaped the
rest of her life's accomplishments. She was the First Lady of the civil rights
movement, a living symbol of everything it had won. (Multimedia: Photo gallery |
Video)
But she was never an idle icon. Mrs. King worked tirelessly to ensure that the
nation honor her husband's contribution. She campaigned for years to make his
birthday a national holiday. President Reagan signed a bill in 1983 establishing
it as a federal holiday, and the nation has observed it since 1986.She founded
the Martin Luther King Jr. Center for Non-violent Social Change here, starting
it in the basement of her house. Today, the King Center is a national shrine,
visited by more than 650,000 people a year.
For a time after her husband's death, Mrs. King was one of the nation's most
respected black voices. In the 1970s, she met with President Carter and the
presidents of the Urban League and the NAACP to discuss civil rights. A decade
later, she worked in the USA and abroad to end apartheid in South Africa.
The Alabama-born Mrs. King met the young Baptist minister while both were in
college in Boston. After he was slain on a motel balcony in Memphis on April 4,
1968, Mrs. King persevered, and she remained true to her husband's ideals, said
the Rev. Jesse Jackson, a civil rights activist who was with Rev. King in
Memphis.
"She was his wife and companion from marriage to death," Jackson said. "They
left Boston together (in 1954) and went back to a rural town in the South. Their
home was bombed. She survived the bombing. She survived the threats. That gave
her a moral authority. A lesser person would have been traumatized and would
have surrendered (after the assassination). She simply got stronger, and she
never gave it up."
NAACP chairman Julian Bond said it's easy to grasp Mrs. King's impact.
"What is less well understood about her after her husband's death is the way she
kept focused on the ideas of non-violence," Bond said. "She never abandoned
that. She focused on the use of non-violence as a way to settle human
conflicts."
At the White House, Dan Bartlett, counselor to the president, told Fox
television: "President Bush and first lady Laura Bush were always heartened by
their meetings with Mrs. King. What an inspiration to millions of people.
President and Mrs. Bush are deeply saddened by today's news."
Mrs. King, a classically-trained opera singer who gave up a promising musical
career when she married Rev. King, was the matriarch of a family that was as
close to black royalty as America has known. Their children, Yolanda Denise
King, 50, Martin Luther King III, 48, Dexter Scott King, 45, and the Rev.
Bernice Albertine King, 42, are among her survivors.
"She dealt with the tragedy of the past with dignity and strength and at the
same time she met the challenges of the future with courage and vision," said
the Rev. Joseph Lowery, one of Rev. King's successors as president of the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference. "She's earned universal admiration."
Today, her husband is one of the nation's most revered figures. His picture
hangs in the office suites of powerful business executives and the walls of
seedy taprooms. Elementary schoolchildren of all races write essays every year
for Martin Luther King Day. She could visit almost any major city in the USA and
find a street bearing his name.
Mrs. King was a reminder of what the nation had been and a symbol of how far
it has come. Her husband died dismantling a government-sanctioned system of
racial segregation that denied constitutional rights to some Americans because
of their skin color.
In the national psyche, Mrs. King belonged to all of that.
A role that grew
Before her husband's death, Mrs. King had a limited role in the civil rights
movement. Her husband led marches and demonstrations in cities around the South,
starting with the Montgomery Bus Boycott that began in 1955. She sang at
fundraisers early on and later attended some marches. Mostly, she stayed home
often reluctantly to raise their four children.
But Mrs. King became active in the peace movement during the Vietnam War in the
late 1960s, said Taylor Branch, author of a three-book history of the civil
rights movement, including this year's At Canaan's Edge and 1988's Pulitzer
Prize-winning Parting the Waters. (Related: A timeline of Coretta Scott King's
life)
"There was a time when Dr. King let her go make speeches he couldn't make"
because of a potential backlash against the civil rights movement, Branch said.
"She was speaking for outright withdrawal from Vietnam at a time when the
well-known anti-war voices were calling for a negotiated settlement."
Rev. King was assassinated in Memphis just
before he was to lead a march by striking city garbage workers. James Earl Ray,
who confessed to the crime and then recanted, was convicted of the murder. He
died in prison of liver failure in 1998 at age 70.Decades after the
assassination, many Americans recalled where they were and what they were doing
when they learned of his death. They remembered the silence as families gathered
around the television for news bulletins. Suddenly, the hopes and dreams Rev.
King had inspired seemed dashed; outraged blacks rioted in more than 100 U.S.
cities.
The nation saw Mrs. King mourning in indelible black-and-white images from her
husband's funeral at Ebenezer Baptist Church here. She was proud, beautiful and
tragic.
The road to Montgomery
When Coretta Scott met her future husband in Boston in 1952, the South was a
place that would seem alien to Americans in 2006.
Blacks and whites did not dine in the same restaurants, sit near each other on
buses or trains, or jointly elect their government officials."Whites Only" and
"Colored Only" signs marked separate entrances for restaurants and restrooms and
hung above water fountains that stood side by side. The segregation laws of the
South dictated that black riders on a crowded bus give their seats to white
riders who wanted them.
Boston seemed a far more progressive place to Miss Scott and Martin King. She
was studying voice on a scholarship at the New England Conservatory of Music; he
was working on a Ph. D. at Boston University.They met through the efforts of a
mutual friend. Rev. King had complained to the friend that he wanted to meet "a
few girls from down home," according to David L. Lewis' 1970 book King: A
Biography. The friend gave him Miss Scott's phone number.
In that first phone conversation, the young King an established ladies man
laid it on pretty thick. "I am like Napoleon at Waterloo before your charms," he
said.
But Miss Scott was no lightweight. "Why, that's absurd," she responded. "You
haven't seen me yet."
But he persisted and won the heart of the young woman he called "Corrie." His
father, Rev. Martin Luther King Sr., a powerful Atlanta minister nicknamed
"Daddy King," initially objected. He wanted his son to marry an Atlanta girl.
But they eventually won him over, and they were wed on June 18, 1953, at the
Scott family home near Marion, Ala.
The following year, Rev. King Jr. accepted the job as pastor of Dexter Avenue
Baptist Church in Montgomery, Ala. It was there that his life intersected with
Rosa Parks in a struggle that would make both of them American icons.
On Dec. 1, 1955, Mrs. Parks, a seamstress at a Montgomery department store,
refused to give her seat on a city bus to a white passenger. The incident
sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, during which blacks stayed off city buses
for more than a year. In 1956, the Supreme Court upheld a U.S. District Court
finding that Alabama's state and local laws requiring segregation on buses were
unconstitutional.The bus boycott propelled Rev. King to international
prominence. He emerged as the clear leader of the civil rights movement.
Overcoming fear
Mrs. King's life as his wife would not be tranquil, but she was prepared.
"As we were thrust into the cause, it was my cause, too," she told the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution in January 2005. "I married the man and the cause. I
realized I, too, could be killed."
There were harrowing moments:
On Jan. 30, 1956, during the bus boycott, Mrs. King and her two-month-old
daughter Yolanda, nicknamed Yoki, were home with a woman from the church when
their house was bombed. The dynamite, thrown on the front porch, blew out
windows and filled the front room with smoke and glass, but no one was hurt.
In September 1958, Mrs. King flew to New York after her husband was stabbed by a
mentally ill woman while signing copies of his new book about the bus boycott,
Stride Toward Freedom. Doctors removed the sharp blade of a letter opener from
near his aorta. If he had so much as sneezed, Rev. King said later, the blade
would have punctured his aorta, killing him instantly.
In 1960, Rev. King was arrested at a sit-in Atlanta. When Mrs. King, six months
pregnant at the time, learned that her husband was being sent to a state prison,
she was disconsolate. Sen. John F. Kennedy, then running for president, called
Mrs. King to reassure her.Her husband wrote a letter from his cell asking her to
be resolute. "I know this whole experience is very difficult for you to adjust
to, but as I said to you yesterday, this is the cross that we must bear for the
freedom of our people," King wrote, according to Bearing the Cross, a 1986
Pulitzer Prize-winning civil rights history by David Garrow. King signed it:
"Eternally yours, Martin."
Despite the nature of that closing, allegations of Rev. King's marital
infidelities have swirled for years and are detailed in histories of the civil
rights movement. Then-FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, who despised Rev. King and
believed he was a Communist sympathizer and adulterer, routinely bugged his
hotel rooms. In January 1965, the FBI sent Mrs. King a tape containing her
husband making bawdy jokes and the sounds of people having sex, according to
Bearing the Cross.
In recent decades, Mrs. King was criticized by Garrow for what he saw as her
heavy-handed handling of Rev. King's public image, papers and speeches. The King
family sold his voice and image to companies such as Cingular Wireless and
Alcatel, which used them in advertisements, while denying or limiting access to
some researchers and scholars.
"It would be easy to say the decade of embarrassment is primarily the children's
fault," Garrow said. "I don't think that would be honest or fair. I think Mrs.
King herself increasingly found that running a historical archive was not going
to be a profit-making venture. The sense that his legacy ought to be used for
maximum income I think that's something that increasingly stems from her."
Garrow traces Mrs. King's actions to the financial hardships she endured as Rev.
King's wife."Much of her behavior of the past 15 years all the crass or
embarrassing commercial uses of his name or image has its roots in the sense
of privation she experienced when he was alive," Garrow said. "Not only did they
not have any money, but Doc did not believe in spending money on the family and
the household. He would spend money on food, good hotels, good suits, but that
was about it."
Despite worries over money and other issues, Mrs. King stood by her husband,
well beyond his death.Mrs. King never remarried, and she lived until 2005 in the
modest home in Atlanta's Vine City neighborhood that she and Rev. King had
bought in 1965.
"That, to my mind, is one of the most important things," Garrow said. "Because
that really underscores the extent and intensity of her commitment and
attachment to him and his memory."That house was her bond to him, was the link."
Contributing: The Associated Press; Bill Welch
Coretta Scott King dies at 78, UT, 31.1.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-01-31-corettascottking_x.htm
Civil rights icon Coretta Scott King dies
at 78
Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:47 PM ET
Reuters
By Karen Jacobs
ATLANTA (Reuters) - Coretta Scott King, who
surged to the front of the fight for racial equality in America after her
husband Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968, has died at age 78,
friends and family said on Tuesday.
Mrs. King, who had been diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer, died late on
Monday in Mexico, where she had been seeking possible treatment, a family
spokeswoman told Reuters.
"Mrs. King was in Mexico for observation and consideration of treatment for
ovarian cancer," the spokeswoman said. "She was considered terminal by
physicians in the United States. She and the family wanted to explore other
options."
Funeral arrangements were not expected to be known until after Mrs. King's
children returned to Atlanta with her body, expected early on Wednesday, the
family spokeswoman said.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that King died at Hospital Santa
Monica, a health center in Rosarito Beach, Mexico, where many Americans seek
alternative and sometimes controversial treatments. The hospital declined
comment.
"Her daughter was with her at the time she passed," said Bishop Eddie Long of
the New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Lithonia, Georgia, pastor for King's
youngest child, Bernice.
King, often called the first lady of the civil rights movement, suffered a
debilitating stroke and heart attack in August. She was last seen in public on
January 14 at a dinner marking the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, where she
received a standing ovation from a crowd of 1,500 people.
By fall, Mrs. King had been told she had ovarian cancer, the Atlanta newspaper
reported on its Web site.
Her steely determination, grace and class won her admirers inside and outside
the civil rights movement. On Tuesday, accolades poured in from leaders in
politics and business.
HAILED BY BUSH, CLINTON, CARTER
President George W. Bush began his State of the Union address by praising King,
drawing a standing ovation.
"Today our nation lost a beloved, graceful, courageous woman who called America
to its founding ideals and carried on a noble dream," Bush said. "Tonight we are
comforted by the hope of a glad reunion with the husband who was taken from her
so long ago, and we are grateful for the good life of Coretta Scott King."
Former President Jimmy Carter called her "a mainstay of the movement for
nonviolent political change," and former President Bill Clinton said Mrs. King
was "a giant in the fight for equal rights for all Americans."
Joseph Lowery, one of Martin Luther King Jr.'s closest aides who co-founded the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference with the slain civil rights leader,
told a news conference in Atlanta that her memory will live on in the hearts of
people who love liberty.
Coretta Scott King played a back-up role in the civil rights movement until her
husband was gunned down on a Memphis motel balcony on April 4, 1968.
Mrs. King, who was in Atlanta at the time, learned of the murder in a telephone
call from the Rev. Jesse Jackson, a call she later wrote, "I seemed
subconsciously to have been waiting for all of our lives."
As she recalled in her autobiography "My Life With Martin Luther King Jr.," Mrs.
King felt she had to step fully into the civil rights movement after her
husband's assassination.
She created a memorial and a forum in the Martin Luther King Jr. Center for
Nonviolent Social Change in Atlanta. The center has archives containing more
than 2,000 King speeches and is built around the King crypt and its eternal
flame.
Coretta Scott was born April 27, 1927, near Marion, Alabama. Spending most of
her early years on a farm, she saw little prejudice until she was sent into town
to attend Lincoln High School, a black school in the segregated South.
"It was awful," she said of living in Marion. "Every Saturday we would hear
about some black man getting beat up and nothing was done about it."
SCOTT HOME BURNED DOWN
Her father built a small trucking business but his success began to irritate
poor whites, she said, and after harassment someone burned down the Scott home
on Thanksgiving night 1942.
"I guess I was being prepared for my role when I was growing up because when we
were young children my father's life was in danger," Mrs. King once told
Reuters. "We were afraid he was going to be killed.
"A white man threatened him and he never ran. He was fearless," she said.
After graduating in 1951 from majority white Antioch College in Yellow Springs,
Ohio, Coretta Scott studied at the New England Conservatory of Music in Boston.
Martin Luther King, who was studying for his doctorate in theology at Boston
University, had told a mutual friend he was looking for a wife. The friend gave
him her phone number but when he came calling she was not impressed.
"I saw this green car coming up the street and this short man," she said in an
interview. "He leaned over to open the door, and when I got in the car I saw
this very young looking man. I thought, 'Oh my God, I expected to see a man but
this is a boy.'"
When he began to speak, however, she changed her mind.
She never doubted King would battle the status quo. "Even at the time we were
courting," she said, "Martin was deeply concerned -- and indignant -- with the
plight of the Negro in the United States."
They were married at her parents' home on June 18, 1953, and had four children:
Yolanda Denise, born in 1955; Martin Luther III, born in 1957; Bernice
Albertine, born in 1963; and Dexter Scott, who turned 45 the day his mother
died.
Civil
rights icon Coretta Scott King dies at 78, R, 31.1.2006,
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-02-01T024723Z_01_N31367618_RTRUKOC_0_US-KING.xml&archived=False
Five facts about Coretta Scott King
Tue Jan 31, 2006 10:23 AM ET
Reuters
(Reuters) - Coretta Scott King, widow of civil
rights leader Martin Luther King, was a leader of the fight for racial equality
in America in her own right.
* Coretta Scott was born April 27, 1927, near Marion, Alabama. Spending much of
her early years on a farm she saw little prejudice until she reached high
school.
* Her father had a small trucking business but his success began to irritate
poor whites in the area, she said, and, the Scott home burned in an arson fire
on Thanksgiving night in 1942.
* She received a B.A. in music and education from the mainly white Antioch
College in Yellow Springs, Ohio, and then went on to study at Boston's New
England Conservatory of Music, where she earned a degree in voice and violin.
* She married Martin Luther King on June 18, 1953, and the couple moved to
Atlanta, where King was co-pastor at Ebenezer Baptist Church with his father. In
1956, the couple moved to Montgomery, Alabama, where he took over the pulpit at
the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church. It was there he became active in the civil
rights movement. He was killed on April 4, 1968.
* She created a memorial and a forum in the Martin Luther King Jr. Center for
Nonviolent Social Change in Atlanta. She also led the fight to have a national
holiday named for him.
Five
facts about Coretta Scott King, R, 31.1.2006,
http://today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=newsOne&storyID=2006-01-31T152330Z_01_N31385360_RTRUKOT_0_TEXT0.xml&related=true
Smithsonian Picks Notable Spot for Its
Museum of Black History
January 31, 2006
The New York Times
By LYNETTE CLEMETSON
WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 After nearly a century
of political infighting and delay, the Smithsonian Institution on Monday
selected a prominent space on the Mall near the Washington Monument as the site
of its National Museum of African-American History and Culture.
Supporters of the project, including many black cultural, political and academic
leaders, who labored for years to have the museum approved, greeted the
selection by the Board of Regents, the institution's governing body, with
elation.
High-profile advocates of the museum, the institution's first dedicated to a
comprehensive study of the black American experience, had told Smithsonian
officials that any site off the Mall would be viewed as a slight to
African-Americans.
In September 2004 the National Museum of the American Indian opened to much
fanfare and high visibility in its site on the eastern edge of the Mall near the
Capitol.
Some groups responded to the announcement on Monday with disappointment, arguing
that the project would clutter the Mall, the grassy expanse stretching from the
Lincoln Memorial to the Capitol.
Smithsonian officials said the vote on the site was not unanimous but would not
give details. Officials said they hoped to open the new museum within the next
decade.
"My first task for tomorrow is to stop smiling," said Lonnie G. Bunch, director
of the museum.
The selection of the five-acre site allows Mr. Bunch to move forward with
choosing an architect, as well as to begin raising money and acquiring
collections. Cost estimates for the museum, the 19th in the Smithsonian complex,
range from $300 million to $500 million. Fifty percent of the cost will be paid
by the federal government, the other half by private sources.
The building will probably be at least 350,000 square feet, roughly the same
size as the National Museum of the American Indian, Smithsonian officials said.
Mr. Bunch, former director of curatorial affairs for the Smithsonian's National
Museum of American History, left a position as president of the Chicago
Historical Society in July to lead the new project. He said it was "quite
fitting that the experience of African-Americans take its place among the
museums and monuments that make the National Mall a world-renowned location."
Fund-raising has already started and will be greatly aided by the site
selection, Mr. Bunch said.
Lawrence M. Small, secretary of the Smithsonian, said the institution was
committed to building "a remarkable museum that will inspire generations of
future visitors from around the world with truly American stories of
perseverance, courage, talent and triumph."
Richard D. Parsons, chairman and chief executive of Time Warner Inc. and a
co-chairman of the museum's advisory council, said he planned to use America
Online, which Time Warner owns, to create a virtual connection between the
museum and potential donors, by offering links to the kinds of material and
artifacts that the museum will contain.
"We are going to try to hit this at several levels," Mr. Parsons said in a
telephone interview after the announcement. "We will reach out to the entire
corporate community and the philanthropic community, but also just folks at very
large levels and at the $5 and $10 level. And you can use online communities to
reach these people in new and unique ways."
Supporters said the highly visible spot, adjacent to the Washington Monument
across the street from the National Museum of American History, acknowledged the
centrality of the African-American experience in the country's development.
Efforts to build a national museum of black history began in the early 1900's
but were repeatedly thwarted by political and social opposition well into the
1990's. In 1994 Senator Jesse Helms, Republican of North Carolina, passionately
blocked Senate passage of a bill authorizing the museum, saying Congress should
not have to "pony up" for such efforts.
"Thank God," said Robert L. Wilkins, a Washington lawyer who headed the site
selection committee on a presidential commission formed in 2002 to make
recommendations for the museum to Congress. "Even though the building has not
yet been constructed, I feel like we have finally fulfilled this long quest in
an honorable and appropriate way."
Many opponents of the site had lobbied heavily for a site south of the Mall,
arguing that the new museum would help bring about a much-needed physical and
psychological expansion of the Mall beyond its current boundaries.
"It is a lost opportunity," said Judy Scott Feldman, chairwoman of the National
Coalition to Save Our Mall, a group founded in 2000 to oppose the site of the
World War II Memorial between the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial.
"We believe that there was a possibility here to make this museum not the last
museum on the 20th-century Mall, but the first museum on the 21st-century Mall.
It could have motivated the nation to move the Mall into the future."
Detractors said they had long suspected they were waging a difficult battle.
The advisory council which includes numerous influential black leaders,
including E. Stanley O'Neal, chairman and chief executive of Merrill Lynch &
Company; Robert L. Johnson, founder of Black Entertainment Television; and Oprah
Winfrey recommended the monument site to the Board of Regents in early
December. They based their recommendation on a review of a 198-page engineering
evaluation, commissioned by the Smithsonian, of four potential sites. Two were
on the Mall; two were not.
"We were very clear and unanimous in our recommendation," said Michael L. Lomax,
president and chief executive of the United Negro College Fund and a member of
the advisory council. "The site articulates not just the kind of recognition the
museum will receive, but ultimately what kind of recognition African-Americans
will receive for their contributions to the country."
In an interview, Mr. Johnson said he had told Mr. Small that he would resign
from the advisory council if the board chose a site off the Mall.
"The symbolism of denying African-Americans the same treatment as museums like
the Museum of the American Indian, the Holocaust Museum and all of the great
museums on the Mall would have been too much," he said. "To have relegated this
museum to another site, when people are looking to it to answer everything from
the need for an apology for slavery to reparations, would have been the ultimate
dismissal."
The 17-member board includes several politicians, as well as Chief Justice John
G. Roberts Jr. Vice President Dick Cheney was the only member not in attendance
for the announcement, made in a lecture hall near the Castle, the Smithsonian's
main administrative building.
President Bush, who signed the bill authorizing the museum in December 2003,
also endorsed a site on the Mall last February at a Black History Month event at
the White House. "We have a chance to build a fantastic museum, right here in
the heart of Washington, D.C., on the Mall," the president told those in
attendance, including Mr. Small.
Mr. Bunch said in an interview that he awoke at 4 a.m. on Monday, the day of the
announcement, in a fit of excitement and anxiety over the vote.
"I have always thought that the honor of creating this museum would make any
place that it is located sacred ground," he said. "My focus has just been let me
know what the decision is, and off to work I will go."
He is quickly hiring staff members to fill his temporary offices, near the site
south of the Mall that the board rejected.
Lakiesha Carr contributed reporting for this article.
Smithsonian Picks Notable Spot for Its Museum of Black History, NYT, 31.1.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/arts/design/31museum.html?hp&ex=1138683600&en=f66da1719e8d9aa2&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Protesters at King March Oppose Air Force
Flyover
January 17, 2006
The New York Times
By TIM EATON
SAN ANTONIO, Jan. 16 - Protesters wore yellow
and black armbands and chanted during speeches Monday in disapproval of the
inclusion of Air Force jets at the end of this military city's 20th annual march
honoring the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Activists had threatened to boycott the march, but 100,000 people turned out as
expected.
The protesters said Dr. King, who opposed the war in Vietnam and dedicated his
life to nonviolence, would not have supported the display of military muscle.
Supporters of the flyover by T-1 training jets from 99th Training Squadron from
nearby Randolph Air Force Base pointed to the squadron's direct lineage to the
Tuskegee Airmen, the country's first group of black military pilots.
An activist, Tommy Calvert Jr., attended the event and led a group of a few
dozen people who wore armbands. "Dr. King's dream was buried by the M.L.K.
Commission," Mr. Calvert said after the flyover. "Dr. King was against
militarization. We have to honor his values."
Other protesters released white doves, carried signs reading "Peace Not Planes"
and repeated a chant of "Shame" as the T-1's passed overhead.
City Councilwoman Sheila McNeil, who was the honorary M.L.K. March chairwoman
for the city's M.L.K. Commission, was part of the effort that invited the 99th
Training Squadron to fly over the city, which she called "Military City, U.S.A."
"We understand that Dr. King was against the Vietnam War, but he wasn't against
the military," Ms. McNeil said.
Dr. King regularly worked with the military during events promoting racial
equality, she said. It was National Guardsmen who escorted black students into
once segregated schools in the South in the 1950's and 1960's, Ms. McNeil added.
Another supporter of the flyover, Mayor Phil Hardberger, said he heard Dr.
King's "I Have a Dream" speech in person and understood the civil rights
leader's values.
"I think it's a great honor to Dr. King," Mr. Hardberger said of the flyover.
"Even the armed services, essentially, bow down before him and his ideas."
Henry Cisneros, the former San Antonio mayor and former housing secretary in the
Clinton administration, said he did not oppose the flyover, adding, "We want to
have as inclusive a day as possible." Mr. Cisneros also said it was important to
consider that such a large portion of the military was black, and that Dr. King
would not support excluding them.
Much of the protest was enmeshed with criticism of the war in Iraq. There is a
growing portion of the population that is opposed to the war, Mr. Cisneros said,
"even in Texas, even in Bush country."
Melvin Pipkins, 52, a marcher not connected to the protest, was part of the
quiet opposition to the flyover. He said he understood the squadron's history
but still objected to the jets at the event.
"That's a whole different episode of history," Mr. Pipkins said. "Don't try to
put it all into one basket."
Far removed from the controversy was Capt. LeRon Hudgins, a 31-year-old
African-American pilot, who flew one of the two T-1's over Pittman-Sullivan Park
here.
"I just thought we'd go out and put on the best show that we could, we would go
home, and it'd be over," Captain Hudgins said in the week before Monday's event.
Captain Hudgins volunteered to be a part of the flyover because his involvement
represented Dr. King's dedication to equality. Before the Tuskegee Airmen,
blacks were locked out of roles as military pilots, Captain Hudgins said.
Reflecting on his own position, Captain Hudgins, a graduate of the Air Force
Academy, noted that he had risen to a coveted position in the military.
"I don't see how there can be a bigger tribute to the idea of equality," Captain
Hudgins said. "For me, being in the 99th, and being a black pilot myself, I
think it is tremendous tribute to some of the things that he fought for."
Protesters at King March Oppose Air Force Flyover, NYT, 17.1.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/17/national/17king.html
Bush Salutes Memories of 2 Civil Rights
Leaders
January 17, 2006
The New York Times
By RICHARD W. STEVENSON
WASHINGTON, Jan. 16 - President Bush saluted
the memory of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on Monday, saying Dr. King,
like Rosa Parks, who died last year, "roused the dozing conscience of a
complacent nation."
In remarks here to commemorate Dr. King's birthday, Mr. Bush invoked the
religious faith held by Dr. King and Mrs. Parks, another symbol of the civil
rights movement, in describing freedom not as "a grant of government, but a gift
from the author of all life." And he said that more needed to be done to achieve
their goal of racial equality.
"The reason to honor Martin Luther King is to remember his strength of character
and his leadership, but also to remember the remaining work," Mr. Bush said at a
symposium sponsored by Georgetown University at the John F. Kennedy Center for
the Performing Arts. "The reason to honor Mrs. Parks is not only to pay homage
to her strength of character, but to remember the ideals of active citizenship."
For Mr. Bush, who started his day with a trip to the National Archives to see
the Emancipation Proclamation, the events had clear political undertones. He has
long harbored hopes of breaking the grip of the Democratic Party on the loyalty
of black voters. But whatever progress he may have made in his first term
suffered a setback in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, when he was widely
criticized as failing to respond urgently to a natural disaster that fell with
particular ferocity on poor blacks.
As Mr. Bush made a point of telling his audience here, Laura Bush spent Monday
in Africa, attending the inauguration in Liberia of Africa's first elected
female president, Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf. The chairman of the Republican National
Committee, Ken Mehlman, who spent much of his time last year courting minority
voters, spoke Monday to an audience at a predominantly black church in
Beltsville, Md.
In his remarks, Mr. Bush called on Congress to renew the Voting Rights Act of
1965, some provisions of which would otherwise expire in 2007.
But his administration has come under fire from some critics for taking what
they consider a lax attitude toward voting rights.
The Justice Department acknowledged last month that top officials had overruled
a finding by the department's civil rights staff in 2003 that a Texas
redistricting plan that helped gain Republicans seats in the House would violate
voting rights laws. And Mr. Bush's nominee for the Supreme Court seat being
vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., came under
questioning at his confirmation hearings last week over his description of
himself in 1985 as a critic of the "one person one vote" precedents set by the
Supreme Court.
Democrats also used the commemoration of Dr. King's birthday to send a political
message, trying to link continued progress in civil rights to an issue they
consider the Republican Party's greatest vulnerability right now, the
far-reaching corruption investigation into the relationships between lobbyists
and lawmakers.
"Working together, we can defeat this culture of corruption that neglects the
moral issues that Dr. King fought for," said Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the
Democratic minority leader.
Bush
Salutes Memories of 2 Civil Rights Leaders, NYT, 17.1.2006,
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/17/politics/17bush.html
Americans honor Martin Luther King
Posted 1/16/2006 8:34 AM Updated 1/16/2006
12:50 PM
USA Today
GREENVILLE, S.C. (AP) Millions of people
across the country are remembering slain civil rights leader Martin Luther King
on Monday's national holiday in his honor. (Related video: MLK's legacy
celebrated)
Christine Pollard of Oklahoma City, sings Lift Every Voice and Sing, during a
celebration of the life of Dr. King.
AP
In Washington, President Bush visited the National Archives and paid tribute
both to King and to Abraham Lincoln. In Chicago, Rev. Jesse Jackson praised King
as a prophet whose dream has not been fully achieved. (Related story: Bush marks
MLK day with gospel performance)
Bush viewed the Emancipation Proclamation Lincoln signed to free the slaves, and
the president said Lincoln "recognized that all men are created equal."
The president said King "lived on that admonition to call our country to a
higher calling." Bush added that King "called Americans to account when we
didn't live up to our ideals."
Jackson spoke at the 16th Annual Rainbow PUSH Martin Luther King Jr. Scholarship
Breakfast in Chicago on Monday morning.
He said blacks are free but not equal in life expectancy, access to education
and infant mortality. Jackson urged the breakfast's 2,000 attendees to continue
to fight for change.
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, Ill. Gov. Rod
Blagojevich and Chicago Mayor Richard Daley also spoke at the breakfast, which
also honored people whose work over the past year has been in the King
tradition.
Most Americans believe there has been significant progress in achieving King's
dream of racial equality, though blacks are more skeptical, an AP-Ipsos poll
found. (Related story: Poll: Most see racial progress, but blacks skeptical)
Racial integration has swept across much of American life and blacks have gained
economic ground since the height of the civil rights movement. Two decades ago,
the government established a federal holiday in honor of the slain civil rights
leader.
On some measures such as annual income, blacks have closed the gap considerably
with whites over the past few decades, census figures show. The progress for
blacks may have stalled, however, and some even fear a possible backlash.
"We've made great progress over the last 50 years," said Julian Bond, national
chairman of the NAACP. "Progress has always been stop-and-start, and sometimes
backup. We're in a holding pattern right now."
Three-quarters of those surveyed say there has been significant progress on
achieving King's dream. But only 66% of blacks felt that way.
"At times I have felt that we've made progress," said Aubrey Jones, a black
deputy warden at a state prison near Macon, Ga. "At other times, I feel we're at
a standstill, especially when you come across instances of individuals being
prejudiced."
The obstacles extend beyond instances of discrimination and prejudice.
"For a big portion of the African-Americans, there's not better education," said
David Bositis, an analyst of black issues for the Joint Center for Political and
Economic Studies. "There have been some gains made, but it's uneven. A lot of
whites basically say: 'The civil rights movement has been done. I don't want to
hear about it anymore.'"
Only 23% of respondents say they will do anything to commemorate the national
holiday that took effect in 1986 after a lengthy campaign in Congress to honor
King. A solid majority of blacks, 60%, say they will get involved in holiday
activities.
Some say the civil rights movement sparked a backlash that could reverse gains.
Among those concerns are efforts to require a voter ID card in Georgia; the
expected confirmation of conservative Judge Samuel Alito to be on the Supreme
Court; immigration's effect on the job market for blacks; and an expected fight
next year over reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act.
"Politically, the group that has gained the most after the civil rights movement
was white Southern conservatives," Bositis said. "They have transformed the
Republican Party, which has become the dominant political party."
All 50 states gradually recognized a King holiday. But only one-third of
businesses offer a paid holiday, according to the Bureau of National Affairs.
Participation in the holiday was enhanced by legislation passed in 1994
establishing the day as one of service.
In many places, people will help with projects aimed to improve the community
and help the needy. Supporters of the holiday try to discourage businesses from
using it as a marketing gimmick.
"Martin Luther King would turn over in his grave if he thought he was recognized
by a day of shopping and rest," said former Sen. Harris Wofford, D-Pa., who
worked with Rep. John Lewis of Georgia to establish the holiday as a day of
service.
"The idea that it's a day on and not a day off is catching on. But the King
holiday is well short of what it needs to be," Wofford said.
Three-fourths of those polled say King should be honored with a federal holiday.
Blacks almost unanimously favored that, according to the poll of 1,242 adults
that included an oversample of blacks.
The poll, taken Monday through Thursday, has a margin of sampling error of plus
or minus 3 percentage points.
Accusations that King committed adultery and plagiarized material in academic
writings emerged in the years after the holiday was established. Those claims
remind people that King had human failings despite his larger-than-life image as
a hero of the civil rights movement, said William Boone, a political scientist
at Clark Atlanta University. (Related story: Heed Dr. King's words, Atlanta
mayor urges)
"It does not diminish the mission he was on," Boone said. "People now have a
tendency to sanitize him, to make him more palatable to a broader spectrum of
the American population."
For Latoya Williams, a black mother of four from Norfolk, Va., the holiday is a
chance to remind her children what King accomplished to give them more
opportunities in life. Her children respond with a weary, "We know, Ma."
Replays of King's soaring "I have a dream" speech from 1963 inspire Williams
every time.
"When I hear that speech they play on TV every year," she said, "I still feel
that dream."
Americans honor Martin Luther King, UT, 16.1.2006,
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-01-16-king-holiday_x.htm
AP Poll: Most see significant progress in
realizing King's dream
Posted 1/14/2006 12:34 PM Updated 1/14/2006 12:48 PM
USA Today
WASHINGTON (AP) Most Americans believe there has been
significant progress in achieving Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream of racial
equality, though blacks are more skeptical, an AP-Ipsos poll found.
Racial integration has swept across much of American life
and blacks have gained economic ground since the height of the civil rights
movement. Two decades ago, the government established a federal holiday in honor
of the slain civil rights leader.
On some measures such as annual income, blacks have closed the gap considerably
with whites over the past few decades, census figures show. The progress for
blacks may have stalled, however, and some even fear a possible backlash.
"We've made great progress over the last 50 years," said Julian Bond, national
chairman of the NAACP. "Progress has always been stop-and-start, and sometimes
backup. We're in a holding pattern right now."
Three-quarters of those surveyed say there has been significant progress on
achieving King's dream. But only 66% of blacks felt that way.
"At times I have felt that we've made progress," said Aubrey Jones, a black
deputy warden at a state prison near Macon, Ga. "At other times, I feel we're at
a standstill, especially when you come across instances of individuals being
prejudiced."
The obstacles extend beyond instances of discrimination and prejudice.
"For a big portion of the African-Americans, there's not better education," said
David Bositis, an analyst of black issues for the Joint Center for Political and
Economic Studies. "There have been some gains made, but it's uneven. A lot of
whites basically say: 'The civil rights movement has been done. I don't want to
hear about it anymore.'"
Only 23% of respondents say they will do anything to commemorate the national
holiday that took effect in 1986 after a lengthy campaign in Congress to honor
King. A solid majority of blacks, 60%, say they will get involved in holiday
activities.
Some say the civil rights movement sparked a backlash that could reverse gains.
Among those concerns are efforts to require a voter ID card in Georgia; the
expected confirmation of conservative Judge Samuel Alito to be on the Supreme
Court; immigration's effect on the job market for blacks; and an expected fight
next year over reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act.
"Politically, the group that has gained the most after the civil rights movement
was white Southern conservatives," Bositis said. "They have transformed the
Republican Party, which has become the dominant political party."
All 50 states gradually recognized a King holiday. But only one-third of
businesses offer a paid holiday, according to the Bureau of National Affairs.
Participation in the holiday was enhanced by legislation passed in 1994
establishing the day as one of service.
In many places, people will help with projects aimed to improve the community
and help the needy. Supporters of the holiday try to discourage businesses from
using it as a marketing gimmick.
"Martin Luther King would turn over in his grave if he thought he was recognized
by a day of shopping and rest," said former Sen. Harris Wofford, D-Pa., who
worked with Rep. John Lewis of Georgia to establish the holiday as a day of
service.
"The idea that it's a day on and not a day off is catching on. But the King
holiday is well short of what it needs to be," Wofford said.
Three-fourths of those polled say King should be honored with a federal holiday.
Blacks almost unanimously favored that, according to the poll of 1,242 adults
that included an oversample of blacks.
The poll, taken Monday through Thursday, has a margin of sampling error of plus
or minus 3 percentage points.
Accusations that King committed adultery and plagiarized material in academic
writings emerged in the years after the holiday was established. Those claims
remind people that King had human failings despite his larger-than-life image as
a hero of the civil rights movement, said William Boone, a political scientist
at Clark Atlanta University.
"It does not diminish the mission he was on," Boone said. "People now have a
tendency to sanitize him, to make him more palatable to a broader spectrum of
the American population."
For Latoya Williams, a black mother of four from Norfolk, Va., the holiday is a
chance to remind her children what King accomplished to give them more
opportunities in life. Her children respond with a weary, "We know, Ma."
Replays of King's soaring "I have a dream" speech from 1963 inspire Williams
every time.
"When I hear that speech they play on TV every year," she said, "I still feel
that dream."
AP Poll: Most see
significant progress in realizing King's dream, UT, 14.1.2006,http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-01-14-martin-luther-king-jr_x.htm
Vocabulaire /
Encyclopιdie >
Racisme > UK, USA, SA
|